Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #556120 > unrolled thread

New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 23:01 -0600
    Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 06:12 +0000
      Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 06:20 -0500
        Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 04:20 -0800
          Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 05:40 -0800
            Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 05:59 -0800
              Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 15:41 -0500
          Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 15:30 -0500
            Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 23:02 +0000
      Re: New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-24 07:17 -0600

#556120 — New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling

New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling
> http://phys.org/news/2016-02-button.html#nRlv


> Gather your patience and put the old "a watched pot never boils"
> saying to the test. The experience might rival watching paint dry,
> but of course the water will eventually begin to boil. When it does,
> you'll see a flurry of bubbles form and quickly rise to the surface
> of the water. Once it kicks in, it builds at a furious pace and
> quickly creates a roiling cauldron on your stovetop. Time to add the
> pasta.
>
> People have been boiling water to make dinner for ages, but it is
> also used in our refrigerators and even in the international space
> station as a method for cooling its systems. Ninety percent of all
> electricity in the United States is generated with steam turbines
> that require boiling to make the steam. With so many uses and over
> five decades of research, it is hard to believe that there are any
> stones left unturned in our understanding of boiling. Yet, as with
> all things, there is always room to learn more. The formation of
> bubbles in boiling is not completely understood.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#556148

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling
>> http://phys.org/news/2016-02-button.html#nRlv
> 
> 
>> Gather your patience and put the old "a watched pot never boils"
>> saying to the test. The experience might rival watching paint dry,
>> but of course the water will eventually begin to boil. When it does,
>> you'll see a flurry of bubbles form and quickly rise to the surface
>> of the water. Once it kicks in, it builds at a furious pace and
>> quickly creates a roiling cauldron on your stovetop. Time to add the
>> pasta.
>>
>> People have been boiling water to make dinner for ages, but it is
>> also used in our refrigerators and even in the international space
>> station as a method for cooling its systems. Ninety percent of all
>> electricity in the United States is generated with steam turbines

Wrong answer.

30% is natural gas turbines and that number is climbing.

Then there is 7% hydroelectric, 5% wind, and 1% solar which makes boiling
water less than 57%.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556170

On 02/24/2016 01:12 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling
>>> http://phys.org/news/2016-02-button.html#nRlv
>>
>>
>>> Gather your patience and put the old "a watched pot never boils"
>>> saying to the test. The experience might rival watching paint dry,
>>> but of course the water will eventually begin to boil. When it does,
>>> you'll see a flurry of bubbles form and quickly rise to the surface
>>> of the water. Once it kicks in, it builds at a furious pace and
>>> quickly creates a roiling cauldron on your stovetop. Time to add the
>>> pasta.
>>>
>>> People have been boiling water to make dinner for ages, but it is
>>> also used in our refrigerators and even in the international space
>>> station as a method for cooling its systems. Ninety percent of all
>>> electricity in the United States is generated with steam turbines
>
> Wrong answer.
>
> 30% is natural gas turbines and that number is climbing.
>
> Then there is 7% hydroelectric, 5% wind, and 1% solar which makes boiling
> water less than 57%.
>
>
Once again the SPAMMER gets his ass handed to him. And even funnier is 
that he's totally wrong with information in his own "green" propaganda 
area. I guess this is what happens when you are used to just making up 
your data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556175

BJ quacked:
Once again the SPAMMER gets his ass handed to him. And even funnier is 
that he's totally wrong with information in his own "green" propaganda 
area. I guess this is what happens when you are used to just making up 
your data. 
---------------

Please post the 'data' from the ESP experiments which decided you into believing it was real.

(Another thing kooks hate is when you turn their own arguments against them. Right BJ?)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556180

I have experienced ESP,
spammer HVAC.
It's real.

Why do I care if you know that?
Use your OWN eyes/brain (I know/ it hurts
to think).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556185

8:40 AMjohn
I have experienced ESP, 
spammer HVAC. 
It's real. 

Why do I care if you know that? 
Use your OWN eyes/brain (I know/ it hurts 
to think). 
------------

John, how do you know this wasnt a dream? How did you vet your experience? Did you document this ESP activity?

I have follow up questions, but I'll let you answer those first.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556295

On 02/24/2016 08:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
> 8:40 AMjohn
> I have experienced ESP,
> spammer HVAC.
> It's real.
>
> Why do I care if you know that?
> Use your OWN eyes/brain (I know/ it hurts
> to think).
> ------------
>
> John, how do you know this wasnt a dream? How did you vet your experience? Did you document this ESP activity?
>
> I have follow up questions, but I'll let you answer those first.
>

John just WAIT until some alien blasts a thought right into HVAC's 
primitive brain with such power and force that he shits his pants.

He'll still say he doesn't believe, of course, because he does not 
accept reality. He'll say he had to do laundry because he had a "dream" 
HAR HAR!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556287

On 02/24/2016 07:20 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked:
> Once again the SPAMMER gets his ass handed to him. And even funnier is
> that he's totally wrong with information in his own "green" propaganda
> area. I guess this is what happens when you are used to just making up
> your data.
> ---------------
>
> Please post the 'data' from the ESP experiments which decided you into believing it was real.
>
> (Another thing kooks hate is when you turn their own arguments against them. Right BJ?)

You mean all those books written by the scientists who conducted that 
million dollar government remote viewing project?

You didn't even go to Amazon, let along read the information. When a 
person is stupid and intends to stay that way, there is nothing the rest 
of us can do about it.

===
I have given numerous references to the scientific work done on ESP, 
Remote viewing and the like with many excellent books easily available 
on Amazon.com. HVAC prefers not to read anything so as to remain 
ignorant. I have referenced a number of Nobel prize-winning scientists 
who have found significant ESP evidence. HVAC who thinks he is the 
“moderator” of an unmoderated newsgroup thinks he's smarter than them. I 
have referenced government projects costing millions verifying ESP 
effects. In spite of FOIA proof, HVAC acts as if they do not exist. I 
have listed PROOF BEYOND DOUBT of a government cover-up of UFO 
information from the government's own documents. HVAC admits nothing.

So everybody, the ONLY thing that anonymous HVAC (whatever that is) has 
going for "him" is the assertion that this or that person "believes" in 
Ghosts, ESP, or the like. That's it. He has ONLY his "superpowers" to 
tell you what another person has in their mind!  No evidence, no records 
of posts, nada. Of course such “superpowers” would be ESP, would they 
not? Science is only about evidence. Religion and pseudoscience is about 
"belief".  HVAC has no science education and knows no science.

So the only question YOU must ask is are you interested in science or 
strategic writer fantasy. Make your choice.

These paragraphs will be repeated every time HVAC accuses someone of 
"believing" in something.

PS. My “superpowers” tell me HVAC is Gay and needs to come out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556345

benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 07:20 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> BJ quacked:
>> Once again the SPAMMER gets his ass handed to him. And even funnier is
>> that he's totally wrong with information in his own "green" propaganda
>> area. I guess this is what happens when you are used to just making up
>> your data.
>> ---------------
>>
>> Please post the 'data' from the ESP experiments which decided you into believing it was real.
>>
>> (Another thing kooks hate is when you turn their own arguments against them. Right BJ?)
> 
> You mean all those books written by the scientists who conducted that 
> million dollar government remote viewing project?

You mean the one that came to the conclusion it is all crap?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556178

On 2/24/2016 12:12 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> New research introduces 'pause button' for boiling
>>> http://phys.org/news/2016-02-button.html#nRlv
>>
>>
>>> Gather your patience and put the old "a watched pot never boils"
>>> saying to the test. The experience might rival watching paint dry,
>>> but of course the water will eventually begin to boil. When it does,
>>> you'll see a flurry of bubbles form and quickly rise to the surface
>>> of the water. Once it kicks in, it builds at a furious pace and
>>> quickly creates a roiling cauldron on your stovetop. Time to add the
>>> pasta.

>>> People have been boiling water to make dinner for ages, but it is
>>> also used in our refrigerators and even in the international space
>>> station as a method for cooling its systems. Ninety percent of all
>>> electricity in the United States is generated with steam turbines
>
> Wrong answer.
>
> 30% is natural gas turbines and that number is climbing.
>
> Then there is 7% hydroelectric, 5% wind, and 1% solar which makes boiling
> water less than 57%.
>
>

   "Fat Ass in-a cube making stuff up @phys.org" again

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web