Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #513795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-16 08:35 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 105 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200
Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 23:00 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:26 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:37 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:09 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-16 09:50 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:39 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:47 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:12 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 18:35 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:09 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:46 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 04:19 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 05:03 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:38 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:39 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:35 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:56 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 08:09 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:48 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 17:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:23 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:27 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:45 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:00 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:10 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-18 14:27 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 18:37 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 10:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:35 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:14 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:53 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 17:33 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-20 00:07 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-21 14:15 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:31 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 23:51 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 23:07 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-18 15:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:07 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:55 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:57 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 09:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:15 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:37 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:42 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:41 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:53 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
yo, dOOds noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:41 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:52 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:35 -0500
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514537 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:04:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>wrote in message news:a990909152ffc20d67bb56b180d7eb8b@dizum.com...67 >on the alleged Flight 175. alleged Flight 175? How beyond "alleged" does it have to be to find debris from Flight 175 and human remains of passengers on buildings surrounding GZ? I won't make it any more complicated for you than a WIKI reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175 "Some debris from the aircraft were recovered nearby, including landing gear found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park Place, an engine found at Church & Murray Street, and a section of the fuselage landed on top of 5 World Trade Center. During the recovery process, small fragments were identified from some passengers on Flight 175, including a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson,[30] and small bone fragments of Lisa Frost.[31] In 2008, the remains of Flight 175 passenger Alona Avraham was identified using DNA samples.[32] Remains of many others aboard Flight 175 were never recovered.[33] Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.303af7d939a04fda98abe9@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #514547 |
In article <sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > six-inch piece of bone Hey percent, this one's for you... -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <8mob9q.g6n.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #514549 |
Checkmate wrote: > In article <sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com>, > ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > >> six-inch piece of bone > > Hey percent, this one's for you... i'm not sure i have any of your brain pieces that big
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.303afb512ea1caad98abeb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #514553 |
In article <8mob9q.g6n.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Checkmate wrote: > > In article <sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com>, > > ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > > > > >> six-inch piece of bone > > > > Hey percent, this one's for you... > > i'm not sure i have any of your brain pieces that big No, this one is a bone. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <8mp35k.h99.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #514554 |
Checkmate wrote: > In article <8mob9q.g6n.17.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > >> >> Checkmate wrote: >>> In article <sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com>, >>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>> >>> >>>> six-inch piece of bone >>> >>> Hey percent, this one's for you... >> >> i'm not sure i have any of your brain pieces that big > > No, this one is a bone. i know that bone head
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) |
| Message-ID | <_sqdnY2z5ayA_kzInZ2dnUU7-RWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514547 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com... > > "Some debris from the aircraft were recovered nearby, including landing > gear > found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park Place, > an > engine found at Church & Murray Street, and a section of the fuselage > landed > on top of 5 World Trade Center. And some of that debris was filmed in place by the Naudet Brothers before the CGI representing Flight 175 lost it's wing and then had it grow back. There was even a tarp a few feet above one of those parts like people didn't want it to get rained on before the great 9/11 hoax. Note: the real Flight 175 had it's transponder turned off exactly like the media claimed but when it was rebooted it showed up as a different flight number and then flew to Cleveland but to do that they had the software on that jet changed to help with the great 9/11 hoax. After the transponder on the original Flight 175 was rebooted it was replaced by a bogus blip on the radar just like Flight 77 was but Flight 77 was a bogus blip on the radar from beginning to end because it wasn't even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. Don't believe in the bogus blips? Check out all the games the military was playing on 9/11 because one of them involved bogus blips. And there is even have a recording of someone begging to have the bogus blips turned off if you want to hear it. > Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday. Fine, but if I get the impression you are just being an asshole I'll have to ignore some of your post just like I do with so many others that have trouble with someone that has always doubted the bs from the media ever since he was told a 757 crashed at the pentagon and yet the only airplane debris to be seen was by the heliport instead of the hole in the Pentagon. And the bs they have to explain the missing wing parts at the Pentagon is the wings on a 757 folded back just like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into that little hole where it burned up with a fire that could not even burn desk in the Pentagon. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 05:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) |
| Message-ID | <li68ac-6ch.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514556 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Note: the real Flight 175 had it's transponder turned off exactly like the > media claimed but when it was rebooted it showed up as a different flight > number and then flew to Cleveland but to do that they had the software on > that jet changed to help with the great 9/11 hoax. > > After the transponder on the original Flight 175 was rebooted it was > replaced by a bogus blip on the radar just like Flight 77 was but Flight 77 > was a bogus blip on the radar from beginning to end because it wasn't even > scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. Add how transponders work to the list of things the gibbering kook knows nothing about. Transponders of the time transmitted nothing more than a 4 digit octal number that are set by switches on it's face as assigned by ATC and the pressure altitude, kook boy. They don't transmit flight numbers even today, kook boy. Also transponders don't boot; they are dumb devices. Rocky just can face facts: The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) |
| Message-ID | <95o3ta182ldn5kaepk35ubg033q7jjeu23@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514556 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 23:28:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:sqk2tad2qmcib1vt3brna7j2sqv1dkhcou@4ax.com... >> >> "Some debris from the aircraft were recovered nearby, including landing gear >> found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park Place, an >> engine found at Church & Murray Street, and a section of the fuselage >> landed on top of 5 World Trade Center. > >And some of that debris was filmed in place by the Naudet Brothers before >the CGI representing Flight 175 lost it's wing and then had it grow back. >There was even a tarp a few feet above one of those parts like people didn't >want it to get rained on before the great 9/11 hoax. Here seems to be an inconvenient truth for Rocky. " During the recovery process, small fragments were identified from some passengers on Flight 175, including a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson,[30] and small bone fragments of Lisa Frost.[31] In 2008, the remains of Flight 175 passenger Alona Avraham was identified using DNA samples.[32] Remains of many others aboard Flight 175 were never recovered.[33]" What happened to the passengers? >Note: the real Flight 175 had it's transponder turned off exactly like the >media claimed but when it was rebooted it showed up as a different flight >number and then flew to Cleveland but to do that they had the software on >that jet changed to help with the great 9/11 hoax. What about the passengers? Did they vanish into thin air? >After the transponder on the original Flight 175 was rebooted it was >replaced by a bogus blip on the radar just like Flight 77 was but Flight 77 >was a bogus blip on the radar from beginning to end because it wasn't even >scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. My husband and three associates were on their way to the 10 AM briefing at the CNO-IP in the Pentagon. They, along with hundreds of commuters watched Flight 77 strike the Pentagon. >> Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday. > >Fine, but if I get the impression you are just being an asshole I'll have to >ignore some of your post You're already ignoring portions of my posts. The reason you do so is because you to have no answers to my questions and my questions make you uncomfortable. >And the bs they have to explain the missing wing parts at the Pentagon is >the wings on a 757 folded back just like the wings on a bird and tucked >itself neatly into that little hole where it burned up with a fire that >could not even burn desk in the Pentagon. <G> One of my husband's bosses was killed sitting at his desk at the CNO-IP. CDR Dan Shanower. May he rest in peace. He served honorably in the United States Navy and fought to keep even people like you safe from harm. http://pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographies/cdr-dan-f-shanower-usn CDR Dan F. Shanower, USN CDR Dan F. Shanower was born on February 7, 1961 in Naperville, Illinois. He was a member of Naperville Central High School’s varsity soccer team and graduated in 1979. He attended Carroll College in Waukesha, Wisconsin, graduating in 1983 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science. While a student at Carroll, he participated in the Washington Semester at American University, interning in the office of Illinois Senator Charles Percy, then Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. CDR Shanower attended Aviation Officer School in Pensacola, Florida and received his commission as an Ensign, U.S. Navy in June 1985. After attending the Armed Forces Air Intelligence Training Course at Lowry Air Force Base, Colorado, he reported to VAQ-136 onboard U.S.S. Midway in March 1986 as Squadron Intelligence Officer. In September 1988, he was assigned as Officer-in-Charge of the Pacific Fleet Area Support Team Detachment, Subic Bay, Philippines. Following this tour, he transitioned to the Naval Reserve, serving from August 1990 to October 1994 as a Foreign Service Officer with the U.S. State Department in the Philippines. CDR Shanower was recalled to active duty in November 1994 and reported to the Navy & Marine Corps Intelligence Training Center as a student. He was assigned to the Joint Intelligence Center, Pacific Detachment Japan in December 1994 as Operations Support Department Head. In May 1997, he received orders to the staff of the Commander, U.S. Third Fleet in San Diego, California aboard the U.S.S. Coronado as the Assistant Intelligence Officer. In June 1999, CDR Shanower reported to the Office of Naval Intelligence in Washington, DC as Fleet Support Department Head. He began graduate work in the Naval War College. In August 2000, he was selected as the Officer-in-Charge of the Chief of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot. There he was responsible for the provision of current intelligence support to the Navy Secretariat, Chief of Naval Operations staff, and the Director of Naval Intelligence. In December 2000, he was promoted to his final rank of Commander. CDR Shanower’s personal and professional commendations include the Defense Meritorious Service Award, two Navy Commendation Medals, the Navy Achievement Medal, the Purple Heart, and numerous campaign and service awards. Carroll College awarded him its first Distinguished Alumni Award for Service to Country in February 2002. Naperville Central High School recognized his contributions to his country by presenting him an Outstanding Alumni Award in May 2002. Dan was known for his ready smile, terrific sense of humor, love of conversation, ability to tell a story, love of politics, and his intellectual and cultural curiosity about the world. He loved the sea, sailing, scuba diving, water skiing, and above all else, his family, friends and the Navy. He enjoyed writing both fiction and non-fiction, and many of his opinion essays and articles were published in the United States Naval Institute Proceedings, including the poignant May 1997 one entitled, “Freedom Isn’t Free.” His article reflected on the loss of his shipmates in 1987, and he wrote: “Those of us in the military are expected to make the ultimate sacrifice when called. The military loses scores of personnel each year. Each one risked and lost his or her life in something they believed in, leaving behind family and shipmates to bear the burden and celebrate their devotion to our country… They knew the risks they were taking and gave their lives for something bigger than themselves.” CDR Shanower’s survivors include his parents, Dr. Donald, WWII veteran and college professor, and Patricia, retired public school teacher; brothers, Thomas and Jonathan; sisters, Victoria and Paula; and eight nephews and nieces. He was interred at Arlington National Cemetery on October 1, 2001. ---- I suspect you provide a lot of unintended entertainment on usenet, Rocky. Sadly your shelf life is short. People eventually get bored with your cross-eyed bumbling routine and you find yourself ostracized and plonked to death in every newsgroup you infest. >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <XKKdndJEebdbcEzInZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514639 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:95o3ta182ldn5kaepk35ubg033q7jjeu23@4ax.com... > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 23:28:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > What happened to the passengers? They could have been gassed after they landed in Cleveland. But what is really important is the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 can only be recreated by 3D software with the jet programmed to reflect the sky. Or why there were no crash dynamics whatsoever. Also see: Airline whistleblower solves 9/11 Posted by Kevin Barrett on January 31, 2015 A review of "Methodical Illusion" by Rebekah Roth http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ > My husband and three associates were on their way to the 10 AM briefing at > the CNO-IP in the Pentagon. They, along with hundreds of commuters > watched Flight 77 strike the Pentagon. You will have to quote them because as proven by the great 9/11 hoax it only takes one "Crisis Actor" to get others to start repeating their exact same bullshit. And don't forget about this video where you can hear the guy say plain as day: "That is what we heard that is what we saw on TV" because that probably holds true for the people you mentioned above. See: 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0 And don't forget about the bullshit story about Flight 77 where the only reason it didn't leave any parts from the wings on the ground was the wing folded up like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the Pentagon. That is too funny and then the parts were supposed to have burned up in a fire that didn't even burn desk? As for the Pentagon the best video about all that bullshit is: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw >>> Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday. >> >>Fine, but if I get the impression you are just being an asshole I'll have >>to >>ignore some of your post > > You're already ignoring portions of my posts. BULLSHIT I just haven't gotten around to them yet. I have a life too incase you didn't know. > The reason you do so is > because you to have no answers to my questions and my questions make you > uncomfortable. ROTFLMAO because your playing with loaded questions and I know that trick too. I can even give you an example too if you want. >>And the bs they have to explain the missing wing parts at the Pentagon is >>the wings on a 757 folded back just like the wings on a bird and tucked >>itself neatly into that little hole where it burned up with a fire that >>could not even burn desk in the Pentagon. <G> > > One of my husband's bosses was killed sitting at his desk at the CNO-IP. > CDR Dan Shanower. May he rest in peace. He served honorably in the > United > States Navy and fought to keep even people like you safe from harm. > > http://pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographies/cdr-dan-f-shanower-usn I have no doubt that a lot of people were killed at the Pentagon but the funny thing is there was one group of people and I can't remember the name of them now but Clinton started it after he found out that the Oklahoma City bombing was an inside job. Anyway one of them lived but the news tried to say they all died because they were the real targets for the missle that flew around to hit the far side of the Pentagon. See: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > He was interred at Arlington National Cemetery on October 1, 2001. Yes that is a very sad story but that should not stop you or anybody else for looking at the facts presented in: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > I suspect you provide a lot of unintended entertainment on usenet, Rocky. > Sadly your shelf life is short. People eventually get bored with your > cross-eyed bumbling routine and you find yourself ostracized and plonked > to > death in every newsgroup you infest. You aren't thinking. It is not my job to convince anybody of anything. Only that there are other possibilities to what really happened during the great 9/11 hoax and why most of the Twin Towers floated away in a great big cloud of ultra fine debris. Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for weeks or longer. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514646 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >weeks or longer. You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make your walk off AUK and make it permanent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <YcKdnfkkS-ojbEzInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514649 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com... > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >>ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >>weeks or longer. > > You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make > your walk off AUK and make it permanent. And why was it you had to delete other things I brought up? Oh yeah that's right, you are just being an asshole too. Here, for the sake of the record I'll repost what you deleted from your post by reposting everything.: ================================================== "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:95o3ta182ldn5kaepk35ubg033q7jjeu23@4ax.com... > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 23:28:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > What happened to the passengers? They could have been gassed after they landed in Cleveland. But what is really important is the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 can only be recreated by 3D software with the jet programmed to reflect the sky. Or why there were no crash dynamics whatsoever. Also see: Airline whistleblower solves 9/11 Posted by Kevin Barrett on January 31, 2015 A review of "Methodical Illusion" by Rebekah Roth http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ > My husband and three associates were on their way to the 10 AM briefing at > the CNO-IP in the Pentagon. They, along with hundreds of commuters > watched Flight 77 strike the Pentagon. You will have to quote them because as proven by the great 9/11 hoax it only takes one "Crisis Actor" to get others to start repeating their exact same bullshit. And don't forget about this video where you can hear the guy say plain as day: "That is what we heard that is what we saw on TV" because that probably holds true for the people you mentioned above. See: 911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0 And don't forget about the bullshit story about Flight 77 where the only reason it didn't leave any parts from the wings on the ground was the wing folded up like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the Pentagon. That is too funny and then the parts were supposed to have burned up in a fire that didn't even burn desk? As for the Pentagon the best video about all that bullshit is: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw >>> Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday. >> >>Fine, but if I get the impression you are just being an asshole I'll have >>to >>ignore some of your post > > You're already ignoring portions of my posts. BULLSHIT I just haven't gotten around to them yet. I have a life too incase you didn't know. > The reason you do so is > because you to have no answers to my questions and my questions make you > uncomfortable. ROTFLMAO because your playing with loaded questions and I know that trick too. I can even give you an example too if you want. >>And the bs they have to explain the missing wing parts at the Pentagon is >>the wings on a 757 folded back just like the wings on a bird and tucked >>itself neatly into that little hole where it burned up with a fire that >>could not even burn desk in the Pentagon. <G> > > One of my husband's bosses was killed sitting at his desk at the CNO-IP. > CDR Dan Shanower. May he rest in peace. He served honorably in the > United > States Navy and fought to keep even people like you safe from harm. > > http://pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographies/cdr-dan-f-shanower-usn I have no doubt that a lot of people were killed at the Pentagon but the funny thing is there was one group of people and I can't remember the name of them now but Clinton started it after he found out that the Oklahoma City bombing was an inside job. Anyway one of them lived but the news tried to say they all died because they were the real targets for the missle that flew around to hit the far side of the Pentagon. See: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > He was interred at Arlington National Cemetery on October 1, 2001. Yes that is a very sad story but that should not stop you or anybody else for looking at the facts presented in: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > I suspect you provide a lot of unintended entertainment on usenet, Rocky. > Sadly your shelf life is short. People eventually get bored with your > cross-eyed bumbling routine and you find yourself ostracized and plonked > to > death in every newsgroup you infest. You aren't thinking. It is not my job to convince anybody of anything. Only that there are other possibilities to what really happened during the great 9/11 hoax and why most of the Twin Towers floated away in a great big cloud of ultra fine debris. Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for weeks or longer. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <soi9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514654 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Here, for the sake of the record I'll repost what you deleted from your post > by reposting everything.: Reposting your insane kook babble does not make it true, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <k1l4ta5rj0m81kctn2l3gr3cdgstj8lqch@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514654 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:37:01 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >>>ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >>>weeks or longer. >> >> You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make >> your walk off AUK and make it permanent. > >And why was it you had to delete other things I brought up? Oh yeah that's >right, you are just being an asshole too. You are always trying to engage people into topics and conversations not previously discussed while you evade the points and counterpoints presented to you. >Here, for the sake of the record I'll repost what you deleted from your post >by reposting everything.: > >================================================== > > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:95o3ta182ldn5kaepk35ubg033q7jjeu23@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 23:28:30 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> What happened to the passengers? > >They could have been gassed after they landed in Cleveland. Evasion. But what is >really important is the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 can only >be recreated by 3D software with the jet programmed to reflect the sky. Or >why there were no crash dynamics whatsoever. Also see: > >Airline whistleblower solves 9/11 >Posted by Kevin Barrett on January 31, 2015 >A review of "Methodical Illusion" by Rebekah Roth > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/31/airline911/ Attempt to engage me in topics and conversations not previously discussed. >> My husband and three associates were on their way to the 10 AM briefing at >> the CNO-IP in the Pentagon. They, along with hundreds of commuters >> watched Flight 77 strike the Pentagon. > >You will have to quote them because as proven by the great 9/11 hoax it only >takes one "Crisis Actor" to get others to start repeating their exact same >bullshit. >And don't forget about this video where you can hear the guy say plain as >day: "That is what we heard that is what we saw on TV" because that probably >holds true for the people you mentioned above. See: > >911 FOX - an eye-witness says it was a bomb, no plane > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq1-BCeNcm0 > >And don't forget about the bullshit story about Flight 77 where the only >reason it didn't leave any parts from the wings on the ground was the wing >folded up like the wings on a bird and tucked itself neatly into the >Pentagon. That is too funny and then the parts were supposed to have burned >up in a fire that didn't even burn desk? > >As for the Pentagon the best video about all that bullshit is: > >Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? Simple question. >>>> Good night Rocky. I have an early morning on Monday. >>> >>>Fine, but if I get the impression you are just being an asshole I'll have >>>to >>>ignore some of your post >> >> You're already ignoring portions of my posts. > >BULLSHIT I just haven't gotten around to them yet. I have a life too >incase you didn't know. No. Before this post you edited out portions out and ignored questions asked of you. . >> The reason you do so is >> because you to have no answers to my questions and my questions make you >> uncomfortable. > >ROTFLMAO because your playing with loaded questions and I know that trick >too. I can even give you an example too if you want. Asking you to name and describe the specific 'physics package ' of your so claimed nukes in NYC and what happened to the passengers on Flight 77 are not loaded questions. They are questions you find inconvenient because they dig deeply into the falsehoods you're trying to sell. >>>And the bs they have to explain the missing wing parts at the Pentagon is >>>the wings on a 757 folded back just like the wings on a bird and tucked >>>itself neatly into that little hole where it burned up with a fire that >>>could not even burn desk in the Pentagon. <G> >> >> One of my husband's bosses was killed sitting at his desk at the CNO-IP. >> CDR Dan Shanower. May he rest in peace. He served honorably in the United >> States Navy and fought to keep even people like you safe from harm. >> >> http://pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographies/cdr-dan-f-shanower-usn > >I have no doubt that a lot of people were killed at the Pentagon but the >funny thing is there was one group of people and I can't remember the name >of them now but Clinton started it after he found out that the Oklahoma City >bombing was an inside job. > >Anyway one of them lived but the news tried to say they all died because >they were the real targets for the missle that flew around to hit the far >side of the Pentagon. See: > >Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw What happened to the passengers on Flight 77? >> He was interred at Arlington National Cemetery on October 1, 2001. > >Yes that is a very sad story but that should not stop you or anybody else >for looking at the facts presented in: > >Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > > >> I suspect you provide a lot of unintended entertainment on usenet, Rocky. >> Sadly your shelf life is short. People eventually get bored with your >> cross-eyed bumbling routine and you find yourself ostracized and plonked to >> death in every newsgroup you infest. > >You aren't thinking. It is not my job to convince anybody of anything. Of course it is. It's why you're here trolling. >Only that there are other possibilities to what really happened during the >great 9/11 hoax and why most of the Twin Towers floated away in a great big >cloud of ultra fine debris. Attempt to engage me in topics and conversations not previously discussed. >Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >weeks or longer. > >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.303b97d8415c9a8b98abed@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #514649 |
In article <kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com>, ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > >Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll > >ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for > >weeks or longer. > > You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make > your walk off AUK and make it permanent. That's good... he's going to ignore us, when he's already been plonked by most of us. He's a ko0k, but just not a very entertaining one. I'm not so sure that his entire existence isn't a CGI. -- Checkmate Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) |
| Message-ID | <5M-dnQr6y8jVYEzInZ2dnUU7-aOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514658 |
"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.303b97d8415c9a8b98abed@news.altopia.com... > In article <kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com>, > ninety7gt@cox.net says... > > >> >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >> >ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >> >weeks or longer. >> >> You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make >> your walk off AUK and make it permanent. > > That's good... he's going to ignore us, when he's already been plonked > by most of us. He's a ko0k, but just not a very entertaining one. I'm > not so sure that his entire existence isn't a CGI. Pretty funny that you are among the others that can not explain why so much of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 floated up up and away but an NCD can. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) |
| Message-ID | <6ri9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514668 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Pretty funny that you are among the others that can not explain why so much > of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 floated up up and away but an NCD can. Nothing floated away and there is no such thing as an NCD, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) |
| Message-ID | <abl4ta5uo5qgop047gi5nm9vn3lvu99u47@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514668 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:26:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Checkmate" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message
>news:MPG.303b97d8415c9a8b98abed@news.altopia.com...
>> In article <kqr3ta97s5uaqllbjnpp7m449qfle8203t@4ax.com>,
>> ninety7gt@cox.net says...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll
>>> >ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for
>>> >weeks or longer.
>>>
>>> You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make
>>> your walk off AUK and make it permanent.
>>
>> That's good... he's going to ignore us, when he's already been plonked
>> by most of us. He's a ko0k, but just not a very entertaining one. I'm
>> not so sure that his entire existence isn't a CGI.
>
>Pretty funny that you are among the others that can not explain why so much
>of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC3 floated up up and away but an NCD can.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
Very little floated away. Some of the pulverized concrete and
drywall did float away. But the amount was so minor it's statistically
insignificant.
No amount of your claiming otherwise will change this truth.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <tbl4tal41a8tq24i80c7k3bmqpi7glthhn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514649 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:28:29 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll
>>ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for
>>weeks or longer.
>
>You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make
>your walk off AUK and make it permanent.
He may walk away for a while, but he thrives on the attention, so
he will be back.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <ohs4ta9nr5ug963ivh8fjp585nf3j2krni@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514867 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:43:28 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:28:29 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:20:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>Incase you didn't notice, I've already started my list of posters I'll >>>ignore and why so after more people get on that list I can walk away for >>>weeks or longer. >> >>You're getting testy because no one believes what you're selling. Make >>your walk off AUK and make it permanent. > > He may walk away for a while, but he thrives on the attention, so >he will be back. Plonked into oblivion. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:35 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) |
| Message-ID | <iki9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514646 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > They could have been gassed after they landed in Cleveland. But what is > really important is the disappearing wing of the alleged Flight 175 can only > be recreated by 3D software with the jet programmed to reflect the sky. Or > why there were no crash dynamics whatsoever. Also see: No planes landed in Cleveland, no one was gassed, no wings dissappeared, and there were no CGI's, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web