Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #686340 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 23:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-31 10:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 111 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-19 23:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 14:28 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 18:01 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 14:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 05:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:45 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 06:31 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:39 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 15:19 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 17:52 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:58 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 20:56 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 17:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-23 19:13 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:55 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 01:31 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-24 10:26 +0100
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 04:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-24 14:23 +0100
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 06:58 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 08:32 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 08:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 08:30 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 11:54 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 16:52 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:40 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 11:56 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 08:55 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-29 20:13 +0200
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 23:52 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 17:21 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 14:17 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 14:34 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:20 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 13:32 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 15:18 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 15:48 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 20:23 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 20:27 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 10:35 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 16:28 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 21:09 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 15:50 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-28 18:35 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 15:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:22 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 20:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 11:21 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:54 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 13:25 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 17:39 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 21:05 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 05:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 02:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 15:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 23:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-29 09:12 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:28 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 12:04 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-01 23:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 13:17 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:52 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 15:04 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:43 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 23:46 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 08:01 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-03 13:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-03 18:37 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 06:56 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-03 06:51 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 02:01 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 11:33 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 13:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 18:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 21:02 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 01:13 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 10:09 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 10:27 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:53 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 01:36 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 14:08 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 15:16 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-05-30 11:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 20:35 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-05-29 22:20 +1000
Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 07:19 -0700
Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 08:37 -0700
Time == Entropy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 09:44 -0700
Re: Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:23 -0400
Your desire to be "God, the Father" has been your down fall. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 10:28 -0700
Re: Your desire to be "God, the Father" has been your down fall. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:59 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0700
The Origin of Gravity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 20:10 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 22:03 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:10 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-31 12:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:18 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:18 +1000
Re: The Origin of Gravity Vaughn Fleck <guah@nhnw.nc> - 2018-06-01 20:00 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 21:06 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:07 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-31 10:44 -0700
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 15:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pefcje$5kp$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686340 |
On 5/19/2018 11:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The problem with describing > The Origin of Gravity is > using 'words' to describe it.. > > math won't do.. > > and it is very differcult to picture.. > > before the big bang... > > stars in the universe were like.. > a dozen eggs. [...] Where did they come from?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 15:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c40881c9-607c-4fc5-9079-13c84e4b6dc4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687406 |
Chris “ Where did they come from? ” Same place the ‘singularity’ came from
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 20:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pefsn0$lep$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687407 |
On 5/27/2018 3:54 PM, john wrote: > Chris > “ > Where did they come from? ” > Same place the ‘singularity’ came from > Out of the points and laws of everything? Well, did everything already exist in a different state _before_ the "big bang"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 20:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pefsvg$lep$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687444 |
On 5/27/2018 8:23 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 5/27/2018 3:54 PM, john wrote: >> Chris >> “ >> Where did they come from? ” >> Same place the ‘singularity’ came from >> > > Out of the points and laws of everything? Well, did everything already > exist in a different state _before_ the "big bang"? Or, was the "big bang" nothing more than a local hyper massive explosion involving multiple black holes merging together at once?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 06:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d6ed18b5-b0ef-4740-a826-7208fc698e76@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687445 |
Chris “Or, was the "big bang" nothing more than a local hyper massive explosion involving multiple black holes merging together at once? ” In the big scale of things, with galaxies being atoms, the part we can see is about 2 inches in diameter of some kind of gaseous chemical reaction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a52c2a4e-d1c6-4d63-8abb-b769a8d4f391@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687476 |
On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 9:43:08 AM UTC-4, john wrote: > Chris > “Or, was the "big bang" nothing more than a local hyper massive explosion > involving multiple black holes merging together at once? ” > > In the big scale of things, with galaxies being atoms, the part > we can see is about 2 inches in diameter of some kind of gaseous > chemical reaction. John, the Men in Black movies were not... spoiler alert!! ... documentaries. I'm sure you have seen them dozens of times. But they are fiction. fantasy. They are not a valid basis for forming scientific theories. Enjoy them (I do) but remember, they are not real life. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b6b79b01-c147-464e-88bd-4e9124c6b84f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687971 |
Ed “Men in Black movies were not... ” Never watched them. Read Sci fi for a number of years and had enough
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tb0QC.211227$LR2.48966@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #688028 |
On 5/31/2018 7:28 PM, john wrote: > Ed > “Men in Black movies were not... > ” > Never watched them. > Read Sci fi for a number of years and had enough > You are right John. Science FACT is much more interesting that the fantasies of writers who know no science (and science nerds who know science but can't write if their lives depended on it). Note that what you read in Odd's textbooks these days is also pretty much science fiction too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 21:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3c3f507b-bd96-466f-9e8a-8e8de026adaf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #688040 |
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 3:12:12 AM UTC+3, benj wrote: > On 5/31/2018 7:28 PM, john wrote: > > Ed > > “Men in Black movies were not... > > ” > > Never watched them. > > Read Sci fi for a number of years and had enough > > > You are right John. Science FACT is much more interesting that the > fantasies of writers who know no science (and science nerds who know > science but can't write if their lives depended on it). > > Note that what you read in Odd's textbooks these days is also pretty > much science fiction too. ===================== not only that to sell books is the only think that Bodkin (Draper ) can do and in addition disturb any innovation !! btw is he a physics teacher??? I would not like to be his people === TIA Y.Porat ==============
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5b0QC.211226$LR2.108562@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #687971 |
On 5/31/2018 1:35 PM, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 9:43:08 AM UTC-4, john wrote: >> Chris >> “Or, was the "big bang" nothing more than a local hyper massive explosion >> involving multiple black holes merging together at once? ” >> >> In the big scale of things, with galaxies being atoms, the part >> we can see is about 2 inches in diameter of some kind of gaseous >> chemical reaction. > > John, > the Men in Black movies were not... > > > spoiler alert!! > > > > > > ... documentaries. > > I'm sure you have seen them dozens of times. > But they are fiction. fantasy. They are not a valid basis > for forming scientific theories. > > Enjoy them (I do) but remember, they are not real life. > > Ed > And the way you know they are not would be? Your many trips to other planets perhaps? Or maybe talking to "kensi" describing HER trips to other planets where she learned all her astrophysics first hand? You do understand that "ET" and "Close Encounters" were not total fantasy, right? More like "Dramatizations".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 15:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <efbcbf5d-22c6-40ec-b685-e95a147c5643@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687444 |
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 8:23:16 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 5/27/2018 3:54 PM, john wrote: > > Chris > > “ > > Where did they come from? ” > > Same place the ‘singularity’ came from > > > > Out of the points and laws of everything? Well, did everything already > exist in a different state _before_ the "big bang"? Its state before BB was all QM.Small stuff always comes first. Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 18:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <peiarq$i5c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687554 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: <snip SwineBert's phony attempt to seek Pity & Sympathy>, since Bert bragged: "Going to CA was Bert's one-way trip, cuz Bert is such a stupid shit & always very full of it".Bert. "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. > "Reality is, for Bert it will only get much worse & very bitter, till he explains why SwineBert is a filthy & kinky Face-Shitter." > See details in: ------- Glazier's Dossier ------- e.g. <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent> for which GOPers put <https://tinyurl.com/Glazier-in-Mental-Institution> for being <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> & for pimping <https://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-sexual-harassments> > out of <https://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-Xmas-Hitler-Van> thath made Bert suffer from PTSD, "President Trump Stress Syndrome" since <https://tinyurl.com/Trump-is-walking-all-over-Bert> as <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-s-de-Minting > is still going on. Bert Pity. > "Why am I posting this, it's making me cry as it always does".Bert > ______ "Why am I not loved by all?". Bert. > > > hmmm... <snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5B0B37C3.74D3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687406 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 5/19/2018 11:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The problem with describing > > The Origin of Gravity is > > using 'words' to describe it.. > > > > math won't do.. > > > > and it is very differcult to picture.. > > > > before the big bang... > > > > stars in the universe were like.. > > a dozen eggs. > [...] > > Where did they come from? I already mentioned in my class that before the big bang stars existed in the steady state universe. Do you mean where sis the stars come from in the steady state universe? I don't have a photograph of that... I juat have a photograph of before and after the big bang... i don't have a photograph of before the steady state universe... i would have to look for it. But certaintly Gravity existed before stars were born.. The Starmaker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bb74a4ba-5b07-4dc1-bf6c-9a36180392a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687409 |
And certainly there were eggs before there were chickens
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 20:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e44f21d6-cc93-453c-b2ee-9f2514e32f41@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687409 |
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 at 3:56:35 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > > On 5/19/2018 11:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The problem with describing > > > The Origin of Gravity is > > > using 'words' to describe it.. > > > > > > math won't do.. > > > > > > and it is very differcult to picture.. > > > > > > before the big bang... > > > > > > stars in the universe were like.. > > > a dozen eggs. > > [...] > > > > Where did they come from? > > > I already mentioned in my class > that before the big bang stars existed in > the steady state universe. > > Do you mean where sis the stars come from in > the steady state universe? > > I don't have a photograph of that... > > I juat have a photograph of before and after the big bang... > > i don't have a photograph of before the steady state universe... > > i would have to look for it. > > But certaintly Gravity existed before stars were born.. > > > The Starmaker Gravity didn't exist before energy. It's strength builds by it. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5B0C488F.724D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687409 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > > > On 5/19/2018 11:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The problem with describing > > > The Origin of Gravity is > > > using 'words' to describe it.. > > > > > > math won't do.. > > > > > > and it is very differcult to picture.. > > > > > > before the big bang... > > > > > > stars in the universe were like.. > > > a dozen eggs. > > [...] > > > > Where did they come from? > > I already mentioned in my class > that before the big bang stars existed in > the steady state universe. > > Do you mean where sis the stars come from in > the steady state universe? > > I don't have a photograph of that... > > I juat have a photograph of before and after the big bang... > > i don't have a photograph of before the steady state universe... > > i would have to look for it. > > But certaintly Gravity existed before stars were born.. > > The Starmaker Gravity extends far beyond the universe. Far beyond before the big bang.. far beyond the steady stste universe... and as close as the stem of an apple. In other words, gravity is the machinery behind every celestial body and the invisible hand of Adam Smith.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 14:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <CfYOC.124862$R51.83442@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #687519 |
On 5/28/2018 2:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> >>> On 5/19/2018 11:43 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> The problem with describing >>>> The Origin of Gravity is >>>> using 'words' to describe it.. >>>> >>>> math won't do.. >>>> >>>> and it is very differcult to picture.. >>>> >>>> before the big bang... >>>> >>>> stars in the universe were like.. >>>> a dozen eggs. >>> [...] >>> >>> Where did they come from? >> >> I already mentioned in my class >> that before the big bang stars existed in >> the steady state universe. >> >> Do you mean where sis the stars come from in >> the steady state universe? >> >> I don't have a photograph of that... >> >> I juat have a photograph of before and after the big bang... >> >> i don't have a photograph of before the steady state universe... >> >> i would have to look for it. >> >> But certaintly Gravity existed before stars were born.. >> >> The Starmaker > > > Gravity extends far beyond the universe. Far beyond before the big bang.. > > far beyond the steady stste universe... > > and as close as the stem of an apple. > > In other words, gravity is the machinery behind every celestial body and the invisible hand of Adam Smith. > and the way you know all this is? Oh that's right, you've actually BEEN beyond the universe and before the Big Bang (in your mind). Faker you are STILL a moron. Lay off the stash for a while, OK?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 13:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <40555442-0828-4420-946d-003c37ea7194@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687522 |
Gravity is a product of the ‘kinetic energy’ of electrons.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5B0CA15D.3E9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687538 |
john wrote: > > Gravity is a product of the ‘kinetic energy’ of electrons. do you mean...electro gravity?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 21:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bd129984-e9d7-490c-b6c4-9433f4d0599f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687538 |
On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 11:25:37 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > Gravity is a product of the ‘kinetic energy’ of electrons. ========================================== (:-) and kinetic energy is a product of what !!! -------------------------- TIA Y.Porat ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web