Groups > sci.physics > #585780 > unrolled thread

What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

Started by	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post	2016-06-19 21:02 -0700
Last post	2016-06-27 17:10 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 28 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#585780 — What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-19 21:02 -0700
Subject	What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?
Message-ID	<2fb84b6f-0568-4ad0-af1d-86942067b9a6@googlegroups.com>

A group delusion.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#585798

From	Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-20 00:02 -0700
Message-ID	<873fa0e3-7c58-476d-8ddc-d70e739b0e05@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585780

Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence. The rest of us have all recognised that the ecidence is there.
What do you call a person who does not see what everyone else can see? Either blîd or ignorant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585834

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-06-20 11:53 -0500
Message-ID	<nk971r$1i76$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#585798

On 6/20/2016 2:02 AM, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:
> Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence.
> The rest of us have all recognised that the ecidence is there. What
> do you call a person who does not see what everyone else can see?
> Either blîd or ignorant.
>



  "Corporibus ignorantia non excusat"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586595

From	Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-25 09:25 -0700
Message-ID	<9f7bec38-ec38-4a3b-80d2-812f0719788e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585798

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 12:02:16 AM UTC-7, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:
> Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence. The rest of us have all recognised that the ecidence is there.
> What do you call a person who does not see what everyone else can see? Either blîd or ignorant.

Please don't pretend to speak for all of us.  McGinn is right.  There is no dispute about the boiling temperature of water.  Facts are facts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586633

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-06-25 13:05 -0500
Message-ID	<nkmh69$1c01$8@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#586595

On 6/25/2016 11:25 AM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 12:02:16 AM UTC-7, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:
>> Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence.
>> The rest of us have all recognised that the ecidence is there. What
>> do you call a person who does not see what everyone else can see?
>> Either blîd or ignorant.
>
> Please don't pretend to speak for all of us.  McGinn is right.  There
> is no dispute about the boiling temperature of water.  Facts are
> facts.
>

McGinn is an asshole, that is a fact.  And you Dink, are retarded, that 
is fact too.

This means that You are a Retarded Asshole.  Got it ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585814

From	little brother <andronicus451@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-20 05:40 -0700
Message-ID	<239111a4-2628-496a-b203-00b3dad2d357@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585780

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 6:03:01 AM UTC+2, James McGinn wrote:
> A group delusion.

A wise persons said once upon a time:
"The absence of an evidence is not an evidence of the absence."

lb

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585825

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-06-20 10:02 -0500
Message-ID	<nk90i6$16tj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#585814

On 6/20/2016 7:40 AM, little brother wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 6:03:01 AM UTC+2, James McGinn wrote:
>> A group delusion.
>
> A wise persons said once upon a time:
> "The absence of an evidence is not an evidence of the absence."
>
> lb
>

    "Corporibus ignorantia non excusat"


    "ignorance of physical laws is no excuse"


   James McGinn (Dink) is member of the null set =>  {}

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585833

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-20 09:46 -0700
Message-ID	<33af0a91-3b3b-44b0-9d1f-ccefa1af994e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585814

On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 5:40:49 AM UTC-7, little brother wrote:
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 6:03:01 AM UTC+2, James McGinn wrote:
> > A group delusion.
> 
> A wise persons said once upon a time:
> "The absence of an evidence is not an evidence of the absence."
> 
> lb

Right.  If you don't find a nickel under your pillow that doesn't mean that the tooth fairy doesn't exist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585985

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-21 06:22 -0700
Message-ID	<4bfaaae3-8bef-4d62-b37f-1ad429998412@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585833

Too bad imagination isn't evidence, huh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586117

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-21 20:20 -0700
Message-ID	<eb2cbdbc-9044-4630-b9c9-e0c354cd299a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585985

Maybe U all should work together to see if U can formulate an argument, or even a point.

Something . . . ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586258

From	edprochak@gmail.com
Date	2016-06-22 19:06 -0700
Message-ID	<b493d5b3-ff88-4e84-bc78-ac88758f1159@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#585985

On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 9:22:50 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote:
> Too bad imagination isn't evidence, huh.

And you can imagine you have a theory JM when all you have
is a crappy self published book.

Guys,
 just remember that is the only reason he is here.
He is trying to build the conspiracy theory part of
his crazy weather theory.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586322

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-06-23 10:18 -0500
Message-ID	<nkguk4$su9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#586258

On 6/22/2016 9:06 PM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 9:22:50 AM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote:
>> Too bad imagination isn't evidence, huh.
>
> And you can imagine you have a theory JM when all you have
> is a crappy self published book.
>
> Guys,
>  just remember that is the only reason he is here.
> He is trying to build the conspiracy theory part of
> his crazy weather theory.
>

ha!  James can't keep all his marbles in a box.

Best James McGinn has is about 12 one liners like the one above in 
newsgroups, and his "Insane James" youtube videos a babbling with 
drawings of Mickey Mouse for hours.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586432

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-23 20:01 -0700
Message-ID	<d15eb3cf-8d99-4602-8266-73ae35bd0705@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586322

It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586516

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-06-24 21:09 -0700
Message-ID	<e6bc4fc1-301e-4ff6-970e-2e8de8d25432@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586432

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:

> It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.

I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586521

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-24 21:35 -0700
Message-ID	<85aeb891-a7f0-4486-b30d-f7810fb3ba21@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586516

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> 
> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.

Steam tables.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586534

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-06-24 22:26 -0700
Message-ID	<3f22f910-faf0-464a-833f-5c04da3cdc14@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586521

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:35:28 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > 
> > > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> > 
> > I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> 
> Steam tables.

Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586543

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-24 22:59 -0700
Message-ID	<e0b7a885-0229-4094-8afc-836ab6d835e1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586534

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:26:27 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:35:28 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> > > 
> > > I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> > 
> > Steam tables.
> 
> Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.

They contradict your position, you evasive twit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586546

From	pnalsing@gmail.com
Date	2016-06-24 23:24 -0700
Message-ID	<d9a18f75-12d1-4cdf-bca9-bafe3dc39c6d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586543

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:59:35 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:

> They contradict your position, you evasive twit.

I'm evasive, asshole?

Where did you get your degree? Evasive.

Show me any proof of ANY of your theories? Evasive.

Show me any experiment that supports, for example, that humid air is heavier than dry air? Evasive.

You do nothing but spout fantasy and are 100% evasive when asked to step up and support your position with facts. In other words, you are evasive.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586573

From	James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date	2016-06-25 07:14 -0700
Message-ID	<1b2f06cf-3eed-494e-9f25-badd05c88d65@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#586546

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 11:24:48 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 10:59:35 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > They contradict your position, you evasive twit.
> 
> I'm evasive, asshole?
> 
> Where did you get your degree? Evasive.
> 
> Show me any proof of ANY of your theories? Evasive.
> 
> Show me any experiment that supports, for example, that humid air is heavier than dry air? Evasive.
> 
> You do nothing but spout fantasy and are 100% evasive when asked to step up and support your position with facts. In other words, you are evasive.

Is the boiling point of H2O not 100 C at sea level?  

Answer my question you evasive asshole.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586592

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-06-25 15:47 +0000
Message-ID	<6ml24d-tae.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#586534

pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:35:28 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> > 
>> > > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
>> > 
>> > I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
>> 
>> Steam tables.
> 
> Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.

He totaly fails to understand than most common steam tables are abridged
for specific uses and that a complete steam table goes to 0 C.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

Contents

#585780 — What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

#585798

#585834

#586595

#586633

#585814

#585825

#585833

#585985

#586117

#586258

#586322

#586432

#586516

#586521

#586534

#586543

#586546

#586573

#586592