Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #681089 > unrolled thread

What Are We?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-14 17:52 -0700
    Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-14 21:11 -0400
      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-14 20:55 -0700
        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 00:04 -0400
          Re: What Are We? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-04-14 21:36 -0700
          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 12:19 -0700
            Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:31 -0400
              Re: What Are We? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 19:19 -0700
                Re: What Are We? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-04-15 19:54 -0700
                Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:11 -0400
                  Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:36 -0700
                    Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 17:10 -0400
                      Re: What Are We? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 16:19 -0500
                      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 15:15 -0700
                        Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 15:25 -0700
                          Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:01 -0400
                            Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 17:26 -0700
                              Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:52 -0400
                        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 19:59 -0400
                          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 19:58 -0700
              Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 23:28 -0700
              Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-15 23:43 -0700
        Re: What Are We? Klaus Meinhard <k_meinhard@gmx.de> - 2018-04-15 09:42 +0200
    Re: What Are We? Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-04-15 17:56 +1000
      We're consumers, like the sun. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-15 00:59 -0700
      Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 23:50 -0700
        Re: What Are We? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:14 -0400
          Re: What Are We? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:34 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#681089 — What Are We?

Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...

          What Are We?




Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.


It's a very simple question...


What Are We?



Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
will ever answer it correctly.


What Are We?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#681091

On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> 
>            What Are We?
> 
> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer. 
> 
> It's a very simple question...
> 
> What Are We?
> 
> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> will ever answer it correctly.
>  
> What Are We?

The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an 
ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that 
you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of 
knowledge and understanding that you do not have.

Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all 
other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to 
be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the 
questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.

Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit 
and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science. 
You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as 
interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come 
back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".

I hate phonies!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681093

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >
> >            What Are We?
> >
> > Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >
> > It's a very simple question...
> >
> > What Are We?
> >
> > Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> > will ever answer it correctly.
> >
> > What Are We?
> 
> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
> 
> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
> 
> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
> 
> I hate phonies!




That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.



Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.


You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..


you got no life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681095

On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
>>>
>>>             What Are We?
>>>
>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>
>>> It's a very simple question...
>>>
>>> What Are We?
>>>
>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
>>> will ever answer it correctly.
>>>
>>> What Are We?
>>
>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
>>
>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
>>
>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
>>
>> I hate phonies!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
> 
> 
> 
> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer. 
> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
> you got no life.

You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing 
everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch 
that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science 
this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in 
the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't 
hurt your work either).

So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define 
it precisely if you want some kind of answer.

And you can answer my question: What are YOU?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681100

"benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
>>>>
>>>>             What Are We?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>>
>>>> It's a very simple question...
>>>>
>>>> What Are We?
>>>>
>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
>>>>
>>>> What Are We?
>>>
>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
>>>
>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
>>>
>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
>>>
>>> I hate phonies!
>>
>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
>>
>>
>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer. You just
>> wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
>> you got no life.
>
Benj wrote:
> Starmaker,You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing everything
> "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch that you
> don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science this is
> drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in the SF
> group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't hurt your
> work either).
>
> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define it
> precisely if you want some kind of answer.
>
> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
>
hanson wrote:
Benj, the "Starmaker-YOU", that you referred to
is a currently active CHNOPS conglomerate
that expresses it's own Weltbild.
His notion is, like you said, as ancient as human-
kind. It is heuristically described beautifully by
"Dire Straights" in "Brothers in Arms" which lyrics:
>
[===] "There's so many different worlds
[===] So many different suns
[===] and we have just one world
[===] But we live in different ones..."
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5JkHBC5lDs>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu4oy1IRTh8>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9oakm9-vjo>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681146

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >>>
> >>>             What Are We?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>>
> >>> It's a very simple question...
> >>>
> >>> What Are We?
> >>>
> >>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> >>> will ever answer it correctly.
> >>>
> >>> What Are We?
> >>
> >> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
> >> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
> >> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
> >> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
> >>
> >> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
> >> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
> >> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
> >> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
> >>
> >> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
> >> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
> >> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
> >> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
> >> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
> >>
> >> I hate phonies!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
> >
> >
> >
> > Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
> > You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
> > you got no life.
> 
> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
> hurt your work either).
> 
> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
> 
> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?


Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.


"What Are We?"


It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...

the operative word is..."What"


"WHAT are we?"

not "What are WE?"


"*What* are we?"


It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about


What
Are
We?


Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.


How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????


"W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681161

On 4/15/2018 3:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
>>>>>
>>>>>              What Are We?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a very simple question...
>>>>>
>>>>> What Are We?
>>>>>
>>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
>>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Are We?
>>>>
>>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
>>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
>>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
>>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
>>>>
>>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
>>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
>>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
>>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
>>>>
>>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
>>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
>>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
>>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
>>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
>>>>
>>>> I hate phonies!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
>>> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
>>> you got no life.
>>
>> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
>> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
>> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
>> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
>> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
>> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
>> hurt your work either).
>>
>> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
>> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
>>
>> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
> 
> 
> Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.
> 
> 
> "What Are We?"
> 
> 
> It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...
> 
> the operative word is..."What"
> 
> 
> "WHAT are we?"
> 
> not "What are WE?"
> 
> 
> "*What* are we?"
> 
> 
> It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about
> 
> 
> What
> Are
> We?
> 
> 
> Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.
> 
> 
> How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????
> 
> 
> "W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??
> 
Hey, don't you know that saying stupid things louder doesn't make anyone 
understand them better.

You have not defined what you mean by "we". Please define it instead of 
babbling on about how nobody understands you. They don't understand you 
because you are drooling drivel. In science, dear boy, one must 
precisely DEFINE one's words. THis is not the great American novel and 
it is not some kind of philosophical phantasy. If you want an answer, 
you have to ask the question properly. Obviously you are too stupid to 
do that and like every lib you think you can cover up that fact with 
bluster. You can't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681182

On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 3:31:43 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 4/15/2018 3:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> benj wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>              What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's a very simple question...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
> >>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What Are We?
> >>>>
> >>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
> >>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
> >>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
> >>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
> >>>>
> >>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
> >>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
> >>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
> >>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
> >>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
> >>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
> >>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
> >>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
> >>>>
> >>>> I hate phonies!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
> >>> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
> >>> you got no life.
> >>
> >> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
> >> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
> >> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
> >> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
> >> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
> >> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
> >> hurt your work either).
> >>
> >> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
> >> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
> >>
> >> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
> > 
> > 
> > Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.
> > 
> > 
> > "What Are We?"
> > 
> > 
> > It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...
> > 
> > the operative word is..."What"
> > 
> > 
> > "WHAT are we?"
> > 
> > not "What are WE?"
> > 
> > 
> > "*What* are we?"
> > 
> > 
> > It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about
> > 
> > 
> > What
> > Are
> > We?
> > 
> > 
> > Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.
> > 
> > 
> > How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????
> > 
> > 
> > "W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??
> > 
> Hey, don't you know that saying stupid things louder doesn't make anyone 
> understand them better.
> 
> You have not defined what you mean by "we". Please define it instead of 
> babbling on about how nobody understands you. They don't understand you 
> because you are drooling drivel. In science, dear boy, one must 
> precisely DEFINE one's words. THis is not the great American novel and 
> it is not some kind of philosophical phantasy. If you want an answer, 
> you have to ask the question properly. Obviously you are too stupid to 
> do that and like every lib you think you can cover up that fact with 
> bluster. You can't.

We are the eyes of the universe.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681185

"reber G=EMC^2"<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> referred
to himself and the bucket that Bert shits into and talks 
to as: "**We** are the eyes of the universe.Bert" &  wrote:
"I park & bark in the dark. I'm a stupid shit and full of it." Bert." 
"I am a first class low wit bigot.  Sad and so true. Bert"
>
"Why am I posting this, it's making me cry as it always does".Bert
>
______  "Why am I not loved by all?". Bert.
>

>
>
>
hmmm...<snicker>...<chortle>...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFLMAO
>
>
PS:
SwineBert Glazier's daily Sanctimony and his 
phony idiotic posts, are  very different from
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-REAL-intent> [J]
who brags to be a Marxist Jewish Supremacist &
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
who knows how everything works, which is 1st &
foremost Bert's habit to shit into peoples' mouths, &
to see them being murdered so that Glazier can be
a criminal graveyard vandal & piss onto their graves. 
Read it in Jewpig Glazier's own words in link [J]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681205

On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 3:31:43 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
>> On 4/15/2018 3:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/14/2018 11:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/14/2018 8:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> Here is a question that has never been asked by anyone...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               What Are We?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe it's because yous don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a very simple question...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What Are We?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Three simple words and I don't think anyone uderstands the question or
>>>>>>> will ever answer it correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What Are We?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The real question, Starfaker is "What are YOU?". You are obviously an
>>>>>> ignorant Lib writer who knows no science but like all libs think that
>>>>>> you can use your fantasy and imagination to make up for any lack of
>>>>>> knowledge and understanding that you do not have.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like all Libs you think that your fantasy life make you superior to all
>>>>>> other humanoids and never consider a lack of actual valid information to
>>>>>> be a hindrance. The problem starfaker is that YOU don't even know the
>>>>>> questions to ask let alone have a clue as to the answers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Coming in here pretending to be erudite through your skill with bullshit
>>>>>> and words is insulting to everyone here who actually knows some science.
>>>>>> You are as big a fake and fraud as Kensi and Nads (just not as
>>>>>> interested in theft as they are) Please learn some science and then come
>>>>>> back. You can start with Schroedinger and his work "what is life?".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hate phonies!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is just a kind of dopey way of avoiding the question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: YOU don't understand the question or the answer.
>>>>> You just wasted 3 dopey paragraphs..
>>>>> you got no life.
>>>>
>>>> You are the dope pretending to be Socrates for something.
>>>> What do you expect some kind of encyclopedia article describing
>>>> everything "we" are? You know so little science you dumb son of a bitch
>>>> that you don't even bother to define what "we" is. This is not science
>>>> this is drooling writer blather. This is a science group. (you guys in
>>>> the SF group can hold off for a while...learning a little science won't
>>>> hurt your work either).
>>>>
>>>> So tell us faker just what is this "we" you want to know about? Define
>>>> it precisely if you want some kind of answer.
>>>>
>>>> And you can answer my question: What are YOU?
>>>
>>>
>>> Like I already said many times..yous don't understand the question.
>>>
>>>
>>> "What Are We?"
>>>
>>>
>>> It has nothing to do about we or yous, they are both the same thing...
>>>
>>> the operative word is..."What"
>>>
>>>
>>> "WHAT are we?"
>>>
>>> not "What are WE?"
>>>
>>>
>>> "*What* are we?"
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not about Who Are We, or Why Are We, or Where Are We, ...it's about
>>>
>>>
>>> What
>>> Are
>>> We?
>>>
>>>
>>> Like I already said ...yous don't understand the question.
>>>
>>>
>>> How are you ever going to come up with the right answer????
>>>
>>>
>>> "W-H-A-T are we?" I gotta spel it out??
>>>
>> Hey, don't you know that saying stupid things louder doesn't make anyone
>> understand them better.
>>
>> You have not defined what you mean by "we". Please define it instead of
>> babbling on about how nobody understands you. They don't understand you
>> because you are drooling drivel. In science, dear boy, one must
>> precisely DEFINE one's words. THis is not the great American novel and
>> it is not some kind of philosophical phantasy. If you want an answer,
>> you have to ask the question properly. Obviously you are too stupid to
>> do that and like every lib you think you can cover up that fact with
>> bluster. You can't.
> 
> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> 
We are cells in the body of God, Bert.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681396

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:

> > We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> >
> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.



eyes, cells....????


This is worse than I thought.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681422

On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> 
>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
>>>
>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
> 
> 
> 
> eyes, cells....????
> 
> 
> This is worse than I thought.
> 
Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what 
you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681425

On 4/17/2018 4:10 PM, benj wrote:
> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>
>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
>>>>
>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
>>
>>
>>
>> eyes, cells....????
>>
>>
>> This is worse than I thought.
>>
> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.



   Is Starfarter simply a cellular mass of random firing neurons ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681432

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >
> >>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> >>>
> >> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
> >
> >
> >
> > eyes, cells....????
> >
> >
> > This is worse than I thought.
> >
> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.


It's been defined...you're blind too????


--
okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..


We | Define We at Dictionary.com
refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.


All people on the planet which we live.



Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?


How about...What?


example: What is this thing or object called people? 



 "W-H-A-T are we?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681435

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> benj wrote:
> >
> > On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > benj wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > >
> > >>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> > >>>
> > >> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > eyes, cells....????
> > >
> > >
> > > This is worse than I thought.
> > >
> > Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
> > you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
> 
> It's been defined...you're blind too????
> 
> --
> okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
> 
> We | Define We at Dictionary.com
> refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.
> 
> All people on the planet which we live.
> 
> Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?
> 
> How about...What?
> 
> example: What is this thing or object called people?
> 
>  "W-H-A-T are we?"



here is the braile version...


.. o. o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. o. .. o. oo .. .o o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. .o .. .o o.
.. .. o. o. .. o. .o .o o. o. .o .. .o .o .. oo oo .o .. o. o. .. .o .o oo .. oo oo
.o .. o. o. .. o. .. o. o. o. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. o. .. .o ..
 
.o oo o. .. .o o. .. o. .o o. o. ..
o. .. oo .. oo .o .. o. o. o. .o oo
.. .. .. .. .o .. .. o. .. oo .. .o

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681453

On 4/17/2018 6:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
>>>>>>
>>>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> eyes, cells....????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is worse than I thought.
>>>>
>>> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
>>> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
>>
>> It's been defined...you're blind too????
>>
>> --
>> okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
>>
>> We | Define We at Dictionary.com
>> refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.
>>
>> All people on the planet which we live.
>>
>> Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?
>>
>> How about...What?
>>
>> example: What is this thing or object called people?
>>
>>   "W-H-A-T are we?"
> 
> 
> 
> here is the braile version...
> 
> 
> .. o. o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. o. .. o. oo .. .o o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. .o .. .o o.
> .. .. o. o. .. o. .o .o o. o. .o .. .o .o .. oo oo .o .. o. o. .. .o .o oo .. oo oo
> .o .. o. o. .. o. .. o. o. o. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. o. .. .o ..
>   
> .o oo o. .. .o o. .. o. .o o. o. ..
> o. .. oo .. oo .o .. o. o. o. .o oo
> .. .. .. .. .o .. .. o. .. oo .. .o
> 
Maybe if you shout in people's faces then they will understand what you 
are asking? Seems to work with a lot American Tourists. Idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681456

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/17/2018 6:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> benj wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> benj wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> eyes, cells....????
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This is worse than I thought.
> >>>>
> >>> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
> >>> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
> >>
> >> It's been defined...you're blind too????
> >>
> >> --
> >> okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
> >>
> >> We | Define We at Dictionary.com
> >> refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.
> >>
> >> All people on the planet which we live.
> >>
> >> Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?
> >>
> >> How about...What?
> >>
> >> example: What is this thing or object called people?
> >>
> >>   "W-H-A-T are we?"
> >
> >
> >
> > here is the braile version...
> >
> >
> > .. o. o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. o. .. o. oo .. .o o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. .o .. .o o.
> > .. .. o. o. .. o. .o .o o. o. .o .. .o .o .. oo oo .o .. o. o. .. .o .o oo .. oo oo
> > .o .. o. o. .. o. .. o. o. o. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. o. .. .o ..
> >
> > .o oo o. .. .o o. .. o. .o o. o. ..
> > o. .. oo .. oo .o .. o. o. o. .o oo
> > .. .. .. .. .o .. .. o. .. oo .. .o
> >
> Maybe if you shout in people's faces then they will understand what you
> are asking? Seems to work with a lot American Tourists. Idiot.

oh i see, you're hard of hearing...here is the loud version:


WE | DEFINE WE AT DICTIONARY.COM
REFERS TO ALL PEOPLE OR PEOPLE IN GENERAL: THE PLANET ON WHICH WE LIVE.


ALL PEOPLE ON THE PLANET WHICH WE LIVE.



DO YOU NEED THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD..."ARE"?


HOW ABOUT...WHAT?


EXAMPLE: WHAT IS THIS THING OR OBJECT CALLED PEOPLE? 



 "W-H-A-T ARE WE?"





do you want the benji the dog bow wow version too? 



           ^\
 /        //o__o
/\       /  __/
\ \______\  /     -ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! 
 \         /
  \ \----\ \
   \_\_   \_\_



woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-


What's on top of a building, benji?
woof!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681550

On 4/17/2018 8:26 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/17/2018 6:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> eyes, cells....????
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is worse than I thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
>>>>> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
>>>>
>>>> It's been defined...you're blind too????
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
>>>>
>>>> We | Define We at Dictionary.com
>>>> refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.
>>>>
>>>> All people on the planet which we live.
>>>>
>>>> Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?
>>>>
>>>> How about...What?
>>>>
>>>> example: What is this thing or object called people?
>>>>
>>>>    "W-H-A-T are we?"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> here is the braile version...
>>>
>>>
>>> .. o. o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. o. .. o. oo .. .o o. o. .. oo o. o. oo o. .o .. .o o.
>>> .. .. o. o. .. o. .o .o o. o. .o .. .o .o .. oo oo .o .. o. o. .. .o .o oo .. oo oo
>>> .o .. o. o. .. o. .. o. o. o. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. .. .. o. o. .. o. .. o. .. .o ..
>>>
>>> .o oo o. .. .o o. .. o. .o o. o. ..
>>> o. .. oo .. oo .o .. o. o. o. .o oo
>>> .. .. .. .. .o .. .. o. .. oo .. .o
>>>
>> Maybe if you shout in people's faces then they will understand what you
>> are asking? Seems to work with a lot American Tourists. Idiot.
> 
> oh i see, you're hard of hearing...here is the loud version:
> 
> 
> WE | DEFINE WE AT DICTIONARY.COM
> REFERS TO ALL PEOPLE OR PEOPLE IN GENERAL: THE PLANET ON WHICH WE LIVE.
> 
> 
> ALL PEOPLE ON THE PLANET WHICH WE LIVE.
> 
> 
> 
> DO YOU NEED THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD..."ARE"?
> 
> 
> HOW ABOUT...WHAT?
> 
> 
> EXAMPLE: WHAT IS THIS THING OR OBJECT CALLED PEOPLE?
> 
> 
> 
>   "W-H-A-T ARE WE?"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> do you want the benji the dog bow wow version too?
> 
> 
> 
>             ^\
>   /        //o__o
> /\       /  __/
> \ \______\  /     -ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF! ARF!  ARF!
>   \         /
>    \ \----\ \
>     \_\_   \_\_
> 
> 
> 
> woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-woof-
> 
> 
> What's on top of a building, benji?
> woof!
> 
Typical lib. Get cornered and change the subject. Try learning how 
science works, faker. Shouting something really doesn't make someone 
better able to understand what in hell you are talking about.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681452

On 4/17/2018 6:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> benj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
>>>>>
>>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> eyes, cells....????
>>>
>>>
>>> This is worse than I thought.
>>>
>> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
>> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
> 
> 
> It's been defined...you're blind too????
> 
> 
> --
> okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
> 
> 
> We | Define We at Dictionary.com
> refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.

I see as a writer you have no clue about science. You have to do better 
than this? Do you mean all people or people in general which is to say 
some sort of "average" people. Is the planet included in "we" or are you 
only referring to humanoids? And of those again I ask is it ALL 
humanoids in any state whatever (including dead) or just some average of 
the living of your age with lower than average intelligence as you've got?

> All people on the planet which we live.

Does people refer to only human lifeforms or are other humanoids 
included if they are on the planet? Does "all" include dead people too?

> Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?

Well, yes! Does "are" mean only states they presently hold and does not 
include historical or future conditions? Are you limiting everything to 
the absolute present?

> How about...What?

And yes, when you say "what"? We have no idea what particular aspect of 
the human humanoids you are interested in describing? Chemistry? 
Biology? Fantasies? goals? Electrical activity? Thoughts? The list can 
be endless and virtually impossible to describe and certainly far more 
than your brain could ever comprehend.

In other words your question is nothing but babbling nonsense from a 
scientific viewpoint. You are trying to sound deep but you are only 
proving you are dumb.
> 
> example: What is this thing or object called people?
> 
> 
> 
>   "W-H-A-T are we?"

You could start with describing WHAT ARE YOU?
True facts about your life like name, address, education, employment 
history, interests, hobbies, height, weight, medical conditions, shoe 
size, belt size, Race, ancestry, family situation and so on would be a 
good start. Remember that in science lies and fiction (fantasies) are 
reason to get thrown out except for mathematical fantasies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681483

benj wrote:
> 
> On 4/17/2018 6:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > benj wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/17/2018 1:36 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> benj wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/15/2018 10:19 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> We are the eyes of the universe.Bert
> >>>>>
> >>>> We are cells in the body of God, Bert.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> eyes, cells....????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This is worse than I thought.
> >>>
> >> Starfaker, given that you have been totally unable to even define what
> >> you mean by "we" your "thoughts" are of zero consequence.
> >
> >
> > It's been defined...you're blind too????
> >
> >
> > --
> > okay, i see you inglish is not tu good..
> >
> >
> > We | Define We at Dictionary.com
> > refers to all people or people in general: the planet on which we live.
> 
> I see as a writer you have no clue about science. You have to do better
> than this? Do you mean all people or people in general which is to say
> some sort of "average" people. Is the planet included in "we" or are you
> only referring to humanoids? And of those again I ask is it ALL
> humanoids in any state whatever (including dead) or just some average of
> the living of your age with lower than average intelligence as you've got?
> 
> > All people on the planet which we live.
> 
> Does people refer to only human lifeforms or are other humanoids
> included if they are on the planet? Does "all" include dead people too?
> 
> > Do you need the definion of the word..."are"?
> 
> Well, yes! Does "are" mean only states they presently hold and does not
> include historical or future conditions? Are you limiting everything to
> the absolute present?
> 
> > How about...What?
> 
> And yes, when you say "what"? We have no idea what particular aspect of
> the human humanoids you are interested in describing? Chemistry?
> Biology? Fantasies? goals? Electrical activity? Thoughts? The list can
> be endless and virtually impossible to describe and certainly far more
> than your brain could ever comprehend.
> 
> In other words your question is nothing but babbling nonsense from a
> scientific viewpoint. You are trying to sound deep but you are only
> proving you are dumb.
> >
> > example: What is this thing or object called people?
> >
> >
> >
> >   "W-H-A-T are we?"
> 
> You could start with describing WHAT ARE YOU?
> True facts about your life like name, address, education, employment
> history, interests, hobbies, height, weight, medical conditions, shoe
> size, belt size, Race, ancestry, family situation and so on would be a
> good start. Remember that in science lies and fiction (fantasies) are
> reason to get thrown out except for mathematical fantasies.


 We can’t define anything precisely. If we attempt to, we get into that paralysis of thought 
that comes to philosophers… one saying to the other: “You don’t know what you are talking about!” The second one says: 
“What do you mean by know? What do you mean by talking? What do you mean by you?” — Richard P. Feynman



"W-H-A-T are we?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web