Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #685794 > unrolled thread

The Origin of Time

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The Origin of Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-16 11:40 -0700
    Re: The Origin of Time "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:26 -0700
      Re: The Origin of Time "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-16 14:20 -0700
      Re: The Origin of Time "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-16 14:21 -0700
    Re: The Origin of Time SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-05-17 12:25 +1000
    Re: The Origin of Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-16 23:55 -0700
      Re: The Origin of Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-17 13:47 -0700
    Re: The Origin of Time The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-19 00:23 -0700
    Re: The Origin of Time Oslovné Ritmickeho <uiq@oichewo.th> - 2018-05-21 09:11 +0000
      Re: The Origin of Time "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 10:35 -0700
        Re: The Origin of Time "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-21 11:02 -0700
        Re: The Origin of Time mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-21 14:43 -0700

#685794 — The Origin of Time

I've been doing observations of
The Origin of Gravity but I'm not finished...

so here is The Origin of Time..

it seems to me
that there is no origin of time.

Time always existed before and after the big bang
according to my observations.

The only difference between Time before the big bang and
Time after the big bang is...seconds.

There were no seconds before the big bang.

Before the big bang Time was infinite..but the big bang
changed that, and divided time into...parts (you call seconds).

According to your measurements of Time...our universe age is
trillion and trillions of years (whatever infinite time is)

if you don't break it into parts of seconds...


There is no spacetime...

There is space...and there is time.


Space doesn't flow.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#685808

On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:40:49 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> I've been doing observations of
> The Origin of Gravity but I'm not finished...
> 
> so here is The Origin of Time..
> 
> it seems to me
> that there is no origin of time.
> 
> Time always existed before and after the big bang
> according to my observations.
> 
> The only difference between Time before the big bang and
> Time after the big bang is...seconds.
> 
> There were no seconds before the big bang.
> 
> Before the big bang Time was infinite..but the big bang
> changed that, and divided time into...parts (you call seconds).
> 
> According to your measurements of Time...our universe age is
> trillion and trillions of years (whatever infinite time is)
> 
> if you don't break it into parts of seconds...
> 
> 
> There is no spacetime...
> 
> There is space...and there is time.
> 
> 
> Space doesn't flow.


Time is based on the force of gravity.gravity and inertia the same.Thus BHs have no time.Photons going at c can't age.The stronger the gravity the slower the clock ticks.Universe'time goes with location. Aleins orbit a BH to give themselves more time.  Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685834

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
Time is based on Bert's Hemorrhoids (BH)
 to give themselves more time."  Bert
>
hmmm...  <snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> LOL  ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685836

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
"Time is based on Bert's Hemorrhoids (BH)
 to give themselves more time."  Bert
>
>
hmmm...  <snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> LOL  ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685883

On Wed, 16 May 2018 11:40:48 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> There is no spacetime...
> 
> There is space...and there is time.

Imagine you are an observer on a ray of light going at C, you experience no
time and no space.

If there is no time, then there is no space.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685913

Mark Earnest wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 1:40:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I've been doing observations of
> > The Origin of Gravity but I'm not finished...
> >
> > so here is The Origin of Time..
> >
> > it seems to me
> > that there is no origin of time.
> >
> > Time always existed before and after the big bang
> > according to my observations.
> >
> > The only difference between Time before the big bang and
> > Time after the big bang is...seconds.
> >
> > There were no seconds before the big bang.
> >
> > Before the big bang Time was infinite..but the big bang
> > changed that, and divided time into...parts (you call seconds).
> >
> > According to your measurements of Time...our universe age is
> > trillion and trillions of years (whatever infinite time is)
> >
> > if you don't break it into parts of seconds...
> >
> >
> > There is no spacetime...
> >
> > There is space...and there is time.
> >
> >
> > Space doesn't flow.
> 
> There is no time before the Big Bang.  The Big Bang began time.  How can there possibly be time infinite in reverse?  There is no way to even imagine such a thing.


Albert Einstein considered a steady-state model of the expanding universe...

that means eternal universe and a big bang (expanding universe).

The big bang was actually the tranfer of a steady-state into a expanding universe.

A no clock universe into a clock universe.

unmeasurable time to measurable time.


In a steady state universe...stars do not die.


The big bang is the tranfer from stars that do not die to stars that die.


The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685971

Mark Earnest wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 1:54:11 AM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Mark Earnest wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 1:40:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > I've been doing observations of
> > > > The Origin of Gravity but I'm not finished...
> > > >
> > > > so here is The Origin of Time..
> > > >
> > > > it seems to me
> > > > that there is no origin of time.
> > > >
> > > > Time always existed before and after the big bang
> > > > according to my observations.
> > > >
> > > > The only difference between Time before the big bang and
> > > > Time after the big bang is...seconds.
> > > >
> > > > There were no seconds before the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > Before the big bang Time was infinite..but the big bang
> > > > changed that, and divided time into...parts (you call seconds).
> > > >
> > > > According to your measurements of Time...our universe age is
> > > > trillion and trillions of years (whatever infinite time is)
> > > >
> > > > if you don't break it into parts of seconds...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There is no spacetime...
> > > >
> > > > There is space...and there is time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Space doesn't flow.
> > >
> > > There is no time before the Big Bang.  The Big Bang began time.  How can there possibly be time infinite in reverse?  There is no way to even imagine such a thing.
> >
> >
> > Albert Einstein considered a steady-state model of the expanding universe...
> >
> > that means eternal universe and a big bang (expanding universe).
> >
> > The big bang was actually the tranfer of a steady-state into a expanding universe.
> >
> > A no clock universe into a clock universe.
> >
> > unmeasurable time to measurable time.
> >
> >
> > In a steady state universe...stars do not die.
> >
> >
> > The big bang is the tranfer from stars that do not die to stars that die.
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker
> 
> Einstein was smart but he was not as smart as your average child who sees more clearly.  The universe is not steady state until it expands to the correct diameter.  Then the gravitation of everything to everything else balances out and stays that way.



Albert Einstein didn't invent gravity or the steady-state model of the universe...


he just said, "Yeah, that's it!"


Albert Einstein didn't come out with a mouse trap...he just came out with a better mouse trap.

Everyone is suppose to come up with a better mouse trap, thats the whole idea of the ...whole thing.


Don't show me a mouse trap thats already been invented..

show me a better mouse trap.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686278

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I've been doing observations of
> The Origin of Gravity but I'm not finished...
> 
> so here is The Origin of Time..
> 
> it seems to me
> that there is no origin of time.
> 
> Time always existed before and after the big bang
> according to my observations.
> 
> The only difference between Time before the big bang and
> Time after the big bang is...seconds.
> 
> There were no seconds before the big bang.



I should add as a footnote that before the big bang the universe only had....two dimensions.


The third dimension was created after the big bang.


What caused the big bang was the manufacturing of Mass from Energy.

After the big bang you get e=mc^2

but, before the big bang was e plus m

e + m = ^2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686465

The Starmaker wrote:

> Time always existed before and after the big bang according to my
> observations.

How could it, taking p as postition dp/dt, what's that time standing for? 
All time, actually.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686504

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:11:52 AM UTC-7, Oslovné Ritmickeho wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > Time always existed before and after the big bang according to my
> > observations.
> 
> How could it, taking p as postition dp/dt, what's that time standing for? 
> All time, actually.

Gravity is te keeper of time Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686511

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
"Gravity is te keeper of time" and Bert did prove it
by Bert being a kinky and stupid Swine. O ya.
 Bert, the Time-Swine, well, timeless by now.

<snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#686552

On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 10:35:26 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 2:11:52 AM UTC-7, Oslovné Ritmickeho wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > > Time always existed before and after the big bang according to my
> > > observations.
> > 
> > How could it, taking p as postition dp/dt, what's that time standing for? 
> > All time, actually.
> 
> Gravity is te keeper of time Bert

You are a time keeper Roy Masters.
But you are not in control. You are
out of control.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web