Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #639491 > unrolled thread

The Alvarez hypothesis

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The Alvarez hypothesis  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 15:22 -0700
    The Alvarez hypothesis "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-08 16:43 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 20:49 -0700
    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis  "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-09 09:20 +0100
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 11:41 -0700
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:46 -0700
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:15 +0100
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:16 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:35 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 14:57 -0700
                  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:25 +0100
                  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:49 -0700
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:08 +0100
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:39 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 20:45 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:19 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:59 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:47 -0700
                  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:31 -0700
                    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:00 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:02 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:06 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 08:54 -0700
                  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:48 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 17:24 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 23:46 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:32 +0100
                  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-12 12:11 -0700
                    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-13 08:35 +0100
                      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-13 09:06 -0700
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 06:42 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#639491 — The Alvarez hypothesis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis


hypothesis:
a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of
its truth.



a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.


If I was a dino 66 million years agao...

and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..

how much time do I got?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#639506

ScatMaker Scatted 

"couple of spanish kooks"

Evil Bigot & Racist ScatMaker 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639539

David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> 
> ScatMaker Scatted
> 
> "couple of spanish kooks"
> 
> Evil Bigot & Racist ScatMaker



2+5, the son of a bitch is 7
3+6, the son of a bitch is 9. . .



Mom: you teaching them to say 2+ 2, the Son of a bitch is 4?

Teacher after laughing: What I taught them was, 2+2,

 The Sum of Which is 4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639562

The Starmaker wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
>
>
> hypothesis:
> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of
> its truth.

But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which is what 
prompted it in the first place.

>
>
>
> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.

Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both 
natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?

>
>
> If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
>
> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
>
> how much time do I got?

About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639618

Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
> >
> >
> > hypothesis:
> > a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of
> > its truth.
> 
> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which is what
> prompted it in the first place.


"hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"


> 
> >
> >
> >
> > a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
> 
> Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
> natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?

"nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??

Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez



"Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but *never* observed."


When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!


That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....



Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."


You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure! 


the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!



and the yokes on Yous.






> 
> >
> >
> > If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
> >
> > and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
> >
> > how much time do I got?
> 
> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
> 
> --
> Mike Dworetsky
> 
> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)


Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish jokes...which one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme, Polish are stupid. Why is that?



Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It took him 2 hours to get his family out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639625

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
> > >
> > >
> > > hypothesis:
> > > a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of
> > > its truth.
> >
> > But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which is what
> > prompted it in the first place.
> 
> "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"
> 
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
> >
> > Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
> > natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?
> 
> "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??
> 
> Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez
> 
> "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but *never* observed."
> 
> When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!
> 
> That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....
> 
> Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."
> 
> You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure!
> 
> the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!
> 
> and the yokes on Yous.
> 
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
> > >
> > > and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
> > >
> > > how much time do I got?
> >
> > About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
> >
> > --
> > Mike Dworetsky
> >
> > (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
> 
> Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish jokes...which one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme, Polish are stupid. Why is that?
> 
> Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It took him 2 hours to get his family out.



So, let's re-cap...Mike Dworetsky, that stupid motherfucker...wants you to believe,
that the guy who got the noble prize came out with the idea that the extinction event that 
wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact.

But the Truth is...it was the father who got the noble prize, and his stupid son is the one
who came out with the idea of the asteroid impact.

Mike Dworetsky gotta be Polish, and get a noble prize for ...stupidity!


Did you hear about when  Mike Dworetsky locked his keys in the car? It took him 2 hours to get his family out!!!!


"HEY DAD, GET US OUT HERE!!! YOU'RE SUPPOSE TO BE THE FUCKIN GENIUS!"


"Listen you stupid kid, I locked my keys in the car..I gotta find a coat hanger!"


the kid rolls down the car window.."Here's a coat hanger!"


Mike Dworetsky says, "I don't know how to work these fuckin things..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639720

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hypothesis:
>>>> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any
>>>> assumption of its truth.
>>>
>>> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which
>>> is what prompted it in the first place.
>>
>> "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the
>> question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
>>>
>>> Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
>>> natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?
>>
>> "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??
>>
>> Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez
>>
>> "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture
>> in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but
>> *never* observed."
>>
>> When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is
>> "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!
>>
>> That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....
>>
>> Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the
>> Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that
>> wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."
>>
>> You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure!
>>
>> the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!
>>
>> and the yokes on Yous.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
>>>>
>>>> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
>>>>
>>>> how much time do I got?
>>>
>>> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Dworetsky
>>>
>>> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
>>
>> Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish
>> jokes...which one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme,
>> Polish are stupid. Why is that?
>>
>> Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It
>> took him 2 hours to get his family out.
>
>
>
> So, let's re-cap...Mike Dworetsky, that stupid motherfucker...wants
> you to believe,
> that the guy who got the noble prize came out with the idea that the
> extinction event that
> wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact.
>
> But the Truth is...it was the father who got the noble prize, and his
> stupid son is the one
> who came out with the idea of the asteroid impact.

If his son was so stupid, how did Walter come up with such a brilliant idea?

>
> Mike Dworetsky gotta be Polish, and get a noble prize for
> ...stupidity!
>
>
> Did you hear about when  Mike Dworetsky locked his keys in the car?
> It took him 2 hours to get his family out!!!!
>
>
> "HEY DAD, GET US OUT HERE!!! YOU'RE SUPPOSE TO BE THE FUCKIN GENIUS!"
>
>
> "Listen you stupid kid, I locked my keys in the car..I gotta find a
> coat hanger!"
>
>
> the kid rolls down the car window.."Here's a coat hanger!"
>
>
> Mike Dworetsky says, "I don't know how to work these fuckin things..."

Actually I do, but a slimjim works a lot better than a coathanger, and won't 
damage the door lock.

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639890

Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> hypothesis:
> >>>> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any
> >>>> assumption of its truth.
> >>>
> >>> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which
> >>> is what prompted it in the first place.
> >>
> >> "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the
> >> question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
> >>>
> >>> Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
> >>> natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?
> >>
> >> "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??
> >>
> >> Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez
> >>
> >> "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture
> >> in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but
> >> *never* observed."
> >>
> >> When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is
> >> "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!
> >>
> >> That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....
> >>
> >> Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the
> >> Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that
> >> wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."
> >>
> >> You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure!
> >>
> >> the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!
> >>
> >> and the yokes on Yous.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
> >>>>
> >>>> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
> >>>>
> >>>> how much time do I got?
> >>>
> >>> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mike Dworetsky
> >>>
> >>> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
> >>
> >> Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish
> >> jokes...which one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme,
> >> Polish are stupid. Why is that?
> >>
> >> Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It
> >> took him 2 hours to get his family out.
> >
> >
> >
> > So, let's re-cap...Mike Dworetsky, that stupid motherfucker...wants
> > you to believe,
> > that the guy who got the noble prize came out with the idea that the
> > extinction event that
> > wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact.
> >
> > But the Truth is...it was the father who got the noble prize, and his
> > stupid son is the one
> > who came out with the idea of the asteroid impact.
> 
> If his son was so stupid, how did Walter come up with such a brilliant idea?


There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his father, they both created 'observations' that have 'never been observed'. Which is
why the question remains..."What happen to the dinosaurs?" 


The answer of cource is very simple...there were only a few dinosaurs then, and they went ..exitint, naturally. They simply died off...



What you have is a group of people today who have no future in the dinosaur field...so they make things up!


In their field, every single bird today is a dinosaur.


You people need to get on with the future and stop riding aroound in horseless carriages.










> 
> >
> > Mike Dworetsky gotta be Polish, and get a noble prize for
> > ...stupidity!
> >
> >
> > Did you hear about when  Mike Dworetsky locked his keys in the car?
> > It took him 2 hours to get his family out!!!!
> >
> >
> > "HEY DAD, GET US OUT HERE!!! YOU'RE SUPPOSE TO BE THE FUCKIN GENIUS!"
> >
> >
> > "Listen you stupid kid, I locked my keys in the car..I gotta find a
> > coat hanger!"
> >
> >
> > the kid rolls down the car window.."Here's a coat hanger!"
> >
> >
> > Mike Dworetsky says, "I don't know how to work these fuckin things..."
> 
> Actually I do, but a slimjim works a lot better than a coathanger, and won't
> damage the door lock.
> 
> --
> Mike Dworetsky
> 
> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640018

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
[]
> 
> There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his
> father, they both created 'observations' that have
> 'never been observed'.

Come back when you learn English.
"never before observed" is very different from "never observed"

Ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640026

Edward Prochak wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> []
> >
> > There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his
> > father, they both created 'observations' that have
> > 'never been observed'.
> 
> Come back when you learn English.
> "never before observed" is very different from "never observed"
> 
> Ed

Come back when you learn to READ English


It READS: 'never been observed', NOT "never before observed"

It means "NEVER NEVER OBSERVED" at any time!


can you people believe the stupidity in these newgroups???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640137

The Starmaker wrote:
> Edward Prochak wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>> []
>>>
>>> There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his
>>> father, they both created 'observations' that have
>>> 'never been observed'.
>>
>> Come back when you learn English.
>> "never before observed" is very different from "never observed"
>>
>> Ed
>
> Come back when you learn to READ English
>
>
> It READS: 'never been observed', NOT "never before observed"
>
> It means "NEVER NEVER OBSERVED" at any time!
>
>
> can you people believe the stupidity in these newgroups???

Only when you are the poster.  I'm still surprised that you put so much 
emphasis on what a Wikipedia article says (or how you interpret it) and so 
ineffectually slam responders who read the article differently (and, from 
context, correctly).

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640161

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:57:16 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Edward Prochak wrote:
> > 
> > On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:15:59 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > []
> > >
> > > There is nothing "brilliant" about his idea...he is like his
> > > father, they both created 'observations' that have
> > > 'never been observed'.
> > 
> > Come back when you learn English.
> > "never before observed" is very different from "never observed"
> > 
> > Ed
> 
> Come back when you learn to READ English
> 
> 
> It READS: 'never been observed', NOT "never before observed"
> 
> It means "NEVER NEVER OBSERVED" at any time!
> 
> 
> can you people believe the stupidity in these newgroups???

So the crux of your argument is base on one typo in one wikipedia article.
<sarcasm mode ON> good argument <sarcasm mode OFF>

Have fun with that.
  ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639717

The Starmaker wrote:
> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
>>>
>>>
>>> hypothesis:
>>> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption
>>> of its truth.
>>
>> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which
>> is what prompted it in the first place.
>
>
> "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the
> question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"
>

Who are "they"?  If a huge impact of an asteroid did not happen, how do you 
explain the hard physical evidence of an iridium-rich layer at the KT 
boundary everywhere that it can be found on Earth?  How do you explain the 
discovery of a large crater of the exact correct age, now mostly underwater 
in the Yucatan region?

>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
>>
>> Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
>> natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?
>
> "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??
>
> Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...

You are not looking closely.

>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez
>
>
>
> "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture
> in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but *never*
> observed."
>
>
> When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is
> "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!

I call it extremely clever experimental work.  It had never been observed by 
other scientists BEFORE Alvarez devised an experiment to detect the expected 
radiation.  He observed it.

>
>
> That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....
>
>
>
> Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the
> Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that
> wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."
>
>
> You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure!
>

They do not have a "geology" category in the Nobel prizes, but Walter 
Alvarez received several important awards for his work, such as the Vetlesen 
Prize (the prestigious geology equivalent of the Nobel) and the Penrose 
Prize.  Many other areas of study are excluded from the Nobel prizes but 
there are prestigious equivalents (mathematics, for example).

>
> the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!
>
>
>
> and the yokes on Yous.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
>>>
>>> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
>>>
>>> how much time do I got?
>>
>> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
>>
>> --
>> Mike Dworetsky
>>
>> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
>
>
> Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish jokes...which

Actually, not Polish.  Some of my ancestors came from Lithuania, Latvia and 
Belarus.

> one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme, Polish are
> stupid. Why is that?
>

Because there are a lot of racists like yourself?  The Nazis loved to tell 
Polish jokes.  Are you a Nazi?

>
>
> Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It
> took him 2 hours to get his family out.

-- 
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639893

Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> hypothesis:
> >>> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption
> >>> of its truth.
> >>
> >> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which
> >> is what prompted it in the first place.
> >
> >
> > "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the
> > question "What happent to the dinosaurs?"
> >
> 
> Who are "they"?  If a huge impact of an asteroid did not happen, how do you
> explain the hard physical evidence of an iridium-rich layer at the KT
> boundary everywhere that it can be found on Earth?  How do you explain the
> discovery of a large crater of the exact correct age, now mostly underwater
> in the Yucatan region?


poppycock. 


> 
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it.
> >>
> >> Spanish?  The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both
> >> natural-born Americans.  Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"?
> >
> > "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners??
> >
> > Let's look closely at this noble prize winner...
> 
> You are not looking closely.
> 
> >
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez
> >
> >
> >
> > "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture
> > in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but *never*
> > observed."
> >
> >
> > When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is
> > "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK!
> 
> I call it extremely clever experimental work.  It had never been observed by
> other scientists BEFORE Alvarez devised an experiment to detect the expected
> radiation.  He observed it.

Then he is not a kook, he's a fraud. There is alot of that going around in your community, even today.


> 
> >
> >
> > That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it....
> >
> >
> >
> > Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the
> > Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that
> > wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact."
> >
> >
> > You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure!
> >
> 
> They do not have a "geology" category in the Nobel prizes, but Walter
> Alvarez received several important awards for his work, such as the Vetlesen
> Prize (the prestigious geology equivalent of the Nobel) and the Penrose
> Prize.  Many other areas of study are excluded from the Nobel prizes but
> there are prestigious equivalents (mathematics, for example).


Prizes are just things people come up with to pretend that they are still...revelant, and they are not.


You can easily come up with your own webpage, offer a ten thousand dollar prize for best 'material' submitted, and give yourself the top prize.

Then put it in your resume.




> 
> >
> > the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke!
> >
> >
> >
> > and the yokes on Yous.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If I was a dino 66 million years agao...
> >>>
> >>> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal..
> >>>
> >>> how much time do I got?
> >>
> >> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mike Dworetsky
> >>
> >> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
> >
> >
> > Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish jokes...which
> 
> Actually, not Polish.  Some of my ancestors came from Lithuania, Latvia and
> Belarus.

When you put Lithuania, Latvia and  Belarus....watta you get? Baltic state = Poland.

Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states?
https://www.google.com/#q=baltic.countries
http://www.answers.com/Q/Estonia_Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states?#slide=2


Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a pin at you? A: Run like hell - he's still got a hand-grenade between his teeth. 

Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a hand-grenade at you? A: Take the pin out and throw it back.




> 
> > one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme, Polish are
> > stupid. Why is that?
> >
> 
> Because there are a lot of racists like yourself?  The Nazis loved to tell
> Polish jokes.  Are you a Nazi?

I don't know, I never gave it much thought...What is a Nazi?



> 
> >
> >
> > Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It
> > took him 2 hours to get his family out.
> 
> --
> Mike Dworetsky
> 
> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639895

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 8:39:13 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mike Dworetsky wrote:

> > Who are "they"?  If a huge impact of an asteroid did not happen, how do you
> > explain the hard physical evidence of an iridium-rich layer at the KT
> > boundary everywhere that it can be found on Earth?  How do you explain the
> > discovery of a large crater of the exact correct age, now mostly underwater
> > in the Yucatan region?
> 
> 
> poppycock. 

Not poppycock at all, but good scientific reasoning. Perhaps you have 'evidence' to the contrary? 

I didn't think so...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639933

Pnal
"Not poppycock at all, but good scientific reasoning. Perhaps you have 'evidence' to the contrary? "

Pnal, are you a scientist?
What kind?
Let's check your 'scientific reasoning'.
Do you honestly believe that dinosaurs
could exist on Earth today?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#639941

Pnal
Do you think that a planet's magnetic field
is in any way an influence on its Gravity?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640021

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 9:20:02 AM UTC-4, john wrote:
> Pnal
> "Not poppycock at all, but good scientific reasoning. Perhaps you have 'evidence' to the contrary? "
> 
> Pnal, are you a scientist?
> What kind?
> Let's check your 'scientific reasoning'.
> Do you honestly believe that dinosaurs
> could exist on Earth today?

That's not the topic of discussion.
The question was why do they no longer exist.
This was just a poorly disguised ad hominem attack
ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640158

ed
"That's not the topic of discussion. 
The question was why do they no longer exist. 
This was just a poorly disguised ad hominem attack 
e"
Really, ed?
Perhaps they no longer exist today is because 
the conditions are different, today.
You are like Odd. A straight-ahead thinker.
A favorite thing for he and PD to start with is,
"Well, there are TWO possibilities....", at which
point I start laughing.

There are more things in this world than are
contained in two possibilities.

Let's say our magnetic field was stable until the
meteorite hit it 16 million years ago.
It was like a spinning top, but this impact makes it
 like an off-kilter spinning top. There used
to be plenty of oxygen, but now it flips every
500,000 years, losing oxygen progressively,
and those unable to handle less O2,
whether from size or body design, die at each flip.

So, what would have changed since the dinosaurs, is much less oxygen out there, today.

So, ed, not on topic?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#640164

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 9:32:03 AM UTC-4, john wrote:
> ed
> "That's not the topic of discussion. 
> The question was why do they no longer exist. 
> This was just a poorly disguised ad hominem attack 
> e"
> Really, ed?
> Perhaps they no longer exist today is because 
> the conditions are different, today.
> You are like Odd. A straight-ahead thinker.
> A favorite thing for he and PD to start with is,
> "Well, there are TWO possibilities....", at which
> point I start laughing.

You cannot post without some personal attack on someone?
> 
> There are more things in this world than are
> contained in two possibilities.

Note I posted earlier that there were likely many factors
with different scales of influence.
> 
> Let's say our magnetic field was stable until the
> meteorite hit it 16 million years ago.
> It was like a spinning top, but this impact makes it
>  like an off-kilter spinning top.


The earth's magnetic field is generated in the earth's core.
That meteorite impact barely broke through the crust.
That's meteorite's mass was not enough to send anything
earth-sized spinning "like an off-kilter spinning top".

> There used
> to be plenty of oxygen, but now it flips every
> 500,000 years, losing oxygen progressively,
> and those unable to handle less O2,
> whether from size or body design, die at each flip.

So that is THE reason dinosaurs are gone?
No other factors?
> 
> So, what would have changed since the dinosaurs,
> is much less oxygen out there, today.
> 
> So, ed, not on topic?

Welcome back to somewhat on topic.
ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web