Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #566371 > unrolled thread

How real is the division of reality into past, present and future?

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-28 20:42 -0500
Last post2016-03-29 14:35 -0700
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  How real is the division of reality into past, present and future? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 20:42 -0500
    Re: How real is the division of reality into past, present and future? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 02:48 +0000
    Re: How real is the division of reality into past, present and future? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-29 14:35 -0700

#566371 — How real is the division of reality into past, present and future?

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-28 20:42 -0500
SubjectHow real is the division of reality into past, present and future?
Message-ID<7OSdnV1zbMsPQGTLnZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
How real is the division of reality into past, present and future?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww7ZPKtGSbg


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#566383

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-29 02:48 +0000
Message-ID<v07psc-hv1.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#566371
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> How real is the division of reality into past, present and future?

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin spammer?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#566540

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2016-03-29 14:35 -0700
Message-ID<0e67554e-8dd2-4414-b624-5e8320afc3dc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#566371
On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 6:42:44 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> How real is the division of reality into past, present and future?
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww7ZPKtGSbg
> 


Very subjective.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web