Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 97 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <imecbbdc8f43nskh8ptdkjtp70kf53ai55@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550931 |
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:57:39 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >teary-eyed bleatfarting spankard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n95q6l$1k43$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550931 |
On 06/02/2016 12:57 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. Go ahead. I dare you. (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c8a7c33ba991a967a174ba054c5b70ce@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550975 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n95q6l$1k43$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 06/02/2016 12:57 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) > Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. > > Go ahead. I dare you. > > (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) Why do that when it tricks poseur lackwits like you into making hilarious fuckups to entertain the intelligent folk, LunkHead? LOL Some moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ The moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Both incorrect. LOL! The moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. LOL You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL ================================ But the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. LOL Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation is "science fiction" and "a howler". So this moron has admitted he has no idea how mass affects 4-D Minkowski space-time. In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. This is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". This is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. This is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. This is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. This is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. SPNAK! on the backpedaling bleatfarting spankard moron. I won. You lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n965td$46g$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550991 |
On 06/02/2016 6:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in > <news:n95q6l$1k43$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into > the wood chipper again: > >> On 06/02/2016 12:57 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) > >> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. >> >> Go ahead. I dare you. >> >> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) > > Why do that when it Cowardice. No surprise there, really. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <73d3c7b73da6ed2cf76c5bcdc7b51f7c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #551001 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n965td$46g$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 06/02/2016 6:54 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in >> <news:n95q6l$1k43$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >> the wood chipper again: >>> On 06/02/2016 12:57 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus wrote: Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> >>>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) >>> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. >>> >>> Go ahead. I dare you. >>> >>> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) >> Why do that when it tricks poseur lackwits like you into making >> hilarious fuckups to entertain the intelligent folk, LunkHead? LOL >> >> Some moron wrote: >> ================================ >> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so >> the curvature is 4*pi >> ================================ >> >> The moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 *and* the Gaussian >> curvature = 4*pi. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a >> sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Both incorrect. LOL! >> >> The moron was corrected: >> ================================ >> Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the >> Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you >> backpedal, LunkHead. LOL >> >> You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = >> (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is >> independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original >> "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL >> ================================ >> >> But the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked >> up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its >> radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to >> use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry >> problems. LOL >> >> Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an >> astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor >> concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general >> relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of >> space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation is >> "science fiction" and "a howler". >> >> So this moron has admitted he has no idea how mass affects 4-D >> Minkowski space-time. In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D >> Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only >> small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has >> no idea of the effects of magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time >> manifold. >> >> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature >> than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and >> Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". >> >> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody >> radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow >> at 489 F. >> >> This is the same moron who first denied the existence of the >> ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed >> that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven >> wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of >> "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral >> emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how >> spectral absorption and emission works. >> >> This is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that >> CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared >> atmospheric window. >> >> The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate >> Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a >> global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second >> Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same >> moron continues to cling to his delusions. >> >> This is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that >> global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three >> peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. And lest anyone forget, Lunkhead is the same moron who has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnets work, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. This is the same moron who's k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that planets ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. This is the same moron who has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. >> SPNAK! on the backpedaling bleatfarting spankard moron. >> >> I won. You lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. >> >> <snicker> Lunkhead just proved he's not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid and delusional to withstand the intellectual rigors of being an astrophysicist. He's of a similar mental acuity to that drooling slump-shouldered moron Paul Derbyshire, who taxes his brain to the breaking point acting as the human equivalent of a truffle pig. <snicker> > Cowardice. No surprise there, really. What a backpedaling spankard. Why can't you refute any of what I wrote, Spankard? You've been proven *wrong*, now the only thing you can do is stage a fighting retreat, but you'd do well to just up and run away. You're too stupid to ever win. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n98rku$1n17$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #551023 |
On 07/02/2016 12:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) >>> >>>> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. >>>> >>>> Go ahead. I dare you. >>>> >>>> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) >>> >>> Why do that when it >> >> Cowardice. No surprise there, really. > > What a backpedaling spankard. Why can't you refute any of what I > wrote, Spankard? You've been proven *wrong*, now the only thing you > can do is stage a fighting retreat, but you'd do well to just up and > run away. You're too stupid to ever win. > > <sn<SMACKAK00K!> In what way is my accusing you of cowardice, for refusing my dare, "backpedaling," kOok? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <76ac189ff45aaa10ef86ff99fe84f9fb@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #551145 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n98rku$1n17$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 07/02/2016 12:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, apparently. And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her mouth! Oh, here's Kensi: <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go kinky. LOL > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited > any good telescopes lately? Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? <snicker> ======================================================== ======================================================== I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, dude. <snicker> >>>>>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) >>>>> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. >>>>> >>>>> Go ahead. I dare you. >>>>> >>>>> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) Your cowardly snipping noted and fixored, Spankard. Why are you so stupid that you can't help but lose each and every time, LunkHead? LOL >>>> Why do that when it tricks poseur lackwits like you into making >>>> hilarious fuckups to entertain the intelligent folk, LunkHead? LOL >>>> >>>> Some moron wrote: >>>> ================================ >>>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so >>>> the curvature is 4*pi >>>> ================================ >>>> >>>> The moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 *and* the Gaussian >>>> curvature = 4*pi. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a >>>> sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Both incorrect. LOL! >>>> >>>> The moron was corrected: >>>> ================================ >>>> Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the >>>> Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you >>>> backpedal, LunkHead. LOL >>>> >>>> You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = >>>> (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is >>>> independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original >>>> "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL >>>> ================================ >>>> >>>> But the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked >>>> up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its >>>> radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to >>>> use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry >>>> problems. LOL >>>> >>>> Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an >>>> astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor >>>> concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general >>>> relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of >>>> space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation is >>>> "science fiction" and "a howler". >>>> >>>> So this moron has admitted he has no idea how mass affects 4-D >>>> Minkowski space-time. In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D >>>> Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only >>>> small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has >>>> no idea of the effects of magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time >>>> manifold. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature >>>> than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and >>>> Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody >>>> radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow >>>> at 489 F. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who first denied the existence of the >>>> ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed >>>> that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven >>>> wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of >>>> "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral >>>> emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how >>>> spectral absorption and emission works. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that >>>> CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared >>>> atmospheric window. >>>> >>>> The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate >>>> Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a >>>> global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second >>>> Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same >>>> moron continues to cling to his delusions. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that >>>> global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three >>>> peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. >> And lest anyone forget, Lunkhead is the same moron who has k'lamed >> that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time >> manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of >> positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby >> proving he doesn't know how magnets work, and denies the existence of >> magnetic attraction. >> >> This is the same moron who's k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of >> the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes >> that planets ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski >> space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature >> positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. >> >> This is the same moron who has described a universe in which planets >> could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not >> work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. >>>> SPNAK! on the backpedaling bleatfarting spankard moron. >>>> >>>> I won. You lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> Cowardice. No surprise there, really. >> What a backpedaling spankard. Why can't you refute any of what I >> wrote, Spankard? You've been proven *wrong*, now the only thing you >> can do is stage a fighting retreat, but you'd do well to just up and >> run away. You're too stupid to ever win. >> >> <snicker> > In what way is my accusing you of cowardice, for refusing my dare, > "backpedaling," kOok? Bwahahahaaa! What a spankard. You snip out everything that proves you *wrong*, only to prop up a straw man of a "dare" as means of diverting attention away from the fact that you've yet again had your stupid ass drop-kicked across Usenet. I don't have to change a thing. I'm right, you're wrong. There's nothing you can do about that. Spankard. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that planets ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnets affect the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n999dq$2qk$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #551181 |
[huge screed containing zero, I mean *zero* original paragraphs not quoted or copy-pasted from previous articles in this froup, deleted] Yer pwn3d. *snicker*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5da8146d601749dee51d8a4bf2263384@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #551183 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> kensi, in <news:n999dq$2qk$2@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in > <news:n98rku$1n17$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into > the wood chipper again: >> On 07/02/2016 12:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: >> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> >> ======================================================== >> ======================================================== >> > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> >> >> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by >> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, >> apparently. >> >> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team >> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. >> >> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch >> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to >> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared >> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his >> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in >> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her >> mouth! >> >> Oh, here's Kensi: >> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> >> >> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? >> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. >> >> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right >> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. >> >> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> >> >> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to >> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls >> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go >> kinky. LOL >> >> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> >> >> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited >> > any good telescopes lately? >> >> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control >> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? >> >> <snicker> >> ======================================================== >> ======================================================== >> >> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have >> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually >> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone >> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows >> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks >> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've >> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop >> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, >> dude. >> >> <snicker> >>>>>>>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) >>>>>>> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Go ahead. I dare you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) >> Your cowardly snipping noted and fixored, Spankard. Why are you so >> stupid that you can't help but lose each and every time, LunkHead? LOL >>>>>> Why do that when it tricks poseur lackwits like you into making >>>>>> hilarious fuckups to entertain the intelligent folk, LunkHead? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Some moron wrote: >>>>>> ================================ >>>>>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so >>>>>> the curvature is 4*pi >>>>>> ================================ >>>>>> >>>>>> The moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 *and* the Gaussian >>>>>> curvature = 4*pi. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a >>>>>> sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Both incorrect. LOL! >>>>>> >>>>>> The moron was corrected: >>>>>> ================================ >>>>>> Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the >>>>>> Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you >>>>>> backpedal, LunkHead. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = >>>>>> (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is >>>>>> independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original >>>>>> "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL >>>>>> ================================ >>>>>> >>>>>> But the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked >>>>>> up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its >>>>>> radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to >>>>>> use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry >>>>>> problems. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an >>>>>> astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor >>>>>> concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general >>>>>> relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of >>>>>> space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation is >>>>>> "science fiction" and "a howler". >>>>>> >>>>>> So this moron has admitted he has no idea how mass affects 4-D >>>>>> Minkowski space-time. In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D >>>>>> Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only >>>>>> small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has >>>>>> no idea of the effects of magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time >>>>>> manifold. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature >>>>>> than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and >>>>>> Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody >>>>>> radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow >>>>>> at 489 F. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the same moron who first denied the existence of the >>>>>> ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed >>>>>> that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven >>>>>> wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of >>>>>> "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral >>>>>> emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how >>>>>> spectral absorption and emission works. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that >>>>>> CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared >>>>>> atmospheric window. >>>>>> >>>>>> The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate >>>>>> Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a >>>>>> global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second >>>>>> Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same >>>>>> moron continues to cling to his delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that >>>>>> global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three >>>>>> peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. >>>> And lest anyone forget, Lunkhead is the same moron who has k'lamed >>>> that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time >>>> manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of >>>> positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby >>>> proving he doesn't know how magnets work, and denies the existence of >>>> magnetic attraction. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who's k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of >>>> the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes >>>> that planets ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski >>>> space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature >>>> positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. >>>> >>>> This is the same moron who has described a universe in which planets >>>> could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not >>>> work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. >>>>>> SPNAK! on the backpedaling bleatfarting spankard moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> I won. You lost. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>>> Cowardice. No surprise there, really. >>>> What a backpedaling spankard. Why can't you refute any of what I >>>> wrote, Spankard? You've been proven *wrong*, now the only thing you >>>> can do is stage a fighting retreat, but you'd do well to just up and >>>> run away. You're too stupid to ever win. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> In what way is my accusing you of cowardice, for refusing my dare, >>> "backpedaling," kOok? >> Bwahahahaaa! What a spankard. You snip out everything that proves you >> *wrong*, only to prop up a straw man of a "dare" as means of diverting >> attention away from the fact that you've yet again had your stupid ass >> drop-kicked across Usenet. >> >> I don't have to change a thing. I'm right, you're wrong. There's >> nothing you can do about that. Spankard. >> >> <snicker> > [huge screed containing zero, I mean *zero* original paragraphs not > quoted or copy-pasted from previous articles in this froup, deleted] > > Yer pwn3d. > > *snicker* Wheee! Look at the moronic spankard backpedal and squirm! SPNAK! <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that planets ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnets affect the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3121cd9bf15e2e3b98c5bb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #551145 |
In article <n98rku$1n17$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 07/02/2016 12:05 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >>>>> Wikipedia (which also got the equation wrong) > >>> > >>>> Go ahead and edit it to the "correct" equation, then. > >>>> > >>>> Go ahead. I dare you. > >>>> > >>>> (I expect the resulting edit war will be *fucking hilarious*.) > >>> > >>> Why do that when it > >> > >> Cowardice. No surprise there, really. > > > > What a backpedaling spankard. Why can't you refute any of what I > > wrote, Spankard? You've been proven *wrong*, now the only thing you > > can do is stage a fighting retreat, but you'd do well to just up and > > run away. You're too stupid to ever win. > > > > <sn<SMACKAK00K!> > > In what way is my accusing you of cowardice, for refusing my dare, > "backpedaling," kOok? Kensi, Kensi, Kensi... you KNOW Fakey's M/O. He's never "wrong". You can argue with him until the joyous day he drops dead, and he'll never admit otherwise. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n94h8o$1goo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550849 |
On 06/02/2016 4:02 AM, Skeeter wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in >> <news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >> the wood chipper again: >> >> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> >> ======================================================== >> ======================================================== >>> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> [GIANT snip] > Damn! Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start. Oh yes. Other events he medals in are the Gish Gallop, the Conclusion Jump, the 1000 Line Dash, the Spam Toss, the Tantrum Throw, the Nonsequitur Marathon, Personal Demon Wrestling, Logic Gymnastics, Moon Howling, the Obsessional March, Dumpster Diving, Snowjobbing, Figure Scribbling, Astrology Archery, Downhill Screeding, the Quackery Triathlon, the Freestyle Meltdown, Reverse Cycling, Wild Guess Golf, and the Mule Out-Stubborn. The only events that give him trouble are the team sports, such as the Vindictive Dogpile, Doubles Bullying, Synchronized Screeding, Insult Volleyball, the Pseudoscientific Relay, Thugby, the Tug of Words, and of course that infamous newsgroup vs. newsgroup event, the Troll Cup. In fact that howardknight URL is one of the biggest Conclusion Jumps ever made by any Ko0klympics athlete in history, though it was a different kOok who made that particular jump by playing six degrees of Kevin Bacon with assorted public wifi IPs. Likely you could "prove" that anyone in the world was anyone else in the world by such methods, making them about as useful a source of meaningful conclusions as reading tea leaves. I think he keeps citing that one because he's jealous that someone outk00ked him that time. The same someone also set world records in the Spam Toss right before losing his usenet access for doing so. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <obkbbb14nqb4f8sug5p6f5424mmhd9iill@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550853 |
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 05:17:53 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Oh yes. Other events he medals in are the Gish Gallop, the Conclusion >Jump, the 1000 Line Dash, the Spam Toss, the Tantrum Throw, the >Nonsequitur Marathon, Personal Demon Wrestling, Logic Gymnastics, Moon >Howling, the Obsessional March, Dumpster Diving, Snowjobbing, Figure >Scribbling, Astrology Archery, Downhill Screeding, the Quackery >Triathlon, the Freestyle Meltdown, Reverse Cycling, Wild Guess Golf, and >the Mule Out-Stubborn. The only events that give him trouble are the >team sports, such as the Vindictive Dogpile, Doubles Bullying, >Synchronized Screeding, Insult Volleyball, the Pseudoscientific Relay, >Thugby, the Tug of Words, and of course that infamous newsgroup vs. >newsgroup event, the Troll Cup. Classic, you managed to out do fakey and didn't even gay it up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.311f73c11c8eb82798c582@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #550859 |
In article <obkbbb14nqb4f8sug5p6f5424mmhd9iill@4ax.com>, skeet@invalid.invalid says... > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 05:17:53 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> > wrote: > > >Oh yes. Other events he medals in are the Gish Gallop, the Conclusion > >Jump, the 1000 Line Dash, the Spam Toss, the Tantrum Throw, the > >Nonsequitur Marathon, Personal Demon Wrestling, Logic Gymnastics, Moon > >Howling, the Obsessional March, Dumpster Diving, Snowjobbing, Figure > >Scribbling, Astrology Archery, Downhill Screeding, the Quackery > >Triathlon, the Freestyle Meltdown, Reverse Cycling, Wild Guess Golf, and > >the Mule Out-Stubborn. The only events that give him trouble are the > >team sports, such as the Vindictive Dogpile, Doubles Bullying, > >Synchronized Screeding, Insult Volleyball, the Pseudoscientific Relay, > >Thugby, the Tug of Words, and of course that infamous newsgroup vs. > >newsgroup event, the Troll Cup. > > > > Classic, you managed to out do fakey and didn't even gay it up. I'm just waiting for Kensi to out Fakey. It's gonna happen sooner or later. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d2eee3c71ca53cdbb63f4052f44e0820@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550853 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n94h8o$1goo$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 06/02/2016 4:02 AM, Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking > Scam-Running Drug-Dealing Wife-Beating Child-Endangering > Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist High-School-Dropout > Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka Tony Ray > Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58, > Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as > Skeeter wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote >> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in >>> <news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into >>> the wood chipper again: >>> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com> >>> ======================================================== >>> ======================================================== >>> > <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800> >>> >>> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by >>> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda, >>> apparently. >>> >>> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team >>> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole. >>> >>> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch >>> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to >>> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared >>> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his >>> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in >>> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her >>> mouth! >>> >>> Oh, here's Kensi: >>> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> >>> >>> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy? >>> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice. >>> >>> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right >>> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too. >>> >>> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> >>> >>> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to >>> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls >>> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go >>> kinky. LOL >>> >>> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ> >>> >>> > P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited >>> > any good telescopes lately? >>> >>> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control >>> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right? >>> >>> <snicker> >>> ======================================================== >>> ======================================================== >>> >>> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have >>> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually >>> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone >>> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows >>> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks >>> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've >>> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop >>> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle, >>> dude. >>> >>> <snicker> > [GIANT snip] Translation: "[GIANT coward]" <snicker> >> Damn! Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start. I kicked LunkHead's ass again. He's too stupid not to get caught in error after error. LOL And now let's watch the spankard backpedal and phooooaaaammmmm... > Oh yes. Other events he medals in are the Gish Gallop, the Conclusion > Jump, the 1000 Line Dash, the Spam Toss, the Tantrum Throw, the > Nonsequitur Marathon, Personal Demon Wrestling, Logic Gymnastics, Moon > Howling, the Obsessional March, Dumpster Diving, Snowjobbing, Figure > Scribbling, Astrology Archery, Downhill Screeding, the Quackery > Triathlon, the Freestyle Meltdown, Reverse Cycling, Wild Guess Golf, and > the Mule Out-Stubborn. The only events that give him trouble are the > team sports, such as the Vindictive Dogpile, Doubles Bullying, > Synchronized Screeding, Insult Volleyball, the Pseudoscientific Relay, > Thugby, the Tug of Words, and of course that infamous newsgroup vs. > newsgroup event, the Troll Cup. > > In fact that howardknight URL is one of the biggest Conclusion Jumps > ever made by any Ko0klympics athlete in history, though it was a > different kOok who made that particular jump by playing six degrees of > Kevin Bacon with assorted public wifi IPs. Likely you could "prove" that > anyone in the world was anyone else in the world by such methods, making > them about as useful a source of meaningful conclusions as reading tea > leaves. I think he keeps citing that one because he's jealous that > someone outk00ked him that time. The same someone also set world records > in the Spam Toss right before losing his usenet access for doing so. > > *snicker* Nicely bleated, LunkHead. Butthurt much? Spankard. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <jc-9CD947.21465810022016@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #550736 |
In article <n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > >> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf > > > > Bwahahahaaa! A high school > > Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or > something? > > > Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14 > > microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared > > atmospheric window > > So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok. > > >> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered. > > *noisy crickets* > > >> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with > >> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) - > >> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient > >> of it in negatively-curved space.) > > > > Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day > > Google-raping sessions, LunkHead. > > Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link > to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did > plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really > shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase > from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than > Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go > on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as > your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without > any truth to it whatsoever. > > Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the > triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of > three great circles: > > First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as > one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the > sphere, divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces. The > sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the > curvature is 4*pi divided by its surface area. If the triangle's area is > x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is > x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established > was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = > curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just > area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum > = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees. > > What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* > triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the > whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that > area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can > tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed > octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a > triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same > area will do likewise. > > Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized > *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to > be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly > spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my > next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you > don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded. > > *snicker* All well and good and consistent with the terms of the challenge. Still, spherical geometry fails to satisfy Euclid's postulate I. In modern terms, part of postulate I specifies that given distinct points P and Q there is a unique line containing P and Q. Thus postulate I fails on a sphere. -- Jed Clampett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <jc-758142.20534810022016@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #550489 |
In article <5bda0cadc6d53a77d20e468705959858@dizum.com>, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Ok, here's the question: "Describe in detail how one can draw a > triangle with angles that do not sum to 180 degrees. Include the > mathematical framework to quantify the effect, and correlate your > answer to the physical phenomenon which is the underlying reason why > astrophysicists must know how to do this." Hyperbolic plane. Poincaré disk model. Space is a Euclidean disk of radius 1. Geodesics are semicircles orthogonal to the boundary of the disk. Tiling with 2-3-7 triangles: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hyperbolic_domains_642.png> Each triangle has internal angles 90 deg, 60 deg, 180/7 deg. Sum is 1230 / 7 deg. The distance metric is not the Euclidean metric. -- Jed Clampett
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <061a9e24328025589e3686b159af2121@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550411 |
In article <n8ut8l$v4p$1@gioia.aioe.org> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast: > > 1. On a winter's night, with snow on the ground, is it typically colder > or warmer when there is cloud cover versus when it is clear? > > 2. What might NASA have meant by "an active Sun" *other* than sunspot > activity? > > This list will be added to as needed over time. I very much doubt any > items will get removed from it by ko0ky giving a straight answer to one > of them. Ever. In what part of the sun's atmosphere are Barack Obama's birth certificate and "college degrees" hidden?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web