Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #710695 > unrolled thread

SpaceTime

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-10-31 23:04 -0700
    Re: SpaceTime SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-11-01 19:58 +1100
      Re: SpaceTime Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-01 04:15 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-01 14:24 +0000
          Re: SpaceTime djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2018-11-01 16:23 +0000
            Re: SpaceTime snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-01 17:41 +0000
            Re: SpaceTime Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2018-11-02 07:51 +1300
              Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:37 -0700
          Re: SpaceTime Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-01 09:47 -0700
            Re: SpaceTime snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-01 17:41 +0000
            Re: SpaceTime djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2018-11-01 17:51 +0000
      Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-01 10:20 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-01 10:38 -0700
          Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-01 23:06 -0700
            Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-02 14:46 -0700
              Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-03 20:37 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 21:15 -0700
                Re: SpaceTime benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 02:09 -0500
                Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-04 09:57 -0800
                  Re: SpaceTime mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 19:07 -0800
                    Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-04 21:08 -0800
                      Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-05 21:27 -0800
                        Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-06 15:37 -0800
                    Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 18:18 -0800
            Re: SpaceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-11-02 14:47 -0700
    Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:37 -0700
    Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:42 -0700
    Re: SpaceTime yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 18:09 -0700
      Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:53 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 03:44 -0800
          Re: SpaceTime yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 03:59 -0800
            Re: SpaceTime yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 04:09 -0800
      Re: SpaceTime Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-02 14:28 -0700
        Without entropy there is neither space nor time. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-11-02 14:49 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 19:00 -0700
        Re: SpaceTime yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 03:48 -0800
          Re: SpaceTime mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 19:04 -0800
    Re: SpaceTime mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 18:23 -0700
      Re: SpaceTime Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-03 16:17 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#711593

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 9:56:58 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > >
> > > David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > > > StarSharter Excreted .....
> > > >
> > > > You need to understand 'the order of events'...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > First comes Time (in the beginning), then God, then created, then the universe, then the earth.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "created" , you can also change it to "Bang"...
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "God" , you can also change it to "Big"...
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "universe" , you can also change it to "Space"...
> > > >
> > > > but the 'order of events' remain the same.
> > >
> > > LOL.
> > >
> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe>
> > >
> > > --
> > > PointedEars
> > >
> > > Twitter: @PointedEars2
> > > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
> >
> >
> > Hey, you stupid motherfucker, you didn't bother to read the disclaimer in the link you provided:
> >
> >  "It is generally considered meaningless or unclear whether time existed before this chronology:"
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
> >
> >
> > "meaningless" means don't fuckin ask.
> >
> > "unclear"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Means, yous people brains are ...unclear.
> >
> >
> > you are running arouning in a fog, wats wrong wit yous people?
> >
> >
> > Population of scientists has gone up, but are they real scientist????
> >
> > (you don't need a high school education to become a scientist...you just need to read one science fiction book)
> >
> 
> We already have to much fiction posing as science.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


Most of the 'scientist' today grew up reading something called... Science Fiction Magazines:


https://www.google.com/search?q=astounding+science+fiction+magazine&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCn-Cuu7zeAhVhTd8KHYZ2Aq8Q_AUIEygC&biw=1920&bih=951



it warps the mind of children...



the majority of todays scientist grew up reading this garbage...


are they still looking for life or carnals on Mars????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711808

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 9:56:58 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > > > > StarSharter Excreted .....
> > > > >
> > > > > You need to understand 'the order of events'...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > First comes Time (in the beginning), then God, then created, then the universe, then the earth.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't like the word "created" , you can also change it to "Bang"...
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't like the word "God" , you can also change it to "Big"...
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't like the word "universe" , you can also change it to "Space"...
> > > > >
> > > > > but the 'order of events' remain the same.
> > > >
> > > > LOL.
> > > >
> > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PointedEars
> > > >
> > > > Twitter: @PointedEars2
> > > > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey, you stupid motherfucker, you didn't bother to read the disclaimer in the link you provided:
> > >
> > >  "It is generally considered meaningless or unclear whether time existed before this chronology:"
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
> > >
> > >
> > > "meaningless" means don't fuckin ask.
> > >
> > > "unclear"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Means, yous people brains are ...unclear.
> > >
> > >
> > > you are running arouning in a fog, wats wrong wit yous people?
> > >
> > >
> > > Population of scientists has gone up, but are they real scientist????
> > >
> > > (you don't need a high school education to become a scientist...you just need to read one science fiction book)
> > >
> >
> > We already have to much fiction posing as science.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> Most of the 'scientist' today grew up reading something called... Science Fiction Magazines:
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?q=astounding+science+fiction+magazine&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCn-Cuu7zeAhVhTd8KHYZ2Aq8Q_AUIEygC&biw=1920&bih=951
> 
> it warps the mind of children...
> 
> the majority of todays scientist grew up reading this garbage...
> 
> are they still looking for life or carnals on Mars????



Now go back...what did Albert Einstein grew up reading?  Well, he wrote about Relativity...that would mean he read a lot of...philosophy books.



All the way to the end of his life by that book on his desk...

https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/the-day-einstein-died-02.jpg?quality=85&w=534

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711889

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 9:56:58 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > > > > > StarSharter Excreted .....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You need to understand 'the order of events'...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First comes Time (in the beginning), then God, then created, then the universe, then the earth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you don't like the word "created" , you can also change it to "Bang"...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you don't like the word "God" , you can also change it to "Big"...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you don't like the word "universe" , you can also change it to "Space"...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but the 'order of events' remain the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL.
> > > > >
> > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe>
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > PointedEars
> > > > >
> > > > > Twitter: @PointedEars2
> > > > > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey, you stupid motherfucker, you didn't bother to read the disclaimer in the link you provided:
> > > >
> > > >  "It is generally considered meaningless or unclear whether time existed before this chronology:"
> > > >
> > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "meaningless" means don't fuckin ask.
> > > >
> > > > "unclear"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Means, yous people brains are ...unclear.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > you are running arouning in a fog, wats wrong wit yous people?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Population of scientists has gone up, but are they real scientist????
> > > >
> > > > (you don't need a high school education to become a scientist...you just need to read one science fiction book)
> > > >
> > >
> > > We already have to much fiction posing as science.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> >
> > Most of the 'scientist' today grew up reading something called... Science Fiction Magazines:
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=astounding+science+fiction+magazine&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCn-Cuu7zeAhVhTd8KHYZ2Aq8Q_AUIEygC&biw=1920&bih=951
> >
> > it warps the mind of children...
> >
> > the majority of todays scientist grew up reading this garbage...
> >
> > are they still looking for life or carnals on Mars????
> 
> Now go back...what did Albert Einstein grew up reading?  Well, he wrote about Relativity...that would mean he read a lot of...philosophy books.
> 
> All the way to the end of his life by that book on his desk...
> 
> https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/the-day-einstein-died-02.jpg?quality=85&w=534


and Einstein said: "I want to know God's thoughts – the rest are mere details."


Was Einstein practicing psychiatry without a licence???? 


What are you thinking, God? or "What were you thinking???!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711790

On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:07:51 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 9:56:58 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> > > > StarSharter Excreted .....
> > > >
> > > > You need to understand 'the order of events'...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > First comes Time (in the beginning), then God, then created, then the universe, then the earth.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "created" , you can also change it to "Bang"...
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "God" , you can also change it to "Big"...
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like the word "universe" , you can also change it to "Space"...
> > > >
> > > > but the 'order of events' remain the same.
> > > 
> > > LOL.
> > > 
> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe>
> > > 
> > > --
> > > PointedEars
> > > 
> > > Twitter: @PointedEars2
> > > Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
> > 
> > 
> > Hey, you stupid motherfucker, you didn't bother to read the disclaimer in the link you provided:
> > 
> >  "It is generally considered meaningless or unclear whether time existed before this chronology:" 
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
> > 
> > 
> > "meaningless" means don't fuckin ask.
> > 
> > "unclear"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Means, yous people brains are ...unclear.
> > 
> > 
> > you are running arouning in a fog, wats wrong wit yous people?
> > 
> > 
> > Population of scientists has gone up, but are they real scientist???? 
> > 
> > (you don't need a high school education to become a scientist...you just need to read one science fiction book)
> > 
>  
> We already have to much fiction posing as science.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

Reality is Gods are fiction.Its faith(brain wash) all the way down to hell.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711114

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > SolomonW wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 23:04:02 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > > >
> > > > > You see, first came time
> > > > >
> > > > > then came space.
> > > > >
> > > > > Space comes from Time.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > > >
> > > > When you run out of space, you run out of time
> > >
> > > Space is a product of time.
> > >
> > > Space comes from Time.
> > >
> > > If you run out of space, there plenty of time.
> > >
> > > Space expands from Time. Time measures Space.
> > >
> > > If you run out of space you need more time to get more space.
> >
> > Relativity is...Time measure Space.
> 
> Now...Time..really doesn't have anything to do with...us.
> 
> What i mean is...Time is not part of this universe..
> 
> Time existed long before the big bang..
> 
> long before
> space
> the universe
> earth
> 
> Time has nothing to do with...nature.
> 
> I'll go as far as the facts as I see it...
> 
> Time existed...before
> 
> .. God.





In other words...Space is not the last frontier.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710939

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:03:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> 
> It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> 
> You see, first came time
> 
> then came space.
> 
> Space comes from Time.
> 
> 
> When you run out of time, you run out of space.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710953

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:03:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> 
> It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> 
> You see, first came time
> 
> then came space.
> 
> Space comes from Time.
> 
> 
> When you run out of time, you run out of space.

No need to look at your Rolex when your going 73% of c.Have Earth send you Earth time and compare it with the spaceship clock.One thing stay away from BHs for they kill time.Hope you don't have a twin on Earth.He could die of old age before you get back.Your wife as well,but what the hell.Find her young sister,and F--k her well.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710957

On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> 
> It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> 
> You see, first came time
> 
> then came space.
> 
> Space comes from Time.
> 
> 
> When you run out of time, you run out of space.
==========================
Time  is relative movement!!
2
 
there is  no movement 
  without mass =

= Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???

old   copyright 
Y.Porat
====================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711005

On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > 
> > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > 
> > You see, first came time
> > 
> > then came space.
> > 
> > Space comes from Time.
> > 
> > 
> > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> ==========================
> Time  is relative movement!!
> 2
>  
> there is  no movement 
>   without mass =
> 
> = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> 
> old   copyright 
> Y.Porat
> ====================

Easy to say,but not easy to show how mass creates gravity,and gravity is the #1 force.G=EMC^2 and never forget it.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711436

On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:53:57 PM UTC+2, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > 
> > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > 
> > > You see, first came time
> > > 
> > > then came space.
> > > 
> > > Space comes from Time.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > ==========================
> > Time  is relative movement!!
> > 2
> >  
> > there is  no movement 
> >   without mass =
> > 
> > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > 
> > old   copyright 
> > Y.Porat
> > ====================
> 
> Easy to say,but not easy to show how mass creates gravity,and gravity is the #1 force.G=EMC^2 and never forget it.Bert
==================
not easy to show ??!!
if so
I will   show you how :

the y circlon'' and 
'The y circlon mechanism'' 
from  1993 !!!!
----------------------------
http://sites/google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

at  its appendix !
=======================
it is not only creator of all***   forces including gravity!!
====================================================
it is as well

A PARTICLE BUILSDER !!
would you believe it ?
by the ''chain  of orbitals'' system !!!as well 
that  working    all along chemistry and physics !!!


TIA
Y.Porat
==================
  
!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711438

On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 1:44:44 PM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:53:57 PM UTC+2, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > > 
> > > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > > 
> > > > You see, first came time
> > > > 
> > > > then came space.
> > > > 
> > > > Space comes from Time.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > > ==========================
> > > Time  is relative movement!!
> > > 2
> > >  
> > > there is  no movement 
> > >   without mass =
> > > 
> > > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > > 
> > > old   copyright 
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ====================
> > 
> > Easy to say,but not easy to show how mass creates gravity,and gravity is the #1 force.G=EMC^2 and never forget it.Bert
> ==================
> not easy to show ??!!
> if so
> I will   show you how :
> 
> the y circlon'' and 
> 'The y circlon mechanism'' 
> from  1993 !!!!
> ----------------------------
> http://sites/google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> 
> at  its appendix !
> =======================
> it is not only creator of all***   forces including gravity!!
> ====================================================
> it is as well
> 
> A PARTICLE BUILSDER !!
> would you believe it ?
> by the ''chain  of orbitals'' system !!!as well 
> that  working    all along chemistry and physics !!!
> 
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ==================
>   
sorry typo 
just one . missing !!

http://sits.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

at the appendix !

it is more than time that you will copy / download  it to your archive !~

hope it is right now
TIA
Y.Porat
===========

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711439

On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 1:59:55 PM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 1:44:44 PM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:53:57 PM UTC+2, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You see, first came time
> > > > > 
> > > > > then came space.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Space comes from Time.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > > > ==========================
> > > > Time  is relative movement!!
> > > > 2
> > > >  
> > > > there is  no movement 
> > > >   without mass =
> > > > 
> > > > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > > > 
> > > > old   copyright 
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > ====================
> > > 
> > > Easy to say,but not easy to show how mass creates gravity,and gravity is the #1 force.G=EMC^2 and never forget it.Bert
> > ==================
> > not easy to show ??!!
> > if so
> > I will   show you how :
> > 
> > the y circlon'' and 
> > 'The y circlon mechanism'' 
> > from  1993 !!!!
> > ----------------------------
> > http://sites/google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> > 
> > at  its appendix !
> > =======================
> > it is not only creator of all***   forces including gravity!!
> > ====================================================
> > it is as well
> > 
> > A PARTICLE BUILSDER !!
> > would you believe it ?
> > by the ''chain  of orbitals'' system !!!as well 
> > that  working    all along chemistry and physics !!!
> > 
> > 
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ==================
> >   
> sorry typo 
> just one . missing !!
> 
> http://sits.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
> 
> at the appendix !
> 
> it is more than time that you will copy / download  it to your archive !~
> 
> hope it is right now
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ===========
again :

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

at  its appendix 
lets hope now … 
Y.Porat
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711106

On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > 
> > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > 
> > You see, first came time
> > 
> > then came space.
> > 
> > Space comes from Time.
> > 
> > 
> > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> ==========================
> Time  is relative movement!!
> 2
>  
> there is  no movement 
>   without mass =
> 
> = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> 
> old   copyright 
> Y.Porat
> ====================


So without mass, there is no time!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711115 — Without entropy there is neither space nor time.

> without mass, there is no time!

Without entropy there is neither space nor time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711376

On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 2:28:17 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > 
> > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > 
> > > You see, first came time
> > > 
> > > then came space.
> > > 
> > > Space comes from Time.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > ==========================
> > Time  is relative movement!!
> > 2
> >  
> > there is  no movement 
> >   without mass =
> > 
> > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > 
> > old   copyright 
> > Y.Porat
> > ====================
> 
> 
> So without mass, there is no time!
> 
> Double-A

Without mass there is no universe.Time we came to that conclusion.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711437

On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 11:28:17 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > 
> > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > 
> > > You see, first came time
> > > 
> > > then came space.
> > > 
> > > Space comes from Time.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> > ==========================
> > Time  is relative movement!!
> > 2
> >  
> > there is  no movement 
> >   without mass =
> > 
> > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > 
> > old   copyright 
> > Y.Porat
> > ====================
> 
> 
> So without mass, there is no time!
> 
> Double-A
=============
right !!bravo !!
you are my friend !  college !
Y.P
===============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711571

On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 3:48:49 AM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 11:28:17 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+2, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > > > 
> > > > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > > > 
> > > > You see, first came time
> > > > 
> > > > then came space.

Where was time Roy?


> > > > 
> > > > Space comes from Time.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > When you run out of time, you run out of space.

Then you're a fossil Roy.

> > > ==========================
> > > Time  is relative movement!!


No. It is order beyond movement.

Slow time is with gravity and movement.

> > > 2
> > >  
> > > there is  no movement 
> > >   without mass =


Movement is for light and atoms.
Light is the lighter mass.

> > > 
> > > = Mass is the creator of all  forces ====???
> > > 
> > > old   copyright 
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ====================
> > 
> > 
> > So without mass, there is no time!

There is No time action for where there is no light or atom...

> > Double-A
> =============
> right !!bravo !!
> you are my friend !  college !
> Y.P
> ===============================

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711163

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:03:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> 
> It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> 
> You see, first came time
> 
> then came space.
> 
> Space comes from Time.
> 
> 
> When you run out of time, you run out of space.

Wrong Roy Masters... Here and now is the right order.
Dimension expanded first then gravity and time began.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711348

On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:23:20 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:03:18 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The problem with the word spacetime is that it is backwards.
> > 
> > It's suppose to be timespace...in that order.
> > 
> > You see, first came time
> > 
> > then came space.
> > 
> > Space comes from Time.
> > 
> > 
> > When you run out of time, you run out of space.
> 
> Wrong Roy Masters... Here and now is the right order.
> Dimension expanded first then gravity and time began.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch


How do you suppose dimension expanded first when it had no time to do it?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web