Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #605793 > unrolled thread

REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER

Started bybenj <benj@nobody.net>
First post2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
Last post2016-11-30 06:05 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 138 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
    REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:33 -0800
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:18 -0600
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:47 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:56 -0500
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:55 -0600
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:39 -0800
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:05 -0600
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:07 -0800
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:11 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:15 -0800
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 12:31 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:52 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:23 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:49 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:46 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 20:09 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 07:35 -0600
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:11 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 16:15 -0600
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 19:37 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0600
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:50 -0800
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:55 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:53 -0800
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:56 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:11 -0800
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:33 -0500
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 03:59 -0800
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:49 -0800
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:50 -0800
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:18 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:54 +0000
                                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:07 -0500
                                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:10 +0000
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:14 -0500
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:27 +0000
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:11 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:12 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:19 -0800
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:13 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 09:48 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:40 -0500
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0000
    REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 15:12 -0800
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 19:14 -0500
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 18:50 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:31 -0500
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-22 23:06 +0000
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:29 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:50 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:22 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:03 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:39 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:03 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:53 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:07 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:29 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:41 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:38 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:40 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:16 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:34 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:58 +0000
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 17:12 -0800
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:27 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:52 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:25 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:06 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:42 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:06 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:55 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:09 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:30 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:42 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:40 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:43 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:18 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:35 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:59 +0000
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:35 -0800
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 18:20 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:59 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:09 +0000
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:44 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:16 +0000
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:58 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:14 +0000
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:32 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:52 +0000
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:41 -0500
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:45 +0000
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:26 -0500
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:43 +0000
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:45 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:02 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:41 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:10 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:46 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:17 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:59 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:15 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:33 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:54 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:43 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:46 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:31 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:04 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 07:59 -0800
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:13 -0800
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:20 -0800
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 09:46 -0800
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 08:57 -0800
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 10:38 -0800
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:16 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:47 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:43 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:37 -0500
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:31 -0800
                premote fiewing **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 19:59 -0800
    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:12 +0000
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:47 -0500
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:19 +0000
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:05 -0500
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:17 +0000
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:34 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:55 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:44 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:49 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:32 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:49 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000

Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

#606925

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-28 16:15 -0600
Message-ID<o1ia9f$13gm$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#606922
On 11/28/2016 4:11 PM, benj wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 8:35 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 11/26/2016 7:09 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Here, Odd Debate this. Is "nothing" something? Since only nothing has no
>>> structure,
>>
>> Wrong.
>
> Your reply makes no sense in English or any other language. You
> understand that, right? Try answering the question instead of just
> shouting "wrong" or "kook". That seems to be the standard for "science"
> in this group.

The "wrong" was in response to the clause "Since only nothing has no 
structure".
That premise is false.

>
>>> then obviously except for "nothing" everything else has
>>> structure. So now we need to debate if nothing is something. OK?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#606946

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-28 19:37 -0500
Message-ID<583ccdbd$0$34531$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606925
On 11/28/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 4:11 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 11/28/2016 8:35 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2016 7:09 PM, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here, Odd Debate this. Is "nothing" something? Since only nothing
>>>> has no
>>>> structure,
>>>
>>> Wrong.
>>
>> Your reply makes no sense in English or any other language. You
>> understand that, right? Try answering the question instead of just
>> shouting "wrong" or "kook". That seems to be the standard for "science"
>> in this group.
>
> The "wrong" was in response to the clause "Since only nothing has no
> structure".
> That premise is false.

So what has structure that has no dimensions. What properties do 
"points" have? What is the structure of nothing? Does nothing have mass? 
You seem to have no problem saying that it does. How is that possible? 
Where does the mass come from? You've taken one too many philosophy 
courses.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607025

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-29 09:04 -0600
Message-ID<o1k5e3$1nsc$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#606946
On 11/28/2016 6:37 PM, benj wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 11/28/2016 4:11 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2016 8:35 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2016 7:09 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here, Odd Debate this. Is "nothing" something? Since only nothing
>>>>> has no
>>>>> structure,
>>>>
>>>> Wrong.
>>>
>>> Your reply makes no sense in English or any other language. You
>>> understand that, right? Try answering the question instead of just
>>> shouting "wrong" or "kook". That seems to be the standard for "science"
>>> in this group.
>>
>> The "wrong" was in response to the clause "Since only nothing has no
>> structure".
>> That premise is false.
>
> So what has structure that has no dimensions. What properties do
> "points" have? What is the structure of nothing? Does nothing have mass?
> You seem to have no problem saying that it does. How is that possible?
> Where does the mass come from? You've taken one too many philosophy
> courses.
>

We're not talking about nothing. We're talking about somethings that 
have no size, no dimensions. Deny all you want.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607275

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-30 12:50 -0800
Message-ID<9548d895-5c10-40ad-b385-d433dc62116f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#606922
BJ quacked 
Ignore Hardblow, Looperji. He's just bent out of shape over their huge 
UFO concert stage. It make it harder for him to pretend UFO don't exist 
(along with ghosts, ESP, Remote viewing, Government lies and so on)
------------

You're getting crazier by the day BJ. Seriously. You've devolved to fringe science, pseudo science, magic and just plain old horseshit.

Right right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607279

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-30 17:55 -0500
Message-ID<583f58fa$0$15571$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607275
On 11/30/2016 3:50 PM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> Ignore Hardblow, Looperji. He's just bent out of shape over their huge
> UFO concert stage. It make it harder for him to pretend UFO don't exist
> (along with ghosts, ESP, Remote viewing, Government lies and so on)
> ------------
>
> You're getting crazier by the day BJ. Seriously. You've devolved to fringe science, pseudo science, magic and just plain old horseshit.
>
> Right right?
>
Froth! We have U2 Froth!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607276

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-30 12:53 -0800
Message-ID<b85eefa2-c9b3-4b3f-b386-493ea6ba3fdc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#606922
BJ quacked 
Your reply makes no sense in English or any other language. You 
understand that, right? Try answering the question instead of just 
shouting "wrong" or "kook". That seems to be the standard for "science" 
in this group. 
--------------

You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.

You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).

Fist bump?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607280

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-30 17:56 -0500
Message-ID<583f593d$0$15571$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607276
On 11/30/2016 3:53 PM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> Your reply makes no sense in English or any other language. You
> understand that, right? Try answering the question instead of just
> shouting "wrong" or "kook". That seems to be the standard for "science"
> in this group.
> --------------
>
> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>
> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>
> Fist bump?
>
I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but we 
still love YOU!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607335

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-01 08:11 -0800
Message-ID<4b7b53be-db29-4d2f-a406-4d588e41feef@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#607280
BJ quacked 
 -------------- 
> 
> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it. 
> 
> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense). 
> 
> Fist bump? 
> 
I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but we 
still love YOU! 
--------------

"We"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607434

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-12-01 16:33 -0500
Message-ID<5840972c$0$10321$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607335
On 12/1/2016 11:11 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
>  --------------
>>
>> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>>
>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>>
>> Fist bump?
>>
> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but we
> still love YOU!
> --------------
>
> "We"?
>
Your fans and readers, natch! I AM allowed to count myself among your 
fans and readers, right? Fist bump?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607517

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-02 03:59 -0800
Message-ID<c02bf09c-76b3-418c-9f85-4ee4e34f7cc0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#607434
BJ quacked 
> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it. 
>> 
>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense). 
>> 
>> Fist bump? 
>> 
> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but we 
> still love YOU! 
> -------------- 
> 
> "We"? 
> 
Your fans and readers, natch! 
------------

You kooks seem to have a desperate need for affirmation in your magical beliefs. It's like you want to be on the edge, yet not too far over the edge because even over-the-top kooks like you still want to be able to think to yourselves "Well, I'm not as kooky as HE is". And in that manner validate your mystical kooky beliefs at least in your own mind.

Make sense BJ?

Good good

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607558

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-02 10:49 -0800
Message-ID<3ba20369-f9c7-4cca-8766-0c08c683d072@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#607517
HVAC,
there's Kooks, and
then there's KKKooks.
You're one of the second variety

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607564

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-02 11:50 -0800
Message-ID<687a05be-d09f-4ab1-ac67-cdff0f8b5e71@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#607558
john
HVAC, 
there's Kooks, and 
then there's KKKooks. 
You're one of the second variety 
------------

Is that an attempt at humor John?
Or was it because I'm black?

Either way, it's senseless

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607616

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-12-02 18:18 -0500
Message-ID<5842015c$0$25230$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607564
On 12/2/2016 2:50 PM, HVAC wrote:
> john
> HVAC,
> there's Kooks, and
> then there's KKKooks.
> You're one of the second variety
> ------------
>
> Is that an attempt at humor John?
> Or was it because I'm black?
>
> Either way, it's senseless
>
Intelligence test.

Does anyone here think HVAC is black?

Yo, If'n so You din't pass, suckah.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607626

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-12-02 23:54 +0000
Message-ID<26e9hd-j9b.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607616
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/2/2016 2:50 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> john
>> HVAC,
>> there's Kooks, and
>> then there's KKKooks.
>> You're one of the second variety
>> ------------
>>
>> Is that an attempt at humor John?
>> Or was it because I'm black?
>>
>> Either way, it's senseless
>>
> Intelligence test.
> 
> Does anyone here think HVAC is black?

Rational people don't care kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607629

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-12-02 19:07 -0500
Message-ID<58420cce$0$1400$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607626
On 12/2/2016 6:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 12/2/2016 2:50 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>> john
>>> HVAC,
>>> there's Kooks, and
>>> then there's KKKooks.
>>> You're one of the second variety
>>> ------------
>>>
>>> Is that an attempt at humor John?
>>> Or was it because I'm black?
>>>
>>> Either way, it's senseless
>>>
>> Intelligence test.
>>
>> Does anyone here think HVAC is black?
>
> Rational people don't care kook.
>
>
shut the fuck up yo crazy racis' cracka before I busta cap on yo ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607641

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-12-03 01:10 +0000
Message-ID<8li9hd-jsb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607629
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/2/2016 6:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 12/2/2016 2:50 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> john
>>>> HVAC,
>>>> there's Kooks, and
>>>> then there's KKKooks.
>>>> You're one of the second variety
>>>> ------------
>>>>
>>>> Is that an attempt at humor John?
>>>> Or was it because I'm black?
>>>>
>>>> Either way, it's senseless
>>>>
>>> Intelligence test.
>>>
>>> Does anyone here think HVAC is black?
>>
>> Rational people don't care kook.
>>
>>
> shut the fuck up yo crazy racis' cracka before I busta cap on yo ass.

Speaking of racist...


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607615

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-12-02 18:14 -0500
Message-ID<5842007a$0$25230$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607517
On 12/2/2016 6:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
>> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>>
>>>
>>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>>>
>>> Fist bump?
>>>
>> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but
>> we still love YOU! --------------
>>
>> "We"?
>>
> Your fans and readers, natch! ------------
>
> You kooks seem to have a desperate need for affirmation in your
> magical beliefs. It's like you want to be on the edge, yet not too
> far over the edge because even over-the-top kooks like you still want
> to be able to think to yourselves "Well, I'm not as kooky as HE is".
> And in that manner validate your mystical kooky beliefs at least in
> your own mind.
>
> Make sense BJ?
>
> Good good
>
Ever have a job as a scientist at SRI, Hardblow? Ever have a job
ANYWHERE as a scientist? Of course you haven't. I have. Yet, having seen
the Remote viewing protocols and data it's quite impressive. (not to you
in your ignorance, natch) However, in science one still remains
skeptical in spite do excellent probabilities. In your journalism it's
all about believe and getting people to believe your lies without
question. That's why you don't belong in this group. So repeating your 
lies about what I "believe" is simply drooling nonsense. Too bad there 
are so many here who never question the media or what you say.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607617

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-12-02 23:27 +0000
Message-ID<rkc9hd-j9b.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607615
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/2/2016 6:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> BJ quacked
>>> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>>>>
>>>> Fist bump?
>>>>
>>> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but
>>> we still love YOU! --------------
>>>
>>> "We"?
>>>
>> Your fans and readers, natch! ------------
>>
>> You kooks seem to have a desperate need for affirmation in your
>> magical beliefs. It's like you want to be on the edge, yet not too
>> far over the edge because even over-the-top kooks like you still want
>> to be able to think to yourselves "Well, I'm not as kooky as HE is".
>> And in that manner validate your mystical kooky beliefs at least in
>> your own mind.
>>
>> Make sense BJ?
>>
>> Good good
>>
> Ever have a job as a scientist at SRI, Hardblow? Ever have a job
> ANYWHERE as a scientist? Of course you haven't. I have.

Were you as kooky as you are now at that time?

> Yet, having seen
> the Remote viewing protocols and data it's quite impressive.

If it is classified as you say then you are in violation just by
acknowledging existance.

<snip remaining diatribe>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607630

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-12-02 19:11 -0500
Message-ID<58420dd7$0$55858$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607617
On 12/2/2016 6:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 12/2/2016 6:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>> BJ quacked
>>>> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>>>>>
>>>>> Fist bump?
>>>>>
>>>> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but
>>>> we still love YOU! --------------
>>>>
>>>> "We"?
>>>>
>>> Your fans and readers, natch! ------------
>>>
>>> You kooks seem to have a desperate need for affirmation in your
>>> magical beliefs. It's like you want to be on the edge, yet not too
>>> far over the edge because even over-the-top kooks like you still want
>>> to be able to think to yourselves "Well, I'm not as kooky as HE is".
>>> And in that manner validate your mystical kooky beliefs at least in
>>> your own mind.
>>>
>>> Make sense BJ?
>>>
>>> Good good
>>>
>> Ever have a job as a scientist at SRI, Hardblow? Ever have a job
>> ANYWHERE as a scientist? Of course you haven't. I have.
>
> Were you as kooky as you are now at that time?
>
>> Yet, having seen
>> the Remote viewing protocols and data it's quite impressive.
>
> If it is classified as you say then you are in violation just by
> acknowledging existance.
>
> <snip remaining diatribe>

Only some results are classified (doubtless the best ones) you drooling 
moron. If you are going to talk about something you ought to read a 
little bit about it first, clown shoes. Oh I forgot, you'd lose your 
purity if you actually learned something.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#607642

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-12-03 01:12 +0000
Message-ID<6oi9hd-jsb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607630
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 12/2/2016 6:27 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 12/2/2016 6:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> BJ quacked
>>>>> You have no idea what standard science is except that you hate it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are very similar to John in that regard (no offense).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fist bump?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I just hate lies, Hardblow. Sure you are a liar par excellence, but
>>>>> we still love YOU! --------------
>>>>>
>>>>> "We"?
>>>>>
>>>> Your fans and readers, natch! ------------
>>>>
>>>> You kooks seem to have a desperate need for affirmation in your
>>>> magical beliefs. It's like you want to be on the edge, yet not too
>>>> far over the edge because even over-the-top kooks like you still want
>>>> to be able to think to yourselves "Well, I'm not as kooky as HE is".
>>>> And in that manner validate your mystical kooky beliefs at least in
>>>> your own mind.
>>>>
>>>> Make sense BJ?
>>>>
>>>> Good good
>>>>
>>> Ever have a job as a scientist at SRI, Hardblow? Ever have a job
>>> ANYWHERE as a scientist? Of course you haven't. I have.
>>
>> Were you as kooky as you are now at that time?
>>
>>> Yet, having seen
>>> the Remote viewing protocols and data it's quite impressive.
>>
>> If it is classified as you say then you are in violation just by
>> acknowledging existance.
>>
>> <snip remaining diatribe>
> 
> Only some results are classified (doubtless the best ones)

That isn't how classification works kook.

<snip remaining diatribe>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web