Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #681089 > unrolled thread

What Are We?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-14 17:52 -0700
    Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 21:11 -0400
      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-14 20:55 -0700
        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 00:04 -0400
          Re: What Are We? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-04-14 21:36 -0700
          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 12:19 -0700
            Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:31 -0400
              Re: What Are We? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 19:19 -0700
                Re: What Are We? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-04-15 19:54 -0700
                Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:11 -0400
                  Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:36 -0700
                    Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 17:10 -0400
                      Re: What Are We? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 16:19 -0500
                      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 15:15 -0700
                        Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 15:25 -0700
                          Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:01 -0400
                            Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 17:26 -0700
                              Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:52 -0400
                        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 19:59 -0400
                          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 19:58 -0700
              Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 23:28 -0700
              Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 23:43 -0700
        Re: What Are We? Klaus Meinhard <k_meinhard@gmx.de> - 2018-04-15 09:42 +0200
    Re: What Are We? Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-04-15 17:56 +1000
      We're consumers, like the sun. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-15 00:59 -0700
      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 23:50 -0700
        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:14 -0400
          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:34 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#681211

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/15/2018 3:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> benj wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>              What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's a very simple question...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> >>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>
> >>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
> >>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
> >>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
> >>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
> >>>>
> >>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
> >>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
> >>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
> >>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
> >>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
> >>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
> >>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
> >>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
> >>>>
> >>>> I hate phonies!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
> >>> you got no life.
> >>
> >> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
> >> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
> >> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
> >> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
> >> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
> >> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
> >> hurt your work either).
> >>
> >> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
> >> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
> >>
> >> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
> >
> >
> > Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.
> >
> >
> > "What Are We?"
> >
> >
> > It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...
> >
> > the operative word is..."What"
> >
> >
> > "WHAT are we?"
> >
> > not "What are WE?"
> >
> >
> > "*What* are we?"
> >
> >
> > It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about
> >
> >
> > What
> > Are
> > We?
> >
> >
> > Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.
> >
> >
> > How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????
> >
> >
> > "W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??
> >
> Hey, don't you know that saying stupid things louder doesn't make anyone
> understand them better.
> 
> You have not defined what you mean by "we". Please define it instead of
> babbling on about how nobody understands you. They don't understand you
> because you are drooling drivel. In science, dear boy, one must
> precisely DEFINE one's words. THis is not the great American novel and
> it is not some kind of philosophical phantasy. If you want an answer,
> you have to ask the question properly. Obviously you are too stupid to
> do that and like every lib you think you can cover up that fact with
> bluster. You can't.


I didn't say ...me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681213

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/15/2018 3:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> benj wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>              What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's a very simple question...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> >>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>
> >>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
> >>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
> >>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
> >>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
> >>>>
> >>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
> >>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
> >>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
> >>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
> >>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
> >>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
> >>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
> >>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
> >>>>
> >>>> I hate phonies!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
> >>> you got no life.
> >>
> >> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
> >> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
> >> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
> >> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
> >> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
> >> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
> >> hurt your work either).
> >>
> >> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
> >> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
> >>
> >> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
> >
> >
> > Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.
> >
> >
> > "What Are We?"
> >
> >
> > It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...
> >
> > the operative word is..."What"
> >
> >
> > "WHAT are we?"
> >
> > not "What are WE?"
> >
> >
> > "*What* are we?"
> >
> >
> > It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about
> >
> >
> > What
> > Are
> > We?
> >
> >
> > Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.
> >
> >
> > How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????
> >
> >
> > "W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??
> >
> Hey, don't you know that saying stupid things louder doesn't make anyone
> understand them better.
> 
> You have not defined what you mean by "we". Please define it instead of
> babbling on about how nobody understands you. They don't understand you
> because you are drooling drivel. In science, dear boy, one must
> precisely DEFINE one's words. THis is not the great American novel and
> it is not some kind of philosophical phantasy. If you want an answer,
> you have to ask the question properly. Obviously you are too stupid to
> do that and like every lib you think you can cover up that fact with
> bluster. You can't.


okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..


We | Define We at Dictionary.com
refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.


All people on the planet which we live.



Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?


How about...What?


example: What is this thing or object called people? 



 "W-H-A-T are we?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681108

Hallo The Starmaker,

> you got no life.

That is rich, coming from you!

Thanks, you made my day.



-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Klaus Meinhard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681109

On 15/04/2018 10:52 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> 
>            What Are We?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> 
> 

That being the case it can't be all that important can it?


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681110 — We're consumers, like the sun.

> > Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >            What Are We?

We're consumers, like the sun.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681505

Whisper wrote:
> 
> On 15/04/2018 10:52 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >
> >            What Are We?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >
> >
> 
> That being the case it can't be all that important can it?
> 


Oh, it's very important because it seems not to be ...defined, satisfatory by anyone, ..or
even questioned.

There is only one answer, but a million theories.


Not that I have come up with the answer completely...because I just thought of it
the other day..

but the direction of the one answer (not a theory) (i don't so theories, only facts)

is that..

I'm working on the 'material' these people seem to be made of...

by material, I mean..the substance or chemical that runs on the surface of the earth (that you call people)


In other words...if aliens from another planet would to visit the earth, and report back..

they would say.."There is nothing on the earth but mostly water and a chemical watery substance moving
on the surface ground forming tall rocks."

(which you call cities)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681557

On 4/18/2018 2:50 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Whisper wrote:
>>
>> On 15/04/2018 10:52 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
>>>
>>>             What Are We?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That being the case it can't be all that important can it?
>>
> 
> 
> Oh, it's very important because it seems not to be ...defined, satisfatory by anyone, ..or
> even questioned.
> 
> There is only one answer, but a million theories.
> 
> 
> Not that I have come up with the answer completely...because I just thought of it
> the other day..
> 
> but the direction of the one answer (not a theory) (i don't so theories, only facts)
> 
> is that..
> 
> I'm working on the 'material' these people seem to be made of...
> 
> by material, I mean..the substance or chemical that runs on the surface of the earth (that you call people)
> 
> 
> In other words...if aliens from another planet would to visit the earth, and report back..
> 
> they would say.."There is nothing on the earth but mostly water and a chemical watery substance moving
> on the surface ground forming tall rocks."
> 
> (which you call cities)
> 
The problem with you scifi guys Faker is that you always assume that 
"aliens" are just like us only more stupid. (And more stupid than you is 
pretty far down the totem pole). Aliens are NOT like us. They are ALIEN, 
you dumb moron. And if you think they don't know exactly what "we" are 
far better than you do, then you are in some fantasy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681581

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/18/2018 2:50 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Whisper wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15/04/2018 10:52 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >>>
> >>>             What Are We?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> That being the case it can't be all that important can it?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Oh, it's very important because it seems not to be ...defined, satisfatory by anyone, ..or
> > even questioned.
> >
> > There is only one answer, but a million theories.
> >
> >
> > Not that I have come up with the answer completely...because I just thought of it
> > the other day..
> >
> > but the direction of the one answer (not a theory) (i don't so theories, only facts)
> >
> > is that..
> >
> > I'm working on the 'material' these people seem to be made of...
> >
> > by material, I mean..the substance or chemical that runs on the surface of the earth (that you call people)
> >
> >
> > In other words...if aliens from another planet would to visit the earth, and report back..
> >
> > they would say.."There is nothing on the earth but mostly water and a chemical watery substance moving
> > on the surface ground forming tall rocks."
> >
> > (which you call cities)
> >
> The problem with you scifi guys Faker is that you always assume that
> "aliens" are just like us only more stupid. (And more stupid than you is
> pretty far down the totem pole). Aliens are NOT like us. They are ALIEN,
> you dumb moron. And if you think they don't know exactly what "we" are
> far better than you do, then you are in some fantasy.


Watch it...they'll step on you like an ant. Now, go back on your earth surface and search for food.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web