Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #513582 > unrolled thread

Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters

Started byEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
First post2015-08-14 16:05 +0000
Last post2015-08-14 10:53 -0700
Articles 12 on this page of 32 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-14 16:05 +0000
    Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 11:20 -0500
      Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-14 16:33 +0000
        xaoHDude noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:27 -0700
        Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:45 -0500
          Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 16:43 +0000
            Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 09:58 -0700
              Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 17:18 +0000
                Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 02:07 -0700
              Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:12 -0700
            Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:08 -0500
            Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:18 +0000
              Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 19:49 +0000
                Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 20:15 +0000
                  Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 20:55 +0000
                    Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 21:58 +0000
                      Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 22:18 +0000
                        Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 22:20 +0000
                        Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 22:40 +0000
                          Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 23:12 +0000
                            Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:21 +0000
                Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-15 16:18 -0400
                  Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 20:57 +0000
            Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 17:27 -0500
      Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-14 16:36 +0000
        Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:47 -0500
          Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-15 16:43 +0000
    Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-14 16:40 +0000
    Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:19 -0700
      Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 12:24 -0500
        Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> - 2015-08-14 17:31 +0000
      Re: Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-14 10:53 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#514026

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-08-15 23:21 +0000
Message-ID<95u4ac-u0s.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#514008
In sci.physics Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
 
>> Now there is your problem, kook: "I don't read".
>> 
>> Perhaps if you had read and understood the total of 8 links I gave you,
>> you would understand why what you've posted is utter, babbling nonsense,
>> kook.
> 
> Hey stupid hairy ape, stop posting nothing. You didn't contribute to this 
> discussion in any way, but stupidly assumed whatever false thought 
> bouncing inside your stupid skull, in something that looks like Brownian 
> motion. You are a total, entirely complete moron.

If it upsets you so when people call you a kook, then stop making
kook posts, kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513970

Fromkefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com>
Date2015-08-15 16:18 -0400
Message-ID<pj7vsahqa8n4rm5k8gjul25akp31v6dr64@4ax.com>
In reply to#513962
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:49:34 +0000 (UTC), Eteocles Panagakos
<eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> wrote:

>jimp wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Eteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org> wrote:
>>> Lofty Goat wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:33:06 +0000, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:
>>>>> Are you crazy? That was before manned Moon landing. You can't both
>>>>> use it as a proof and dismiss it same time.
>>>> 
>>>> The first experiments simply bounced laser pulses off the surface of
>>>> the moon.  No retroreflectors involved in those.  Ruby lasers, even
>>>> the old ones, pack some punch, and a good filter will pull the faint
>>>> return pulse out of an awful lot of optical noise.
>>> 
>>> You know this by yourself or you read it from some others. What the
>>> heck is a "retroreflector" anyway? Can a reflector reflects not retro?
>>> I thought it must be about some perfect mirrors. (close to perfect), in
>>> order to reflect back the most of that speckle. In any case, the
>>> integration of the strength over that area MUST be LESS than the
>>> strength of the emitted.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroreflector#On_the_Moon
>> 
>> Yet another babbling, half witted, kook.
>
>Yet another babbling wikipedia freak idiot. Read your stupid wikipedia 
>link, idiot! 
>
>Does not matter what is it. It can never become a perfect mirror, idiot. 
>What you need is to know the power reflected, hence you need to integrate 
>the strength over surface (2d integration). 
>
>You babbling idiot, and that surface is likely LESS than 1 ppm of the spot 
>project on moon surface, due to laser beam divergence. Learn and shut up.
>http://vlab.amrita.edu/?sub=1&brch=189&sim=342&cnt=1

        The stupid name changing troll has ceased to be funny.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513984

FromEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
Date2015-08-15 20:57 +0000
Message-ID<mqo94n$2oc$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#513970
kefischer wrote:

>>Yet another babbling wikipedia freak idiot. Read your stupid wikipedia
>>link, idiot!
>>
>>Does not matter what is it. It can never become a perfect mirror, idiot.
>>What you need is to know the power reflected, hence you need to
>>integrate the strength over surface (2d integration).
>>
>>You babbling idiot, and that surface is likely LESS than 1 ppm of the
>>spot project on moon surface, due to laser beam divergence. Learn and
>>shut up. http://vlab.amrita.edu/?sub=1&brch=189&sim=342&cnt=1
> 
>         The stupid name changing troll has ceased to be funny.

Funny? I not gonna be your monkey, but anyway, do you have the slightest 
idea on how a surface 2d integration looks like, in reality? Not links, in 
reality Kef, this is what it counts, reality. Whithout which you are just 
a piano mover. Which is cool!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514897

FromLofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-17 17:27 -0500
Message-ID<CeidnRZpNLx9wk_InZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#513905
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:43:58 +0000, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:

> Lofty Goat wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:33:06 +0000, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:
>>> Are you crazy? That was before manned Moon landing. You can't both use
>>> it as a proof and dismiss it same time.
>> 
>> The first experiments simply bounced laser pulses off the surface of
>> the moon.  No retroreflectors involved in those.  Ruby lasers, even the
>> old ones, pack some punch, and a good filter will pull the faint return
>> pulse out of an awful lot of optical noise.
> 
> You know this by yourself or you read it from some others. What the heck
> is a "retroreflector" anyway? Can a reflector reflects not retro? I
> thought it must be about some perfect mirrors. (close to perfect), in
> order to reflect back the most of that speckle. In any case, the
> integration of the strength over that area MUST be LESS than the
> strength of the emitted.
> 
> You need to learn a lot about light scattering science, my friend.

"Light scattering science"?  You mean optics?  Gee, you seem to have 
mastered the verbal mannerisms of the disdainful intellectual without 
having mastered the intellectual part.  Lot of that going around.

Let's try an experiment:

Tell us about the connections between optics and the formula to which 
mathematicians sometimes refer as the harmonic mean.

It's a low-difficulty question, but if you can manage even a semblance of 
a coherent answer then you can stay out of the spam bin.

BTW, let's all snip the relativity group from the newsgroups list.  They 
aren't interested in all this horseshit.

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513594

FromEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
Date2015-08-14 16:36 +0000
Message-ID<mql5eq$cjd$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#513586
Sam Wormley wrote:

>> The Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year.[6]
>> This rate has been described as anomalously high.[9]

This is in support of the theory of Divergent Matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513716

FromLofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-14 18:47 -0500
Message-ID<DeSdnURLz6-V41PInZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#513594
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:36:43 +0000, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:

> Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>>> The Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year.[6]
>>> This rate has been described as anomalously high.[9]
> 
> This is in support of the theory of Divergent Matter.

Wot?  No, it's in support of tidal distortion of the Earth transferring 
angular momentum to the orbiting Moon.  Run a Web search on "tidal lock".

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513904

FromEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
Date2015-08-15 16:43 +0000
Message-ID<mqnq8c$1bb$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#513716
Lofty Goat wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:36:43 +0000, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:
> 
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> 
>>>> The Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per
>>>> year.[6]
>>>> This rate has been described as anomalously high.[9]
>> 
>> This is in support of the theory of Divergent Matter.
> 
> Wot?  No, it's in support of tidal distortion of the Earth transferring
> angular momentum to the orbiting Moon.  Run a Web search on "tidal
> lock".

Stop talking to people, stupid goat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513596

FromEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
Date2015-08-14 16:40 +0000
Message-ID<mql5li$cjd$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#513582
Eteocles Panagakos wrote:

> The relativists with another proof supporting Relativity inside its
> domain of applicability. Not bad.
> 
> Moon Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnnm1ztNO_I

Russian Moon - Photos From Soviet Missions To The Moon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nlFpal3Tpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513603

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-14 10:19 -0700
Message-ID<722e55a3-c764-43d8-a2fd-7a3eccb14fe6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#513582
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 9:05:54 AM UTC-7, Eteocles Panagakos wrote:
> The relativists with another proof supporting Relativity inside its domain 
> of applicability. Not bad.
> 
> Moon Hoax Retroreflectors: Hoax Busters Busts the Mythbusters
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnnm1ztNO_I  

I was in Fl. and watch Apollo Saturn lift off. That is my reason for saying shuttles were GOP Mafia Mickey Mouse. GOP Mafia was no surprise to me that we would end up as we are now.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513606

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-14 12:24 -0500
Message-ID<IsidnZ0gb5iquVPInZ2dnUU7-aOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#513603
On 8/14/15 12:19 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> I was in Fl. and watch Apollo Saturn lift off.

   And I was in Berlin and watched the LEM land on the moon.
   Historic times.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513613

FromEteocles Panagakos <eteoclespd@prospernetwork.org>
Date2015-08-14 17:31 +0000
Message-ID<mql8lt$kjc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#513606
Sam Wormley wrote:

> On 8/14/15 12:19 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> I was in Fl. and watch Apollo Saturn lift off.
> 
>    And I was in Berlin and watched the LEM land on the moon.
>    Historic times.

Quite of a distance between Berlin and the moon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#513623

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2015-08-14 10:53 -0700
Message-ID<mql9rq$7ap$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#513603
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, "reber g=emc^2", has "hate brain cells"
which show why Swine Glazier is a H-Bomb War monger, a Jewish  
Jailbird, Face-shitter & Criminal Graveyard Vandal, a Thief of Govt & 
Public Property, a Racist, Bigot & a Communist Traitor Sympathizer,
all of which is fully manifest in *** Glazier's Gutter physics ***, like
seen here where Swine Glazier wrote:
"...  the US Space shuttles were GOP Mafia Mickey Mouse.TreBert"
>
Sam Wormley wrote:
Glazier, I hate to break it to you, but your understanding 
of science is far worse than the man's on the street.  :-o
Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage.
Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can.
Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup.
Glazier, quit posting your gutterscience.
Glazier,  exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!
>
to which...
Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com>
Harlow Campbell succinctly added & wrote:
>
"Bert, your opinion doesn't count"
"Bert you are an idiot."
"TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker".
"Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking
moron who ever came down the Mass Pike.
"Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?"
"Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human
fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)"
"Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet."
"Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get
some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck".
"Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert
you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head.
"a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert"
"Bert, you should be arrested"
"Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your
van seems to be a center for drug activity in the
Wal-Mart parking lot".
>
>
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier> aka Lipshitsz needs
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web