Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 232 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:08 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 15:53 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger now claims he actually won his suit. It was dismissed, meaning he lost) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Roger still doesn't understand the law) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Kid still doesn't understand the law at all ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Roger PROVES he still doesn't understand the law at all and that he FEARS offering an honest answer to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:45 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah the stalker proves she is clearly lying now ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:42 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:24 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:41 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( wilma 6116 the stalker + lp to Sarah the Stalker) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 09:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ( Sarah proves she is an asshole ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:59 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:21 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah is an imbecile that can't prove she is smart "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:39 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:18 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE ... Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:58 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ivGdnbK_KeYbd33InZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517517 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:uiv6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City >>>> was >>>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>>> same >>>> thing. >>> >>> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. >> >> Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. > > No sane person ever said there was no radiation at Fukishima and > Fukishima has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, you bat shit crazy, > delusional, babbling, kook. Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site It is just that our government loves to lie or not inform us properly. Oh yeah, and nuke buildings then after they nuke a few buildings call it Ground Zero and use NIST to lie about how the buildilngs really came down. <G> Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517529 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we > are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can > not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob. Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic. <snip remaining lunatic babbling> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <y7-dnXx85OZXe3zInZ2dnUU7-YGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517543 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we >> are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can >> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site > > Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit > crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob. > > Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic. But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7m79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517665 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from > Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that > have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. The US government has no responsibility to tell anyone anything about Fukishima, you raving lunatic. Handford had nothing to do with 9/11, you raving lunatic. The Ogallala Aquifer had nothing to do with 9/11, you raving lunatic. If by "Ground Zero" you mean New York city, there was no unusual radiation you raving lunatic. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AoednYOPu9g8aXzInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517671 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:7m79bc-vof.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from >> Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps >> that >> have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. > > If by "Ground Zero" you mean New York city, there was no unusual radiation > you raving lunatic. Too bad you don't watch more live courtroom TV because arguments as flimsy as yours prove you really have no evidence. <G> And I know damn well how NIST ran from addressing the following photo that does not show a collapse but a vaporization instead: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g1a9bc-h1g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517675 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Too bad you don't watch more live courtroom TV because arguments as flimsy > as yours prove you really have no evidence. <G> This has nothing to do with what happened on 9/11, you raving lunatic. > And I know damn well how NIST ran from addressing the following photo that You have never read the NIST report, you raving lunatic. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble. Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4v64ua9ovdh3164pv81tjvutp5onolcg5j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517665 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:09:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we
>>> are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can
>>> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford.
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site
>>
>> Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat shit
>> crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob.
>>
>> Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic.
>
>But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from
>Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that
>have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer.
You're seriously claiming Fukushima is contaminating the Ogallala
aquifer? Really?
I can no longer hold the delusion that you're mental sound, but
stupid. You really are mentally ill.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dsydnbizoIRCyX_InZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517719 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4v64ua9ovdh3164pv81tjvutp5onolcg5j@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:09:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than >>>> we >>>> are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation >>>> can >>>> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford. >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site >>> >>> Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat >>> shit >>> crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob. >>> >>> Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic. >> >>But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from >>Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that >>have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer. > > You're seriously claiming Fukushima is contaminating the Ogallala > aquifer? Really? You are really a DUMB FCUK because I stated "radioactive waste dumps" above and if you do a google search for "Ogallala Aquifer radiation" you will see they blame it on radioactive waste dumps. As for Fukushima radiation. Sadly some of the radiation found on the California coast can -not- be traced to Fukushima but it can be traced to Hanford because of the type of radiation found. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oqj5ua1b123fepafuebcu20pk4m3tsaaft@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517751 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:56:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4v64ua9ovdh3164pv81tjvutp5onolcg5j@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:09:27 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>news:8d87bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than
>>>>> we are told about. Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation
>>>>> can not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford.
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site
>>>>
>>>> Fukashima and Hanford have nothing to do with 9/11, you babbling, bat
>>>> shit crazy, brain dead, paranoid, nutjob.
>>>>
>>>> Fukashima is in a different country, you raving lunatic.
>>>
>>>But the issue is our government will not tell us about the radiation from
>>>Fukishima, Hanford, Ground Zero or any of the radioactive waste dumps that
>>>have contaminated the Ogallala Aquifer.
>>
>> You're seriously claiming Fukushima is contaminating the Ogallala
>> aquifer? Really?
>> I can no longer hold the delusion that you're mental sound, but
>>stupid. You really are mentally ill.
>
>You are really a DUMB FCUK because I stated "radioactive waste dumps" above
>and if you do a google search for "Ogallala Aquifer radiation" you will see
>they blame it on radioactive waste dumps.
You're the one who claims above that Fukushima is contaminating
the Ogallala Aquifer.
>
>As for Fukushima radiation. Sadly some of the radiation found on the
>California coast can -not- be traced to Fukushima but it can be traced to
>Hanford because of the type of radiation found.
I probably should have mentioned your claim above about Handford
contaminating the Ogallala aquifer.
You are clearly mentally ill. Seek the professional help you have
proved you need.
Hey, while I'm writing, how's that whole ignoring my posts thing
working out for you?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrvu20$7kr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517751 |
>> You're seriously claiming Fukushima is contaminating the Ogallala >> aquifer? Really? > > I am/are really a DUMB FCUK because I stated "radioactive waste gumps" above > and if you do if a google search for "Ogallala Aquifer radiation" I will saw > they blame it on radioactive waste gumps. you cannot even write a coherent sentance, old man. > > Sadly As for Fuck-u-shima radiation. Sadly some of the radiation found on the > California coast can -not- be traced to Fuck-u-shima but it can be traced to > Sadly Hanford because of the type of radiation found. > > Rocky > LIAR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrqse6$28v$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517529 |
On 8/28/2015 6:10 PM, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:uiv6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City
>>>>> was
>>>>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact
>>>>> same
>>>>> thing.
>>>> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic.
>>>
>>> Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima.
>> No sane person ever said there was no radiation at Fukishima and
>> Fukishima has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, you bat shit crazy,
>> delusional, babbling, kook.
>
> Actually there is a lot more radiation from Fukashima and Hanford than we
> are told about.
...that you are waiting to be told by someone, because you cannot read.
> Don't forget about Hanford because when the radation can
... you forgot Denver! that means you just a copy and paste-er idiot.
Google "ROCKY FLATS" and get your conspericy hat on,
oh it already screwed on.
> not be traced back to Fukishima it can be traced to Hanford.
they are in different countries, did you know that ?
Hanford is in the USA and Fukkieeu is in Japan
> It is just that our Obama government loves to lie or not inform me properly. Oh
> yeah, and nuke buildings then after they nuke a few buildings call it Ground
> Zero and use NIST to lie about how the buildilngs really came down. <G>
NO RADIATION, DUDE. takes a while to sink in, dosen't it.
>
> Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence:
> https://www.HugeManBoobs.com/watch?v=RockyTheLyingSquerrelys&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9sfs11kBDS8W
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9d5499b52de4dec2251c4dc2feb6dd0d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517512 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:S6mdnQ0Ql4_iVH3InZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:l8l6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of >> 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> This is unreal, after the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City was >>> nuked and blamed on a truck bomb someone else decided to do the exact >>> same thing. Bwahahahaaa! Poor paranoid delusional schizophrenic kook is off his meds and seeing nuclear detonations everywhere... >> There were no nukes, you raving lunatic. > Yeah riiight, just like there is no radiation coming from Fukishima. There were no nuclear weapon detonations at Fukushima, Mike. You're just a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic off his meds. Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > You are such a sucker > > Here is another site about the 9/11 Hush money. > http://www.wingtv.net/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html More of your retarded conspiracy theory bullshit about the Social Security Death Index, this time spewed by that brainfucked nitwit Vinnie Sammartino? LOL That's already been addressed here: Message-ID: <77c30dceb8914e139d51f5f3c89510dc@dizum.com> =========================================== Bwahahaha! You subscribe to that whackadoodle Simon Shack's conspiracy theory, as well? You really have no bullshit filter, do you? LOL I suppose you've never actually followed up on your delusion and contacted the Wainio, Ganci, Lewis, Allen, Collins, Weaver, Ellis, Danz or Pettit family, or any of the thousands of other families... and gotten to know them, did the deep research to determine that these people existed, lived their lives and lost their lives because some towel-headed fuckheads slammed planes into the WTC towers. You're just an angry, lonely little loser sitting at his computer and believing all the stupid shit stupid people spew because *you* are not real, you're just an internet glitch come to life. You're too stupid to realize it, but that's why you have no bullshit filter, you're a program, poorly coded and malfunctioning. Please click the 'Close' button soon. LOL I guess New York City Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr. lived his entire life and served all those years as NYC Fire Chief as a "VicSim", and rather than dying in the WTC towers, he quietly disappeared in a puff of electrons, right? I guess Daniel Lewis lived his life and started the thoroughly fictitious company named Akamai Technologies as a "VicSim", and rather than dying in the WTC towers, he *and* his company winked out of existence with the click of a computer mouse, right? I guess the CDC National Death Index mortality registry showing the correct number of identifiable dead on that day is another huge conspiracy to you. You've gone psychotic. Take your meds, you pathetic little loser. LOL =========================================== Take your meds, Mike. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 19 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 19 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <rbqdnY7JiZlP1HzInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517559 |
Hey FNN, And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed is what? Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what remained of the Twin Towers. So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <8no7el.5dn.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517575 |
Rocky wrote: > Hey FNN, > > And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed is > what? > > Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what remained of > the Twin Towers. > > So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> > > Rocky and proves you're a boner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <PL2dndUxpuJAW3zInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517576 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8no7el.5dn.19.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> Hey FNN, >> >> And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed is >> what? Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what remained of >> the Twin Towers. >> >> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> >> >> Rocky > > and proves you're and proves you're not FNN so no wonder why you didn't have enough brains to try and answer the ? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <8npagq.hnp.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517623 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8no7el.5dn.19.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> Hey FNN, >>> >>> And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed >>> is what? Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what >>> remained of the Twin Towers. >>> >>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >> >> and proves you're > > and proves you're > not FNN so no wonder why you didn't have enough brains to try and > answer the ? > > Rocky a boner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <br39bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517623 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > and proves you're > not FNN so no wonder why you didn't have enough brains to try and answer the > ? You have yet to compose a coherent, sane question, you bat shit crazy kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <s5t2uatkmpp23vju2o3iamn946hngdsian@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517575 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>Hey FNN,
>
>And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed is what?
>
>Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what remained of the Twin
>Towers.
>
>So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G>
>
100% of the evidence still PROVES no nukes were used on 9/11/01.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <75SdnU03fOHBVHzInZ2dnUU7-UmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517589 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:s5t2uatkmpp23vju2o3iamn946hngdsian@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>Hey FNN, >> >>And your reason why the bottom of the Twin Towers were not crushed is >>what? >> >>Keep in mind that NIST did not even try to explain what remained of the >>Twin >>Towers. >> >>So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> >> > > 100% of the evidence still PROVES no nukes were used on 9/11/01. You obviously missed the following video you clown: Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y And never forget that NIST knew they could not refer to the Twin Towers as a Pancake Collapse so they came up with "Progressive Collapse" but never let people know what they really meant by progressive because they had no way to explain why so much of the Twin Towers floated away. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN |
| Message-ID | <8u39bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517627 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > You obviously missed the following video you clown: No one cares about kooky youtube videos from other delusional kooks, kook. <snip remaining rediculous kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web