Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 8 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 14 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iqhg7f-66m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703972 |
In sci.physics vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:23 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-09-21 11:03 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp >>>>>>>>> chittered: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> less than four times what the EV can deliver ... and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but >>>>>>>>>>>>>> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting >>>>>>>>>>>>> fossil fuel energy into chemical energy, then into electrical >>>>>>>>>>>>> energy, then into mechanical energy. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency >>>>>>>>>>> and ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has >>>>>>>>>>> broadened ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost >>>>>>>>>>>> (both monetary and in energy and resources terms) of providing >>>>>>>>>>>> the charging infrastructure. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the cost >>>>>>>>>>> of lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the >>>>>>>>>>> individual gas stations? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies that >>>>>>>>>>> are coming down the pike. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there are >>>>>>>>>> no available materials to let you get even close. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help- > to-charge- >>>>>>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of energy >>>>>>>> transferred per unit time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and power? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <snip nonsense> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> yep >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. >>>>>> >>>>> what are you getting at >>>> >>>> That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high school >>>> level physics. >>>> >>>> >>> who are my eco workers i came into this post on my own i don't know >>> anyone here i just know about the topic at the top >> >> The word was "warriors", not "workers". >> >> You appear to have the comprehension of a six year old and the >> compostition skills to match. > > And are you lauded for your compostitions? I was at one time but I don't write for others anymore. > (You're using a Unix. FFS, install aspell.) Just replying to most of these posts is a large enough waste of time without adding spell checking or proof reading. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po480j$d3v$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703986 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:17:38 +0000, chimp wrote: > In sci.physics vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2018-09-21 11:03 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp >>>>>>>>>> chittered: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EV's, so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is less than four times what the EV can deliver ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fossil fuel energy into chemical energy, then into >>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy, then into mechanical energy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency >>>>>>>>>>>> and ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has >>>>>>>>>>>> broadened ... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost >>>>>>>>>>>>> (both monetary and in energy and resources terms) of >>>>>>>>>>>>> providing the charging infrastructure. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the >>>>>>>>>>>> cost of lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the >>>>>>>>>>>> individual gas stations? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies >>>>>>>>>>>> that are coming down the pike. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there >>>>>>>>>>> are no available materials to let you get even close. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help- >> to-charge- >>>>>>>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of >>>>>>>>> energy transferred per unit time? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and >>>>>>>>> power? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <snip nonsense> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yep >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. >>>>>>> >>>>>> what are you getting at >>>>> >>>>> That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high school >>>>> level physics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> who are my eco workers i came into this post on my own i don't know >>>> anyone here i just know about the topic at the top >>> >>> The word was "warriors", not "workers". >>> >>> You appear to have the comprehension of a six year old and the >>> compostition skills to match. >> >> And are you lauded for your compostitions? > > I was at one time but I don't write for others anymore. > >> (You're using a Unix. FFS, install aspell.) > > Just replying to most of these posts is a large enough waste of time > without adding spell checking or proof reading. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iomg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #704005 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:17:38 +0000, chimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2018-09-21 11:03 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp >>>>>>>>>>> chittered: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EV's, so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is less than four times what the EV can deliver ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fossil fuel energy into chemical energy, then into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy, then into mechanical energy. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency >>>>>>>>>>>>> and ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has >>>>>>>>>>>>> broadened ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (both monetary and in energy and resources terms) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing the charging infrastructure. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the >>>>>>>>>>>>> cost of lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> individual gas stations? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies >>>>>>>>>>>>> that are coming down the pike. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there >>>>>>>>>>>> are no available materials to let you get even close. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help- >>> to-charge- >>>>>>>>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of >>>>>>>>>> energy transferred per unit time? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and >>>>>>>>>> power? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <snip nonsense> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yep >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> what are you getting at >>>>>> >>>>>> That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high school >>>>>> level physics. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> who are my eco workers i came into this post on my own i don't know >>>>> anyone here i just know about the topic at the top >>>> >>>> The word was "warriors", not "workers". >>>> >>>> You appear to have the comprehension of a six year old and the >>>> compostition skills to match. >>> >>> And are you lauded for your compostitions? >> >> I was at one time but I don't write for others anymore. >> >>> (You're using a Unix. FFS, install aspell.) >> >> Just replying to most of these posts is a large enough waste of time >> without adding spell checking or proof reading. > > Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. How blazingly clever of you... It has been a while since I wasted much of any time on the gibbering idiots that infest sci.physics. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po4da0$bcv$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #704018 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:41:54 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:17:38 +0000, chimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-09-21 11:03 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp >>>>>>>>>>>> chittered: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the EV's, so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diesel tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fossil fuel energy into chemical energy, then into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy, then into mechanical energy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels >>>>>>>>>>>>>> efficiency and ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> topic has broadened ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost (both monetary and in energy and resources terms) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing the charging infrastructure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost of lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual gas stations? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that are coming down the pike. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there >>>>>>>>>>>>> are no available materials to let you get even close. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could- help- >>>> to-charge- >>>>>>>>>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of >>>>>>>>>>> energy transferred per unit time? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and >>>>>>>>>>> power? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <snip nonsense> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yep >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what are you getting at >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high >>>>>>> school level physics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> who are my eco workers i came into this post on my own i don't know >>>>>> anyone here i just know about the topic at the top >>>>> >>>>> The word was "warriors", not "workers". >>>>> >>>>> You appear to have the comprehension of a six year old and the >>>>> compostition skills to match. >>>> >>>> And are you lauded for your compostitions? >>> >>> I was at one time but I don't write for others anymore. >>> >>>> (You're using a Unix. FFS, install aspell.) >>> >>> Just replying to most of these posts is a large enough waste of time >>> without adding spell checking or proof reading. >> >> Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. > > How blazingly clever of you... > > It has been a while since I wasted much of any time on the gibbering > idiots that infest sci.physics. Would that include the one you see in the mirror, sonny? -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po6aul$10ve$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704021 |
On 9/21/2018 10:35 PM, Libtard wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:41:54 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 01:17:38 +0000, chimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-09-21 11:03 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp >>>>>>>>>>>>> chittered: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the EV's, so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diesel tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fossil fuel energy into chemical energy, then into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electrical energy, then into mechanical energy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efficiency and ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topic has broadened ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost (both monetary and in energy and resources terms) of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing the charging infrastructure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost of lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual gas stations? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that are coming down the pike. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are no available materials to let you get even close. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could- > help- >>>>> to-charge- >>>>>>>>>>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of >>>>>>>>>>>> energy transferred per unit time? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and >>>>>>>>>>>> power? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <snip nonsense> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> yep >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what are you getting at >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high >>>>>>>> school level physics. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> who are my eco workers i came into this post on my own i don't know >>>>>>> anyone here i just know about the topic at the top >>>>>> >>>>>> The word was "warriors", not "workers". >>>>>> >>>>>> You appear to have the comprehension of a six year old and the >>>>>> compostition skills to match. >>>>> >>>>> And are you lauded for your compostitions? >>>> >>>> I was at one time but I don't write for others anymore. >>>> >>>>> (You're using a Unix. FFS, install aspell.) >>>> >>>> Just replying to most of these posts is a large enough waste of time >>>> without adding spell checking or proof reading. >>> >>> Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. >> >> How blazingly clever of you... >> >> It has been a while since I wasted much of any time on the gibbering >> idiots that infest sci.physics. > > Would that include the one you see in the mirror, sonny? > LIBTURD !!! I MISS YOU !! Where did you go ? are you really 4th in line ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360edec2fb6ed641994b23@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703857 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <0cof7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-09-20 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On 2018-09-20 5:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>>>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp chittered: > >>>>> > >>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>>>>> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the > >>>>>>>>>> tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what > >>>>>>>>>> actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four > >>>>>>>>>> times what the EV can deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries > >>>>>>>>>> are improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel > >>>>>>>>>> tanks, > >>>>>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel > >>>>>>>>> energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into > >>>>>>>>> mechanical energy. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency and > >>>>>>> ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has broadened ... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost (both > >>>>>>>> monetary and in energy and resources terms) of providing the charging > >>>>>>>> infrastructure. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the cost of > >>>>>>> lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the individual gas > >>>>>>> stations? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> the time to charge the battery > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies that are > >>>>>>> coming down the pike. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there are no > >>>>>> available materials to let you get even close. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help-to-charge- > >>>>> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 > >>>> > >>>> An iPhone is not a road vehicle. > >>>> > >>>> Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of energy > >>>> transferred per unit time? > >>>> > >>>> Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and power? > >>>> > >>>> <snip nonsense> > >>>> > >>> yep > >> > >> Then you understand charge time is limited by current density. > >> > > what are you getting at > > That you and your fellow eco warriors do not understand high school level > physics. LOL -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po1k7d$1g42$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703718 |
On 9/20/2018 8:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:48:58 +0000, chimp chittered: >> >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:44:32 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >>>> >>>>> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [some fake pundit scribbled] >>>>> >>>>>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the >>>>>>> tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what >>>>>>> actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four >>>>>>> times what the EV can deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries >>>>>>> are improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel >>>>>>> tanks, >>>>>>> a fat, stationary target. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't count all the inefficiency from converting fossil fuel >>>>>> energy into chemical energy, then into electrical energy, then into >>>>>> mechanical energy. >>>> >>>> We were originally discussing only tank-to-wheels efficiency and >>>> ignoring well-to-tank. But, now that the topic has broadened ... >>>> >>>>> Not to mention electricity transmission losses and the cost (both >>>>> monetary and in energy and resources terms) of providing the charging >>>>> infrastructure. >>>> >>>> And meanwhile we're just supposed to completely ignore the cost of >>>> lugging all those fossil fuels *physically* to the individual gas >>>> stations? >>>> >>>>> the time to charge the battery >>>> >>>> Almost instant, with new battery and charging technologies that are >>>> coming down the pike. >>> >>> Utter nonsense, would violate the laws of physics and there are no >>> available materials to let you get even close. >> >> http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-21/new-technology-could-help-to-charge- >> your-iphone-instantly/10021086 > > An iPhone is not a road vehicle. > > Do you understand the concept of power, i.e. the amount of energy > transferred per unit time? > > Do you understand the relationship of voltage, current, and power? > > <snip nonsense> > by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in the stink.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po2pej$1at4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703735 |
On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: > by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and > "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their > education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current > and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well > beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, > and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to > charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge > your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that > their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in > the stink. Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.21--7.12am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #703808 |
"kensi" [sic] wrote: > instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change- > the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin, can do the same thing, I'm told.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <po33d7$1vem$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703822 |
On 9/21/2018 10:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > "kensi" [sic] wrote: >> instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change- >> the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin, can do the same thing, I'm told. > "instantly-rechargeable-battery"!!!! BwaHahahahahaha! "kensi" has a "Ph.D." in physics? Bwahahahahaha! Fucking left wing ignorant insane journalist!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. |
| Message-ID | <po34pe$2si$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703831 |
On 9/21/2018 11:40 AM, benj wrote: > "instantly-rechargeable-battery"!!!! > > BwaHahahahahaha! > > "kensi" has a "Ph.D." in physics? > > Bwahahahahaha! > > Fucking left wing ignorant insane journalist! https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html I will keep reposting this link as long as it continues to be clear that you haven't read word one of the article there. Whether your ignorance is eventually corrected is entirely up to you, of course, but I have ensured you at least have that option, should you choose to accept it. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1kof7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703808 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >> the stink. > > Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding the battery. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9gbpD.108839$LK2.43239@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #703858 |
On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>> the stink. >> >> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >> >> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >> >> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? > > Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about > replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding > the battery. Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those electrolytes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703872 |
In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>> the stink. >>> >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>> >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >> >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >> the battery. > > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those > electrolytes. Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries are toxic and caustic. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360efb6222804972994b41@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703891 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: > >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and > >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their > >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current > >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well > >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, > >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to > >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge > >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that > >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in > >>>> the stink. > >>> > >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? > >>> > >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > >>> > >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? > >> > >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about > >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding > >> the battery. > > > > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure > > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those > > electrolytes. > > Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. > > Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries > are toxic and caustic. I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells about the size of AA batteries? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ri3g7f-ofk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703918 |
In sci.physics Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > >> >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> > On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >> >>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >> >>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >> >>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >> >>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >> >>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >> >>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >> >>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >> >>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >> >>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >> >>>> the stink. >> >>> >> >>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >> >>> >> >>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >> >>> >> >>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >> >> >> >> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >> >> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >> >> the battery. >> > >> > Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >> > to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >> > electrolytes. >> >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells > about the size of AA batteries? Very carefully while wearing a hazmat suit. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <po6b0k$10ve$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703918 |
On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > >> >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>>>> the stink. >>>>> >>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>> >>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>> >>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>> the battery. >>> >>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>> electrolytes. >> >> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >> >> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >> are toxic and caustic. > > I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells > about the size of AA batteries? > I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ascdqdthcuo2gsku0qi9flk6pv89e60k0a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704160 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:08:41 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. Hmm, that's twice as many as in kensiNads' vibrator... -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjwq8.1ao1vdov17pN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704163 |
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> gurgled: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:08:41 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > > > >I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. > > Hmm, that's twice as many as in kensiNads' vibrator... [snigger] -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just sniggered too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po6cm5$13oh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704160 |
On 9/22/2018 5:08 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/21/2018 3:58 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <5utf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >> >> >>> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:07 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 10:15 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> by now it should be obvious that Nads (a supposed programmer) and >>>>>>> "kensi" a supposed Ph.D. only know journalist pseudoscience and their >>>>>>> education has not progressed beyond "women's studies". Voltage, current >>>>>>> and power (and I won't even mention battery chemistry) are clearly well >>>>>>> beyond their abilities. Lefty libs (as I have pointed out many times, >>>>>>> and is proved here) do not do quantity. To them a couple of amps to >>>>>>> charge a cellphone is the same as the massive current needed to recharge >>>>>>> your Tesla. But they are so mentally ill they can't even imagine that >>>>>>> their fantasies are utter nonsense even when their noses are rubbed in >>>>>>> the stink. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did *any* of you k0oks read Nadegda's second link? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Or were you paid by the fossil fuel industry not to? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and the article is NOT about recharging batteries, it is about >>>>> replacing the electrolytes in the battery, i.e. basically rebuilding >>>>> the battery. >>>> >>>> Yes, and it would involve a whole new national infrastructure >>>> to store, collect transport, recycle, and redistribute those >>>> electrolytes. >>> >>> Don't confuse the eco warrior children with petty details. >>> >>> Next you will be noting that the electrolytes of all usefull batteries >>> are toxic and caustic. >> >> I wonder how you'd "change the electrolyte" in a few thousand Tesla cells >> about the size of AA batteries? >> > > I think there are 22,000 AA batteries in a Tesla Car battery. > changing the electrolyte in a Tesla "battery" is simple. You just Drive a fork lift up to the car, lift the old battery out and drop a new charged battery in and bingo! You've "instantly" changed the electrolyte! Some "climate change" journalist "explained" this advanced science to me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web