Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #645726 > unrolled thread

Why is there something?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 09:45 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 12:20 -0500
      Re: Why is there something? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-19 00:11 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 10:22 -0700
      Re: Why is there something? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-13 12:07 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:20 -0700
      Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:23 -0700
        Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-13 14:07 -0700
          Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:27 -0700
        Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-14 11:46 -0700
          Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 11:45 -0700
            Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 13:17 -0700
              Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-15 13:48 -0700
                Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:27 -0700
                  Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:33 -0700
      Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 13:56 -0700
        Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 16:21 -0500
        Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:05 -0500
          Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-14 00:06 -0700
            Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 11:33 +0000
            Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:00 -0700
              Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 12:38 +0000
                Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:42 -0700
                  Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 06:27 -0700
                  Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 08:44 -0500
                    Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:06 -0700
                      Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 13:00 -0500
                      Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 17:55 -0400
                        Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:17 -0700
                        Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 23:36 +0000
                          Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:38 -0700
                            Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 00:54 +0000
                              Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:36 -0400
                                Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
                                Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
                                  Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:40 -0400
                                    Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 01:04 +0000
                                      Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 21:54 -0400
                                        Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 02:28 +0000
                                          Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-17 17:24 -0400
                          Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:52 -0700
                            Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:34 -0400
                              Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-15 21:25 -0500
                                Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:38 -0400
                              Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
                              Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 08:14 -0700
                          Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:24 -0400
                            Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 01:30 +0000
            Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-14 07:45 -0500
        Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:28 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:04 -0500
    Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 17:25 -0700
      Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 21:02 -0500
      Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-14 07:17 -0700
        Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:13 -0700
          Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 18:00 -0400
            Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 15:38 -0700
              Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 19:29 -0400
                Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:37 -0700
                  Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:41 -0400
                    Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
                Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:41 -0700
                  Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:33 -0400
                    Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:53 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-13 17:36 -0700
    Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-14 10:02 +0000
    Re: Why is there something? "Anthony Zen Pride Week" <sender@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-16 07:13 -0700
      Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 07:29 -0700
        Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 17:30 -0700
    Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 20:42 -0700
      Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-17 22:49 -0700
        Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 08:14 -0700

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#645726 — Why is there something?

A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?

Abhinav Lal 
Writer & Investor 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#645728

On 8/13/2017 11:45 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:

> A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing? 

if there was nothing, there would be no book, nor reader.


> I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  

everything wont fit in your house, but some things will.



> I didn't read the book.  

     meh,   didn't like the subject ?




So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?

    Why not?

and ask the remaining questions; How, where, when, what for...

and include 'anything' 'anybody', 'somebody', 'everybody', .... anyone, 
someone, everyone, ....

[you only got 1 question there]

more questions at

http://www.english-test.net/esl/learn/english/grammar/ei076/esl-test.php

> 
> Abhinav Lal
> Writer & Investor
> 

A good learning lesson for you!
-The Great Spore

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646496

On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 8:21:09 PM UTC+3, Serg io wrote:
> On 8/13/2017 11:45 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing? 
> 
> if there was nothing, there would be no book, nor reader.
> 
> 
> > I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  
> 
> everything wont fit in your house, but some things will.
> 
> 
> 
> > I didn't read the book.  
> 
>      meh,   didn't like the subject ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> 
>     Why not?
> 
> and ask the remaining questions; How, where, when, what for...
> 
> and include 'anything' 'anybody', 'somebody', 'everybody', .... anyone, 
> someone, everyone, ....
> 
> [you only got 1 question there]
> 
> more questions at
> 
> http://www.english-test.net/esl/learn/english/grammar/ei076/esl-test.php
> 
> > 
> > Abhinav Lal
> > Writer & Investor
> > 
> 
> A good learning lesson for you!
> -The Great Spore
=====================
in  short 
why is something''
is a stupid question !!
Y.P
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645729

On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 9:45:08 AM UTC-7, alal...@gmail.com wrote:
> A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> 
> Abhinav Lal 
> Writer & Investor

Better question is.Why is there everything? That has an answer. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645748

"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Better question is. Why is there an answer".. which
is here, below:
>
Glazier, you Un-American Liberal Mooch, Face Shitter &
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> aka
you, ___ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim___, how
many NEW posters did you snare, deviously, with your
idiotic Gutter physics & filthy Glazierola, who falsely
believed that they could educate you, you, Glazier who
was kicked out of school in the 4th grade!?.... LOL
>
Glazier, did you tell these respondents that your real goal
is to tell them the same thing that you told...
(2)
On 06Dec2014, to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert.... & addinng
On 03Aug2017:
benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears.
>
(3)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Jew Pig Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
Glazier, you filthy, hate mongering Swine, your "nice" posts
do not belong into s.p. Post your Glazierola into your
<http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017>, until
you accept <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>,
as you wait for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>.
who has a gruesome end in store for you, Glazier. "It's a pity

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645741

alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> 
> Abhinav Lal
> Writer & Investor


It is not a physics question.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645753

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> >
> > Abhinav Lal
> > Writer & Investor
> 
> It is not a physics question.



First it starts off with the word "Why"..



"why is there something rather than nothing?"



Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
read it.



The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...



It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
'poppin' in and out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645772

On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 12:23:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > >
> > > Abhinav Lal
> > > Writer & Investor
> > 
> > It is not a physics question.
> 
> 
> 
> First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> 
> 
> 
> "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> 
> 
> 
> Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> read it.
> 
> 
> 
> The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> 
> 
> 
> It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> 'poppin' in and out.


These are the same kind of topics that Aristotle liked to discuss, and call physics!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645827

Double-A wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 12:23:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > >
> > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > Writer & Investor
> > >
> > > It is not a physics question.
> >
> >
> >
> > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> >
> >
> >
> > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> >
> >
> >
> > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > read it.
> >
> >
> >
> > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> >
> >
> >
> > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > 'poppin' in and out.
> 
> These are the same kind of topics that Aristotle liked to discuss, and call physics!
> 
> Double-A


How is "nothing"...physics????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645903

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > >
> > > Abhinav Lal
> > > Writer & Investor
> >
> > It is not a physics question.
> 
> First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> 
> "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> 
> Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> read it.
> 
> The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> 
> It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> 'poppin' in and out.


But, that aside...

I can explain

'why is there something rather than nothing?'


Nothing and Something contain the same weight.

Except that nothing is not physical..

If you give nothing a number...like a zero

and something the number one..

then one comes after zero.


Physics is something. Something equals one.

Now, since something comes from nothing..

What is nothing?


Nothing is simply...no things.


Nothing is ...consciousness.


Consciousness is not physics..

but how did consciousness create something?

The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...

'I think, therefore I am.'


"am" equals something.


The process that created am/something is nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646036

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > >
> > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > Writer & Investor
> > >
> > > It is not a physics question.
> >
> > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> >
> > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> >
> > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > read it.
> >
> > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> >
> > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > 'poppin' in and out.
> 
> But, that aside...
> 
> I can explain
> 
> 'why is there something rather than nothing?'
> 
> Nothing and Something contain the same weight.
> 
> Except that nothing is not physical..
> 
> If you give nothing a number...like a zero
> 
> and something the number one..
> 
> then one comes after zero.
> 
> Physics is something. Something equals one.
> 
> Now, since something comes from nothing..
> 
> What is nothing?
> 
> Nothing is simply...no things.
> 
> Nothing is ...consciousness.
> 
> Consciousness is not physics..
> 
> but how did consciousness create something?
> 
> The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...
> 
> 'I think, therefore I am.'
> 
> "am" equals something.
> 
> The process that created am/something is nothing.


Now, How much does nothing weigh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646042

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > > >
> > > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > > Writer & Investor
> > > >
> > > > It is not a physics question.
> > >
> > > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> > >
> > > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> > >
> > > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > > read it.
> > >
> > > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> > >
> > > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > > 'poppin' in and out.
> >
> > But, that aside...
> >
> > I can explain
> >
> > 'why is there something rather than nothing?'
> >
> > Nothing and Something contain the same weight.
> >
> > Except that nothing is not physical..
> >
> > If you give nothing a number...like a zero
> >
> > and something the number one..
> >
> > then one comes after zero.
> >
> > Physics is something. Something equals one.
> >
> > Now, since something comes from nothing..
> >
> > What is nothing?
> >
> > Nothing is simply...no things.
> >
> > Nothing is ...consciousness.
> >
> > Consciousness is not physics..
> >
> > but how did consciousness create something?
> >
> > The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...
> >
> > 'I think, therefore I am.'
> >
> > "am" equals something.
> >
> > The process that created am/something is nothing.
> 
> Now, How much does nothing weigh?


...and don't tell me it weighs nothing because i don't know how much
nothing weighs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646046

On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > > > Writer & Investor
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not a physics question.
> > > >
> > > > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> > > >
> > > > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> > > >
> > > > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > > > read it.
> > > >
> > > > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> > > >
> > > > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > > > 'poppin' in and out.
> > >
> > > But, that aside...
> > >
> > > I can explain
> > >
> > > 'why is there something rather than nothing?'
> > >
> > > Nothing and Something contain the same weight.
> > >
> > > Except that nothing is not physical..
> > >
> > > If you give nothing a number...like a zero
> > >
> > > and something the number one..
> > >
> > > then one comes after zero.
> > >
> > > Physics is something. Something equals one.
> > >
> > > Now, since something comes from nothing..
> > >
> > > What is nothing?
> > >
> > > Nothing is simply...no things.
> > >
> > > Nothing is ...consciousness.
> > >
> > > Consciousness is not physics..
> > >
> > > but how did consciousness create something?
> > >
> > > The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...
> > >
> > > 'I think, therefore I am.'
> > >
> > > "am" equals something.
> > >
> > > The process that created am/something is nothing.
> > 
> > Now, How much does nothing weigh?
> 
> 
> ...and don't tell me it weighs nothing because i don't know how much
> nothing weighs.


Well then weigh it!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646085

Double-A wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > > > > Writer & Investor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is not a physics question.
> > > > >
> > > > > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> > > > >
> > > > > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> > > > >
> > > > > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > > > > read it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> > > > >
> > > > > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > > > > 'poppin' in and out.
> > > >
> > > > But, that aside...
> > > >
> > > > I can explain
> > > >
> > > > 'why is there something rather than nothing?'
> > > >
> > > > Nothing and Something contain the same weight.
> > > >
> > > > Except that nothing is not physical..
> > > >
> > > > If you give nothing a number...like a zero
> > > >
> > > > and something the number one..
> > > >
> > > > then one comes after zero.
> > > >
> > > > Physics is something. Something equals one.
> > > >
> > > > Now, since something comes from nothing..
> > > >
> > > > What is nothing?
> > > >
> > > > Nothing is simply...no things.
> > > >
> > > > Nothing is ...consciousness.
> > > >
> > > > Consciousness is not physics..
> > > >
> > > > but how did consciousness create something?
> > > >
> > > > The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...
> > > >
> > > > 'I think, therefore I am.'
> > > >
> > > > "am" equals something.
> > > >
> > > > The process that created am/something is nothing.
> > >
> > > Now, How much does nothing weigh?
> >
> >
> > ...and don't tell me it weighs nothing because i don't know how much
> > nothing weighs.
> 
> Well then weigh it!
> 
> Double-A

I don't want to...weigh..."it", since "it" is a thing and nothing is not
a it or a thing, it's no thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#646088

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Double-A wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 1:17:02 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Abhinav Lal
> > > > > > > > Writer & Investor
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is not a physics question.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First it starts off with the word "Why"..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "why is there something rather than nothing?"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then "something" and "nothing" have a different meaning than one might
> > > > > > read it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The author's meaning is different than one might think it means...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It could be a ...trick, to get you into....the quantum world of things
> > > > > > 'poppin' in and out.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, that aside...
> > > > >
> > > > > I can explain
> > > > >
> > > > > 'why is there something rather than nothing?'
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing and Something contain the same weight.
> > > > >
> > > > > Except that nothing is not physical..
> > > > >
> > > > > If you give nothing a number...like a zero
> > > > >
> > > > > and something the number one..
> > > > >
> > > > > then one comes after zero.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is something. Something equals one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, since something comes from nothing..
> > > > >
> > > > > What is nothing?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing is simply...no things.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing is ...consciousness.
> > > > >
> > > > > Consciousness is not physics..
> > > > >
> > > > > but how did consciousness create something?
> > > > >
> > > > > The simpliest way for you to understand without all the details is...
> > > > >
> > > > > 'I think, therefore I am.'
> > > > >
> > > > > "am" equals something.
> > > > >
> > > > > The process that created am/something is nothing.
> > > >
> > > > Now, How much does nothing weigh?
> > >
> > >
> > > ...and don't tell me it weighs nothing because i don't know how much
> > > nothing weighs.
> >
> > Well then weigh it!
> >
> > Double-A
> 
> I don't want to...weigh..."it", since "it" is a thing and nothing is not
> a it or a thing, it's no thing.


You peoples need to understand if something come from nothing...then you need to understand all that nothing is, or what be nothing, if nothing be or is.


To get beyond something to nothing...you're gonna need a new language.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645769

On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 11:50:12 PM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote:
> alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
> > 
> > Abhinav Lal
> > Writer & Investor
> 
> 
> It is not a physics question.

There is a book by Lawrence M. Krauss, "A universe from nothing: why there is something rather than nothing".  I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks.  

Abhinav Lal 
Writer & Investor 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645776

On 8/13/2017 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 11:50:12 PM UTC+5:30, The Starmaker wrote:
>> alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> A book asked, why is there something rather than nothing?  I ask, why is there something rather than everything?  I didn't read the book.  So please answer the questions.  Why is there something?
>>>
>>> Abhinav Lal
>>> Writer & Investor
>>
>>
>> It is not a physics question.
> 
> There is a book by Lawrence M. Krauss, "A universe from nothing: why there is something rather than nothing".  I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks.
> 
> Abhinav Lal
> Writer & Investor
> 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_M._Krauss

"In his book, A Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather 
than Nothing (2012), Krauss discusses the premise that something cannot 
come from nothing, which has often been used as an argument for the 
existence of a prime mover. He has since argued in a debate with John 
Ellis and Don Cupitt that the laws of physics allow for the universe to 
be created from nothing. "What would be the characteristics of a 
universe that was created from nothing, just with the laws of physics 
and without any supernatural shenanigans? The characteristics of the 
universe would be precisely those of the ones we live in." [32] In an 
interview with The Atlantic, however, he states that he has never 
claimed that "questions about origins are over." According to Krauss, "I 
don't ever claim to resolve that infinite regress of 
why-why-why-why-why; as far as I'm concerned it's turtles all the way 
down."[33]"

I dont think i would want to read/listen to him,  tons of conjecture,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645790

On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks.

I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has 
been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is 
there a reason you believe what you do?

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645835

On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 4:35:50 AM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks.
> 
> I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has 
> been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is 
> there a reason you believe what you do?

I may be lazy, but I am not a liar.  Over time, perhaps you will learn to trust me.  How solid is the evidence you have seen on quarks?  How reliant are you on other people?  

Abhinav Lal 
Writer & Investor 

> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645850

<alal65536@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 4:35:50 AM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on
>>> cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks.
>> 
>> I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has 
>> been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is 
>> there a reason you believe what you do?
> 
> I may be lazy, but I am not a liar.  Over time, perhaps you will learn to
> trust me.  How solid is the evidence you have seen on quarks?  How
> reliant are you on other people?  

I do not rely only on what I can see with my bare senses. Otherwise I would
not believe in molecules or protons or genes either. So I do trust the
clearly documented and corroborated experimental work of physicists. Is
there SOLID reason not to? In other words, what clearly documented
COUNTEREVIDENCE do you have? If none, and you are asking for blind trust in
your claims, no, I will not do that. Why would anyone?

> 
> Abhinav Lal 
> Writer & Investor 
> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web