Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #707830 > unrolled thread

Who isn't "owned", you ?!

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Who isn't "owned", you ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-13 20:20 -0700
    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-13 23:51 -0400
      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:21 -0400
        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:12 -0400
          Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 11:25 -0500
            Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 12:46 -0400
              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 12:01 -0500
                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-15 14:10 -0400
                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:22 -0500
              Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 13:43 -0400
                Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-15 13:25 -0500
                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:07 -0400
                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 22:36 +0200
                      Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:43 -0400
                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-15 16:46 -0400
                  Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-16 06:48 -0500
                    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> - 2018-10-16 14:10 -0400
        Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-10-15 13:39 -0400
    Re: Who isn't "owned", you ?! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 10:42 -0700

#707830 — Who isn't "owned", you ?!

You (Hugh) wrote:
> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  

Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.

Who isn't "owned", you ?!

> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 

Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?

It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.

What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?

  WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#707833

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:

> You (Hugh) wrote:
>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  
> 
> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> 
> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> 
>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
> 
> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> 
> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> 
> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> 
>   WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
You are correct.
Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708207

On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
> 
>> You (Hugh) wrote:
>>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
>>
>> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
>> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
>>
>> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
>>
>>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
>>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
>>
>> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
>>
>> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
>>
>> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
>>
>>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
> You are correct.
> Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
> 
> https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office
> 
Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708225

On 2018-10-15 11:21 a.m., benj wrote:
> On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
>>
>>> You (Hugh) wrote:
>>>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
>>>
>>> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
>>> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
>>>
>>> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
>>>
>>>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
>>>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>>>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
>>>
>>> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
>>>
>>> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
>>>
>>> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
>>>
>>>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
>> You are correct.
>> Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
>>
>> https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office 
>>
>>
> Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
> the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
> millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.

Actually, the Clintons were supposedly broke when they left office 
<https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/jun/10/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-says-she-and-bill-were-dead-broke/>

Since then, however, we've learned that she and her husband will gladly 
trade political power for money. It doesn't matter if Americans suffer 
as long as she can put a few million down on her horse-faced daughter's 
wedding or a few more on a mansion in the Hamptons.

-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708234

SilverSlimer wrote:

> will gladly trade political power for money. 

That's what politicians do.  There's nothing unique about the
Clintons.

Hell, a Repug will aid and abet drug-dealing by the pharmaceutical
companies.  Who cares if thousands are dying, eh?

-- 
"As a card carrying Gnu contributor I often point out that the GPL is
beyond the ken of most people."    -  "card carrying Gnu contributor"
Hadron Quark, arguing that the GPL is difficult to understand, thus
insidious.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708238

On 2018-10-15 12:25 p.m., chrisv wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> will gladly trade political power for money.
> 
> That's what politicians do.  There's nothing unique about the
> Clintons.
> 
> Hell, a Repug will aid and abet drug-dealing by the pharmaceutical
> companies.  Who cares if thousands are dying, eh?

Let's assume you are entirely correct here.

1) The Clintons take personal bribes from companies in exchange for a 
loosening of regulations, turning a blind eye to crimes committed or 
increasing a corporation's power in government.

2) A Republican might choose to protect a corporation producing medicine 
for a variety of illnesses from lawsuits alleging unintended 
consequences which may result in the mass loss of jobs and, 
consequently, a loss of income to the government from corporate and 
individual taxation as well as an increase in expenditures as a result 
of an increase in welfare payments.

Pure evil.

-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708239

SilverSlimer wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>> 
>> Hell, a Repug will aid and abet drug-dealing by the pharmaceutical
>> companies.  Who cares if thousands are dying, eh?
>
>Let's assume you are entirely correct here.

Then why competely re-write what I said?

>2) A Republican might choose

...to aid and abet the drug dealers, so they can make more filthy
money on the dead bodies of Americans.

>Pure evil.

That's the Repugs, in a nutshell, yes.

-- 
"PS loonybins, OSS runs on Windows too."  -  "True Linux advocate"
Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708263

On 2018-10-15 1:01 p.m., chrisv wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Hell, a Repug will aid and abet drug-dealing by the pharmaceutical
>>> companies.  Who cares if thousands are dying, eh?
>>
>> Let's assume you are entirely correct here.
> 
> Then why competely re-write what I said?

Because my wording was more authentic to the message you were conveying.

>> 2) A Republican might choose
> 
> ...to aid and abet the drug dealers, so they can make more filthy
> money on the dead bodies of Americans.

You mean like the millions the Clintons helped to kill by pocketing the 
money otherwise reserved for the victims of the Haitian earthquake? 
<https://www.africanglobe.net/headlines/clintons-destroyed-impoverished-haiti/>

>> Pure evil.
> 
> That's the Repugs, in a nutshell, yes.

Except that what I say about the Clintons is based on fact whereas your 
assessment of Republicans in general is based off of how their are 
depicted in shitty 80s comedies.

-- 
SilverSlimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708268

SilverSlimer wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

Trump was going to make Marino the "drug czar"!  This amoral arsehole
was *completely* in bed with, and protecting, the drug-pushers!  (A
Repug, of course.)

You couldn't make this stuff up!

-- 
"There is no point toppling one giant to install another one."  -
"True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark, protecting his masters in Redmond

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708257

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:46:01 -0400, SilverSlimer wrote:

> On 2018-10-15 12:25 p.m., chrisv wrote:
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>> 
>>> will gladly trade political power for money.
>> 
>> That's what politicians do.  There's nothing unique about the
>> Clintons.
>> 
>> Hell, a Repug will aid and abet drug-dealing by the pharmaceutical
>> companies.  Who cares if thousands are dying, eh?
> 
> Let's assume you are entirely correct here.
> 
> 1) The Clintons take personal bribes from companies in exchange for a 
> loosening of regulations, turning a blind eye to crimes committed or 
> increasing a corporation's power in government.
> 
> 2) A Republican might choose to protect a corporation producing medicine 
> for a variety of illnesses from lawsuits alleging unintended 
> consequences which may result in the mass loss of jobs and, 
> consequently, a loss of income to the government from corporate and 
> individual taxation as well as an increase in expenditures as a result 
> of an increase in welfare payments.
> 
> Pure evil.

The Clintons take crooked politics to a completely different level. Maybe
Warren G. Harding might compare but there is nobody even close in modern
politics.

Then of course you can also look at the Clinton body count as well.
Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
under unusual circumstances.

That alone is suspicious.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708269

Torquemada wrote:

>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>under unusual circumstances.

I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
die because of them.

-- 
"This is what happens when you have a user base of 7 people all of
whom wont help QA it."  -  "Hadron", sneering at OpenSUSE

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708295

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:25:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> Torquemada wrote:
> 
>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>under unusual circumstances.
> 
> I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
> are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
> die because of them.

So you are unable to actually offer an explanation for the fact that people
directly associated with the Clintons seem to disappear, in larger than
normal numbers so you try to obfuscate the topic by injecting wars of
various sorts.

In your cherry picking you seem to have forogt about FDR, a democrat and
WW2 and LBJ, another democrat during Vietnam or Woodrow Wilson a democrat
at the start of WW1.

Now back to the original question,
"Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
under unusual circumstances." 

Good luck.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708301

Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> writes:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:25:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>> Torquemada wrote:
>> 
>>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>>under unusual circumstances.
>> 
>> I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
>> are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
>> die because of them.
>
> So you are unable to actually offer an explanation for the fact that people
> directly associated with the Clintons seem to disappear, in larger than
> normal numbers so you try to obfuscate the topic by injecting wars of
> various sorts.
>
> In your cherry picking you seem to have forogt about FDR, a democrat and
> WW2 and LBJ, another democrat during Vietnam or Woodrow Wilson a democrat
> at the start of WW1.
>
> Now back to the original question,
> "Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
> businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
> under unusual circumstances." 
>
> Good luck.

Fred West was famous. But chrisv will always be a turd.

-- 
chrisv alias turdv is a turd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708302

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:36:24 +0200, in
comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.checkmate you wrote:

> Torquemada <whocares@whocares.org> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:25:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Torquemada wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>>>under unusual circumstances.
>>> 
>>> I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
>>> are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
>>> die because of them.
>>
>> So you are unable to actually offer an explanation for the fact that people
>> directly associated with the Clintons seem to disappear, in larger than
>> normal numbers so you try to obfuscate the topic by injecting wars of
>> various sorts.
>>
>> In your cherry picking you seem to have forogt about FDR, a democrat and
>> WW2 and LBJ, another democrat during Vietnam or Woodrow Wilson a democrat
>> at the start of WW1.
>>
>> Now back to the original question,
>> "Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>> businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>> under unusual circumstances." 
>>
>> Good luck.
> 
> Fred West was famous. But chrisv will always be a turd.

Yea but that's a serial killer. His whole purpose in life is to kill for
the thrill of it. I'm talking about otherwise normal people whose friends
and close acquaintances, business partners keep seem to be committing
suicide.

Like the Clinton's friends and acquaintances

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708306

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:07:45 -0400, Torquemada wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:25:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Torquemada wrote:
>> 
>>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>>under unusual circumstances.
>> 
>> I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
>> are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
>> die because of them.
> 
> So you are unable to actually offer an explanation for the fact that people
> directly associated with the Clintons seem to disappear, in larger than
> normal numbers so you try to obfuscate the topic by injecting wars of
> various sorts.
> 
> In your cherry picking you seem to have forogt about FDR, a democrat and
> WW2 and LBJ, another democrat during Vietnam or Woodrow Wilson a democrat
> at the start of WW1.
> 
> Now back to the original question,
> "Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
> businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
> under unusual circumstances." 
> 
> Good luck.

P.S. Hadron. Your FUP to Poster is screwing up replying to your messages.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708427

chrisv wrote:

>Torquemada wrote:
>
>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>under unusual circumstances.
>
>I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
>are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
>die because of them.

Follow-up posts by "Turqemada" and "Hadron" were deleted, unread.

-- 
"Huh?  (Bit rot) also affects Linux you puffed up little suck up."  -
"True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark, defending his beloved Windows

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708480

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:48:12 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
> 
>>Torquemada wrote:
>>
>>>Quick, name another famous person, politician, entertainment person,
>>>businessman, etc who have had so many, many people connected with them die
>>>under unusual circumstances.
>>
>>I supppose that the wars started by right-wingers, like Bush-league,
>>are "usual" cirsumstances, thus don't "count", even though millions
>>die because of them.
> 
> Follow-up posts by "Turqemada" and "Hadron" were deleted, unread.

Translation: we wiped the floor with your ass so now you run away like a
baby.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708252

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:21:56 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 10/13/2018 11:51 PM, proletariat wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:20:40 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  wrote:
>> 
>>> You (Hugh) wrote:
>>>> someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].
>>>
>>> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
>>> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
>>>
>>> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
>>>
>>>> the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA
>>>> was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
>>>> we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ...
>>>
>>> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
>>>
>>> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
>>>
>>> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
>>>
>>>    WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism
>> You are correct.
>> Take a look at Jeb Busch for example:
>> 
>> https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/30/418895297/jeb-bushs-wealth-skyrocketed-after-leaving-governors-office
>> 
> Whose wealth does NOT skyrocket after leaving government? Shit. Look at 
> the clintons who suddenly went from poor folks with a few hundred K to 
> millions overnight. No collusions I'm sure.

Absolutely agree. I posted some links about the Clintons as well in another
thread. Politicians are crooks. It's not a partisan issue as it crosses all
parties.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708255

On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 8:20:51 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You (Hugh) wrote:
> > someone OWNS him [ Kavanaugh ].  
> 
> Who, the bankers ? What's your _ conspiracy theory ?
> We ( you, the media, and the FBI ) are watching him closely.
> 
> Who isn't "owned", you ?!
> 
> > the "deal" that Trump just bragged about for NAFTA 
> > was actually unchanged [ or worse ].
> > we're still waiting on that promised deal with North Korea, China ... 
> 
> Sounds like there isn't going to be much change, right ?
> 
> It's (popular) lip service to American workers, apparently.
> 
> What do you think of China's "Social Credit System" ?
> 
>   WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Social_Credit_System#Criticism       GOP Mafia is in control of USA.Thank Nixon,Arrenberg ,Kissinger,Bush and now GOP pimp Trump.hey will never pay taxes,and will get INS on all their enemies backs.It all started in 1963.They can kill,and never go to jail.Fact is never will we see Godfather in the news.Hewill not allow it.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web