Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #722126 > unrolled thread

other universes

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  other universes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-01-02 23:10 -0800
    Re: other universes casagiannoni@optonline.net - 2019-01-03 08:55 -0500
      Re: other universes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-01-03 09:18 -0800
      Re: other universes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-01-03 11:11 -0800
      Re: other universes "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-03 14:16 -0800
        Re: other universes "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 14:37 -0800
          Re: other universes "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-03 14:43 -0800
          Re: other universes "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 15:32 -0800
            Re: other universes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2019-01-09 23:36 -0800
              Re: other universes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-01-10 14:49 +0100
      Re: other universes Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-01-04 02:01 +0100
    Re: other universes "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-03 14:38 -0800

#722126 — other universes

if
there
are
other 
universes..

there
certaintly
will
not
be
any
stars
in
it..

or
planets
or
rocks
or
things.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#722134

UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722139

casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> 
> UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.



but i wrote "universes" with an 's' , it's plural...meaning more than one.


My 'observations' of another universe (next to ours) shows that there is nothing in it.


In other words, to be clear..

everything that it takes
for another universe to contain
everything in it like ours
doesn't show up.

It's blank.

There is nothing in it.

It's dark.

Ours
is
filled
with
stars.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722140

Mark Earnest wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 7:55:36 AM UTC-6, casagi...
> > UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.
> 
> I think by other universes people  mean other gigantic gravitation collected
> 
> groups of galaxies or parallel universes.
> 
> But you are right, there can be only one everything.


How can you have one everything if one is one and everything is a group of more than one???? 



Of course there may be other universes with...broken stars.


But only one that works as well as ours...


not as well, but works.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722147

On 1/3/2019 5:55 AM, casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.
> 

Fantasy land thoughts, warning:
____________________
Imagine slices of a higher dimensional object. Each slice can be 
infinite in detail, wrt a fractal. We can infinitely zoom in on any 
detail/artifact we want to. Therefore, each individual slice can hold 
all information, true or not, think library of Babel. However, there are 
an infinite number of slices comprising the larger object. Another 
library wrt a different way of viewing the slices, say, volumetrically?
____________________

Here is a strange infinite bug, rendered wrt a volume of slices, 256^3, 
or 256x256x256:

http://siggrapharts.ning.com/photo/bug-time

;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722148

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 2:16:27 PM UTC-8, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/3/2019 5:55 AM, casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.
> > 
> 
> Fantasy land thoughts, warning:
> ____________________
> Imagine slices of a higher dimensional object. Each slice can be 
> infinite in detail, wrt a fractal. We can infinitely zoom in on any 
> detail/artifact we want to. Therefore, each individual slice can hold 
> all information, true or not, think library of Babel. However, there are 
> an infinite number of slices comprising the larger object. Another 
> library wrt a different way of viewing the slices, say, volumetrically?
> ____________________
> 
> Here is a strange infinite bug, rendered wrt a volume of slices, 256^3, 
> or 256x256x256:
> 
> http://siggrapharts.ning.com/photo/bug-time
> 
> ;^)

There are more universes in the cosmos than snowflakes. Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722154

On 1/3/2019 2:37 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 2:16:27 PM UTC-8, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 1/3/2019 5:55 AM, casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
>>> UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.
>>>
>>
>> Fantasy land thoughts, warning:
>> ____________________
>> Imagine slices of a higher dimensional object. Each slice can be
>> infinite in detail, wrt a fractal. We can infinitely zoom in on any
>> detail/artifact we want to. Therefore, each individual slice can hold
>> all information, true or not, think library of Babel. However, there are
>> an infinite number of slices comprising the larger object. Another
>> library wrt a different way of viewing the slices, say, volumetrically?
>> ____________________
>>
>> Here is a strange infinite bug, rendered wrt a volume of slices, 256^3,
>> or 256x256x256:
>>
>> http://siggrapharts.ning.com/photo/bug-time
>>
>> ;^)
> 
> There are more universes in the cosmos than snowflakes. Bert
> 

Keep in mind that we can zoom in on each unique snowflakes beautiful 
grandeur.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722862

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 2:37:49 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 2:16:27 PM UTC-8, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 1/3/2019 5:55 AM, casagiannoni@optonline.net wrote:
> > > UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING, so there can be only one.
> > > 
> > 
> > Fantasy land thoughts, warning:
> > ____________________
> > Imagine slices of a higher dimensional object. Each slice can be 
> > infinite in detail, wrt a fractal. We can infinitely zoom in on any 
> > detail/artifact we want to. Therefore, each individual slice can hold 
> > all information, true or not, think library of Babel. However, there are 
> > an infinite number of slices comprising the larger object. Another 
> > library wrt a different way of viewing the slices, say, volumetrically?
> > ____________________
> > 
> > Here is a strange infinite bug, rendered wrt a volume of slices, 256^3, 
> > or 256x256x256:
> > 
> > http://siggrapharts.ning.com/photo/bug-time
> > 
> > ;^)
> 
> There are more universes in the cosmos than snowflakes. Bert

Universes are also created in pairs.We are negative,and our twin is positive.Now you know where what we call anti-matter is.My time lapse theory fits in at the moment time began to flow.As I posted my late friend Treb gave me these answers.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722920

"homo-reber G=emc^2" <herbertgay-lazier0@gmail.com> is
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> who wrote:
"I can do wonders with **Manure&Maggots** (=M&M." Bert
and **Treb**, which is short for **The reeking excrement bucket
that I shot into in my stinky old van, gave me these answers" Bert
>
 So, "Forget about the Nobel. I will not even get a "Nobelch-price"
since "My bar-tab for Bud Light broke-all-records" O ya. Bert.
"and along the very same line I do guzzle my wine". Bert
>
Also, "I use Cocaine that is a wonder-drug for me". Bert.
"The drugs I'm taking, (21/d), are fogging my mind".  Bert
"I can't even remember lots of stuff anymore".Bert  ... But...
"I will do even more Drugs till the end of my time". Bert
>
"Best keep in mind my stolen G=EMC^2 for the universe is
short for "GLAZIER EXHIBITS MICRO CEPHALIC CRETINISM"
which is now rather well accepted by myself". O ya. Bert .
"Its made me famous in my own time".Bert... which is prven
by web-searches that say:
>
--- Glazier Stupid G=EMC^2 Cretin       ----  3'327'833 hits & rising
--- SwineBert mooch reber Face-shitter  ---- 3'947'953 hits & rising
--- Glazier criminal Graveyard Vandal   ---- 3'653'334 hits & rising.
>
But "I am a STUPID shit who ELECTED to become a homeless
bum, and to strut myself as a self-elected & self-anointed vagrant
who lives in & shits  into a bucket in a stinky old Van". Oya. Bert
>
"So, there are Lots of reasons why-I-lie. Go figure. O ya." Bert
"Ok-I'm-lying". "I feel very safe when I lie. I will lie till I die" Bert
>
"I am phony Swine who shamed & hates his own Glazier-Family,
which now does not want to have anything to do with SwineBert
anymore. And I, SwineBert, am proud to be at fault of having
caused all that. It's a given. Go figure. O ya. Bert
But then "I am a 1st class low wit bigot.  Sad and so true. Bert"
>
So, "I daily bleat **My Stupid Palaver** ( = MSP) to prove
that I have always been a Mental Cadaver. Bert"
>
____ "I park, bark & fart in the dark. Bert" _________
>
"I'm a stupid shit and always very full of it." Bert."
>
"Why am I posting this, it's making me cry as it always does".Bert
>
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true". That is a given. Bert
"Get the picture", "Go figure", "O ya",  "I know why".Bert
>
but ______  "Why am I not loved by all?". Bert. _________
>
"I am a proud Marxist/Soros/Bolshevik Jew with a IQ of 1-point-22". Bert
"I have a Superiority complex" without any quirks
 which lets me know how everything works." Bert...as it also
>
shows <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent> even
while <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-de-Minting > is happening
& <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker> proves
>
that SwineBert has always-ONLY-ONE-thing-on his mind,
namely to do all those items-from-(1)-to-item-(5), as that is
SwineBert's sole accomplishment & his only success that
Glazier has achieved in SwineBert useless life, proven when....
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
On 20Jul2018:
Benj, my posts are way over your head.Reality is your head
is up your ass.So fart it out before you get constipated.Bert
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722927

hanson wrote:
> "homo-reber G=emc^2" <herbertgay-lazier0@gmail.com> is
> <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> who wrote:
> […]

Please FOAD.

F’up2 where you belong

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722170

casagiannoni@optonline.net demonstrated their ignorance again:
> UNIVERSE means EVERYTHING so there can be only one
The term was coined by philosophers around 63 BCE.

This is science and the year is 2018 CE.

F’up2 sci.physics.relativity

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722149

On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 11:08:47 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> if
> there
> are
> other 
> universes..
> 
> there
> certaintly
> will
> not
> be
> any
> stars
> in
> it..
> 
> or
> planets
> or
> rocks
> or
> things.
> 
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web