Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #538833 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-12 21:14 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-12-13 05:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Using cycling to explain why physics isn't a drag Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 21:14 -0600
Re: Using cycling to explain why physics isn't a drag jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-13 05:42 +0000
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-12 21:14 -0600 |
| Subject | Using cycling to explain why physics isn't a drag |
| Message-ID | <uridndCLTuHif_HLnZ2dnUU7-b_OydjZ@giganews.com> |
Using cycling to explain why physics isn't a drag > http://phys.org/news/2015-12-physics-isnt.html > Scientists and teachers have combined to develop a simple > spreadsheet-based method of teaching aerodynamic drag to 14 and 15 > year olds. By measuring the speed of one of their classmates riding a > bike and taking a photo in order to measure the frontal area of the > cyclist, the students were able to calculate the drag co-efficient. > > The results are published today, 11th December 2015, in the journal > Physics Education. > > "Usually, describing a realistic motion including aerodynamic drag > would be beyond the scope of a secondary physics course. However, I > realised that this could be done fairly easy for a bike slowing down > by aerodynamic drag" explains Florian Theilmann, an author of the > paper who is based at the Weingarten University of Education in > Germany. > > "In a common physics class, physics seems to be presented in a very > simplified way." Theilmann continues. "Sure, that helps you to do > easier calculations or some experiments but then it is less connected > to real life." -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-12-13 05:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <82dvjc-lf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #538833 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Using cycling to explain why physics isn't a drag >> http://phys.org/news/2015-12-physics-isnt.html > > >> Scientists and teachers have combined to develop a simple >> spreadsheet-based method of teaching aerodynamic drag to 14 and 15 >> year olds. By measuring the speed of one of their classmates riding a >> bike and taking a photo in order to measure the frontal area of the >> cyclist, the students were able to calculate the drag co-efficient. >> >> The results are published today, 11th December 2015, in the journal >> Physics Education. Whoopde fucking doo; a high school science fair project. >> "Usually, describing a realistic motion including aerodynamic drag >> would be beyond the scope of a secondary physics course. However, I >> realised that this could be done fairly easy for a bike slowing down >> by aerodynamic drag" explains Florian Theilmann, an author of the >> paper who is based at the Weingarten University of Education in >> Germany. Duh? >> "In a common physics class, physics seems to be presented in a very >> simplified way." Theilmann continues. "Sure, that helps you to do >> easier calculations or some experiments but then it is less connected >> to real life." Pandering idiot. > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. And not your personal blog. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web