Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #523737 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-29 11:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 247 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 09:53 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 18:23 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:17 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:02 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-30 15:21 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:55 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 14:20 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 19:20 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 09:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 12:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:31 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:06 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 05:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:47 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:27 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-03 05:33 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 22:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:58 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 19:33 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 16:30 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 19:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 04:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:12 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 13:25 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-05 21:41 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:34 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 21:12 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 15:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 16:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 10:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 16:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-08 03:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:11 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 16:46 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:19 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 20:09 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 10:59 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 00:57 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 11:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 09:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 14:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-06 15:59 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-07 05:58 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 02:21 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 18:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 10:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:40 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-04 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 11:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-03 19:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-04 18:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 20:28 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:24 +0000
Re: Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:39 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 18:07 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 13:36 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:21 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:22 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 14:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 18:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 19:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:18 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 09:32 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 19:22 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:08 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 19:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 00:26 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 21:33 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 22:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 22:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 04:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:30 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 09:34 +1000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 21:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 21:49 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 22:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:41 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 19:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 20:05 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:45 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 16:00 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 17:26 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:38 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 09:48 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 07:34 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 11:18 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-10-04 09:28 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:09 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:54 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:51 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 02:56 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:08 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 22:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 23:00 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-01 10:11 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 12:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-02 10:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 18:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-03 10:29 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 16:13 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:07 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 18:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:56 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:25 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:47 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 23:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:55 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:54 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:16 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 04:35 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:57 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 09:16 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:14 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 14:30 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:40 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:00 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 23:27 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 13:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 22:46 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:02 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-01 04:17 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:37 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-01 18:35 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:07 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 01:37 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 14:41 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-02 10:46 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 17:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-02 20:34 +0200
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-02 19:43 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-02 17:09 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:11 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-30 17:04 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:45 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 23:07 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 00:19 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 08:27 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-30 00:34 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:03 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-29 17:36 -0700
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:06 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:18 +0000
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:23 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 10:15 -0400
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:43 -0500
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: The Popular Mechanics Pentagon Myth where a 757 turned into a liquid. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 11:59 -0700
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 16:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8cgo0bprs2742k3noki8f6p06546nm0jd2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523922 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:23:37 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:55:12 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >wrote: >> >>They routinely deny a lot of things,....even the stealth fighters and >>bombers (F-117 Nighthawk) >>Those never existed until they suddenly appeared in the gulf war. > > I recall seeing at least one on a Ford commercial. > The stealth planes were known to exist long before the first Gulf >war. Yep. First used by George HW Bush in Panama in 1989. The invasion of Panama was the first combat deployment for the AH-64, the HMMWV, and the F-117A. 19889. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/militaryaircraft/p/f117.htm None of this you can't find on Google. Of course some of us also know who Kelly Johnson and Ben Rich were. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 20:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3lcm0b9jlf0spcqpauoqp6gi1k4f181188@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523842 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>>And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger plane >>>that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into the air. >>>Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a 16' round hole. >>> >>>And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete walls, >>>in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>> >>>Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have had >>>problems, without further explosives being used. >>> >> >>So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >>and that additional explosives were used? >> >>What platform for your supposed missile? >> >>What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>located? > >I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch through >reinforced concrete walls. > >From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on missiles, I >seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick concrete walls were >"bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise missiles were, primarily, designed >to carry a warhead, conventional or nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a >target by relying on the power of the warhead to do the work, rather than >actually penetration. > >But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit up. Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to behold isn't it?. And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) >Shill #2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 09:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mugodh$nnh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523862 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 > <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>> small hole. >>>>> >>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>> the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> >>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged >>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that >>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any >>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole. >>>> >>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>> >>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>> >>> >>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >>> and that additional explosives were used? >>> >>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>> >>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>> located? >> >> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch >> through reinforced concrete walls. >> >> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on >> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick >> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise >> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional or >> nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the power >> of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually penetration. >> >> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit up. > > Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to > behold isn't it?. > > And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) > > >> Shill #2 You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more developed than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ? So I'm not sure an unsubstantiated claim of "past military experience" is going to count for much.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jijo0bdakjqputd889ora04hq8fdgjqsph@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523934 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 >> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>>> small hole. >>>>>> >>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged >>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that >>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any >>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole. >>>>> >>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>>> >>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>>>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >>>> and that additional explosives were used? >>>> >>>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>>> >>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>>> located? >>> >>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch >>> through reinforced concrete walls. >>> >>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on >>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick >>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise >>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional or >>> nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the power >>> of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually penetration. >>> >>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit up. >> >> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to >> behold isn't it?. >> >> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) >> >> >>> Shill #2 > > >You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more developed >than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ? Who had cruise missiles in WW II ? That is your claim, that a cruise missile hit the Pentagon. >So I'm not sure an unsubstantiated claim of "past military experience" is >going to count for much. That's funny coming from you who calls a smart bomb a drone. Do you know what a bunker buster is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 15:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muukm6$5jc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524007 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 >>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>>>> small hole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged >>>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that >>>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any >>>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole. >>>>>> >>>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced >>>>>> concrete walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would >>>>>> have had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the >>>>> Pentagon and that additional explosives were used? >>>>> >>>>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>>>> >>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>>>> located? >>>> >>>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch >>>> through reinforced concrete walls. >>>> >>>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on >>>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick >>>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise >>>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional >>>> or nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the >>>> power of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually >>>> penetration. >>>> >>>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit >>>> up. >>> >>> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to >>> behold isn't it?. >>> >>> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) >>> >>> >>>> Shill #2 >> >> >> You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more >> developed than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ? > > Who had cruise missiles in WW II ? That is your claim, that a cruise > missile hit the Pentagon. > >> So I'm not sure an unsubstantiated claim of "past military >> experience" is going to count for much. > > That's funny coming from you who calls a smart bomb a drone. > > Do you know what a bunker buster is? Oh wait, I know this one. .....A fart after eating 2 bowls of taco-bell chili
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 04:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <730q0bl5mf15r81rerltmijnq908bqq7e2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523934 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>
>
>Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2
>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757
>>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a
>>>>>>> small hole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike
>>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that
>>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit
>>>>>> the Pentagon.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged
>>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that
>>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any
>>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete
>>>>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have
>>>>> had problems, without further explosives being used.
>>>>
>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon
>>>> and that additional explosives were used?
>>>>
>>>> What platform for your supposed missile?
>>>>
>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were
>>>> located?
>>>
>>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch
>>> through reinforced concrete walls.
>>>
>>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on
>>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick
>>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise
>>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional or
>>> nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the power
>>> of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually penetration.
>>>
>>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit up.
>>
>> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to
>> behold isn't it?.
>>
>> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more developed
>than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ?
>
The problem you have is that #2 isn't old enough to have served
in WW2. Because of this, he could not have been posting about anything
used in WW2. Not when presenting it was from personal experience.
>So I'm not sure an unsubstantiated claim of "past military experience" is
>going to count for much.
You use unsubstantiated claims for your position on 9/11.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 08:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mv0d38$lhu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524076 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 >>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a >>>>>>>> small hole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit >>>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged >>>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that >>>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any >>>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole. >>>>>> >>>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced >>>>>> concrete walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would >>>>>> have had problems, without further explosives being used. >>>>> >>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the >>>>> Pentagon and that additional explosives were used? >>>>> >>>>> What platform for your supposed missile? >>>>> >>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >>>>> located? >>>> >>>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch >>>> through reinforced concrete walls. >>>> >>>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on >>>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick >>>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise >>>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional >>>> or nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the >>>> power of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually >>>> penetration. >>>> >>>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit >>>> up. >>> >>> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to >>> behold isn't it?. >>> >>> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more >> developed than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ? >> > > The problem you have is that #2 isn't old enough to have served > in WW2. Because of this, he could not have been posting about anything > used in WW2. Not when presenting it was from personal experience. > So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video gamers" thing ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 04:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <d7o91bl3oosj5os150m918v6kc5i2eijoe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524870 |
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:03:38 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2
>>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757
>>>>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a
>>>>>>>>> small hole.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike
>>>>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that
>>>>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit
>>>>>>>> the Pentagon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged
>>>>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that
>>>>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any
>>>>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced
>>>>>>> concrete walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would
>>>>>>> have had problems, without further explosives being used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the
>>>>>> Pentagon and that additional explosives were used?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What platform for your supposed missile?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were
>>>>>> located?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch
>>>>> through reinforced concrete walls.
>>>>>
>>>>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on
>>>>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick
>>>>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise
>>>>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional
>>>>> or nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the
>>>>> power of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually
>>>>> penetration.
>>>>>
>>>>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit
>>>>> up.
>>>>
>>>> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to
>>>> behold isn't it?.
>>>>
>>>> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more
>>> developed than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ?
>>
>> The problem you have is that #2 isn't old enough to have served
>> in WW2. Because of this, he could not have been posting about anything
>> used in WW2. Not when presenting it was from personal experience.
>
>
>So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other.
We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the
United States.
One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one?
>Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video
>gamers" thing ???
We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic.
I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 17:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307f541cfcbbd21898c321@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525048 |
In article <d7o91bl3oosj5os150m918v6kc5i2eijoe@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:03:38 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > >K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:36:18 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:47 +1000, Government Shill #2 > >>>> <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:08:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 > >>>>>>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a > >>>>>>>>> small hole. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike > >>>>>>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that > >>>>>>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit > >>>>>>>> the Pentagon. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged > >>>>>>> passenger plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that > >>>>>>> poked 40' into the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any > >>>>>>> damage beyond a 16' round hole. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced > >>>>>>> concrete walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would > >>>>>>> have had problems, without further explosives being used. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the > >>>>>> Pentagon and that additional explosives were used? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What platform for your supposed missile? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were > >>>>>> located? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm surprised to learn that a cruise missile is designed to punch > >>>>> through reinforced concrete walls. > >>>>> > >>>>> From my time in the military, some of which was spent working on > >>>>> missiles, I seem to recall that weapons designed to penetrate thick > >>>>> concrete walls were "bunker buster" type weapons, and that cruise > >>>>> missiles were, primarily, designed to carry a warhead, conventional > >>>>> or nuclear, hundreds of miles to destroy a target by relying on the > >>>>> power of the warhead to do the work, rather than actually > >>>>> penetration. > >>>>> > >>>>> But since I'm sane I don't have the troofers ability to dream shit > >>>>> up. > >>>> > >>>> Ah the delusional Roger and Bast's crazy Troofer world is something to > >>>> behold isn't it?. > >>>> > >>>> And thanks for your expertise on the matter. :) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> You do realize that the missiles they had by 9/11 were far more > >>> developed than the ones they used in WW2 . don't you ? > >> > >> The problem you have is that #2 isn't old enough to have served > >> in WW2. Because of this, he could not have been posting about anything > >> used in WW2. Not when presenting it was from personal experience. > > > > > >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. > > We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the > United States. > One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? > > >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video > >gamers" thing ??? > > We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. > I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. I'm bringing the booze and chips! -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 20:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2leb1b991mffi6ce0147dtcci6ikqu2lbo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525137 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. >> >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the United States. >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? >> >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video >> >gamers" thing ??? >> >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. > >I'm bringing the booze and chips! Waitaminnit. Annual Shill Picnic? <BlinkBlink> I make delicious homemade potato salad and baked beans. uh ...... can I get an invite for next year? I just *have* to see the Bast backyard! Maybe get a gander at Roger Rocky too. LOL. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.307fa5ce41d577f798c327@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525183 |
In article <2leb1b991mffi6ce0147dtcci6ikqu2lbo@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. > >> > >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the United States. > >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? > >> > >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video > >> >gamers" thing ??? > >> > >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. > >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. > > > >I'm bringing the booze and chips! > > > Waitaminnit. Annual Shill Picnic? > > <BlinkBlink> > > I make delicious homemade potato salad and baked beans. > > uh ...... can I get an invite for next year? I just *have* to see > the Bast backyard! Maybe get a gander at Roger Rocky too. > > LOL. :) Sure, you can bring that stuff, but the picnic is always troofer/kOOktard free. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 00:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4ege1bl9i8rrprvjnpeemaulhd5tlc6tcg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525207 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:58:07 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote: >In article <2leb1b991mffi6ce0147dtcci6ikqu2lbo@4ax.com>, >ninety7gt@cox.net says... >> >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. >> >> >> >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the United States. >> >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? >> >> >> >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video >> >> >gamers" thing ??? >> >> >> >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. >> >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. >> > >> >I'm bringing the booze and chips! >> >> >> Waitaminnit. Annual Shill Picnic? >> >> <BlinkBlink> >> >> I make delicious homemade potato salad and baked beans. >> >> uh ...... can I get an invite for next year? I just *have* to see >> the Bast backyard! Maybe get a gander at Roger Rocky too. >> >> LOL. :) > >Sure, you can bring that stuff, but the picnic is always >troofer/kOOktard free. LOL Jeese I thought the picnic was going to be in Bast's backyard !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 04:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5p2f1btj70gibev86ak45j1etu2v3ge83t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525380 |
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:28:56 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:58:07 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <2leb1b991mffi6ce0147dtcci6ikqu2lbo@4ax.com>,
>>ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other.
>>> >>
>>> >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the United States.
>>> >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one?
>>> >>
>>> >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video
>>> >> >gamers" thing ???
>>> >>
>>> >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic.
>>> >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard.
>>> >
>>> >I'm bringing the booze and chips!
>>>
>>> Waitaminnit. Annual Shill Picnic?
>>>
>>> <BlinkBlink>
>>>
>>> I make delicious homemade potato salad and baked beans.
>>>
>>> uh ...... can I get an invite for next year? I just *have* to see
>>> the Bast backyard! Maybe get a gander at Roger Rocky too.
>>>
>>> LOL. :)
>>
>>Sure, you can bring that stuff, but the picnic is always
>>troofer/kOOktard free.
>
>LOL Jeese I thought the picnic was going to be in Bast's backyard !
>
It is. But Bast isn't invited. We're mean like that :D
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 10:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30819e28fe25184a98c332@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525380 |
In article <4ege1bl9i8rrprvjnpeemaulhd5tlc6tcg@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:58:07 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <2leb1b991mffi6ce0147dtcci6ikqu2lbo@4ax.com>, > >ninety7gt@cox.net says... > >> > >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. > >> >> > >> >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the United States. > >> >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? > >> >> > >> >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video > >> >> >gamers" thing ??? > >> >> > >> >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. > >> >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. > >> > > >> >I'm bringing the booze and chips! > >> > >> > >> Waitaminnit. Annual Shill Picnic? > >> > >> <BlinkBlink> > >> > >> I make delicious homemade potato salad and baked beans. > >> > >> uh ...... can I get an invite for next year? I just *have* to see > >> the Bast backyard! Maybe get a gander at Roger Rocky too. > >> > >> LOL. :) > > > >Sure, you can bring that stuff, but the picnic is always > >troofer/kOOktard free. > > LOL Jeese I thought the picnic was going to be in Bast's backyard ! Bast will be visible through a two way mirror. But there will be a kOOk proof fence to prevent any possibility of contact. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ieae1b1cpv2dpufcfghha8jlve809vjktl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525137 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other.
>>
>> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the
>> United States.
>> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one?
>>
>> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video
>> >gamers" thing ???
>>
>> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic.
>> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard.
>
>I'm bringing the booze and chips!
I'm bringing some Pseudo Sue ale in honor of Ernie. :)
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 10:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30819c451b24045698c330@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525369 |
In article <ieae1b1cpv2dpufcfghha8jlve809vjktl@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other. > >> > >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the > >> United States. > >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one? > >> > >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video > >> >gamers" thing ??? > >> > >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic. > >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard. > > > >I'm bringing the booze and chips! > > I'm bringing some Pseudo Sue ale in honor of Ernie. :) I'll bring these, also in honor of Ernie: http://www.cafepress.co.uk/ +bald_mountain_colorado_drinking_glass,851110316 -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 04:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m3nh1blgnn2ah5i1gsd90jb5uuk7lbglpu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525429 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:42:00 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <ieae1b1cpv2dpufcfghha8jlve809vjktl@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:09:40 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> >So it's nice to see that all you 9/11 shill numbers know each other.
>> >>
>> >> We're REAL Government Shills. And we're not all from or in the
>> >> United States.
>> >> One of those two statements is true. Can you guess which one?
>> >>
>> >> >Do you get togther for meetings, or is just an internet "black ops" / "video
>> >> >gamers" thing ???
>> >>
>> >> We see each other at the annual Shill Picnic.
>> >> I understand next year's picnic will be held in your back yard.
>> >
>> >I'm bringing the booze and chips!
>>
>> I'm bringing some Pseudo Sue ale in honor of Ernie. :)
>
>I'll bring these, also in honor of Ernie:
>
>http://www.cafepress.co.uk/
>+bald_mountain_colorado_drinking_glass,851110316
SWEET!
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 19:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muf6t9$276$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523838 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>> hole. >>> >>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>> >>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>> Pentagon. >> >> >> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >> 16' round hole. >> >> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >> >> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >> had problems, without further explosives being used. >> > > So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon > and that additional explosives were used? > > What platform for your supposed missile? > > What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were > located? I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile" As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet hitting the pentagon. How about letting someone excavate the shanksville hole ? And let the truther groups have observers on scene You should have all sorts of proof there Tell your handlers to simply show us some conclusive eveidence, and you would shut us up for good. ....But you can't come up with anything more than a fairytale.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 00:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9mmrdc-eel.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523843 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >>> 16' round hole. >>> >>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>> >>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>> >> >> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >> and that additional explosives were used? >> >> What platform for your supposed missile? >> >> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >> located? > > > > > > > I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile" > As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet > hitting the pentagon. Lunatic logic; the Titanic never hit an iceberg because there is no video or picture of it happening. <snip remaing kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 21:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t1dm0b1atnhv9np1697hlcuesc1jbp62a9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523843 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 19:31:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:51:42 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> To make a long story short Mike Walter claims the wings of a 757 >>>>> folded back so both the wings and the engines could fit into a small >>>>> hole. >>>> >>>> You've said Mike Walter's claims are idiocy. And we've said Mike >>>> Walter's claims are idiocy. >>>> >>>> Why do you still bring this up? Everyone agrees to the truth that >>>> American Airlines Flight 77 did NOT fold it's wings before it hit the >>>> Pentagon. >>> >>> >>> And yet you refuse or are unable to explain how an alleged passenger >>> plane that had a wingspan of over 120' and a tail that poked 40' into >>> the air. Managed to hit a building and not leave any damage beyond a >>> 16' round hole. >>> >>> And that 16' hole was punched through at least 5 reinforced concrete >>> walls, in addition to other walls inside each ring. >>> >>> Only a cruise missile is designed to do that. And even it would have >>> had problems, without further explosives being used. >>> >> >> So now you're claiming it was a cruise missile which hit the Pentagon >> and that additional explosives were used? >> >> What platform for your supposed missile? >> >> What additional explosives and where are you claiming they were >> located? > >I don't need to tell you anything beyond "A Missile" Your case for a missile is therefore without fact. >As you refuse to show even one video or picture of any passeneger jet >hitting the pentagon. Why would I need a video or picture when I've already told you my husband, a Naval Intelligence Specialist, witnessed the AA plane hit the Pentagon?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web