Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #520362 > unrolled thread

14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
Last post2015-09-12 13:58 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 81 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:04 -0400
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:16 +0000
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 16:23 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:42 +0000
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-11 23:04 -0400
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 06:51 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 10:13 -0400
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-11 22:35 +0200
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:48 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:07 -0500
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:40 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:57 -0500
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:41 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 19:18 -0400
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 18:30 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 21:26 -0400
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:07 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:14 +0000
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:11 -0500
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:36 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:44 -0500
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:29 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:51 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:09 -0400
                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:23 -0500
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? (  Sarah the stalker with no valid argument ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:37 -0400
                        Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:54 +0000
                          Re: Rocky's imaginary missle Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:06 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 21:27 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:41 -0400
          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 01:40 -0400
            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:34 -0400
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:03 -0500
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:24 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:30 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:59 -0400
                    Re: Rocky's imaginary missile jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:59 +0000
                    Re: Rocky's imaginary missile moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 15:00 +0000
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:44 -0500
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:19 -0400
                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 17:31 -0500
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 18:56 -0400
                          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:35 -0500
                            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:59 -0400
                              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 19:19 -0500
                                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 20:51 -0400
                                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:32 -0500
                                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:07 -0400
                                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:16 -0500
                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
                                          Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:44 -0500
                                            Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:08 -0400
                                              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:10 -0500
                                                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:30 -0400
                                                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:46 -0500
                                                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:53 -0400
                                                      Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 11:12 -0500
                                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 12:32 -0400
                                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:37 -0500
                                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again & again ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:36 -0500
                                Re: Rocky stumped jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:46 +0000
                            Re: Rocky's legal woes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:52 +0000
                        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( sarah is a liar a stalker and a heckler again ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100
                        Re: Rocky's newst delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:50 +0000
                    Re: Backed into a corner, Rocky lashes out jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Rocky's imaginary missle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:56 +0000
              Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-14 08:42 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:32 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:29 -0400
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 15:32 -0400
                Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-14 10:44 -0400
                  Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 09:33 -0400
                    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-17 10:33 -0400
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 22:47 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? ( plus other media fcuk ups ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 23:42 -0500
        Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?  ( Gov Shit can't even keep his stories straight ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:59 -0500
    Re: 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-12 13:58 -0400

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#520362 — 14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-11 14:24 -0500
Subject14 years after 9/11 and where are Kid Wills supporting links?
Message-ID<TqadnYPULp0Bt27InZ2dnUU7-dudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Hey Kid,

I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and 
you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the Great 
9/11 Psy-op.

Basically you need a link that proves a 757 crashed a Pranksville, PA and 
you need a video that proves jets can not be filmed from a few miles away 
without a zoom.  <G>

And the funniest thing is there are all sorts of videos taken on 9/11 that 
had a jet but those were not real time so they had plenty of time to add 
CGIs to them.  <G>

And don't forget the black after the alleged crash filmed by Chopper 5.  The 
person thought the CGI fcuked up so he pulled the plug and there is no other 
reason why he pulled the plug.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#520369

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-11 16:04 -0400
Message-ID<msvc20$v1d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520362

Rocky wrote:
> Hey Kid,
>
> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence
> and you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of
> the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
>
> Basically you need a link that proves a 757 crashed a Pranksville, PA
> and you need a video that proves jets can not be filmed from a few
> miles away without a zoom.  <G>
>
> And the funniest thing is there are all sorts of videos taken on 9/11
> that had a jet but those were not real time so they had plenty of time
> to add CGIs to them.  <G>
>
> And don't forget the black after the alleged crash filmed by Chopper 5.
> The person thought the CGI fcuked up so he pulled the plug and there is
> no other reason why he pulled the plug.  <G>
>
> Rocky






Those plane videos are even funnier when you compare them back to back and 
notice the planes look different in each one.
That's why the networks never aired them more than once.


9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc


15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8


Watch, and do your own further research and verification..






[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520372 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-11 20:16 +0000
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<5dpbcc-qs6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520362
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> Hey Kid,
> 
> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and 
> you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the Great 
> 9/11 Psy-op.

Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520375 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-11 16:23 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<msvd54$3n0$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520372

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> Hey Kid,
>>
>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence
>> and you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of
>> the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
>
> Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -
>
> The facts are......



9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc


15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8


Watch, and do your own further research and verification..





[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520380 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-11 20:42 +0000
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<quqbcc-k17.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520375
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> Hey Kid,
>>>
>>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence
>>> and you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of
>>> the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
>>
>> Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -
>>
>> The facts are......
> 
> 
> 
> 9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
> 
> 
> 15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8
> 
> 
> Watch, and do your own further research and verification..
 
Here are some youtube videos for you and Rocky:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbwmzcnCF50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-2lBvdhN3g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M20Yrw-QlGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIrA6iCke2M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48nsKXTR1YE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA157Qb0K4A
 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520440 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

FromBDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
Date2015-09-11 23:04 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<MPG.305d6063d192a1b898c293@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#520380
In article <quqbcc-k17.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
says...
> 
> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>> Hey Kid,
> >>>
> >>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence
> >>> and you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of
> >>> the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
> >>
> >> Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -
> >>
> >> The facts are......
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
> > 
> > 
> > 15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8
> > 
> > 
> > Watch, and do your own further research and verification..
>  
> Here are some youtube videos for you and Rocky:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbwmzcnCF50

Sounds like Bast and the other Troofers have a form of Mixed Delusional 
Disorder. A belief in something crazy (Troofery) and a enlarged sense of 
self importance, where people are paid to block them from spreading the 
"truth".

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-2lBvdhN3g
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M20Yrw-QlGY
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIrA6iCke2M
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48nsKXTR1YE
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA157Qb0K4A
>  
>  



-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520473 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

From"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Date2015-09-12 06:51 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<mt100o$jq5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520440

BDK wrote:
> In article <quqbcc-k17.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> says...
>>
>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>> Hey Kid,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting
>>>>> evidence and you would think you could provide some for the 14th
>>>>> anniversary of the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -
>>>>
>>>> The facts are......
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>>>
>>>
>>> 15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8
>>>
>>>
>>> Watch, and do your own further research and verification..
>>
>> Here are some youtube videos for you and Rocky:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbwmzcnCF50
>
> Sounds like Bast and the other Troofers have a form of Mixed Delusional
> Disorder. A belief in something crazy (Troofery) and a enlarged sense of
> self importance, where people are paid to block them from spreading the
> "truth".





When did I ever say you were paid ?
I'm qute sure you are just being a troll on your own time.

So you lie again.
Watch the videos, as they will teach you why being publicly stupid is not an 
enviable position.
If you can't turn on the videos, ask an adult to do it for you.


9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc

15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 you will wish were not true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520481 — Re: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy

FromBDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
Date2015-09-12 10:13 -0400
SubjectRe: 14 years after 9/11 and Rocky still crazy
Message-ID<MPG.305dfd1be43ec43f98c294@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#520473
In article <mt100o$jq5$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> BDK wrote:
> > In article <quqbcc-k17.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Hey Kid,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting
> >>>>> evidence and you would think you could provide some for the 14th
> >>>>> anniversary of the Great 9/11 Psy-op.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey, delusional, raving, bat shit crazy, stalker -
> >>>>
> >>>> The facts are......
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 yoe;ll wish were not true
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Watch, and do your own further research and verification..
> >>
> >> Here are some youtube videos for you and Rocky:
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbwmzcnCF50
> >
> > Sounds like Bast and the other Troofers have a form of Mixed Delusional
> > Disorder. A belief in something crazy (Troofery) and a enlarged sense of
> > self importance, where people are paid to block them from spreading the
> > "truth".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> When did I ever say you were paid ?

Maybe you didn't, but a lot of your fellow Troofer kOOks do. A lot.

> I'm qute sure you are just being a troll on your own time.

It's my duty, and pleasure to point out the many issues you Troofers 
have.

> 
> So you lie again.

What did I lie about?

> Watch the videos, as they will teach you why being publicly stupid is not an 
> enviable position.

No, they teach me, again, that there are quite a few deluded Troofers 
out there like you.

> If you can't turn on the videos, ask an adult to do it for you.
> 

Sorry, I understand basic science and metallurgy, and that proves 
Troofery to be a false religion.

> 
> 9/11 Anatomy Of A Great Deception
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc

A video that a smart 8 year old would laugh at.

> 
> 15 Disturbing facts about 9/11 you will wish were not true
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbsZjW-m0x8

And this one a seven year old would call "stupid".

The question is what happened to your brain to make you swallow such 
nonsense?


-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520378

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2015-09-11 22:35 +0200
Message-ID<d5gs91FkktsU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#520362
Am 11.09.2015 21:24, schrieb Rocky:
> Hey Kid,
>
> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and
> you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the Great
> 9/11 Psy-op.

Well, i suggest you should be a little happier.

Maybe you will not find out, what actually happened.

But his is how things are and you may eventually fail to explain e.g. 
electrons (or: the collapse of the Twin towers).

Bad luck! (but: don't worry.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520650

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 06:48 -0500
Message-ID<M8ydnbaXLv4__2jInZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520378
"Thomas Heger" <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message 
news:d5gs91FkktsU1@mid.individual.net...
> Am 11.09.2015 21:24, schrieb Rocky:
>> Hey Kid,
>>
>> I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence 
>> and
>> you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the 
>> Great
>> 9/11 Psy-op.
>
> Well, i suggest you should be a little happier.
>
> Maybe you will not find out, what actually happened.
>
> But his is how things are and you may eventually fail to explain e.g. 
> electrons (or: the collapse of the Twin towers).
>
> Bad luck! (but: don't worry.)

Thanks and in case you missed it Kid Wills could not provide any good photos 
of the Flight 93 crash site and he is too stupid to figure out why he can't. 
<G>

Kid has also failed to see that a lot of people love to debunk Popular 
Mechanics because it is so easy to do.  Here ae911truth debunks PM:
 http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/676-debunking-popular-mechanics.html

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520408

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-11 18:07 -0500
Message-ID<hkn6va113o8o5rfghhmahv3h0jldfsfsag@4ax.com>
In reply to#520362
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>Hey Kid,
>

     Who, in reality and not your delusions, is Kid Wills?

>I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and 
>you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the Great 
>9/11 Psy-op.
>

     You're the one who makes the claim. It befalls you to provide
valid, verifiable evidence.

>Basically you need a link that proves a 757 crashed a Pranksville, PA and 
>you need a video that proves jets can not be filmed from a few miles away 
>without a zoom.  <G>

http://www.history.com/topics/flight-93

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/

     Shall I go on?

>
>And the funniest thing is there are all sorts of videos taken on 9/11 that 
>had a jet but those were not real time so they had plenty of time to add 
>CGIs to them.  <G>

     That something *can* be done is not evidence that it *has* been
done. DUH.

>
>And don't forget the black after the alleged crash filmed by Chopper 5.  

     What black?

>The 
>person thought the CGI fcuked up so he pulled the plug and there is no other 
>reason why he pulled the plug.  <G>

     What are you rambling about?
     I'd ask you for evidence for your claim, but if you do offer
anything, it will be bogus.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520422

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-11 18:40 -0500
Message-ID<Q5OdnTZ6SfQ4-27InZ2dnUU7-eudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520408
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:hkn6va113o8o5rfghhmahv3h0jldfsfsag@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>Hey Kid,
>>
>
>     Who, in reality and not your delusions, is Kid Wills?
>
>>I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and
>>you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the 
>>Great
>>9/11 Psy-op.
>>
>
>     You're the one who makes the claim. It befalls you to provide
> valid, verifiable evidence.
>
>>Basically you need a link that proves a 757 crashed a Pranksville, PA and
>>you need a video that proves jets can not be filmed from a few miles away
>>without a zoom.  <G>
>
> http://www.history.com/topics/flight-93

Lacks s lot of photos of the correct site for some reason.

> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/
>
>     Shall I go on?

Popular Mechanics has been debunked already and with other places they used 
a lot of straw man arguments and failed to address why so much of the Twin 
Towers floated away leaving Survivors in Stairwell B.  <G>

the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary)
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpTRNEVKMY4

>>And the funniest thing is there are all sorts of videos taken on 9/11 that
>>had a jet but those were not real time so they had plenty of time to add
>>CGIs to them.  <G>
>
>     That something *can* be done is not evidence that it *has* been
> done. DUH.

The fact that the jet was not in the wide shot is a smoking gun you idiot. 
<G>


>>And don't forget the black after the alleged crash filmed by Chopper 5.
>
>     What black?

Right after it appears that the jet went right through the South Tower.  The 
cameraman thought the CGI screwed up so he disconnected the camera.  <G>


>>The
>>person thought the CGI fcuked up so he pulled the plug and there is no 
>>other
>>reason why he pulled the plug.  <G>
>
>     What are you rambling about?
>     I'd ask you for evidence for your claim, but if you do offer
> anything, it will be bogus.

There is no other reason for why the video from Chopper 5 was screwed up 
other than the cameraman pulled the plug on it for a second or two.  <G>

Once again you fail and you fail big time because if you had been keeping 
track of the things that do not agree with the Official Bullshit you would 
have known about the Chopper 5 video.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520466

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-12 03:57 -0500
Message-ID<3up7va153d0q18ikqs6ip9d6vdlrckio90@4ax.com>
In reply to#520422
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:40:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:hkn6va113o8o5rfghhmahv3h0jldfsfsag@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Hey Kid,
>>
>>     Who, in reality and not your delusions, is Kid Wills?
>>


Note that Rocky is scared of offering an honest answer to my question.


>>>I'm sick and tired of trying to find your links to supporting evidence and
>>>you would think you could provide some for the 14th anniversary of the 
>>>Great
>>>9/11 Psy-op.
>>
>>     You're the one who makes the claim. It befalls you to provide
>> valid, verifiable evidence.
>>
>>>Basically you need a link that proves a 757 crashed a Pranksville, PA and
>>>you need a video that proves jets can not be filmed from a few miles away
>>>without a zoom.  <G>
>>
>> http://www.history.com/topics/flight-93
>
>Lacks s lot of photos of the correct site for some reason.
>

     I forgot. Words hurt your head. You can only deal with pictures
and k00k videos.

>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/
>>
>>     Shall I go on?
>
>Popular Mechanics has been debunked already and with other places they used 
>a lot of straw man arguments and failed to address why so much of the Twin 
>Towers floated away leaving Survivors in Stairwell B.  <G>

     So it's wrong because it proves your claims wrong?
     Wow.

>
>the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpTRNEVKMY4
>
>>>And the funniest thing is there are all sorts of videos taken on 9/11 that
>>>had a jet but those were not real time so they had plenty of time to add
>>>CGIs to them.  <G>
>>
>>     That something *can* be done is not evidence that it *has* been
>> done. DUH.
>
>The fact that the jet was not in the wide shot is a smoking gun you idiot. 
><G>
>

     Not to the mentally sound and educated mind.

>
>>>And don't forget the black after the alleged crash filmed by Chopper 5.
>>
>>     What black?
>
>Right after it appears that the jet went right through the South Tower.  The 
>cameraman thought the CGI screwed up so he disconnected the camera.  <G>
>

     I eagerly await your evidence.

>
>>>The
>>>person thought the CGI fcuked up so he pulled the plug and there is no 
>>>other
>>>reason why he pulled the plug.  <G>
>>
>>     What are you rambling about?
>>     I'd ask you for evidence for your claim, but if you do offer
>> anything, it will be bogus.
>
>There is no other reason for why the video from Chopper 5 was screwed up 
>other than the cameraman pulled the plug on it for a second or two.  <G>

     I eagerly await your evidence. If you're flat out lying, as you
will prove you are, you'll offer either avoidance or nothing.

>
>Once again you fail and you fail big time because if you had been keeping 
>track of the things that do not agree with the Official Bullshit you would 
>have known about the Chopper 5 video.  <G>
>

     Your avoidance is funny. 
     If you're very lucky, I'll be the only one who notices your use
of avoidance to deny the truth. But you're not even a little bit
lucky.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520648

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 06:41 -0500
Message-ID<Oa6dnd00FYWs_GjInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520466
Sure is funny that the people that ate the obvious lies about 9/11 are so 
quick to dish out more lies.



"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:3up7va153d0q18ikqs6ip9d6vdlrckio90@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:40:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/
>>>
>>>     Shall I go on?
>>
>>Popular Mechanics has been debunked already and with other places they 
>>used
>>a lot of straw man arguments and failed to address why so much of the Twin
>>Towers floated away leaving Survivors in Stairwell B.  <G>
>
>     So it's wrong because it proves your claims wrong?
>     Wow.

WRONG.  A lot of people have debunked PM and probably the place that loves 
to debunk PM the most is the following:
 http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520669

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
Message-ID<01tava1lt81frqigvpivg6sa3vu2ta6sjt@4ax.com>
In reply to#520648
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:41:56 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>Sure is funny that the people that ate the obvious lies about 9/11 are so 
>quick to dish out more lies.
>

     You do prove you are quick to dish out more lies. 

>
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:3up7va153d0q18ikqs6ip9d6vdlrckio90@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:40:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5688/debunking-911-myths-flight-93/
>>>>
>>>>     Shall I go on?
>>>
>>>Popular Mechanics has been debunked already and with other places they 
>>>used
>>>a lot of straw man arguments and failed to address why so much of the Twin
>>>Towers floated away leaving Survivors in Stairwell B.  <G>
>>
>>     So it's wrong because it proves your claims wrong?
>>     Wow.
>
>WRONG.  A lot of people have debunked PM and probably the place that loves 
>to debunk PM the most is the following:
> http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167 
>

     A k00k site? Surely you can do better.
     Well, maybe you can't since you need such sites to feed your
delusions.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520416

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-11 19:18 -0400
Message-ID<q3o6va91iu7jc27sdljjlh6mb66hcodq6u@4ax.com>
In reply to#520362
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>Hey Kid,

Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?

No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.

Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile and
launch platform?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520419

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-11 18:30 -0500
Message-ID<1vadnUWj6Pf_-W7InZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520416
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:q3o6va91iu7jc27sdljjlh6mb66hcodq6u@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>Hey Kid,
>
> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>
> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>
> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile and
> launch platform?

The type of missile used is in the video below and oddly enough the missile 
that was used is in the graphic associated with the following video too.

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I

And oddly enough there are still no links to support the Kid Wills' 
bullshit.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520435

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-11 21:26 -0400
Message-ID<vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com>
In reply to#520419
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:30:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:q3o6va91iu7jc27sdljjlh6mb66hcodq6u@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Hey Kid,
>>
>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>
>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>
>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile and
>> launch platform?
>
>The type of missile used is in the video below and oddly enough the missile 
>that was used is in the graphic associated with the following video too.

What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was used?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520550

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-12 18:07 -0500
Message-ID<ZKqdnXCPBpQdLWnInZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520435
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:vnv6va513k3d9hqknk94t34haqdnu8mqkd@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:30:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>news:q3o6va91iu7jc27sdljjlh6mb66hcodq6u@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hey Kid,
>>>
>>> Which one of you kook conspiracy trolls mentioned a cruise missile?  I
>>> responded asking what kind of cruise missile and launch platform?
>>>
>>> No answer yet.  And you're demanding proof from others.
>>>
>>> Get cracking Roger.  Answer the questions: What kind of cruise missile 
>>> and
>>> launch platform?
>>
>>The type of missile used is in the video below and oddly enough the 
>>missile
>>that was used is in the graphic associated with the following video too.
>
> What missile is it, Roger?   Don't you know?   And what platform was used?

You are making me repeat myself but this time I'll add the minute and second 
to start the video at:

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
( indexed to start at 25:25 )
 https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s

A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the
type of missile used didn't have a problem.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520564

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-13 00:14 +0000
Message-ID<torecc-dug.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520550
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> You are making me repeat myself but this time I'll add the minute and second 
> to start the video at:

Your delusions are making you repeat this laughable video, delusional
fuckwit.

> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the
> type of missile used didn't have a problem.

How do airliners ever land if they can't get close to the ground, delusional
fuckwit?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web