Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #635920 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-09 11:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-06-25 14:26 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 55 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 11:38 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-06-09 13:36 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-09 13:50 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 10:55 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-10 11:18 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 12:18 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-10 13:15 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-12 09:40 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:26 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong mosca.muha@gmail.com - 2017-06-13 07:29 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:20 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-13 17:03 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-13 20:56 -0400
Re: the speed of light is wrong Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-06-18 14:07 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 12:31 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-06-27 15:39 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:34 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 01:36 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 10:53 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 11:12 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 10:51 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:04 +0100
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-25 11:30 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-25 19:38 +0100
Re: the speed of light is wrong "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 15:15 -0400
Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:45 +0200
Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 07:56 +0200
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:15 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 12:21 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:22 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 20:36 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:00 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-27 21:10 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 21:52 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Jim Petroff <ruuri@twjotr.eo> - 2017-06-29 09:55 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-27 16:20 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 05:22 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 06:15 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-26 12:08 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:42 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-11 20:51 +1000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 19:54 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:20 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-06-12 12:31 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 16:57 -0500
Re: the speed of light is wrong benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 18:54 -0400
Re: the speed of light is wrong Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 09:54 +0200
Re: the speed of light is wrong Kitubu Nkyaku <akntuu@buwkau.kk> - 2017-06-10 11:00 +0000
Re: the speed of light is wrong Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:16 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 12:17 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-10 13:13 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-10 13:06 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-10 21:28 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-25 12:30 -0700
Re: the speed of light is wrong "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-25 14:26 -0700
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-09 11:38 -0700 |
| Subject | the speed of light is wrong |
| Message-ID | <593AEB3E.5E36@ix.netcom.com> |
i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pcardinale@volcanomail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-09 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8037e211-8b68-4afe-a08c-4314a859f97c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635920 |
On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-09 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <593B09F9.249A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #635934 |
pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. meter peter 'meter' nonsence. In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like 'the universe comes from nothing' 'exactly 299,792,458' you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. untill 'they' say otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-10 10:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <593C3297.6BB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #635937 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > meter peter > > 'meter' nonsence. > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > untill 'they' say otherwise. The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. The slow speed of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-10 11:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <593C37F5.F37@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #636010 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > meter peter > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > The slow speed of light. The question is, How slow can light travel? Slower than slow...real slow. I mean...slow. not so fast not so q uick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-10 12:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7026db67-ce18-4859-baf3-cb1095c5f93b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636014 |
On Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 11:18:31 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > The slow speed of light. > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > I mean...slow. > > not so fast > > > not so q uick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-10 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ohhjr2$1bv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #636022 |
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>, "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: "I posted this reality for over 25 years.Still it goes for not" explaining why SwineBert is a stinky, habitual Face-Shitter & a criminal Graveyard vandal who has put a permanentr __Stain of Shame__ onto his Jewish Glazier Family Name....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12 09:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <593EC3EE.589A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #636014 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > The slow speed of light. > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > I mean...slow. > > not so fast > > not so q uick i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half it's speed when it is passing through something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-12 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66d05ccf-0d55-49eb-9156-851789f11fd3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636144 |
On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 12:40:22 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: [] > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > it's speed when it is passing through something. But that has nothing to do with the constant c. People keep leaving off the full name: the speed of light in a vacuum. ------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^ So it is irrelevant if light travels slower through a medium. And pertaining to Relativity, nothing has yet been shown to travel faster than light. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mosca.muha@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-13 07:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <83f651d7-2e04-4f17-8301-a968cb9cfcda@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636171 |
Il giorno lunedì 12 giugno 2017 22:26:03 UTC+2, Edward Prochak ha scritto: > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 12:40:22 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > [] > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > But that has nothing to do with the constant c. > People keep leaving off the full name: > the speed of light in a vacuum. > ------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > So it is irrelevant if light travels slower through a medium. > And pertaining to Relativity, > nothing has yet been shown to travel faster than light. > > ed The sound travels always at his propagation velocity: determined by density and pressure. As light, the same formula of sound. Maxwell computed it theoretically in analogy with sound(chap. XX of the Treatise).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-13 15:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8ace5ffa-e6ce-4a56-8338-ca050d190ec7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636144 |
On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 9:40:22 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > not so fast > > > > not so q uick > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > it's speed when it is passing through something. Bad guess.Just think it photons went slower it begs the question."what brings them back to the speed when going through the vacuum of space.I've posted this and never got an answer.I know why Trebert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-13 17:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ohpuih$v9u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #636286 |
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>, "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote I've posted this and never got an answer.But I, Trebert know why SwineBert is a Face-Shitter and a criminal Graveyard Vandal > > So SwineBert don't talk out of both sides of your mouth but EXPLAIN why you are such a pig.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-13 20:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <594089ab$0$22692$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #636286 |
On 6/13/2017 6:20 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 9:40:22 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. >>>>>>> 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. >>>>>> >>>>>> The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. >>>>> >>>>> Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." >>>>> >>>>> Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. >>>>> >>>>> meter peter >>>>> >>>>> 'meter' nonsence. >>>>> >>>>> In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like >>>>> >>>>> 'the universe comes from nothing' >>>>> >>>>> 'exactly 299,792,458' >>>>> >>>>> you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... >>>>> >>>>> In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. >>>>> >>>>> untill 'they' say otherwise. >>>> >>>> The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. >>>> >>>> And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. >>>> >>>> The slow speed of light. >>> >>> The question is, How slow can light travel? >>> >>> Slower than slow...real slow. >>> >>> I mean...slow. >>> >>> not so fast >>> >>> not so q uick >> >> >> i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half >> it's speed when it is passing through something. > > Bad guess.Just think it photons went slower it begs the question."what brings them back to the speed when going through the vacuum of space.I've posted this and never got an answer.I know why Trebert > It's so simple, Bert! It's because all space is moving at the speed of light! Just ask HVAC if I'm not right! He knows all about science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-18 14:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <135e64f0-ca83-4d06-a4fd-d505d04ae663@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636286 |
On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 3:21:08 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 9:40:22 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > > > not so fast > > > > > > not so q uick > > > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > Bad guess.Just think it photons went slower it begs the question."what brings them back to the speed when going through the vacuum of space.I've posted this and never got an answer.I know why Trebert Up to speed? At c the universe shrinks so completely in their direction of travel that they are always essentially at rest! Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-25 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <269e5c41-d68e-47e2-8a26-cf0124a9627c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #636873 |
On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 2:07:06 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 3:21:08 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 9:40:22 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > > > > > not so fast > > > > > > > > not so q uick > > > > > > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > > > Bad guess.Just think it photons went slower it begs the question."what brings them back to the speed when going through the vacuum of space.I've posted this and never got an answer.I know why Trebert > > > Up to speed? At c the universe shrinks so completely in their direction of travel that they are always essentially at rest! > > Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-27 15:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ccf505a1-a3dd-47fe-9225-d5e864410996@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #637676 |
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 12:32:01 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 2:07:06 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 3:21:08 PM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 9:40:22 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > > > > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > > > > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > > > > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > > > > > > > not so fast > > > > > > > > > > not so q uick > > > > > > > > > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > > > > > Bad guess.Just think it photons went slower it begs the question."what brings them back to the speed when going through the vacuum of space.I've posted this and never got an answer.I know why Trebert > > > > > > Up to speed? At c the universe shrinks so completely in their direction of travel that they are always essentially at rest! > > > > Double-A Is my statement so profound that it has you speechless, Bert? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-15 09:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5942B72C.1B5F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #636144 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > not so fast > > > > not so q uick > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > it's speed when it is passing through something. I'm willing to bet that nobody today is trying to find out what is the speed of light. Because you'll discover that your numbers will be different and that means you would have to go against the mafia of the 'scientific community'... ..and the mafia of the 'scientific community' instills FEAR in others. Truth is it's over 300,000,000 but somebody in the the mafia of the 'scientific community' wrote down 299,792,458. What is the name of the person that came up with the number 299,792,458???? There's your Mafia guy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-16 01:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <59439899.1A6B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #636516 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > > > not so fast > > > > > > not so q uick > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > I'm willing to bet that nobody today is trying to find out what is the speed of light. Because you'll discover that > your numbers will be different and that means you would have to go against the mafia of the 'scientific community'... > > ..and the mafia of the 'scientific community' instills FEAR in others. > > Truth is it's over 300,000,000 but somebody in the the mafia of the 'scientific community' wrote down 299,792,458. > > What is the name of the person that came up with the number 299,792,458???? There's your Mafia guy. Now, I'm going to prove to everyone that the speed of light is a FAKE number. You don't have to look it up to see it's a fake number You don't have to be a math whiz You don't need to a rocket scientist Your own common sense with verify it. Here is the value given: the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s https://www.google.com/#q=the+speed+of+light Now here is the proof it's a FAKE number.... Look at the number: 299 792 458 the first three digits is proof it's a fake number: 299 it ends like a 99.9 percent ( how these guys think when they are unsure) 299...just short of 300 keeping it under the true value of over 300,000,000. If you want to fix the number not to go past 300... you just write 299. 299 792 458 was created as a fixed number to prevent it from going past 300,000,000 or 400,000,000 or 500,000,000 299 792 458 m / s is a FAKE number Now, why didn't they just changed it to 299 792 459 or 299 799 459 or 299 799 499 or 299 999 959 ??? To obvious. There would be too many number 9's. It wouldn't look...natural. Conclusion: YOU FUCKIN CANNOT TRUST THESE MOTHERFUCKERS WITH ANYTHING.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-22 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <594C0412.442E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #636620 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > pcardinale@volcanomail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 11:39:02 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > i certaintly wouldn't use any of your.. > > > > > > > > 'measuring tools'.. to measure it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just as i wouldn't measure Time using some ...clock a nut invented. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The speed of light isn't measured anymore. It's now a defined constant. The value is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: "a defined constant" means, somebody said "That's it, don't question it, it's set in stone..it's our law, don't fuckin break it." > > > > > > > > > > > > Translation: it's not exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, it's fucking exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. > > > > > > > > > > > > meter peter > > > > > > > > > > > > 'meter' nonsence. > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, those old guys in the scientific community decide to put up a 'wall' with a fixed idea, like > > > > > > > > > > > > 'the universe comes from nothing' > > > > > > > > > > > > 'exactly 299,792,458' > > > > > > > > > > > > you're not suppose to go pass the wall they put up... > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, you think what 'they' want you to think. > > > > > > > > > > > > untill 'they' say otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > The fact is...no one has ever seen light travel at the speed of light, or even touch it. > > > > > > > > > > And light travels sometimes...slow..depending what is slowing it down. > > > > > > > > > > The slow speed of light. > > > > > > > > The question is, How slow can light travel? > > > > > > > > Slower than slow...real slow. > > > > > > > > I mean...slow. > > > > > > > > not so fast > > > > > > > > not so q uick > > > > > > i would have to guess the speed of light slows down to more than half > > > it's speed when it is passing through something. > > > > I'm willing to bet that nobody today is trying to find out what is the speed of light. Because you'll discover that > > your numbers will be different and that means you would have to go against the mafia of the 'scientific community'... > > > > ..and the mafia of the 'scientific community' instills FEAR in others. > > > > Truth is it's over 300,000,000 but somebody in the the mafia of the 'scientific community' wrote down 299,792,458. > > > > What is the name of the person that came up with the number 299,792,458???? There's your Mafia guy. > > Now, I'm going to prove to everyone that the speed of light is a FAKE number. > > You don't have to look it up to see it's a fake number > You don't have to be a math whiz > You don't need to a rocket scientist > > Your own common sense with verify it. > > Here is the value given: the speed of light = 299 792 458 m / s > > https://www.google.com/#q=the+speed+of+light > > Now here is the proof it's a FAKE number.... > > Look at the number: 299 792 458 > > the first three digits is proof it's a fake number: > > 299 > > it ends like a 99.9 percent ( how these guys think when they are unsure) > > 299...just short of 300 > > keeping it under the true value of over 300,000,000. > > If you want to fix the number not to go past 300... > you just write 299. > > 299 792 458 was created as a fixed number to prevent it from going past 300,000,000 or 400,000,000 or 500,000,000 > > 299 792 458 m / s is a FAKE number > > Now, why didn't they just changed it to 299 792 459 or 299 799 459 or 299 799 499 or 299 999 959 ??? To obvious. There would be too many number 9's. > > It wouldn't look...natural. So, I suspect...whoever came up with a fixed set speed of light of "299 792 458" probably wrote: 299 792 459.. and then his friends looked at that fixed number and told him.. "Did you know that all the numbers total to "9"s???" "People are going to get suspicous and ask "Why are all the numbers total nine????" "You're going to have to change that number so it does'n all total to "9"s!!!" So he said, "Okay, I'll change the last number to 8." Google, what is the speed of light? https://www.google.com/#q=what+is+speed+of+light? Okay, truth is...nobody knows what the speed of light is. Not even Albert Einstein *ever* knew what the speed of light is or was. Albert Einstein never mentioned anywhere what the speed of light is. He simply didn't know... which is evident in his ...formular E=Mc^2. Since Albert Einstein didn't know the speed of light, he didn't know how big the atomic bomb would be. He miscalculated. He wrote: "A single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory." http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first Albert Einstein could have blown up the whole planet because he miscalculated the speed of light. "might very well destroy the whole port" How big is a port? "Stand back, no telling how big this thing is going to get!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-23 11:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <594D5A04.325E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #637332 |
If you ask Albert Einstein "What is the speed of light?" He'll probably say.. "How the hell do I know. I don't know how the can opener works." Then he'll tell me, "Why do you bother me with these stupid question? Can you not see I'm fuckin busy designing a new bomb????" And I look over his shoulder and ask him .."What kind of bomb is that?" He says, "Oh, it's fuckin beautiful! This fuckin bomb will blow up a whole fuckin ship, kill all the motherfuckers on it!" I ask, "How does it work?" He says, "Oh, it's fuckin beautiful! This fuckin bomb will blow up a whole fuckin ship, kill all the motherfuckers on it!" I say, "You said that already." "Where are your friends, how come they are not helping you with this new bomb?" He says, "Oh, those fuckin motherfuckers are too afraid to be seen around me..FBI is bothering them, I mention bomb and they all run the other way!" I say to him, "Don't you want to do something else? Maybe find a cure for cancer??" He says, "Are you fuckin kidding me? I LOVE THIS STUFF! I love building bombs and watching all these stupid motherfuckers die. They call me Mr. BadASSSSSSSS." "What?" BadASSSSSSSS. "What?" Mr. BadASSSSSSSS!!! http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb1.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb2.jpg http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/bomb3.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web