Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #729201 > unrolled thread

Red is Dead

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2019-02-25 23:02 -0800
Last post2019-02-27 22:02 -0800
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Red is Dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-25 23:02 -0800
    Re: Red is Dead Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-26 03:28 -0800
    Re: Red is Dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-26 08:22 -0800
      Re: Red is Dead The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-27 22:02 -0800

#729201 — Red is Dead

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2019-02-25 23:02 -0800
SubjectRed is Dead
Message-ID<5C74E47A.4C82@ix.netcom.com>
I don't understand what NASA is doing 
on Mars...Mars is dead.

Red is Dead.

If a surface of a planet is red, it's dead.

All one has to do is stand on
top of the Sun
and see all the planets around you...

if the surface of a planet is Red, it's dead.

All of the planets surface color are red except Earth, it's Blue.

If you're searching for life on other planets, just
stand on the sun, and look around it for a planet
with a color blue surface.

You know...just screen for the color Blue.

Red is Dead.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#729214

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Date2019-02-26 03:28 -0800
Message-ID<chine.bleu-5AD759.03284226022019@reader.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#729201
In article <5C74E47A.4C82@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Red is Dead.

Orphan Red is dead? That's so sad. Sure she was dumber than a box of hammers, 
but she was still a unique person.

-- 
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.    @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                                    /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy   This post         / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy.   insults Islam.  Mohammed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#729242

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2019-02-26 08:22 -0800
Message-ID<5C7567CB.3E9E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#729201
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I don't understand what NASA is doing
> on Mars...Mars is dead.
> 
> Red is Dead.
> 
> If a surface of a planet is red, it's dead.
> 
> All one has to do is stand on
> top of the Sun
> and see all the planets around you...
> 
> if the surface of a planet is Red, it's dead.
> 
> All of the planets surface color are red except Earth, it's Blue.
> 
> If you're searching for life on other planets, just
> stand on the sun, and look around it for a planet
> with a color blue surface.
> 
> You know...just screen for the color Blue.
> 
> Red is Dead.
> 

You never hear NASA say they are seaching for another ...pale blue dot.


Of the the billions and billions of planets they claimed to discover (and their super earths), all they have to do is screen out one color...Red.

You find another blue dot, you got life!

It's not sooo hard to screen out Colors (there's only three), ...(it's easy for them to fake colors.)

I mean, come on already...you got a fuckin hint..pale blue. 

Why are they searching...red planets?


Red is Dead.

Here are the facts: All planets out there their surface color is Red, except Earth.


Earth is known as the ...pale blue dot.


Why would anyone search for life on a red planet? Because...it's easier????

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect

bunch of drunk people at NASA...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#729561

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2019-02-27 22:02 -0800
Message-ID<5C777980.1A17@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#729242
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand what NASA is doing
> > on Mars...Mars is dead.
> >
> > Red is Dead.
> >
> > If a surface of a planet is red, it's dead.
> >
> > All one has to do is stand on
> > top of the Sun
> > and see all the planets around you...
> >
> > if the surface of a planet is Red, it's dead.
> >
> > All of the planets surface color are red except Earth, it's Blue.
> >
> > If you're searching for life on other planets, just
> > stand on the sun, and look around it for a planet
> > with a color blue surface.
> >
> > You know...just screen for the color Blue.
> >
> > Red is Dead.
> >
> 
> You never hear NASA say they are seaching for another ...pale blue dot.
> 
> Of the the billions and billions of planets they claimed to discover (and their super earths), all they have to do is screen out one color...Red.
> 
> You find another blue dot, you got life!
> 
> It's not sooo hard to screen out Colors (there's only three), ...(it's easy for them to fake colors.)
> 
> I mean, come on already...you got a fuckin hint..pale blue.
> 
> Why are they searching...red planets?
> 
> Red is Dead.
> 
> Here are the facts: All planets out there their surface color is Red, except Earth.
> 
> Earth is known as the ...pale blue dot.
> 
> Why would anyone search for life on a red planet? Because...it's easier????
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect
> 
> bunch of drunk people at NASA...
> 


Searching for life on other planets is very easy..you no need to be a rockit scientists.


You just take a pictue of the universe
screen/filter out all the dead red
and pick the pale blue spots...
there's your life.

There are only three primary colors.

Red is Dead.


But landing rockets on dead red is stupid, if not fraudulent, or both.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web