Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #637658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-07-07 19:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 116 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
"Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:25 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-25 15:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 22:49 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:20 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:24 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 05:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 06:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 16:19 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 19:05 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:00 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:17 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 00:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-27 23:12 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:49 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-29 00:34 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 22:06 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-28 22:53 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:10 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 13:26 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 17:09 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 17:53 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 16:15 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:37 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 17:41 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 18:06 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 21:41 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:26 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:32 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 19:49 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 17:37 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 17:50 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-28 17:35 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 16:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:40 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 19:09 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 10:02 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-29 10:24 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 17:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 05:07 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 05:11 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 06:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:21 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 16:42 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 14:30 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 18:04 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-30 18:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 01:43 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:39 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 11:55 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 17:04 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 21:16 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 06:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-03 15:23 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 17:50 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-04 17:16 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 19:52 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-05 19:39 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 08:24 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-06 17:12 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 15:10 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-06 21:53 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 21:58 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-02 12:55 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 11:15 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 11:21 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 18:33 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 01:35 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 04:46 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 04:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Gibutsi Fumihazu <uft@wwhm.cu> - 2017-07-01 12:06 +0000
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 08:30 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:45 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 16:34 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 05:09 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "Herp Derpington" <herp@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-01 07:06 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 08:21 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-01 09:43 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 11:27 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 06:38 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 12:28 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 16:33 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 13:54 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-01 21:06 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-01 18:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-03 14:04 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 18:13 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:40 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 09:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 22:25 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:39 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегg io <innvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-28 23:37 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 23:56 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:46 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:22 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-29 14:16 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 05:41 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:43 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 15:14 +0200
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-26 18:15 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:19 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-26 18:14 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 16:58 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 19:06 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:01 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:23 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 18:48 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-27 07:46 -0500
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 17:14 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 15:57 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 20:36 -0400
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-06-26 16:31 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 23:34 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-27 10:04 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-07 14:23 -0700
Re: "Einstein's Philosophy" "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-07 19:20 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-06 21:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <595ee98b$0$19115$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #639180 |
On 7/6/2017 6:10 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 5:12:17 PM UTC-4, benj wrote:
>> On 7/6/2017 11:24 AM, Mahipal wrote:
>>> I'm going to drift. Do go start your own physics discussions. TIA.
>>>
>
> <trim>
>
>>> I simply don't have time enough to explain/translate... Go Google Yourselves!
>
> Go Google Yourselves! I'm still laughing at my self! I'm so funny! He he...
>
>> Me neither. Arindam will tell you I"m just a Western Devil and Third
>> World hater anyway.
>
> I recently learned that the English word Devil is Hindi Shataan is Satan...
> Silent h. Come on {Devil, Shataan, Satan} how can anyone miss that?!
>
>>> Mozart2Self: Too many notes! Just too much depth. Write me something sill(y), like Beyoncé.
>>>
>>> Music is a part of Physics... one person can never know all the songs/topics.
>>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=physics+vade+mecum is a great reference.
>>> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=encyclopedia+of+physics a small fortune.
>>
>>> No no NO, that's not a desperate attempt to stay on-topic. Physics, is it?!
>>
>> Yes, music is physics (plus so much more) Math is the science and music
>> is the art of time. I once worked for one of the most famous music
>> physicists. A.H. Benade, author of the famous book on the physics of
>> instruments. Used to build his inventions and instruments for him. Just
>> ONE of his braincells could put this entire newsgroup to shame. That is
>> a given.
>
> Worked for/with Benade?! That is so ridiculously cool, BenjJi! It really is!
> The book I read/studied is Music, Physics and Engineering, by Harry F. Olson.
> https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=physics+of+music+dover+book
You have no idea how ridiculously cool it was! He was the first true
genius I ever met! He could blow you away describing the transmission
line equations that describe a clarinet and then in the next breath be
describing how to do cutting edge physics using something like "an
ordinary Sear and Roebuck tire pump" as he might describe it.
It's really humorous Looperji the way people here all think they are
SOOOOO cool, and they haven't the slightest clue what true cool really is!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-06 21:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d66abc0b-73e3-46ad-8f2b-4c612e03d376@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #639168 |
On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 7:12:17 AM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 7/6/2017 11:24 AM, Mahipal wrote: > > I'm going to drift. Do go start your own physics discussions. TIA. > > > > On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 7:39:40 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >> On 7/4/2017 10:52 PM, Mahipal wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 5:16:23 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >>>> On 7/3/2017 8:50 PM, Mahipal wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 3:23:55 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/2/2017 9:48 AM, Mahipal wrote: > >>> <trim> > >>>>>>> All those great old Indian movies/stories have a new meaning/depth to me now. > >>>>>>> Still, the best Westren Spaghetti money movie is The Good The Bad The Ugly. > >>>>>>> Don't die Blondie. Don't die! You're my best friend... tell me The Grave Name... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> God I just LOVE Spaghetti Westerns! Italy may be a bureaucratic piece of > >>>>>> crap as a country but MAN do they have the macho fantasy thing down! > >>>>> > >>>>> I had longer hair once, the Chinese/Asian girls called me Rambo, Sylvester Stallone. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know which is the cooler image: You with purple turban or you > >>>> with long hair and muscles like Rambo. Oh wait, you hate guns and > >>>> killing people who "need" killin'. Oh well...yeah, turban is cool. > >>> > >>> I don't have muscles like Rambo, no one could play real tennis being stiff like that. > >>> Real tennis players are very limber, exercise with less weight and more repetitions. > >>> > >>> I never did understand me being called Rambo, by those sex(y) Asian girls in Dubai. > >>> Btw... They could've called me anything, as long as I was called upon ...youKnow! > >>> Rambo does live like within 13 miles of me in Potomac, MD. No, I've never met him. > >>> Also... I wouldn't even force my worst enemy to go suffer a Sylvester Stallone movie. > >>> > >>> In all fairness, I do prefer the image of me being The Sikh in Alanis' Thank U train. > >>> Except, I'd have a tennis racquet in one hand and a bamboo flute in the other. > >>> How about not balling your e(y)es out... Thank U thank u THANK U... India... > >>> Happy happy HAPPY SILENCE... the moment I jumped off of it... Namaste IndiaJi... > >> > >> Bamboo flute in one hand and tennis racket in the other???!!! I"m > >> writing the script for the music video right now!!! > > > > Bamboo flute is an extension of the human voice, very authentic/difficult to play. > > > > Next to the human voice, the drums, sticks and stones, I suspect bamboo > > flutes were the first musical instrument ever invented by mankind. No? > > > >>> How about not equating death with stopping?! How about kudos?! Disillusionment?! > >>> I think I'm in love with AlanisJi! Call/Text/Facebook/... me m(y) Morrisette... hurry! > >>> How come God god GOD never let me meet a girl/woman so deep?! I hate you, GodJi! > >> > >> Who equated death with stopping? To take a Christian tack,there is a way > >> that seemeth right to a man but the end thereof is death and confusion. > > > > Well, that is a very good question. Who first did it? Perhaps matters not much. > > Death is inevitable, confusion is by choice. Or preordained. Whatever. TicTock. > > > >> Godji hath not willed that any should suffer (HVAC's mistaken nonsense > >> to the contrary not withstanding) The problem (as always) is YOU and > >> your thoughts. As you think so shall ye be! > > > > That exactly is me m(y) problem. If only I were more optimistic/hopeful... > > For me, life seems to be a slow painful agonizing death drowning in QuickSand. Jo(y)! > > You're thinking I'm exaggerating. Sure... just keep thinking that... > > Friends/Family are vanishing and/or dying. Girls address me as Sir sir SIR... > > > > Please BenjJi, do stop with the PollyAnna Philosophy of life... I've got balls... > > > > Nevermind that last line, BenjJi. I just wanted to try be funn(y), just to make a joke. > > > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lyu1KKwC74 I'm a million different people... > >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yam5uK6e-bQ I just love this song -- Dreams. > >>> What what WHAT?! Am I supposed to just post a link to all the songs I love?! > >>> Allow me the Artists' Privilege of drawing you in... what's your favourite song?! > >> > >> Contrary to many musicians I don't do hero worship. I have met many > >> heroes, however. I do prefer meeting the real thing as opposed to > >> worship from afar. > > > > Most all of us have no other choice. How is anyone going to gather The > > Moody Blues, ELP, Queen, Rolling Stones, Beatles, Laxmikant Pyarelal, > > Indeevar, Sahir Ludhianvi, R.D. Burman, Planck, Newton, M.E. Talaat... > > into one train or one room? Mozart, Bach, Roger Federer, Agassi, Bjorn Borg, > > Neil Diamond, Sachin, Me, Sean Connery, ShakesHisSpeare... Mohammad Rafi, > > Kishor Kumar, Mukesh, Lata Mangeshkar, Asha... How how HOW?! One room?! > > > > Some things are never ever gonna happen. No need to cry about/over them. > > No tiny whining sad violins need play. Wine? Sure. Pour me a glass, full. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkmLa5JrVr4 dafli wale dafli baja > > Drummer meets bamboo flute player meets dancing sex(y) girl... Enjo(y). > > She's singing: I'm dancing, go ahead, make me dance... more More MORE... > > Without you, what I am? Without me, what are you? Sargam ke mele... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargam_(music) Sargam refers to singing the notes. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oE5hB1GVLg Aaja Re O Mere Dilbar Aaja - Noorie > > Noorie is from my small village/city, likely my age. Never met her, even once. > > Music Director: Khaiyyam is a God god OMG GOD! Just wow Wow WOW! Wahe Guru! > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfoYZ4TFpbA Uske Khel Nirale... Just too deep! > > > > I simply don't have time enough to explain/translate... Go Google Yourselves! > > Me neither. Arindam will tell you I"m just a Western Devil and Third > World hater anyway. > caught my name being taken here... as a general rule western devils encourage their third world bootlickers, corrupts, etc. who fight among themselves to be selected to do the dirty unto their own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-02 12:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <59594FCE.117C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #638442 |
Mahipal wrote:
>
> On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 1:42:41 AM UTC-4, benj wrote:
> > On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your internet
> > >>>> tools. You might be surprised.
> > >>>
> > >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote from my fb page)
> > >>> is that the benj types are blind to what they do not like, such as I or at
> > >>> any rate my works which upset them.
> > >>
> > >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your privacy
> > >> settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide in your head
> > >> what is "more likely".
> > >>
> > >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding some
> > >> activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" reasons
> > >> for not doing it.
> > >
> > > You mean like not fixing the washing machine? How can you expect your wife to fix it??
> >
> > You are so out of it Starfaker. Today women are just as good as the men!
> > There are women executives every bit as nasty as the men ("Dragon Lady"
> > where I used to work comes to mind) and there are women engineers
> > designing washing machines. Today Starfaker Women play tennis every bit
> > as well as the men. Wake up to modern life and modern physics (they are
> > sort of the same)
>
> Women don't play against men, at least not professionally. Yes, I'm
> well aware of genius John McEnroe's recent comment regards Serena Williams.
> To be fair, Serena would beat the hell out of Sir Rafa Nadal! Sorry, RafaJi.
>
> When I was young, I played tennis with this one beautiful girl. I
if a girl is beautiful, it mean she wants money.
So, you take your ATM receipt
scan it with a scanner
change the balance to
2 million dollars
print it out
and tell her
"I think you're beautiful, call me."
and then take out your new ATM receipt
and write your phone number on the back
and give it to her...
I gurantee you she will call you constantly.
(especially if she is a blonde)
https://www.google.com/search?q=fake+atm+receipts&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjrvcqwsOvUAhXrhlQKHbhECD8QsAQILQ&biw=1280&bih=871
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4ceef23-7957-41ac-9cb2-8497ec0428d5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638530 |
On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 3:56:09 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Mahipal wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 1:42:41 AM UTC-4, benj wrote:
> > > On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your internet
> > > >>>> tools. You might be surprised.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote from my fb page)
> > > >>> is that the benj types are blind to what they do not like, such as I or at
> > > >>> any rate my works which upset them.
> > > >>
> > > >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your privacy
> > > >> settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide in your head
> > > >> what is "more likely".
> > > >>
> > > >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding some
> > > >> activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" reasons
> > > >> for not doing it.
> > > >
> > > > You mean like not fixing the washing machine? How can you expect your wife to fix it??
> > >
> > > You are so out of it Starfaker. Today women are just as good as the men!
> > > There are women executives every bit as nasty as the men ("Dragon Lady"
> > > where I used to work comes to mind) and there are women engineers
> > > designing washing machines. Today Starfaker Women play tennis every bit
> > > as well as the men. Wake up to modern life and modern physics (they are
> > > sort of the same)
> >
> > Women don't play against men, at least not professionally. Yes, I'm
> > well aware of genius John McEnroe's recent comment regards Serena Williams.
> > To be fair, Serena would beat the hell out of Sir Rafa Nadal! Sorry, RafaJi.
I spent five hours last night (7/6/17) watching Nadal vs. Federer, Wimbledon 2008. Great match.
The only way Final2008 could've been better is that RogerJi should've won! Sorry, RafaJi.
> > When I was young, I played tennis with this one beautiful girl. I
>
> if a girl is beautiful, it mean she wants money.
Trust me, even the ugly ones want for money Money MONEY.
Remember the great insightful ancient old Irish/English limerick:
There once was a Knight
Who offered his honour
There once was a Lad(y)
Who honoured his offer
All night long, He was
On Her and Off Her...
Hadn't you heard, Prostitution is God's oldest/current profession?
It' written right on their green mone(y), In God We Thrust?! Read!
> So, you take your ATM receipt
> scan it with a scanner
> change the balance to
> 2 million dollars
> print it out
> and tell her
>
> "I think you're beautiful, call me."
I was once in a hot tub with three beautiful girls. For like 30 minutes.
Then two of my guy college friends walked by and jumped in. Buoyanc(y)!
Instantly the girls left. On the bright side, I still got my friends?!
Talk about your water displacement Archimedes Principle. I dare you.
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk! TGBU. Tuco. "Man With No Name."
> and then take out your new ATM receipt
> and write your phone number on the back
> and give it to her...
>
> I gurantee you she will call you constantly.
Fine. How do you then explain your tiny one-bedroom NJ Ghetto apartment to her?
Well, you also can't blame Gravity for people falling in love. OneStone.
Gravity is merely responsible for people falling on eachother. NYC WTC2001.
Help me, I've fallen down and I can't get up... D'yer Maker... LedZep...
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Dyer+Maker Houses of the Holy.
> (especially if she is a blonde)
Fake it 'til you make it, S(y)ndrome.
-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f225ebe6-a6ed-4036-80e0-35fba01af3fd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638633 |
On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 2:15:22 PM UTC-4, Mahipal wrote: > I spent five hours last night (7/6/17) watching Nadal vs. Federer, Wimbledon 2008. Great match. > The only way Final2008 could've been better is that RogerJi should've won! Sorry, RafaJi. Sorry, typo. It was 7/3/2017 EST. I hate SpellCheckers and AutoCorrect! Tennis Channel, reruns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-30 18:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2cb9d137-e7e3-4c5d-b820-5d49ebc0312e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638310 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 5:30:44 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> > >> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your internet > >> tools. You might be surprised. > > > > That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote from my fb page) > > is that the benj types are blind to what they do not like, such as I or at > > any rate my works which upset them. > > What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your privacy > settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide in your head > what is "more likely". My fb profile is set for public viewing so people can see my profile if they have an fb account. Nice of fb to make a special video for me. Came up this morning and I shared it. benj was saying in spe that he got some HVAC to block my facebook page from viewing in his computer or domain. He has complained to the local big brother. Fair enough, he is a hostile so he do will hostile things. I cannot wish him the best in his nefarious pastime, but I don't see how any charge of laziness can apply to me in this matter. Now if that is what he is doing, getting my fb page blocked, then what can I do about it! And why should I get blamed when other insecure people try to manipulate! But then, blaming the victim is a time honoured practice. > > It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding some > activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" reasons > for not doing it. Now that is valid for ostriches like benj et al. It is always "more likely" to them that I have done a bad job, and that conclusion they come to after doing no work at all, just letting their racist+bigoted biases rule. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 01:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59573463$0$60144$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #638356 |
On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 5:30:44 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your >>>> internet tools. You might be surprised. >>> >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote >>> from my fb page) is that the benj types are blind to what they do >>> not like, such as I or at any rate my works which upset them. >> >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your >> privacy settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide >> in your head what is "more likely". > > My fb profile is set for public viewing so people can see my profile > if they have an fb account. Nice of fb to make a special video for > me. Came up this morning and I shared it. Sorry dude, but it's not set for public viewing. It can only be seen by your few friends of which you tell us only 3 or 4 actually know any physics. So why bother? > benj was saying in spe that he got some HVAC to block my facebook > page from viewing in his computer or domain. He has complained to the > local big brother. I categorically deny contacting Big Brother. > Fair enough, he is a hostile so he do will hostile things. I cannot > wish him the best in his nefarious pastime, but I don't see how any > charge of laziness can apply to me in this matter. Right. You work like a beaver trying to prove Einstein and Western Devil Science is all wrong. > Now if that is what he is doing, getting my fb page blocked, then > what can I do about it! And why should I get blamed when other > insecure people try to manipulate! But then, blaming the victim is a > time honoured practice. Well, you could of course actually try to shed some of that Third World Sum people ignorance and learn how Facebook works as Odd suggested. Shouldn't be must of a task for a genius like you who is smarter than Einstein. >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding >> some activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" >> reasons for not doing it. > > Now that is valid for ostriches like benj et al. It is always "more > likely" to them that I have done a bad job, and that conclusion they > come to after doing no work at all, just letting their racist+bigoted > biases rule. I know how science works, You don't. End of discussion. Saying you are a genius won't ever make it so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 04:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9d61e4c8-e99c-409c-af48-fbaecd2f2b48@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638362 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 3:34:32 PM UTC+10, benj wrote: > On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 5:30:44 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your > >>>> internet tools. You might be surprised. > >>> > >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote > >>> from my fb page) is that the benj types are blind to what they do > >>> not like, such as I or at any rate my works which upset them. > >> > >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your > >> privacy settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide > >> in your head what is "more likely". > > > > My fb profile is set for public viewing so people can see my profile > > if they have an fb account. Nice of fb to make a special video for > > me. Came up this morning and I shared it. > > Sorry dude, but it's not set for public viewing. It can only be seen by > your few friends of which you tell us only 3 or 4 actually know any > physics. So why bother? YouTube is for the videos films. Usenet is for discussions. Facebook is like a diary. I use it for social purposes, and also to present my works in arts, sciencs, maths, etc. from time to time. A diary is good, for it gives a record which all can see. Except the arrogant anti-thirdworld racist+bigots, adequately represented by you-know-who because it is you, benj. Gotta keep 'em down, what. > > > benj was saying in spe that he got some HVAC to block my facebook > > page from viewing in his computer or domain. He has complained to the > > local big brother. > > I categorically deny contacting Big Brother. > > > Fair enough, he is a hostile so he do will hostile things. I cannot > > wish him the best in his nefarious pastime, but I don't see how any > > charge of laziness can apply to me in this matter. > > Right. You work like a beaver trying to prove Einstein and Western Devil > Science is all wrong. > > > Now if that is what he is doing, getting my fb page blocked, then > > what can I do about it! And why should I get blamed when other > > insecure people try to manipulate! But then, blaming the victim is a > > time honoured practice. > > Well, you could of course actually try to shed some of that Third World > Sum people ignorance and learn how Facebook works as Odd suggested. > Shouldn't be must of a task for a genius like you who is smarter than > Einstein. > > >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding > >> some activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" > >> reasons for not doing it. > > > > Now that is valid for ostriches like benj et al. It is always "more > > likely" to them that I have done a bad job, and that conclusion they > > come to after doing no work at all, just letting their racist+bigoted > > biases rule. > > I know how science works, You don't. End of discussion. > Saying you are a genius won't ever make it so.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 04:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d67b45dd-8539-4cad-a2a3-786eb62de81b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638362 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 1:34:32 AM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 5:30:44 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your > >>>> internet tools. You might be surprised. > >>> > >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote > >>> from my fb page) is that the benj types are blind to what they do > >>> not like, such as I or at any rate my works which upset them. > >> > >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your > >> privacy settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide > >> in your head what is "more likely". > > > > My fb profile is set for public viewing so people can see my profile > > if they have an fb account. Nice of fb to make a special video for > > me. Came up this morning and I shared it. > > Sorry dude, but it's not set for public viewing. It can only be seen by > your few friends of which you tell us only 3 or 4 actually know any > physics. So why bother? There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. The list of FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. I posted my FB link as an experiment/test. Non-FB-friends accessed my link. For the record, I rarely, like never, discuss physics on FB. Why? Given how many few friends I have, I can't afford to lose anymore. > > benj was saying in spe that he got some HVAC to block my facebook > > page from viewing in his computer or domain. He has complained to the > > local big brother. > > I categorically deny contacting Big Brother. BenjJi, that's a good imitation of HVAC. A little too good. Suspiciously. > > Fair enough, he is a hostile so he do will hostile things. I cannot > > wish him the best in his nefarious pastime, but I don't see how any > > charge of laziness can apply to me in this matter. > > Right. You work like a beaver trying to prove Einstein and Western Devil > Science is all wrong. Wait... what?! There's Western, Eastern, Northmen, Southern Physics?! > > Now if that is what he is doing, getting my fb page blocked, then > > what can I do about it! And why should I get blamed when other > > insecure people try to manipulate! But then, blaming the victim is a > > time honoured practice. > > Well, you could of course actually try to shed some of that Third World > Sum people ignorance and learn how Facebook works as Odd suggested. > Shouldn't be must of a task for a genius like you who is smarter than > Einstein. > > >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding > >> some activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" > >> reasons for not doing it. > > > > Now that is valid for ostriches like benj et al. It is always "more > > likely" to them that I have done a bad job, and that conclusion they > > come to after doing no work at all, just letting their racist+bigoted > > biases rule. > > I know how science works, You don't. End of discussion. > Saying you are a genius won't ever make it so. Self serving self promoting fake false bravado never works, ask/tweet TrumpET. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gibutsi Fumihazu <uft@wwhm.cu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 12:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oj8393$ka3$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #638380 |
Mahipal wrote: > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once > again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, > Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. The list of > FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. Untrue, they are some wonderful human beings. They are not all bad. You are learning now and then some Physics, that's not bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 08:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3b8b0c20-1d55-4cdf-9128-e0f7a0a2ce78@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638381 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 8:07:06 AM UTC-4, Gibutsi Fumihazu wrote: > Mahipal wrote: > > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > > > Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once > > again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, > > Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. The list of > > FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. > > Untrue, they are some wonderful human beings. They are not all bad. I think you meant there, not they. Wonderfully bad your mistake, Fumihazu. > You are learning now and then some Physics, that's not bad. I know Physics when I see/hear/read/write/live/feel/... it It IT. Go away. I'm getting this feeling, loser posters just want to use me to promote themselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 09:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5957D1AE.991@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #638381 |
Gibutsi Fumihazu wrote: > > Mahipal wrote: > > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > > > Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once > > again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, > > Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. The list of > > FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. > > Untrue, they are some wonderful human beings. They are not all bad. You > are learning now and then some Physics, that's not bad. hanson is a wonderful human being...i'm thinking about buying my own gas chamber from amsazon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 16:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59580772$0$55937$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #638381 |
On 7/1/2017 8:06 AM, Gibutsi Fumihazu wrote: > Mahipal wrote: > >> There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. >> >> Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once >> again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. Once again, >> Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. The list of >> FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. > > Untrue, they are some wonderful human beings. They are not all bad. You > are learning now and then some Physics, that's not bad. > Wait a minute! Theory of "heavy air" "spin is in" "cold steam" Electromagnetic gravity on a fluke multimeter? Where's the beef?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 05:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5d999f3-bfa4-4db5-9a8d-d8b7b3db5133@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638380 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 9:48:58 PM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 1:34:32 AM UTC-4, benj wrote: > > On 06/30/2017 09:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 5:30:44 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >> On 6/29/17 6:42 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 1:02:12 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Depends on your privacy settings. Like I said, get to know your > > >>>> internet tools. You might be surprised. > > >>> > > >>> That may be, but the more likely scenario (since Mahipal quote > > >>> from my fb page) is that the benj types are blind to what they do > > >>> not like, such as I or at any rate my works which upset them. > > >> > > >> What's adorable is that, rather than investigating what your > > >> privacy settings do (too much work, too much arcanery), you decide > > >> in your head what is "more likely". > > > > > > My fb profile is set for public viewing so people can see my profile > > > if they have an fb account. Nice of fb to make a special video for > > > me. Came up this morning and I shared it. > > > > Sorry dude, but it's not set for public viewing. It can only be seen by > > your few friends of which you tell us only 3 or 4 actually know any > > physics. So why bother? > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > Once again, Arindam and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. > Once again, Sergio and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. > Once again, Benj and I==Mahipal are not friends on FB. Period. > The list of FB-friends I don't have is very Very VERY long. O(y)e. > > I posted my FB link as an experiment/test. Non-FB-friends accessed my link. > > For the record, I rarely, like never, discuss physics on FB. Why? > Given how many few friends I have, I can't afford to lose anymore. > > > > benj was saying in spe that he got some HVAC to block my facebook > > > page from viewing in his computer or domain. He has complained to the > > > local big brother. > > > > I categorically deny contacting Big Brother. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.electromag/knTKODMthJg/hMC3p8GnDwAJ > > BenjJi, that's a good imitation of HVAC. A little too good. Suspiciously. > > > > Fair enough, he is a hostile so he do will hostile things. I cannot > > > wish him the best in his nefarious pastime, but I don't see how any > > > charge of laziness can apply to me in this matter. > > > > Right. You work like a beaver trying to prove Einstein and Western Devil > > Science is all wrong. > > Wait... what?! There's Western, Eastern, Northmen, Southern Physics?! He does not understand simple English. So it won't penetrate his bird brain that all I am trying to do is to put physics back on the rails after it has got derailed by Einstein and Co. > > > > Now if that is what he is doing, getting my fb page blocked, then > > > what can I do about it! And why should I get blamed when other > > > insecure people try to manipulate! But then, blaming the victim is a > > > time honoured practice. > > > > Well, you could of course actually try to shed some of that Third World > > Sum people ignorance and learn how Facebook works as Odd suggested. > > Shouldn't be must of a task for a genius like you who is smarter than > > Einstein. > > > > >> It's fascinating to me how people who are steadfastly avoiding > > >> some activity they don't want to do, will manufacture "more likely" > > >> reasons for not doing it. > > > > > > Now that is valid for ostriches like benj et al. It is always "more > > > likely" to them that I have done a bad job, and that conclusion they > > > come to after doing no work at all, just letting their racist+bigoted > > > biases rule. > > > > I know how science works, You don't. End of discussion. heh-heh, that does work doesn't it when you have got all the top blokes deep in your pocket, the whole lot frightened by nukes and awed by bullshit dressed as impenetrable science. The entire public is the naked king here. > > Saying you are a genius won't ever make it so. My genius is not limited to science. It takes time for the rest of the world to catch up with my genius. The simpler, the more profound the new idea out of my genius the more time it takes them to understand. So long as I keep myfamily and friends amused, they are fine and I am fine. It is only to the hostiles like you that I declare, hey benj, I am Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole god among lotsa devils now go rumpelstiltskinise out of frustration, along with all the other pseudo-scientific ostriches. > > Self serving self promoting fake false bravado never works, ask/tweet TrumpET. > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5957D258.4184@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #638382 |
Arindam Banerjee wrote: > He does not understand simple English. So it won't penetrate his bird brain "bird brain"???? you beginning to sound like the odd bodkin. you guys are all alike, ain't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Herp Derpington" <herp@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 07:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <oj8a9t$15eu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #638380 |
"Mahipal" ---> Google translate ---> "Penis Lunch"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 08:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2aff50e3-6896-46da-ab17-70119ef8fda0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638386 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 10:06:58 AM UTC-4, Herp Derpington wrote: > "Mahipal" > > ---> Google translate ---> > > "Penis Lunch" Not that anybody had asked, but thanks for sharing your lunch plans, Herp.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5957D116.AD7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #638380 |
Mahipal wrote: > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. who are the other 2 or 3 besides me? I have an IQ higher than God!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-01 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7695041d-e300-4235-9989-8fbe8a81ce84@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638401 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 12:43:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > Mahipal wrote: > > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > who are the other 2 or 3 besides me? That you Starmaker do not know them, speaks volumes. Out loud. > I have an IQ higher than God! Seriously? God's got an IQ? Well then, who measured it? Got Scale?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-03 06:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ed7815b1-8dac-468e-bf15-c71d7ce752cb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #638401 |
On Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 12:43:11 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > Mahipal wrote: > > > > There's only about 3 or 4 posters in this NG who know any physics. > > who are the other 2 or 3 besides me? ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web