Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #694047 > unrolled thread

Re: No Explanation for the Sun

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
Last post2018-07-18 12:12 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 86 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
    Re: No Explanation for the Sun mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-15 15:58 -0700
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:40 -0700
        Re: No Explanation for the Sun "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-16 20:23 -0700
    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Olin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh> - 2018-07-16 12:42 +0000
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 07:48 -0700
        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 16:08 +0000
          Re: No Explanation for the Sun "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:36 -0700
            Re: No Explanation for the Sun "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-16 20:15 -0700
            Re: No Explanation for the Sun Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-17 13:55 -0700
              Re: No Explanation for the Sun "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:12 -0700
                Re: No Explanation for the Sun "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-21 18:45 -0700
          Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 21:22 -0700
            Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 12:44 +0000
              Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 06:34 -0700
                Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:10 +0000
                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:18 -0700
                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:24 +0000
                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 08:31 -0700
                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 15:51 +0000
                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:24 -0700
                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 17:52 +0000
                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 10:53 -0700
                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 18:12 +0000
                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 11:15 -0700
                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 11:18 -0700
                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:31 +0000
                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 13:02 -0700
                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 21:01 +0000
                                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:18 -0700
                                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 21:58 +0000
                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 18:20 -0700
                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:16 +0000
                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 20:30 -0400
                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 02:04 +0000
                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 22:21 -0400
                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:23 -0700
                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 18:54 -0700
                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 19:08 -0700
                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:09 -0700
                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:28 -0700
                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 06:44 -0700
                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:39 -0700
                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:31 -0700
                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:57 -0700
                                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:13 +0000
                                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 07:41 -0700
                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:51 +0000
                                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 09:18 -0700
                                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 16:28 +0000
                                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 10:21 -0700
                                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 13:03 -0700
                                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 21:09 +0000
                                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 15:30 -0700
                                                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 23:21 +0000
                                                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 20:00 -0700
                                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 06:04 -0700
                                                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:52 +0000
                                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 10:24 -0700
                                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:39 +0000
                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:21 -0700
                                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 13:50 +0000
                                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 06:47 -0700
                                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:54 +0000
                                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 07:03 -0700
                                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 07:11 -0700
                                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 14:19 +0000
                                                          Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 07:49 -0700
                                                            Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 15:41 +0000
                                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 15:43 +0000
                                                              Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 09:02 -0700
                                                                Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 17:07 +0000
                                                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 10:16 -0700
                                                                    Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 17:19 +0000
                                                                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 10:25 -0700
                                                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 17:38 +0000
                                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 14:12 +0000
                                  Re: No Explanation for the Sun Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:37 -0700
                      Re: No Explanation for the Sun Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-17 10:54 -0500
                        Re: No Explanation for the Sun benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 14:10 -0400
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 19:42 -0700
        Re: No Explanation for the Sun "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-16 20:20 -0700
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-17 10:15 -0700
        Re: No Explanation for the Sun Otto Snook <uot@wuoluo.uc> - 2018-07-17 17:53 +0000
    Re: No Explanation for the Sun The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-18 00:31 -0700
      Re: No Explanation for the Sun benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:12 -0400

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#694047 — Re: No Explanation for the Sun

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2018-07-15 15:46 -0700
SubjectRe: No Explanation for the Sun
Message-ID<5B4BCEC1.2498@ix.netcom.com>
Mark Earnest wrote:
> 
> No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
> 
> years.


the universe goes from hot to cold as ice...

before the big bang, it was in the reverse state..
from cold to hot.

Now, our sun takes a little longer to turn to an ice cube.


In other words, women live longer than men.

they are lighter
have squeaky voices
and as cold as ice..
but give a lot more warmth.

i no tink you get the connection...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#694051

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2018-07-15 15:58 -0700
Message-ID<750338e3-a712-450d-aacb-ee0f86c5e720@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694047
On Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mark Earnest wrote:
> > 
> > No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
> > 
> > years.
> 
> 
> the universe goes from hot to cold as ice...
> 
> before the big bang, it was in the reverse state..
> from cold to hot.
> 
> Now, our sun takes a little longer to turn to an ice cube.
> 
> 
> In other words, women live longer than men.
> 
> they are lighter
> have squeaky voices
> and as cold as ice..
> but give a lot more warmth.
> 
> i no tink you get the connection...

There was another star before the Solar System.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694213

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 19:40 -0700
Message-ID<5d543e8a-22e8-4184-9ed0-c8f1efecf6d7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694051
On Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 3:58:13 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 3:46:23 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Mark Earnest wrote:
> > > 
> > > No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
> > > 
> > > years.
> > 
> > 
> > the universe goes from hot to cold as ice...
> > 
> > before the big bang, it was in the reverse state..
> > from cold to hot.
> > 
> > Now, our sun takes a little longer to turn to an ice cube.
> > 
> > 
> > In other words, women live longer than men.
> > 
> > they are lighter
> > have squeaky voices
> > and as cold as ice..
> > but give a lot more warmth.
> > 
> > i no tink you get the connection...
> 
> There was another star before the Solar System.
> 
> Mitchell Raemsch

That star exploded and created all the dust and rocks.Earth is are wet rock.All others are dry ice.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694229

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2018-07-16 20:23 -0700
Message-ID<pijnf8$20b$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694213
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip SwineBert's  sanctimony and Bert's Lies>

Mitchell Raemsch <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> said: 
"Glazier, you are yodeling in & from your jail's mental 
hospital ward" ... & GOPers will put 
<https://tinyurl.com/Glazier-in-Mental-Institution>
 
>
==== See more in  Glazier's Dossier =====
>
>
hmmm...<snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694112

FromOlin Hayton <toa@nahslao.nh>
Date2018-07-16 12:42 +0000
Message-ID<pii3s3$1c22$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694047
The Starmaker wrote:

> Mark Earnest wrote:
>> No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last
>> ten billion years.
>  
> the universe goes from hot to cold as ice... before the big bang, it was
> in the reverse state.. from cold to hot.

I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
capabilities.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694124

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 07:48 -0700
Message-ID<887d65f4-849c-48ce-8ad9-30f9131f3bad@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694112
“I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
capabilities. 
”
The Universe is constantly being recycled.
Old stars burn out and are shredded and new stars and planets condense from their and others’ remains. How is that hard to grasp?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694134

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 16:08 +0000
Message-ID<piifuo$5io$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694124
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> “I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
> they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
> of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
> capabilities. 
> ”
> The Universe is constantly being recycled.
> Old stars burn out and are shredded and new stars and planets condense
> from their and others’ remains. How is that hard to grasp?
> 

Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694210

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 19:36 -0700
Message-ID<ba26db2e-5ac3-4be3-9436-edf8371049fe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694134
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:09:00 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> > “I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
> > they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
> > of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
> > capabilities. 
> > ”
> > The Universe is constantly being recycled.
> > Old stars burn out and are shredded and new stars and planets condense
> > from their and others’ remains. How is that hard to grasp?
> > 
> 
> Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so. 
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Sun is  controlled fusion.Gravity does the controlling.I know how to control fusion in pulses(time lapses) Thus I have invented my PFM  It will give humankind all the energy it will need even if the sun up and went  Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694227

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2018-07-16 20:15 -0700
Message-ID<pijn0g$vqr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694210
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
"I know how to control face-shitting in pulses (time lapses)
Thus I have invented my "Perverted Fart Mentality" ( = PFM)
 It will give SwineBert reasons not to explain why SwineBert
has posted items (1) to (5)
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694329

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2018-07-17 13:55 -0700
Message-ID<d514c165-0186-4bd9-8e3d-d9a42aa4e943@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694210
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 7:36:43 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:09:00 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > “I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
> > > they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
> > > of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
> > > capabilities. 
> > > ”
> > > The Universe is constantly being recycled.
> > > Old stars burn out and are shredded and new stars and planets condense
> > > from their and others’ remains. How is that hard to grasp?
> > > 
> > 
> > Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> Sun is  controlled fusion.Gravity does the controlling.I know how to control fusion in pulses(time lapses) Thus I have invented my PFM  It will give humankind all the energy it will need even if the sun up and went  Bert


So why don't you sell some stock, float some bonds, give Elon Musk a call, and get that fusion reactor off the ground!  We need the energy!  We don't want to give up our smart electric toothbrushes!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694963

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-21 14:12 -0700
Message-ID<f4bac5d9-94e2-453b-a44c-0c906e2e7eb8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694329
On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 1:55:47 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 7:36:43 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:09:00 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > “I hardly conceive the universe going into existence instantaneously as 
> > > > they pretend. However, that the Earth got into existence same way, 4.5e9 
> > > > of years ago, still instantaneously, exceeds by far my comprehension 
> > > > capabilities. 
> > > > ”
> > > > The Universe is constantly being recycled.
> > > > Old stars burn out and are shredded and new stars and planets condense
> > > > from their and others’ remains. How is that hard to grasp?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so. 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> > 
> > Sun is  controlled fusion.Gravity does the controlling.I know how to control fusion in pulses(time lapses) Thus I have invented my PFM  It will give humankind all the energy it will need even if the sun up and went  Bert
> 
> 
> So why don't you sell some stock, float some bonds, give Elon Musk a call, and get that fusion reactor off the ground!  We need the energy!  We don't want to give up our smart electric toothbrushes!
> 
> Double-A

Easy said then done.To make my machine would cost $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ At 90 it pays for me to live good(to my way) and not worry.Keep in mind I have all the gold in credit cards,and still use only debit.Hawaii is the only thing I think of.Pool is the only thing I do in my spare time. I worry about Sandy.I keep emailing but no reply.I will take Teresa out this Monday.I gave up on M&M on ebay.My last shot will be to go like Tuperwear. It could work,but being tone deaf is a kick in the ass.Bert 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695007

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2018-07-21 18:45 -0700
Message-ID<pj0nlj$6la$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694963
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
At 90, I have been a perverted Face-Shitter and a
criminal Graveyard Vandal already for 10 years, and
I gave up pimping "Maggots&Manure" ( = M&M) on ebay.
"I have all the gold in credit cards,and still no Money" Bert
I worry about Sandy. I keep emailing but no reply except
for a kick in my ass from her since I have Kosher AIDS.Bert
>
... & Bert has also a lame noodle that stinks like Bert's stool.
Everyone says Bert is wrong + a fool and never cool.
>
See SwineGlazier's Dossier:
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent>
wherein SwineBert refuses to explain
why SwineBert's has posted these items in word & by name:
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
On 20Jul2018:
Benj, my posts are way over your head.Reality is your head
is up your ass.So fart it out before you get constipated.Bert
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694240

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-16 21:22 -0700
Message-ID<f1871b8c-4644-42b5-a785-576a9f249253@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694134
Odd
“Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so
“
We’ve seen it .
Rapidly orbiting star shreds and instantaneously becomes two jets at 90 degrees to the disk- delude yourself that it’s splash if you want- your imagination is good enough, maybe 


 https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/swift/bursts/shredded-star.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694255

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 12:44 +0000
Message-ID<pikob6$1qj6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694240
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “Easy to grasp but that doesn’t make it so
> “
> We’ve seen it .
> Rapidly orbiting star shreds and instantaneously becomes two jets at 90
> degrees to the disk- delude yourself that it’s splash if you want- your
> imagination is good enough, maybe 
> 
> 
>  https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/swift/bursts/shredded-star.html
> 

That’s all well and good. But you extrapolated from an example of an event
to saying this is how it happens for every single star, which is not true.
Second, you’ve said that the matter from the jets recoalesce into new
stars, which is not observed in your example. 

It’s a little like looking at a sink food grinder and saying this is how
new plants and animals are made. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694257

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 06:34 -0700
Message-ID<af0f5662-a6d9-4d7c-b9b7-1c5140ed6089@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694255
Odd
“It’s a little like looking at a sink food grinder and saying this is how 
new plants and animals are made. 
“
Hmm.
Wasn’t ‘your’ science saying ‘nothing’ comes out?
That’s a little like looking at a sink grinder and saying ‘all this goes to a different universe’

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694265

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 15:10 +0000
Message-ID<pil0t0$b3l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694257
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “It’s a little like looking at a sink food grinder and saying this is how 
> new plants and animals are made. 
> “
> Hmm.
> Wasn’t ‘your’ science saying ‘nothing’ comes out?

No. It says nothing comes out from within the event horizon. It says LOTS
comes out from the accretion zone outside the event horizon. 

Good heavens, is all you read just comic books?

> That’s a little like looking at a sink grinder and saying ‘all this goes
> to a different universe’
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694266

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 08:18 -0700
Message-ID<c6b0d523-3f79-438d-934f-99e18c808909@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694265
Odd
“No. It says nothing comes out from within the event horizon. It says LOTS 
comes out from the accretion zone outside the event horizon. ”
Haha.
Yes, it’s been saying that ever since they (oops) saw the jets being produced.
You still call that “splash”?
I love your dedicated, ludicrous backpedal. It’s going to continue until you turn around.

The latest Hubble observation says that the ENTIRE body of galactic gas- which stretches 1/3 of the way past the spherical double shell of old globular clusters, is turning with the galactic disc. At the SAME RATE as the sun- once every 225 million years.

Huh.

Didn’t you say something about one side of the disc going faster?
Okay. Go. Backpedal hard. Hard!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694268

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 15:24 +0000
Message-ID<pil1nb$ci9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694266
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “No. It says nothing comes out from within the event horizon. It says LOTS 
> comes out from the accretion zone outside the event horizon. ”
> Haha.

Why are you laughing?

> Yes, it’s been saying that ever since they (oops) saw the jets being produced.

No it was said LONG before that. 
Again, are you reading only comic books?

> You still call that “splash”?
> I love your dedicated, ludicrous backpedal. 

What backpedal? Nobody is backpedaling. I can’t help it if you haven’t
learned what the science says and then when you say something STUPID like
“nothing comes out” you get corrected on it. And then you call that
correction backpedaling? Are you on shrooms?

> It’s going to continue until you turn around.
> 
> The latest Hubble observation says that the ENTIRE body of galactic gas-
> which stretches 1/3 of the way past the spherical double shell of old
> globular clusters, is turning with the galactic disc. At the SAME RATE as
> the sun- once every 225 million years.
> 
> Huh.
> 
> Didn’t you say something about one side of the disc going faster?
> Okay. Go. Backpedal hard. Hard!
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694270

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 08:31 -0700
Message-ID<db906aa1-f1ee-45ac-960f-8ec0ae5794f0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#694266
I don’t know if any of you remember, but maybe 10 years ago I predicted that it would be better telescopes that will fix Odd’s broken Science.
(Attophysics still might distinguish that atoms are disks before telescopes figure out that the galactic disc is precessing.)
It looks like the telescopes are already there. The data is there.
But the High Priests will die before they look.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694277

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-17 15:51 +0000
Message-ID<pil39i$fi1$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#694270
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t know if any of you remember, but maybe 10 years ago I predicted
> that it would be better telescopes that will fix Odd’s broken Science.
> (Attophysics still might distinguish that atoms are disks before
> telescopes figure out that the galactic disc is precessing.)
> It looks like the telescopes are already there. The data is there.
> But the High Priests will die before they look.
> 

Reference to the data?

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web