Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516417 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:54 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:15 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:23 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:37 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:43 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:57 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:51 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:12 +0100
re, nah noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:39 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:53 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:55 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:52 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 15:30 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:36 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:50 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 15:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:21 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:46 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:46 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:24 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:55 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:22 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:11 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:35 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 17:10 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:13 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:02 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (Jim need more help) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:32 -0500
say dUh; thankyoiu noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 21:09 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 17:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:28 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:28 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:34 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 20:23 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:29 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-27 21:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:02 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 11:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:06 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:05 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (iimp is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:49 -0500
Re: Rocky is still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a complete idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:45 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 08:29 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dmaster is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (K proves she is an asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
Re: Rocky's latest delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 05:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 02:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 10:09 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-28 15:51 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:09 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:06 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (More for Moroneyn) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:11 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:41 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying again) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 22:01 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:13 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:32 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (T-annoy is lying now) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:12 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:12 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:52 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 distroys links gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:33 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:28 +0200
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:19 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:53 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:34 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:50 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-26 22:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:30 +0000
hah, may be not noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:13 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:24 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 12:39 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:42 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:19 -0500
two noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:29 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:51 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-29 22:25 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 22:35 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 20:25 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:24 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-30 10:31 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:38 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:48 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:58 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:07 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:59 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:40 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:27 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:50 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:31 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:31 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:35 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:49 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:07 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 10:00 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:47 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 10:23 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:12 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-24 13:41 -0400
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 09:17 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:44 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 10:56 -0500
Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:42 +0000
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 06:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrk5gi$r7r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516848 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>> >>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else >>>> saw it. >>> >>> Everybody else did not see it. >> >> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH > > So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) > So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing > about molten metal, what a quiant idea. > >> >> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about >> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >> > So these two people did not see the metal. > >> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >> >> Rocky sheeple >> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? Go to the 23 second mark to save time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 22:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrl9f3$9hj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516978 |
On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> >>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else >>>>> saw it. >>>> >>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>> >>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH >> >> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing >> about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >> >>> >>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about >>> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>> >> So these two people did not see the metal. >> >>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>> >>> Rocky sheeple >>> > > > > > > The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. > Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? > > Go to the 23 second mark to save time > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE > > That does not appear to be what that video said. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 17:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrt8qv$nn4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517112 |
Tony Dragon wrote: > On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>> >>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>> else saw it. >>>>> >>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>> >>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>> it. DUH >>> >>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>> >>>> >>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>> >>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>> >>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>> >>>> Rocky sheeple >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >> >> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >> >> > > That does not appear to be what that video said. > He says it clear as day. Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" I get pages of returns. https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal Pick whichever link you like.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bqm9bc-67h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517728 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>> >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. Yeah, like a lawyer knows about metallurgy. The presense or absense of any molten metal is irrelevant. I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; melting steel is not all that difficult to do. This is just another kooktard red herring. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrtbhe$f56$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517730 |
jimp wrote: > I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; > melting steel is not all that difficult to do. Nice. What else can you do?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dno9bc-ifh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517732 |
Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; >> melting steel is not all that difficult to do. > > Nice. What else can you do? Lots of things. What can you do? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 20:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Oc2dnbkJ3Z0Zxn_InZ2dnUU7-YMAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517732 |
On 8/29/15 5:25 PM, Reginald Ehrett wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; >> melting steel is not all that difficult to do. > > Nice. What else can you do? > He's good at bullying and name calling -- just look at his posting history. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 03:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6k9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517756 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/29/15 5:25 PM, Reginald Ehrett wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; >>> melting steel is not all that difficult to do. >> >> Nice. What else can you do? >> > > He's good at bullying and name calling -- just look at his posting > history. The spamming piece of shit chimes in. Aren't I supposed to be kill filed, shit head? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 10:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mrum1k$1qd$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517779 |
jimp wrote: >> He's good at bullying and name calling -- just look at his posting >> history. > > The spamming piece of shit chimes in. Aren't I supposed to be kill > filed, shit head? "Aren't I" ? What a language to that mouth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) |
| Message-ID | <h7ednT4eW9Er3X_InZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517730 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bqm9bc-67h.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>>> >>>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>>> it. DUH >>>>> >>>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>>> >>>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>>> >>>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>>> >>>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>>> >>>> >>> >>> That does not appear to be what that video said. >>> >> >> He says it clear as day. >> Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. >> >> Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten >> metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. >> Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut >> >> Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" >> >> I get pages of returns. >> >> https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal >> >> Pick whichever link you like. > > Yeah, like a lawyer knows about metallurgy. > > The presense or absense of any molten metal is irrelevant. ROTFLMAO because what they originally placed on the molten metal is further evidence that the Twin Towers were nuked. See 6:00 - 6:21 of the following video: 9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center PATH Bathtub, Yellow Trucks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JcLWkTpyRc And I have another photo that shows the M291 resin was used to cover the area where the north end of WTC3 used to stand which happens to be exactly where a deep underground nuke would have to be placed to do the damage it did to the North Tower. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > I've melted steel with BBQ brickets and a vaccum cleaner set to blow; > melting > steel is not all that difficult to do. That stayed hot for months? I doubt that. > This is just another kooktard red herring. You are just too funny because what you are trying you best to deny is really more supporting evidence that Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the pre-9/11 definition of Ground Zero meaning it was nuked, nuked and nuked. <G> And talking about NIST, here is the guy that told NIST why the Twin Towers collapsed and who the fcuk is he other than another paid Crisis Actor? See 9/11 Eyewitness - FOX Freelancer Harley Guy Mark Walsh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14 And dig this about "What is your role right here right now?" 3:27-3_28 in the following. WTF type of question is that? Then he answers with "can't say what role I'm going to play right now." So FOX news was just looking for more crisis actors in the following clip. "Freelancer" Mark Walsh B.S Story For Fake FOX News on 911 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbizU1msKQg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 01:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The US has been caught lying about radiation before too (dumptrucks full of M291 resin) |
| Message-ID | <qm2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517740 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because what they originally placed on the molten metal is further > evidence that the Twin Towers were nuked. See 6:00 - 6:21 of the following > video: Whether or not there was molten metal is a red herring and irrelevant kook babble> There were no nukes, you babbling lunatic. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrtb3l$3u6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517728 |
On 29/08/2015 22:41, Bast wrote: > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > > > > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. > > Nope still missed it, give me the time stamp & the words he used. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 18:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <M9WdnbM_SpU_3n_InZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517728 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrt8qv$nn4$1@dont-email.me... > > > Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 26/08/2015 11:49, Bast wrote: >>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone >>>>>>> else saw it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Everybody else did not see it. >>>>> >>>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that >>>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near >>>>> it. DUH >>>> >>>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again) >>>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know >>>> nothing about molten metal, what a quiant idea. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard >>>>> about the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you: >>>>> >>>> So these two people did not see the metal. >>>> >>>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y >>>>> >>>>> Rocky sheeple >>> >>> >>> The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times. >>> Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ??? >>> >>> Go to the 23 second mark to save time >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE >>> >>> >> >> That does not appear to be what that video said. >> > > He says it clear as day. > Try rewatching the video, and this time pay attention. > > Although I can find you plenty of times he refers directly to the molten > metal in the first few weeks after 9/11. > Later on he was told to keep his mouth shut > > Just google "giuliani talks about molten metal" > > I get pages of returns. > > https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=OybiVYzQAoON8QeRtpLoDw&gws_rd=ssl#q=giuliani+talks+about+molten+metal > > Pick whichever link you like. Thanks and I learned a lot from that link but when I saw the following video I heard Steven Jones say there was molten metal at "all three buildings" but I wish he had been more precise because I saw someone point to a spot of the molten metal and he pointed to the north end of WTC3 and not one of the towers. Scientists Examine the Molten Steel that Lingered for Weeks Underneath WTC 1, 2 & 7 on 9/11 - Many Surprises Found https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY The exact location of the pools of molten metal is very important because if it really was under WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7 then it helps prove that nukes finished of the Twin Towers by supporting the location where the deep underground nukes had to be placed to do the damage they did. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 01:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lp2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517742 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Thanks and I learned a lot from that link but when I saw the following video > I heard Steven Jones say there was molten metal at "all three buildings" but > I wish he had been more precise because I saw someone point to a spot of the > molten metal and he pointed to the north end of WTC3 and not one of the > towers. Babbling about molten metal is a red herring and irrelevant, you delusional kook. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 04:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lslttahrultoij2un867n5b1p26h7hub60@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #516978 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:49:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 25/08/2015 16:19, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>> They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else
>>>>> saw it.
>>>>
>>>> Everybody else did not see it.
>>>
>>> T-annoy you are a complete imbecile because only the people that
>>> didn't know what caused that molten metal would get anywhere near it. DUH
>>
>> So not everybody then, glad you have changed your mind (again)
>> So the only people that saw the molten metal are people who know nothing
>> about molten metal, what a quiant idea.
>>
>>> And at least two of them are on record for saying they had heard about
>>> the molten metal. And this is some good stuff for you:
>>>
>> So these two people did not see the metal.
>>
>>> Nuclear destruction of the WTC
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y
>>>
>>> Rocky sheeple
>
>
>
>The then Mayor of New York he saw the molten metal,...several times.
>Are you calling mayor Giuilliani a liar ???
>
>Go to the 23 second mark to save time
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtyrMt7GzyE
>
Mayor Giuliani made no comment about molten metal. He did state:
"There were fires of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit below the ground."
If you're going to lie, and you are, do not include the PROOF
that you've lied in your posts, stupid.
What, exactly, did you hope to gain by lying about what the Mayor
said? Serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 14:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30467c12e722337298c244@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516750 |
In article <mrhu3l$d6l$2@dont-email.me>, tony.dragon@btinternet.com says... > > On 25/08/2015 14:52, Bast wrote: > > gilber34 wrote: > >>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger > >>>> counter ? > >>>> > >>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. > >>> > >>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the > >>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" and > >>> since > >>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. > >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > >> > >> NO RADIATION > >> > >> > >>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence > >>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies and > >>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do > >>> it > >>> again. > >> > >> NO RADIATION DETECTED > >> > >>> > >>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and > >>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar > >>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: > >> > >> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and > >> morons, > >> > >> > >> > >>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: > >>> > >>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W > >>> > >> > >> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION > >> DETECTED then or now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So WHO actually checked ? > > The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. > > > > They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw it. > > Everybody else did not see it. I just want one of the troofers to explain what melted all this supposed metal and more importantly, what energy source was there to keep it molten? > > > > > I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. > > > > If it were a nuke where was the radiation, where were the seismic > signatures? > > > And like dynamite, that can take out a mountain side, or be scaled down to > > make firecrackers for kids. > > Nukes can be scaled down as well. > > > > > > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 09:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kJ6dnTav365G4EHInZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516746 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrhrrt$4va$1@dont-email.me... > > > gilber34 wrote: >>>> moron, you think "...the US..." is the only one with a flipping Geiger >>>> counter ? >>>> >>>> No radiation was detected by anybody in NYC then and now. >>> >>> You are such an idiot. All you really have to do is see that the >>> following does not resemble a "Collapse" or a "Controlled Demolition" >>> and since >>> DEWs have never been proven to exist that only leaves nukes. >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> NO RADIATION >> >> >>> Plain and simple the evidence outweighs the lies and we have evidence >>> of not just NIST using lie after lie after lie but the EPA using lies >>> and >>> then the fact the US has lied before is more evidence that they would do >>> it >>> again. >> >> NO RADIATION DETECTED >> >>> >>> Shit, if you can't even face the fact NIST was full of complete and >>> udder bullshit when they charged the taxpayers millions for their fubar >>> hypotheses that didn't have a single fact supporting it. See: >> >> NO RADIATION your silly kook conspiritcies videos are for idiots and >> morons, >> >> >> >>> The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence by Ko0k: >>> >>> https://www.yourBoobs.com/watch?v=zvCuMULut33&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8y33vK1-a9H_11kBDS8W >>> >> >> all that is totally meaningless and off topic, as there was NO RADIATION >> DETECTED then or now. > > > So WHO actually checked ? > The Federalies only seemed to see what they wanted to see. > > They completely missed the molten metal,...even though everyone else saw > it. > > I will not say there was proof of a nuclear device,.....I'm just saying > there is no conclusive proof THERE WASN'T a Nuke. > > And like dynamite, that can take out a mountain side, or be scaled down to > make firecrackers for kids. > Nukes can be scaled down as well. Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. And here is a short video that I just saw for the first time today. Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y And then add to that the playlist I have proving that NIST lied about every single fact they based their "hypothetical collapse initiation" on it is becomes clear that NIST might have known the Twin Towers were nuked on 9/11/01. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 16:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c8juac-7ig.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #516753 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the > spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. And here is a > short video that I just saw for the first time today. The deeper you bury a nuke, the greater the seismic signature, kook. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d7212e96-a0b1-4993-b3fe-4128b9ea16fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #516807 |
ah, gOOd observation; this guy just does not interst himself in physics per se > The deeper you bury a nuke, the greater the seismic signature, kook. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any > seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers > as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected > by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the > Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. > > A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a > fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. > > Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it > has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. > > Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available > on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. > > Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any > governmental agency. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. > > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > <snip remaining kook babble> > > > -- > Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mrkk98$ivq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #516807 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Not just scaled down but if you bury a nuke deep in rock it changes the >> spread pattern and that was the trick used at Ground Zero. And here >> is a short video that I just saw for the first time today. > > The deeper you bury a nuke, the greater the seismic signature, kook. > > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. > > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any > seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers > as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected > by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the > Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. > > A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a > fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. > > Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it > has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. > > Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available > on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. > > Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any > governmental agency. > > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. > > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > <snip remaining kook babble> Right. Those are some credible websites you provided links to,...NOT They don't even list an email address. And I'll bet even if they did it would be a gmail address. Damn,....even the site they referrence is somethig homemade. You want to try again ? Are are you going to stick with, "it's on the internet so it must be true" ? <ROTFLMAO>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web