Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #706328 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
'Space' is never empty Musatov <tomusatov@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 19:08 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-05 21:54 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 22:21 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 23:27 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 14:54 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 17:17 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-06 16:46 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 22:10 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 12:25 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 05:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 14:30 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 09:07 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 21:31 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 06:02 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:54 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:24 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 12:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 19:44 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 09:00 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 18:58 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 14:53 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 20:59 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 21:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 05:52 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:44 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 06:59 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:12 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 18:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:14 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:41 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 00:07 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:50 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 23:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:01 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:28 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:57 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 22:34 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:45 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:13 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 17:57 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:52 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:56 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 05:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:15 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 06:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 14:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:07 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:52 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 22:11 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 21:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 13:35 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 21:59 -0700
You can't _ measure motion if you never stop measuring. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:51 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:17 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 09:50 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:24 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 20:43 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 00:03 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:29 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 12:49 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 16:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:23 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:27 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 07:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:00 -0400
Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-13 22:38 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 23:39 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 14:45 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 08:04 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 16:12 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 20:20 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 13:40 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 21:09 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 18:18 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 05:34 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:24 +0000
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 21:44 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-14 10:58 -0600
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 19:06 +0200
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-14 14:49 -0700
Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 23:06 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 10:34 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 09:33 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 12:48 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:35 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:29 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 11:10 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-17 14:33 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 18:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 23:54 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 13:22 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 09:42 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:59 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:21 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 11:55 -0400
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:47 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-08 11:51 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 09:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 17:13 +0000
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:04 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 17:39 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Ivan Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-11 08:28 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 18:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-11 19:43 -0500
Re: 'Space' is never empty Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 10:20 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 11:58 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 12:13 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 15:51 -0400
'Space' is never empty john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 07:55 -0700
Re: 'Space' is never empty mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 13:32 -0700
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 16:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <ppvptj$hie$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707903 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Quite right! It was Rutherford who made that comment. > ” > And none of them thought the electron doesn’t rapidly orbit the nucleus. > One of them, maybe Rutherford, said the electron ‘slows down’ at each end > of its orbital, which is exactly what happens with orthogonal, in phase, 1:2 spin. > John, I’ve asked you for a reference for this many times. You’ve never been able to cough it up. One thing to remember: that old model preceded quantum mechanics. In other words, mistakes were found in what they thought. Why hang onto mistakes? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 09:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <2db62839-0d71-402e-a43c-f6b91ab447fb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707948 |
Odd “other words, mistakes were found in what they thought. Why hang onto mistakes? ” These very smart people clearly saw electrons moving around atoms at high speed. You say they’re mistaken. I prefer to think that it’s you who are mistaken. You lost Logic along the way and now you’re just Lost
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 20:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <pq08eu$19mp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707953 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “other > words, mistakes were found in what they thought. Why hang onto mistakes? ” > These very smart people clearly saw electrons moving around atoms at high speed. No, John, they did not. They imagined a model where this happened. This model ends up having enough problems that it was declared wrong. Even Bohr declared the original model wrong and then went about the business of finding the right model, along with Schrödinger, Pauli, Heisenberg, Dirac, and others. You claim that someone in this pool “saw” electrons slowing down in an orbital, but you and I both know this is just your bullshit. > You say they’re mistaken. THEY say they were mistaken. Then they fixed it. > I prefer to think that it’s you who are mistaken. You can prefer to think whatever you want. History proves otherwise. Educate yourself. > You lost Logic along the way and now you’re just Lost > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 13:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <7669c84a-fbb3-40bd-8371-05113cdbd0a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #708006 |
If there is no light wave or matter dimension is empty. If there is a light wave or more or an atom dimension is occupied. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 13:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <134760c7-24a6-4ca9-95d5-e401d6abf23c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #708006 |
Odd “You can prefer to think whatever you want. History proves otherwise. Educate yourself. ” Femtosecond cameras are here, Odd. History is being made. We’ll see what atoms do
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 21:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <pq0b9v$1e8l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #708024 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “You can prefer to think whatever you want. History proves otherwise. > Educate yourself. ” > Femtosecond cameras are here, Odd. > History is being made. > We’ll see what atoms do > Yes we will. Are you prepared to be wrong? I am, but you? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 18:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <794671dd-9de6-436f-b42c-12e30f305444@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #708042 |
On Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 2:09:24 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > > Odd > > “You can prefer to think whatever you want. History proves otherwise. > > Educate yourself. ” > > Femtosecond cameras are here, Odd. > > History is being made. > > We’ll see what atoms do > > > > Yes we will. Are you prepared to be wrong? I am, but you? You are talking to yourself Roy Masters? You are answering to a hypocrite. Mitchell Raemsch > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 05:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <d5641dee-d102-4650-871b-0ebd65829f38@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #708042 |
Odd “Yes we will. Are you prepared to be wrong? I am, but you? ” The difference between us is that I have known what to look for. For years. It’s good that you’re prepared- you must have been a scout
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-15 14:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <pq27uo$c5i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #708190 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Yes we will. Are you prepared to be wrong? I am, but you? ” > The difference between us is that I have known what to look for. For years. > It’s good that you’re prepared- you must have been a scout > LOL. So you are not prepared to be wrong, because you have special insights. I see. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 21:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <1de69e3b-f2da-4518-9e9f-19eb17da3187@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707953 |
On Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 7:33:34 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > Odd > “other > words, mistakes were found in what they thought. Why hang onto mistakes? ” > These very smart people clearly saw electrons moving around atoms at high speed. > You say they’re mistaken. > I prefer to think that it’s you who are mistaken. > You lost Logic along the way and now you’re just Lost ================================== Jhon you are wrong ! electrons do not orbit and not shmorbit it was an idea of Bhore 9he got a nobel '' about it .. see how far delusions can go indeed the formula of an orbiting object -are quite exactly as a VIBRATION OBJECT but as you know mathematics is not all in physics i learning about it as a civil engineer dealing with earthquakes !! 2 see my model and its CHAIN OF ORBITALS SYSTEM '' reminding the string theory but i found it independently !! after big efforts and toil it works perfectly allo along atomic and nuclear 3D structure btw particles are 3D all along yet you have to be educated about dealing with it and to understand 3D and to express yourself 3D and to think 3D ! not common ability !!! not everyone education in short see a ''little'' example : (that i was working on it about 10 years day and some night ... http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract ==== TIA Y.P ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 10:58 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <OAKwD.131230$um3.122521@fx32.iad> |
| In reply to | #707899 |
On 10/14/2018 8:45 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <Jeff-Relf.Me @.> wrote: >> Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. >> >> Whenever you hear an "Einstein" quote you can be pretty sure it's fake. >> > > Quite right! It was Rutherford who made that comment. We were graced with his quote because Heisenburg said Rutherford usually could not be reached for comment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 19:06 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <8736t81mqd.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #707955 |
Rogue Cormac <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> writes: > On 10/14/2018 8:45 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <Jeff-Relf.Me @.> wrote: >>> Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. >>> >>> Whenever you hear an "Einstein" quote you can be pretty sure it's fake. >>> >> >> Quite right! It was Rutherford who made that comment. > > We were graced with his quote because Heisenburg said > Rutherford usually could not be reached for comment. > He said he was unable to determine if he could ask Rutherford for comment. -- chrisv alias turdv is a turd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 14:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <bee214da-b71c-4b75-a517-210e31291161@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707851 |
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. > > Whenever you hear an "Einstein" quote you can be pretty sure it's fake. Like when they quote Einstein predicting gravitational waves! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-14 23:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. |
| Message-ID | <pq0i6j$1oh0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #708058 |
Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote: > On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 10:38:57 PM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> Einstein never said you should be able to explain physics to a barmaid. >> >> Whenever you hear an "Einstein" quote you can be pretty sure it's fake. > > > Like when they quote Einstein predicting gravitational waves! https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol7-trans/25 > > Double-A > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-11 10:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b42d19ca-79ed-455c-a210-1e9d43d01a17@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707061 |
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 8:43:08 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 10/10/2018 6:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > I don’t find mathematics indecipherable. Maybe you and John do. Maybe you > > think this is somehow unfair, like John does. John wants no science that a > > third grader can’t follow. > > > I have never heard you explain any of your so-called "science" either in > words OR math. Einstein said one should be able to explain science to > anyone. You can't explain your science to anyone who speaks both science > AND math. YOU just then explain that by saying that THEY are uneducated > and stupid. What is the flaw in your thinking? Just to keep the record straight: Odd has never called anyone stupid. Odd and I both have said John could use a little more education. > John at least understands > the IDEA behind his theories. yeah, sometimes he's wrong, but at least > he knows what the idea he had was. You on the other hand have NO ideas. IMHO, John does not understand his own theory. As far as ideas, those are cheap. I have many ideas daily. Most are trivial, a few are potentially profound. Most are quickly evaluated, found wanting, and discarded. Would you prefer I annoyed you and many others in this group with useless ideas? And since we are on that subject, I have not seen too many ideas come from you, benj. But, no one is keeping score. Enjoy the ideas, ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 09:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f9c7bdc7-52e4-4bc7-bdaa-058b9ce58d6c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707046 |
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > >> benj > >> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his > >> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” > >> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle > >> > > > > Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. > > Something’s gonna stick, right? > > > Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks > you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people > who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your > mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 12:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppqj8a$ih8$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707461 |
On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: >> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> benj >>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his >>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” >>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle >>>> >>> >>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. >>> Something’s gonna stick, right? >>> >> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks >> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people >> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your >> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. > > Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert > It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in Space where it all is created. That is a given!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0afb19f2-bc33-4c07-878f-503858b15760@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707464 |
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > >> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> benj > >>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his > >>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” > >>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle > >>>> > >>> > >>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. > >>> Something’s gonna stick, right? > >>> > >> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks > >> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people > >> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your > >> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. > > > > Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert > > > It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in > Space where it all is created. That is a given! No. Only God is a given for any creation... Space is expanding. And there is more than aether... Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-12 17:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ppr3mq$1e6u$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #707490 |
On 10/12/2018 4:35 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: >> On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>> On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: >>>> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> benj >>>>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his >>>>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” >>>>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. >>>>> Something’s gonna stick, right? >>>>> >>>> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks >>>> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people >>>> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your >>>> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. >>> >>> Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert >>> >> It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in >> Space where it all is created. That is a given! > > No. Only God is a given for any creation... > > Space is expanding. And there is more than aether... > > > Mitchell Raemsch > Space is NOT expanding. That is a bogus error. Aether is the TOE! That is a given!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-13 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8fa6c3b1-7a02-4f52-b5cc-7a96940b6d74@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #707512 |
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > On 10/12/2018 4:35 PM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-7, benj wrote: > >> On 10/12/2018 12:33 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 3:01:31 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: > >>>> On 10/10/2018 11:59 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> benj > >>>>>> “Proof? Odd's proof is he gets out textbooks and thumps them. It's his > >>>>>> version of bible thumping. What's yours? ” > >>>>>> ed and Odd are stuck in an epicycle > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Just grab any word handy that sounds awful. Lib, epicycle, polyunsaturated. > >>>>> Something’s gonna stick, right? > >>>>> > >>>> Typical Odd. He thinks science is all about political debate. He thinks > >>>> you do science by arguing about words. He's even worse than the people > >>>> who think science is all about how complex and indecipherable your > >>>> mathematics are. Odd doesn't even have mathematics. Just words. > >>> > >>> Einstein and I agree."Space is the most dynamic part of the universe" Its where all is created.It is the source of gravity,and never forget G=EMC^2 Bert > >>> > >> It is not SPACE that is dynamic. Space is "empty" it is the Aether in > >> Space where it all is created. That is a given! > > > > No. Only God is a given for any creation... > > > > Space is expanding. And there is more than aether... > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch > > > Space is NOT expanding. That is a bogus error. Aether is the TOE! That > is a given! You are wrong on both accounts Roy Masters. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web