Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #643448 > unrolled thread

NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 15:14 -0700
    NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 16:49 -0700
      Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 19:18 -0700
        Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 19:30 -0700
          our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 21:45 -0700
            Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 01:36 -0700
              Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 03:35 -0700
                Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 03:49 -0700
                  Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 03:59 -0700
                    Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 04:34 -0700
                      Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 04:51 -0700
                        Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 04:56 -0700
                          Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:04 -0700
                            Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:21 -0700
                              probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:23 -0700
                                Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 17:20 -0700
                                  Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 01:39 -0700
                                    Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 04:49 -0700
                                      Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 17:19 +0000
        Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 22:30 -0700
          Pentcho Valev appointed Chief of Staff in Trump White House Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 22:38 -0700
    Re: NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:41 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#643448 — NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak

NK + China, crossed Trump's red-line-- "ICBMs- it will never happen", well it happened and Trump is weak weak weak weak weak

If I were president, what would have happened last week is ALL TRADE WITH CHINA would now be shut down. In other words, no Chinese import into USA, at all. Nothing made in China, into the USA. 

How do we know that the missiles, NK launches are not Chinese missiles that go up to NK? 

Trump, not only Alzheimers feeble, but weak weak weak weak weak. Worse than Obama's red line in Syria over chemical weapons. 

When will the USA have a president that can think straight, think clear 



Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:43:15 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY, lifting the dismal science to the status of
 real science
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:43:15 +0000


PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY, lifting the dismal science to the status of real science

Now, the science of economics exists and is real, but has little to miniscule science associated with it. It is composed of only one good idea, and all the rest are junk ideas, but junk good enough to earn crappy Nobel prizes-- like throwing money into a sewer pit. The Nobel prize in economics has been nothing more than a gigantic joke. 

There is only one good idea in Economics until now, where we two good ideas. 

First good idea dates back to the century in which someone noted that Supply and Demand are linked to cause change and effect on prices. Who discovered this and elaborated on it? 

There has been no good economics ideas since the First one, but now here is a new good science of economics idea that will revolutionize all of Economic theory. 

Second good idea:: Economics is a science that links biology with physics, the biology of food and safety and the physics of destruction/death and material hardware (money as coins is one hardware) 

The trouble with Economics of the past, is that no-one connected it with biology to physics. And we see the great abyss of knowing Economics that we should know-- as we live in a age where nuclear war destroys civilizations and cultures, where economic sanctions is more a part of physics than political science, and where we behave economically because of the threat of nuclear war. So, physics is driving economics. 

And this theory comes not a day too soon. For the old ideas of Economics is so vastly idiotic and ruinous, for the Old Economics is leading us directly into a nuclear world war 3. To think, our giving out of these crazy Nobel prizes in Economics, has more than ever, led and leads the world into a Nuclear World War 3. 

SECOND GREAT IDEA IN ECONOMICS:: boils down to a simple idea, of economics. We trade with other people, only if we recognize them as "friends". We never trade with other people if they are in any way belligerent towards us, or antagonistic to our way of life. 

What that means is that we never care about making a dollar off our enemies, and our growth rate as a nation will suffer, but, our economics will never get us into a war that we so desperately want to avoid wars. 

If this Second Idea had been known and used by 1900, China would still be a backward nation. Russia would not be our rivals so much as they are rivals right now. Of course, the USA would not have grown so much since 1900, but the cost of not trading with our enemies, is the cost of slow growth and less potential for nuclear war. The cost of accelerated growth-- trading with our enemies, opening up all global trade and accelerating growth-- the cost of that scenario is the ever increased chances of a Nuclear Holocaust. 

The Advantage of trade only with friends, is that USA and Europe and Canada and Australia become closer and closer together and actually merging and the threat of war diminishing. The chances of a third world country like North Korea developing a nuclear program would have never really happened because China would never have risen so high, and then the USA could have stepped into NK as it stepped into Iraq in the early 2000 decade. 

At present, the Economics ideas that are running planet Earth are out of line with nuclear weapons. And we see this crazy unalignment in countries imposing trade sanctions. When trading with all enemies should never have happened. We should never have ever traded with Russia and China. For that is like giving your enemies the supplies they need to end the USA. But because of stupid idiot economists wanting Nobel prizes in Economics, those idiots told the world to open China, trade freely with Russia and China. Those economists had little to no commonsense, they were just fame-seekers. 

In the below is our present day bad situation, all because we foolishly accepted what dumb economists of the 20th century spelled out. 


Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 01:41:54 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: Doctrine of Foreign Policy-- Know you Friends from Enemies Re: North 
 Korea solved-- YOU LAUNCH, WE LAUNCH// The Science and Logic solution to 
 North Korea 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 08:41:54 +0000 


Doctrine of Foreign Policy-- Know you Friends from Enemies Re: North Korea solved-- YOU LAUNCH, WE LAUNCH// The Science and Logic solution to North Korea 

MAD, Mutual Assured Destruction kept the peace in the world from Nuclear War from 1945 to 2017. 

But a key component of MAD, is that if we see some missiles fired, we have not much time to call up and ask-- did you Russia fire or did you China fire? We do not have time to gabb on the phone-- did you fire and are they nuclear tipped. 

The way MAD works is , you fire, we fire,,,... 

So, now, the world cannot afford some 3rd world country to be in amongst the dangerous 1st world of mostly US, Russia, China. 

And the MECHANISM is you fire, we fire, or else it is Not Mutual Assured but rather-- a Conquering of one over the other. 

The North Korea continual testing, is a war action itself. In MAD, there is no difference between missile testing and war itself. 

So, what needs be done, is have on South Korea, or on a ship-- the moment a North Korea missile is launched we have no idea if it is nuclear tipped or not, so we shot the missile out of the sky, and we destroy the site itself. 

And, whenever we destroy a NK missile launch, the world itself is on the highest alert, for we need to know that Russia, China, Pakistan, India and everyone else who has nuclear weapons, does not start WW3, nuclear. 

Now, the USA needs a Doctrine of Telling Apart Enemies from Friends. After the Vietnam War, and during the Vietnam War, the USA got terribly sloppy in Foreign Policy, terribly sloppy. 

If the USA had been careful after WW2, the USA would now be the most powerful country 10 times over its nearest rival. As it stands now, because of the US terrible foreign policy -- oh, let us be nice to our enemies, let our enemies build crap and flood US stores with cheap junk, oh, let us give aid to anyone and everyone. If the USA had had a Doctrine of Telling Apart Enemies from Friends after WW2, today China would not be equal or surpassing the USA in economy and almost on equal footing of military might. Today, Russia would not be about equal to US on military might. 

What the Doctrine of Telling Apart Enemies from Friends is about is we determine who is with us or against us, and if against, we never deal with them, we ignore. Two crazy things the US did in the 1900s was Vietnam and opening the door to China. If the USA had ignored both Vietnam and China, they would be almost as backward as they were in 1970. 

Only Reagan seemed to understand a Doctrine of Telling Apart Enemies from Friends. 

Russia, still looks at the USA as a horrible foe, and does things only to irritate the USA. 

We need a Doctrine of Foreign Policy that lasts for centuries, and is well known. This craziness of every president having his own doctrine, has only made USA weak and weaker. 

Now if a country is on the enemy list, it means we have to ignore it, and it means, we cannot trade and have economic ties. Because as we see with China, we gave them their prosperity, and what did we get in return-- cheap goods. 

Somewhere between 1945 and 1999, some idiotic foreign policy was borne to open up all countries to trading, even if the countries are lasting enemies and wish us harm. 

Political Science is actually a science, and in that science, countries are like individual people. When we are friends with people, we trade with them, we share with them, but when we are faced with enemies, who hate us and mean us harm, why open the door to them and share and trade with them? Why? Because some crackpot economists say that economy has to be global? Some loose wired and marbled economists think global free trading is the way to go? No, countries are like individual people, and we deal with those that we are friends with and totally ignore those that mean us harm. If our enemies get large, means we need more friends. We never do things to make our small enemies become large enemies. 

So what was the idiotic idea in the 1900s to have global free trade, making our enemies grow larger and larger? What was that idiotic idea and policy? It was all about making more money, more money and faster money. So that we fill our stores with cheap China made junk, enabling China to become as big as USA. But what instead, the USA had been smart in the 1900s as it was smart about Russia, it as enemy and we want no way of aiding Russia to become bigger than USA. What if the USA treated China as it did Russia in the 1900s. What if Nixon had never opened China? 

You see, how the grub for money and jobs-- opening China was the driving force and contrary to a Doctrine of Knowing Your Friends and Your Enemies. 

China and North Korea are one and the same. 

Cut back on China trading, even if it means a 0 growth rate in US economy. 

Only when countries show signs that they are "friendly to USA" do we trade and share with them. 

If China cannot throw out the North Korea missiles, then, we stop trading with China, even though we lose jobs. 

Have a Doctrine that transcends any new president, and this idiocy of every president having his own Foreign Policy. 

The horrible decline of USA might from about 1970 to 2000, a span of just 30 years, where the USA fell from #1 and China rose to #1. That all can be attributed to an idiotic foreign policy of treating everyone as friends, even though they wish us harm. In just the span of 30 years, the USA fell into #2. All because the US presidents have their own crazy quilt Foreign Policy everytime a new president enters office. 

Which is better, a USA going into a recession while China goes into a depression by ceasing trading with China, because they refuse to stop North Korea. Or, a North Korea that starts a nuclear World War 3. Which is better? Of course, cease trading with China, would enrich the USA because we have to manufacture once again, back home here in the USA. So the recession would be short lived for the USA, but would be a depression in China, and finally, China would straighten out that North Korea. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Adam Smith, 1776 starts economics Re: PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY,
 lifting the dismal science to the status of real science
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:52:26 +0000


Adam Smith, 1776 starts economics Re: PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY, lifting the dismal science to the status of real science

So, this, most definitely is going to be my very best theory of Economics, to date. In the past I had a few ideas, but nothing as vast as this. In fact, my theory will dominate Economics thinking for the next millenium, and until, the planet Earth, is, but one country, not these thousands of piddle paddle countries. 

That is what the threat of nuclear weapons has done-- keeps pushing people together, in order to not detonate. 

The most dangerous situation for Earth with nuclear war hanging over, is our current situation of many different countries, many having nuclear, and many rivals. 

To ease the threat, every human social activity, has to be engineered to lessen the threat of detonation, and that means the science of Economics has to be Nuclear Weapons Ease the Tension. 

Presently, Economics has it all wrong, except for Sanctions. The bozo theories in Economics which won Nobel prizes were theories that pushes the world ever closer to nuclear war. Those fools with their theories preached free trade, preached open markets, preached open borders, preached no tariffs. Why did they preach that nonsense? They preached it because they "felt" that freedom was the best way to go, even though they had no evidence for free markets. They preached it because they felt that "making a dollar or making money and profit" was godly. That making money and jobs was heaven. 

They never realized that economics is a minor science to biology and to physics. So what is going on in biology and physics is far more important than all the goings on in economics. 

The key idea of Economics, these days, is that the world is looming and lurching towards a nuclear war. Nuclear war is physics, the threat of life, far more important than whether you made a profit or you have a good job. A nuclear war would be worse than a worldwide Syria, for a nuclear war has this radiation clean-up. 

To avert the Physics catastrophe, our trading and economics should all be designed not for more jobs, not for greater profits, but rather, designed to avert nuclear war. And that means, trade only with known friends, do not trade with anyone else but friends. 

If that had been followed by the USA and Europe after WW2, then China would never have become a behemoth, and Russia would not now be a rival to the USA. Of course, the world would not have grown 8 billion humans and huge economies, but it is this rapid growth that ushers in a nuclear world war 3. 

Now I was looking at the history of Economics and it appears to start with Adam Smith, in England, in 1776, his book The Wealth of Nations and Wikipedia says "the effective birth of the economics as a separate discipline". 

That is rather sad, because, economics should never be separated from its larger sciences of Biology and of Physics. And perhaps the idea since Adam Smith's time that economics is a separate science, has gotten it into so much trouble, so much off the beaten track of what economic policy by nations should be, that it has lead us to a brink of a nuclear world war. 

Today, the only correct economic policy we see in the world is where we have sanctions imposed on North Korea, on Russia, on Iran. 

Where the correct policy is that we never trade with anyone who is deemed "enemy" or deemed "not friendly". We should never have had a open door to China. 

The world would not have grown so fast. But it is in fast growth, and in blurring of who is friend and who is foe, that leads to war. 

Now I am being sarcastic, but the next Nobel prize in Economics should go to the person that writes a book telling us how fools and foolish were all the economists who believed and felt that "open the door and free trade." How such a dumb theory was passed off as being supported by evidence that such was a good thing. It would be like in physics, if Newton had said the law of gravity was masses squared per distance rather than inverse square per distance, the exact opposite. 

The world trade should be with only countries friendly, and no trading no traveling, no nothing with countries our enemies. By doing this, those enemies get smaller and wither, while we get stronger and form a more perfect union (as the USA Constitution says) a more perfect Union. 

Trouble with the world after WW2, was a trouble that John Muir found in California, where he wanted to preserve Wildness and Nature, where Muir said, whereever and whenever you can make dollar from something yet spoil Nature, mankind will flood in there and make the dollar and spoil nature. Likewise, with the world in the age of nuclear weapons, if we trade with any and everyone, we just make our enemies stronger so that one day, they put us in our grave, all because lunatics wanted to make more dollars. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: so many Nobel prizes handed out-- yet none could support the idea of
 free trade Re: PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY,
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 23:56:24 +0000


so many Nobel prizes handed out-- yet none could support the idea of free trade Re: PHYSICS-ECONOMICS THEORY,

You see, all of Economics theory, can be gleaned from a individual living creature and a group of living creatures in the wild. So the individual and group need food and water to live, once they have that, their next thought is safety from danger. The physics of a world armed nuclear is what the group of animals has fear of predators in the wild. So, if a group knows there is danger, they forego the food and water until they cannot forego it any longer. 

And that is the modern day predicament in a glimpse. Do we trade with our enemies so they can destroy us faster. Or, do we never allow any trading, any form of economic exchange with our enemies, until, and unless they become so weak that they start to be our friends. 

So, if in the year 1945, we had realized this TRUTH OF ECONOMICS, then, today, China would be backwards and fighting with Russia over their borders. USA and Europe would be supreme powers. The countries in the Middle East that are enemies of us, we never trade with them, never even buy any oil and our allies cannot buy oil from them. We make due with less. 

The science principle behind this-- when you deal with enemies and trade with them, you only hasten the attack upon you. 

The idiots of economics who won Nobel prizes, none of them realized that economics is governed by biology and by physics, yet they were so stupid as to think economics is a independent science and that the idea of "free trade" was a heavenly ordained policy. When in fact, it is a policy by idiots who cannot think clearly. 

Now recently I read somewhere about a chemist who was described as the single human who did the largest pollution of planet Earth yet-- for he invented lead additive in gasoline and the refrigerant that destroys the ozone. I mean, if Earth had ten of these guys all at once, those ten could just extinct the human species. But, the Economists of the past 100 years with their crazy "free trade" even if enemies, well, those economists  are leading the world into nuclear war. 

The idea is that in the nuclear era, we want our enemies to fad away, not embolden them, and the starting point of that, never trade with them. 

What would happen tomorrow if we ceased trade with China. Well, China would go in depression, while US will resurge by bringing manufacturing back to the USA. 

It is said that North Korea missiles is a huge problem-- no it is not, but a tiny problem. Just get on the phone to Beijing and say-- end the NK missiles or we stop all trade with you. Watch how super fast NK shapes up. For, by our huge trading with China, China caused the NK buildup. A clear example of that when you trade with enemies, you only hasten the day of nuclear war. 

AP 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#643459

Trump, the balsa wood presidency

NK with ICBMs, Trump says-- it will never happen

But then, no-one knew Trump was just a powder puff talker with the strength of balsa wood

Is the Trump tower also made out of balsa wood just like its boss?

A real president, not a powder puff alzheimer stand in-- would annouce today::

No more imports of anything that is made in China, none, zero, zip imports

And announce to the world-- any NK launch

YOU LAUNCH, WE LAUNCH

This is how you keep the world safe from nuclear world war 3.

You always actively stop and prevent

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643491 — Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

Hey Trump, Donald Trump, the US President

Your red line with North Korea has been crossed, they have a ICBM, you said would never happen

It has happened,,...

Even Obama had more strength than you, Donald, for Obama did something about it-- ship the chemicals

While you, Donald does nothing about NK, except, yappity yap New York style yappity yap

Donald spends more time tweeting against Rosie O'Donnel then Donald spends on "being president"

What is so dam difficult about Ending all Imports from China

Why not say, Donald, -- No more imports from China

Let China marry NK, and stop making the West such laughable fools

At Least Obama did something when his red line was crossed

But Donald is so pathetically weak, miserably weak, that he cannot say the words "Cut all import trade with China"

What is so hard about that Donald

Cut all Import Trade with China

Cut all Import Trade with China

Cut all Import Trade with China

Donald, do you think your Alzheimers mind can remember that

Or, be the Balsa Wood President, Donald Trump

Show the world, how the USA has devolved into babbling infantile Alzheimer blubbering

What is your next tweet there Donald? That Rosie is fat, that Hillary is crook, that Jared is nice and sweet?

Be the Balsa Wood President, the president who saw a tin badge country of North Korea get the better of him, couldn't even get the better of North Korea, that is what the history books will say of Donald

Obvious to anyone outside the White House-- Cut all Import trade with China

Cut all Import Trade with China

Cut all Import Trade with China

Cut all Import Trade with China

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643494 — Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 12:18:17 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Hey Trump, Donald Trump, the US President
> 
> Your red line with North Korea has been crossed, they have a ICBM, you said would never happen
> 
> It has happened,,...
> 
> Even Obama had more strength than you, Donald, for Obama did something about it-- ship the chemicals
> 
> While you, Donald does nothing about NK, except, yappity yap New York style yappity yap
> 
> Donald spends more time tweeting against Rosie O'Donnel then Donald spends on "being president"
> 
> What is so dam difficult about Ending all Imports from China
> 
> Why not say, Donald, -- No more imports from China
> 
> Let China marry NK, and stop making the West such laughable fools
> 
> At Least Obama did something when his red line was crossed
> 
> But Donald is so pathetically weak, miserably weak, that he cannot say the words "Cut all import trade with China"
> 
> What is so hard about that Donald
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Donald, do you think your Alzheimers mind can remember that
> 
> Or, be the Balsa Wood President, Donald Trump
> 
> Show the world, how the USA has devolved into babbling infantile Alzheimer blubbering
> 
> What is your next tweet there Donald? That Rosie is fat, that Hillary is crook, that Jared is nice and sweet?
> 
> Be the Balsa Wood President, the president who saw a tin badge country of North Korea get the better of him, couldn't even get the better of North Korea, that is what the history books will say of Donald
> 
> Obvious to anyone outside the White House-- Cut all Import trade with China
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Cut all Import Trade with China

Do so by all means. 
China will sell to other countries. 
The poor ones, who will then become better off.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643522 — our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 9:30:22 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 12:18:17 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
> > 
> > Cut all Import Trade with China
> > 
> > Cut all Import Trade with China
> > 
> > Cut all Import Trade with China
> 
> Do so by all means. 
> China will sell to other countries. 
> The poor ones, who will then become better off.
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

Yes, Arindam is a fine example of trade with China enriches. Where, before, Arindam was a village idiot of physics. Then he bought a cheap Chinese camera and some other Chinese made junk, and surrounded himself with that lot. Next thing you know, Arindam made a film of his physics and is now poised to be the new Isaac Newton of the 21st century.

What next Arindam? Buy a cheap Chinese microscope that makes you become the next Darwin of biology?

Sucks, having a mind that is barren of logical thoughts.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643550 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 2:45:57 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 9:30:22 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 12:18:17 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snipped)
> > > 
> > > Cut all Import Trade with China
> > > 
> > > Cut all Import Trade with China
> > > 
> > > Cut all Import Trade with China
> > 
> > Do so by all means. 
> > China will sell to other countries. 
> > The poor ones, who will then become better off.
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> 
> Yes, Arindam is a fine example of trade with China enriches.

You has no comprehension abilities. 

> Where, before, Arindam was a village idiot of physics. 

Village idiots have a far better grasp of physics and life in general than
sedulous dumbfucks of your sort, for they do not mislead by confusion.

> Then he bought a cheap Chinese camera and some other Chinese made junk, and surrounded himself with that lot. Next thing you know, Arindam made a film of his physics and is now poised to be the new Isaac Newton of the 21st century.

So long as no one with honesty and intelligence (qualities well beyond your
grasp) finds anything wrong with my work, and agree that
my films point to a far better and safer and interesting future for 
humanity, the fact that I used simple and effective equipment to make new discoveries in science will not diminish admiration. Certainly they are the 
beginning of new and great things in the field of motion and energy.

The fact that I did all the work entirely on my own, with zero public funding,
will not go unnoticed either. 

Zero public funding, just my own time and money, for the greater good of all.
People of heart should know, that people like I still exist! 

Yes I am glad you mentioned Sir Isaac Newton. I am his #2. He is the boss.

They will welcome the fact that I have shown how with such simple equipment
the most interesting facts of Nature can be verified by everyone.

One then need not depend upon the frauds who have taken over the physics
establishment, and the math diarrhoea  they use to mask their worthlessness.

They will be dismissed as the cunning weavers were, who "wove" fine garments
for the naked king.

> What next Arindam? Buy a cheap Chinese microscope that makes you become the next Darwin of biology?

I don't need to waste public money profusely to make impressions. 

> Sucks, having a mind that is barren of logical thoughts.

The only logic you have shown here is how necessary it is to waste public
money for phony pseudo/anti-science purposes. The more public money one wastes
for supporting lies, the greater one is! It is not illogical, but some would
say this mentality is criminal. It certainly works for the toxic types
in charge of everything, but it is not my style.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643555 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:36:06 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
(snip the swearing)
> 
> So long as no one with honesty and intelligence (qualities well beyond your
> grasp) finds anything wrong with my work, and agree that
> my films point to a far better and safer and interesting future for 
> humanity, the fact that I used simple and effective equipment to make new discoveries in science will not diminish admiration. Certainly they are the 
> beginning of new and great things in the field of motion and energy.
> 

Your posts are more of belly beating like Tarzan, boasts of grandeur, for which you have not done any new physics.

All you done is taking a picture of a crappy experiment set-up.

You seem deranged in wanting admiration, not seeking truth.

For instance, you pilfer a formula of .5mVV(N)(N-k) and never in your life explain what the hell is (N)(N-k)

We all know what 1/2 mv^2 is, so you being a idiot of science tacks on (N)(N-k) and wants the world to lick your feet in admiration.

You and your kind are dime a dozen in sci.physics or science newsgroups. You come up with some foolish item, believing it is the greatest thing since Sergio's Tang or McGinn's dry rain or Moroney's radioactivity is fossil fuel.

You show up in sci.physics wanting adulation for being a village idiot for a quarter or year, however long you stay.

So, idiot, what is (N)(N-k)

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643557 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 8:35:20 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:36:06 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> (snip the swearing)
> > 
> > So long as no one with honesty and intelligence (qualities well beyond your
> > grasp) finds anything wrong with my work, and agree that
> > my films point to a far better and safer and interesting future for 
> > humanity, the fact that I used simple and effective equipment to make new discoveries in science will not diminish admiration. Certainly they are the 
> > beginning of new and great things in the field of motion and energy.
> > 
> 
> Your posts are more of belly beating like Tarzan, boasts of grandeur, for which you have not done any new physics.
> 
> All you done is taking a picture of a crappy experiment set-up.
> 
> You seem deranged in wanting admiration, not seeking truth.
> 
> For instance, you pilfer a formula of .5mVV(N)(N-k) and never in your life explain what the hell is (N)(N-k)
> 
> We all know what 1/2 mv^2 is, so you being a idiot of science tacks on (N)(N-k) and wants the world to lick your feet in admiration.
> 
> You and your kind are dime a dozen in sci.physics or science newsgroups. You come up with some foolish item, believing it is the greatest thing since Sergio's Tang or McGinn's dry rain or Moroney's radioactivity is fossil fuel.
> 
> You show up in sci.physics wanting adulation for being a village idiot for a quarter or year, however long you stay.
> 
> So, idiot, what is (N)(N-k)
> 
> AP

Had you any wits you could have found out from elementary googling
the groups what I have been saying for the last 17 years.

But you are such a moron, that task is well beyond you, otherwise you would 
not have been making such ignorant comments.

Anyway, I am now in the process of revising the corrupted physics of our time,
and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
be included.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643558 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 5:49:38 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> 
> Anyway, I am now in the process of revising the corrupted physics of our time,
> and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> be included.

Yea, yea, the quack and the flake cannot say what the N(N-k) is

Is it a secret sauce, like a tartar sauce

Did your film clip capture it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643560 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 8:59:17 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 5:49:38 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Anyway, I am now in the process of revising the corrupted physics of our time,
> > and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> > be included.
> 
> Yea, yea, the quack and the flake cannot say what the N(N-k) is

Nor can a moron like you do the necessary searching to find out. Unlike e=mcc
nonsense, this formula is derived in a few lines. 

Published in Outlook in 2003

https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/newt-is-old-hat/220623

This was an early derivation, which for interest said that a car in a box
would violate inertia. That was an overstatement which was pounced upon by the
malevolent types. Later on I said that friction was causing this motion but
that was ignored. The box movement I said was oscillatory. It would violate
inertia if somehow the reaction force could be avoided. Rail guns when turned
into motors would do that function.
 
> Is it a secret sauce, like a tartar sauce

No, anyone can find that out from the web. None so blind as those who won't see.
 
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643568 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:34:31 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> > > and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> > > be included.
> > 

So the creep can wax pages long on how great he is

But can never say what the N(N-k) is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643570 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:52:03 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:34:31 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> 
> > > > and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> > > > be included.
> > > 
> 
> So the creep can wax pages long on how great he is

You are the creep. 
 
> But can never say what the N(N-k) is

It has been explained many times. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643575 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:56:09 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:52:03 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:34:31 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > 
> > > > > and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> > > > > be included.
> > > > 
> > 
> > So the creep can wax pages long on how great he is
> 
> You are the creep. 
>  
> > But can never say what the N(N-k) is
> 
> It has been explained many times.

Creep does not want to explain, because, creep cannot explain

In science -- don't want to, is the same as can't

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643580 — Re: our president is vapid of logic Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:04:06 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:56:09 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:52:03 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 6:34:31 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > > and so among many other basic issues the derivation of e=0.5mVVN(N-k) will
> > > > > > be included.
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > So the creep can wax pages long on how great he is
> > 
> > You are the creep. 
> >  
> > > But can never say what the N(N-k) is
> > 
> > It has been explained many times.
> 
> Creep does not want to explain, because, creep cannot explain
> 
> In science -- don't want to, is the same as can't

No cretin, I have explained it many times.

N is the number of velocity addition hits
k relates to the efficiency of the system
v is the increase of the mass's velocity with internal force

More than this will be beyond the scope of your pathetic mind!

cretins and frauds best stick with the ridiculous e=mcc voodoo physics.

The stupendous simplicity of the highest genius they can never comprehend.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643690 — probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware

On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 7:22:02 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:04:06 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snip)
> > 
> > Creep does not want to explain, because, creep cannot explain
> > 
> > In science -- don't want to, is the same as can't
> 
> No cretin, I have explained it many times.
> 
> N is the number of velocity addition hits
> k relates to the efficiency of the system
> v is the increase of the mass's velocity with internal force
> 

Sci.math had a creep named John Gabriel, same temperment, same personality, same offering of fake science, and the ploy was-- check it out on my websites.

The ploy was get the innocent onlooker over to his website to fill the onlooker's computer with malware,  to infect his computer.

So one has to question whether John Gabriel changed to a new fake name of Arindam and playing the same crap he played in sci.math.

No science, just how great he is

A lot of noise, and a lot of front page parasite-pollution


> More than this will be beyond the scope of your pathetic mind!
> 
> cretins and frauds best stick with the ridiculous e=mcc voodoo physics.
> 
> The stupendous simplicity of the highest genius they can never comprehend.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee

So dumb is this jackass of physics, that his idiotic formula .5mVVN(N-k)

does not even fit the units of physics

E = m c c fits the units of physics as energy = kgm^2/s^2

whereas the above idiot has energy = kg m^4/s^3

So, sci.physics is in for a rough spell, because the John in sci.math wasted the time of sci.math for about 2 years, in just plain ugly science fiction. McGinn wastes a lot of time in sci.physics, but with a Arindam coupled with a McGinn is as if WW2 hit the place.

What the creep is hoping you the reader does, is visit his crappy websites to fill your computer with malware.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643743 — Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware

On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 7:23:28 AM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 7:22:02 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:04:06 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snip)
> > > 
> > > Creep does not want to explain, because, creep cannot explain
> > > 
> > > In science -- don't want to, is the same as can't
> > 
> > No cretin, I have explained it many times.
> > 
> > N is the number of velocity addition hits
> > k relates to the efficiency of the system
> > v is the increase of the mass's velocity with internal force
> > 
> 
> Sci.math had a creep named John Gabriel, same temperment, same personality, same offering of fake science, and the ploy was-- check it out on my websites.
> 
> The ploy was get the innocent onlooker over to his website to fill the onlooker's computer with malware,  to infect his computer.
> 
> So one has to question whether John Gabriel changed to a new fake name of Arindam and playing the same crap he played in sci.math.
> 
> No science, just how great he is
> 
> A lot of noise, and a lot of front page parasite-pollution
> 
> 
> > More than this will be beyond the scope of your pathetic mind!
> > 
> > cretins and frauds best stick with the ridiculous e=mcc voodoo physics.
> > 
> > The stupendous simplicity of the highest genius they can never comprehend.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Arindam Banerjee
> 
> So dumb is this jackass of physics, that his idiotic formula .5mVVN(N-k)
> 
> does not even fit the units of physics
> 
> E = m c c fits the units of physics as energy = kgm^2/s^2
> 
> whereas the above idiot has energy = kg m^4/s^3
> 
> So, sci.physics is in for a rough spell, because the John in sci.math wasted the time of sci.math for about 2 years, in just plain ugly science fiction. McGinn wastes a lot of time in sci.physics, but with a Arindam coupled with a McGinn is as if WW2 hit the place.
> 
> What the creep is hoping you the reader does, is visit his crappy websites to fill your computer with malware.
> 
> AP

You are the only creep here, AP.

And a most ridiculous liar.

My life is an open book, with all aspects open for public view at:

https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643807 — Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware

I am not the one come barging in sci.physics with a ridiculous claim that energy is .5mVV(N)(N-k)

Hogging the front page and claiming to be the next Newton

Only a idiot of physics like you is unaware that energy has the units kg*m^2/s^2

Your idiotic formula is kg*m^4/s^3

You are so stupid in physics you never even heard of units until now.

You don't belong in physics, try accounting.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643818 — Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware

On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 6:39:35 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I am not the one come barging in sci.physics with a ridiculous claim that energy is .5mVV(N)(N-k)

e=0.5mVVN(N-k) is the equation that states that when a mass m is accelerated
N times, each time with a velocity increase of v, then with respect to its
earliest state the kinetic energy that it possesses with respect to the earliest
frame of reference is e. So much extra energy has been created. And that much
energy will be destroyed when it is again brought to rest. 

I have been elaborating on this formula for many years. Google usenet archives
will show this easily.

> Hogging the front page and claiming to be the next Newton

My claims are not that modest, but yes I am next after Newton as I am 
clarifying the laws of motion taking electricity into account. I adore Sir
Isaac Newton. The greatest ever Englishman! 
 
> Only a idiot of physics like you is unaware that energy has the units kg*m^2/s^2

All you have proved above is that *you* are a complete idiot.

The fundmental units for dimensional analysis are mass M, time T, distance L 
and current A in the MKSA system that is the standard with meter-kilogram-second-ampere.

The formula for potential energy is mgh where m is mass of unit M, g is 
acceleration of dimensions L/TT and h has dimension L.
So energy has the dimensions MLL/(TT) and the unit for energy is joule.
Kinetic energy has the formula 0.5mVV which evidently has the same 
dimensions MLL/(TT).

You being an idiot do not know the first thing about dimensional analysis.
But it is the very first thing engineers learn in physics.
In my time, anyway.


> 
> Your idiotic formula is kg*m^4/s^3

You write whatever rubbish you feel like and then make it as if I wrote that
rubbish!  Your dishonesty is great.

My formula is e=0.5mVVn(N-k)

N and k are dimensionless constants for they are numbers.

So the dimensions are the same as that for kinetic energy.
> 
> You are so stupid in physics you never even heard of units until now.
> 
> You don't belong in physics, try accounting.

You belong nowhere, Putrid-Poo.

All you show here is your ignorance, pretentiousness, meanness and malevolence
with loads of bad humour.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643863 — Re: probably and possibly, Arindam is trying to fill computers with malware

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> writes:

You'll find that Archie is a rather mean kook. He treats sci.physics as a
write-only blog, a place to 'write books', not a discussion group. He
gets upset if anyone actually tries to discuss physics with him, or
points out this group is for discussion, not a mental dumping ground.
(just watch: Because of this post, he'll start a new post claiming I am
somehow a failure and so forth. He'll include a 24 year old reply to me
that he thinks proves failure somehow. Very predictible)

He also projects his own faults a *lot*, see below:

>On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 6:39:35 PM UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>> I am not the one come barging in sci.physics with a ridiculous claim that energy is .5mVV(N)(N-k)

No, he is the one come barging in sci.physics with a ridiculous claim that
the universe is some cosmic plutonium atom.

>> Hogging the front page

Meanwhile Archie is the #1 "hog" of sci.math.  Only a little less of a hog in
sci.physics.  For those using Giggle Groups, of course, not a real issue for
those who don't.

>> and claiming to be the next Newton

complains the one who claims to be the reincarnation of Archimedes of
ancient Greece.

>> Only a idiot of physics like you is unaware that energy has the units kg*m^2/s^2

Says the one who claims the electric field doesn't exist and who replaces
the electric field with voltage everywhere.  Because voltage has different
units, he gets the units all wrong.

>> Your idiotic formula is kg*m^4/s^3

>You write whatever rubbish you feel like and then make it as if I wrote that
>rubbish!  Your dishonesty is great.

He frequently blames others for his own creations. Psychologists call this
projection.

And he loves to insult others, to make up for his own failure:

>> You are so stupid in physics you never even heard of units until now.
>> 
>> You don't belong in physics, try accounting.

>You belong nowhere, Putrid-Poo.

>All you show here is your ignorance, pretentiousness, meanness and malevolence
>with loads of bad humour.

Not to say that I don't consider you yourself to be quite kooky, comparing
yourself to Newton, and dreaming up evil conspiracy theories that prop up
stuff like E=mc^2, and suppressing your ideas because you're not white etc.

Just so that you know, I am here to watch kooks get kooky. It's a form of
entertainment for me. Very little actual science here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#643539 — Re: Donald Trump, the balsa wood president, who could not -- CUT ALL IMPORT TRADE WITH CHINA

James McGinn	
Jul 30 (4 hours ago)


- show quoted text -
LOL.  You are so completely outclassed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web