Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #635047 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-01 22:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-06-06 20:28 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 173 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Are there any scientist here? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 22:54 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-02 02:14 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:41 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 17:37 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 04:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 04:36 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 06:00 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 11:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 11:59 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:54 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 16:38 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 17:41 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 18:05 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 04:23 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 18:46 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 18:34 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 18:21 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 04:44 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 05:51 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 07:36 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-05 01:23 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 03:54 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 04:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 00:37 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 18:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 02:48 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 20:36 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 21:03 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 14:27 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 23:43 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 19:07 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-07 20:16 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 16:33 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 20:05 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 09:00 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-07 20:17 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 17:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-08 00:40 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 18:03 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-08 23:59 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 21:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 17:05 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 18:59 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 18:51 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 21:34 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-10 02:19 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 19:45 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-07 18:44 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-08 00:37 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 19:51 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-08 23:59 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-08 19:54 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-09 22:36 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 19:01 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 19:00 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-10 02:11 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 13:47 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 13:54 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 22:36 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 18:48 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Серг ио <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 22:35 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 19:49 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:30 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:06 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-07 20:17 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 20:00 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 17:41 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 17:08 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-09 22:39 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 19:03 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 19:10 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-09 21:37 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-10 02:13 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 17:44 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-11 10:33 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 17:50 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 22:35 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 18:55 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 20:23 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Серг ио <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 17:06 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 20:06 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-13 21:14 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-13 20:59 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 18:25 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-13 21:43 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 07:37 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Sегg iо <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-14 09:43 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 17:16 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-12 22:33 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 18:55 -0500
Re: Are there any more fucktards like Serg here? Hell, yes! Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-13 21:12 +0000
Re: Are there any more fucktards like Serg here? Hell, yes! Серг ио <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 17:09 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 17:25 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 23:43 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:26 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-06 19:36 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-07 20:15 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 00:32 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 22:46 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 21:57 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 20:26 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 00:42 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 17:02 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-06 21:07 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:08 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-06 19:37 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-07 20:18 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-07 18:58 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-08 00:39 +0000
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-07 20:08 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 19:08 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? "Steamboat Charley" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 20:01 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-05 22:27 -0500
Re: Are there any scientist here? "Steamboat Charley" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 20:57 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 03:47 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-06 22:36 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 04:32 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 05:47 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 06:46 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 09:40 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 11:32 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 14:12 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:10 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 17:54 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 06:43 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 09:55 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 17:34 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 17:13 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 15:21 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 12:00 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:43 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 07:54 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 18:48 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 19:34 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 17:52 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 17:50 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 09:40 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-02 12:18 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 17:58 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 11:38 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 18:14 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 19:48 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 20:07 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 21:10 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 21:19 -0400
Re: Are there any scientist here? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 15:20 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 09:49 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-02 12:43 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 13:52 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-02 14:08 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 07:05 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 10:45 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 14:49 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 18:13 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 18:41 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 19:34 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 21:15 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-06-08 10:24 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 23:59 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 23:56 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-03 11:20 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 10:34 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 12:45 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-06 16:51 -0700
Re: Are there any scientist here? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-06 20:28 -0400
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-01 22:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Are there any scientist here? |
| Message-ID | <5930FD81.7FF1@ix.netcom.com> |
Are there any scientist here?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 02:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5931024c$0$41966$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #635047 |
On 06/02/2017 01:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Are there any scientist here?
>
Nope. Nothing here but Engineers who somehow wish they were scientists,
technicians who try to seek glory by pretending to be scientists. Lib
Writers such as yourself who are fascinated by science (in your case
science fiction) but flunked every science course they ever took. And of
course lastly by geezer kooks like Archie and Bert who cannot even
figure out how to tie their own shoes, but somehow think they can fool
everybody into thinking they are smart by drooling incomprehensible
babble. And lastly some like HVAC who cover serveral of the categories.
I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research
Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research
institutions.
Nuff said.
Starfaker, use your fantasy imagination. What if it came into your
possession a freshman physics textbook from the future. What if you went
online posting some of the ideas and principles you found there but did
not reveal it's source. Remember I said FRESHMAN meaning it's simple
stuff and not advanced. What would they all say about you? It's obvious
isn't it? You'd be reviled as a kook as nuts as Bert or Archie.
You see, humans simply reject things that don't agree with the dogma
they've had drilled into them. So they reject things that they think are
obviously wrong and kooky as goofy, but since they aren't willing to do
the experiments and could not understand them if they did, they ALSO
reject all true science more advanced than their understanding which
usually is way less than current understanding of scientists.
Put that in your next script!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 01:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dea19071-a0bc-485a-9462-25388539b8bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635048 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:14:42 AM UTC+3, benj wrote: > On 06/02/2017 01:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Are there any scientist here? > > > Nope. Nothing here but Engineers who somehow wish they were scientists, > technicians who try to seek glory by pretending to be scientists. Lib > Writers such as yourself who are fascinated by science (in your case > science fiction) but flunked every science course they ever took. And of > course lastly by geezer kooks like Archie and Bert who cannot even > figure out how to tie their own shoes, but somehow think they can fool > everybody into thinking they are smart by drooling incomprehensible > babble. And lastly some like HVAC who cover serveral of the categories. > > I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research > Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research > institutions. ===================== =hey Ben j if it is right that you are a member of Americans premier research institute better take a little advice for me better pay some attention to posts I write just in this ng and my abstract(just the abstract !!) of my model I keep quoting hear along about 25 years model that you can see in Google from 1993 it'''' wan t hurt you and your institute''' ...!!! and may be save a lot of wasted money and investments of precious human resources !! BTW before experiments you need some new ideas based on some ''little '' data and knowledge from other disciplines including -excuse me the word -- engineering !!! -------- TIA Y.Porat ========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59332c00$0$53079$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #635052 |
On 6/2/2017 4:41 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:14:42 AM UTC+3, benj wrote: >> On 06/02/2017 01:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Are there any scientist here? >>> >> Nope. Nothing here but Engineers who somehow wish they were scientists, >> technicians who try to seek glory by pretending to be scientists. Lib >> Writers such as yourself who are fascinated by science (in your case >> science fiction) but flunked every science course they ever took. And of >> course lastly by geezer kooks like Archie and Bert who cannot even >> figure out how to tie their own shoes, but somehow think they can fool >> everybody into thinking they are smart by drooling incomprehensible >> babble. And lastly some like HVAC who cover serveral of the categories. >> >> I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research >> Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research >> institutions. > > ===================== > =hey Ben j > if it is right that you are a member of Americans premier > research institute better take a little advice for me > > better pay some attention to > posts I write just in this ng > and my abstract(just the abstract !!) of my model I keep quoting hear > along about 25 years model that you can see > in Google from 1993 > it'''' wan t hurt you and your institute''' ...!!! > and may be save a lot of wasted money and investments > of precious human resources !! > > BTW > before experiments > you need some new ideas based on > some ''little '' data and knowledge > from other disciplines including > -excuse me the word -- engineering !!! > -------- > > TIA > Y.Porat > ======================== Bad news, Porat! These days science could give a crap about wasting money. In fact wasting money is one of the prime functions of modern science. "In actuality the money isn't wasted because it's used to support and protect the science status quo. Therefore, well spent. If you want civilization to be efficient and effective, it's obviously best to look in development done in ....er...engineering.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 17:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0af4f835-5538-4c5b-a9eb-2f3fa0ff97ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635226 |
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 12:37:06 AM UTC+3, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2017 4:41 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:14:42 AM UTC+3, benj wrote: > >> On 06/02/2017 01:54 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Are there any scientist here? > >>> > >> Nope. Nothing here but Engineers who somehow wish they were scientists, > >> technicians who try to seek glory by pretending to be scientists. Lib > >> Writers such as yourself who are fascinated by science (in your case > >> science fiction) but flunked every science course they ever took. And of > >> course lastly by geezer kooks like Archie and Bert who cannot even > >> figure out how to tie their own shoes, but somehow think they can fool > >> everybody into thinking they are smart by drooling incomprehensible > >> babble. And lastly some like HVAC who cover serveral of the categories. > >> > >> I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research > >> Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research > >> institutions. > > > > ===================== > > =hey Ben j > > if it is right that you are a member of Americans premier > > research institute better take a little advice for me > > > > better pay some attention to > > posts I write just in this ng > > and my abstract(just the abstract !!) of my model I keep quoting hear > > along about 25 years model that you can see > > in Google from 1993 > > it'''' wan t hurt you and your institute''' ...!!! > > and may be save a lot of wasted money and investments > > of precious human resources !! > > > > BTW > > before experiments > > you need some new ideas based on > > some ''little '' data and knowledge > > from other disciplines including > > -excuse me the word -- engineering !!! > > -------- > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ======================== > > Bad news, Porat! These days science could give a crap about wasting > money. In fact wasting money is one of the prime functions of modern > science. "In actuality the money isn't wasted because it's used to > support and protect the science status quo. Therefore, well spent. > > If you want civilization to be efficient and effective, it's obviously > best to look in development done in ....er...engineering. ========================= ok engineering yet just engineering is not enough for advance of science it can be mainly THE PRACTICAL USE OF SCIRNCE !! now the current science us far from being 'complete!! current science as is is still full of harmful wrong garbage!! like 'relativistic mass' 'virtual particles'' fake particles like say the ''God particle Boson '' of which billions were wasted on it not to speak about ****cheating** about 'finding the God particle in the LHC )large hadron collider etc etc it is billions wasted on cheating voodoo ''science !'' just to supply salaries of parasites ! etc etc ======================= Y.Porat =============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 04:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3c1322f-504f-45e0-a6b0-6bec4ddb9083@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635048 |
BJ quacked I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research institutions. ------------- https://harlowcampbell1.shutterfly.com/4 Took about 7 minutes. But BJ should use the card on the right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 04:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e7ec5965-1e60-49f6-951c-6e27bf3136c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635064 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 7:15:07 AM UTC-4, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked >> I however, possess a business card with the title: Principle Research >> Scientist bearing the logo of one of America's premiere research >> institutions. > ------------- He he... BenjJi, I once got a job offer for position of Principle Engineer. I accepted the job, lasted 3 years, at Orbital until The MergingDownSizing. Somewhere, I must still have the paper version of the official job offer letter. > https://harlowcampbell1.shutterfly.com/4 HVAC, because faking forgeries is your life, and used to be your livelihood? > Took about 7 minutes. But BJ should use the card on the right. This post will self destruct in 3 seconds... Mission Impossible Theme. -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ The |meForce> Paradox
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 06:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a63bcf7d-e1d2-4572-beb6-616aaa196a2f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635065 |
Loopy says > https://harlowcampbell1.shutterfly.com/4 HVAC, because faking forgeries is your life, and used to be your livelihood? ---------- I categorically deny ever forging anything in my life. Mostly. But I just wanted to show the value of BJ's 'business card'. Zero. He is a fraud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d82b2ba5-47a3-46cd-b07d-fadf25239701@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635072 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:00:56 AM UTC-4, HVAC wrote:
> Loopy says
> > https://harlowcampbell1.shutterfly.com/4
>
>> HVAC, because faking forgeries is your life, and used to be your livelihood?
> ----------
>
> I categorically deny ever forging anything in my life. Mostly.
I categorically accept/acknowledge... ever open a sentence with that phrase?
I categorically accept/acknowledge that I categorically deny... isTaken (TM, SM, and BMW).
I have already concluded your lack of any college background, your inabilty
to name any parents, ... all suggest you HVAC are one giantLameAssEd forgery.
> But I just wanted to show the value of BJ's 'business card'. Zero.
Given that stupid logic and example, ever(y)one on Earth has zero value/worth.
I suspect you just put VistaPrint.com out of business with a one-liner!
Moral? There's no truth on the WWW/Internet, so who needs it in realLife@#?!
What is the value of 0!, HVAC? Should be easy to Google google ALHAPBET.
Now HVAC, explain why 0! is the value that it is. No physics need apply.
BenjJi's writings speak for themselves. Much like yours, zeroHeilHVAC!
I'm just explicitly stating, you zeroHeilHVAC are a waste in and of humanity.
> He is a fraud.
A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche.
A liar calling another a liar. So cliché.
A fake calling another a fake. So ˈkliːʃeɪ.
A TrumpET screaming/yelling CROOKED HILLARY LOCK HER UP! So ...youKnow.
Makes one wonder how much money TrumpET gains from the PrisonIndustrialComplex?
If TrumpET sends himself to be locked up, then what's his profit margin? Got Math?
Makes one wonder why {fraud, liar, fake, crookEdTrumpET} are the same OneHoax?
A hoax is a Hoax is a HOAX of course -- FromHoax2Horse -- Mr. Ed.
A horse is a Horse is a HORSE of course -- FromHorse2Hoax -- MI$$ TERd Ed.
Hey, a 420 pound|kg Russian hacker/artist walks into a NYC/NJ bar. What happens?
Everybody runs away for fear of being eaten alive by a computer carrying nutjob.
APB: Speaking of M=mass and E=M*g*h, how long should it take to find that POI hacker?
For ever(y)Artist knows M=E, therefore E=M. Do the dynamics, you Big League Assholes!
USA Life? Glad you asked. Simple: Rescue a dog, let the humans die Die DIE!
It's a wonderful world... give me the beat and free m(y) soul...
-- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ The |meForce> Paradox
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 11:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5ee2de8-9a23-434d-92da-47e8bea54300@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635096 |
Loopy says > He is a fraud. A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. --------- So you agree that BJ is a fraud. Rare degree of candor from an Indian. Ever heard the saying "You lie like an Indian rug"? Me either
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 15:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71748d5c-d8c0-4d29-a467-acb97f7ff645@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635103 |
HVAC "Loopy says > He is a fraud. A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. --------- So you agree that BJ is a fraud. " Pretty sure that, just like most of your trains of thought, you missed a connection. He called YOU a fraud, and said you were calling someone else a fraud- that's all. All true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 16:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c068d66e-b634-404d-8947-29b2755f3081@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635136 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 6:54:39 PM UTC-4, john wrote: > HVAC > "Loopy says > > He is a fraud. > > A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. > --------- > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. " > > Pretty sure that, just like most of your trains > of thought, you missed a connection. > He called YOU a fraud, and said you were > calling someone else a fraud- that's all. > All true. JohnJi, HVAC is too corrupt to realize the irony in all that depth. HVAC's never going to get that. The crazy deep good fractal question? Why The Fuck (WTF) does HVAC open his mouth on Usenet or anywhere in realLife? Scene one. HVAC walks into a bar... and then a Usenet happens?! HELL O?! -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ The |meForce> Paradox
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f3ee01e-26d3-4571-98b4-55bb6e299b49@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635143 |
Loopy says > > He is a fraud. > > A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. > --------- > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. > > JohnJi, HVAC is too corrupt to realize the irony in all that depth. HVAC's never going to get that. The crazy deep good fractal question? Why The Fuck (WTF) does HVAC open his mouth on Usenet or anywhere in realLife -------------- Kooks like you hate when I use your *own* words against you. You suck
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 18:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8024871d-217b-4fdd-b2f3-ba99310aa289@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635147 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 8:41:52 PM UTC-4, HVAC wrote: > Loopy says > > > He is a fraud. > > > > A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. > > --------- > > > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. > > >> JohnJi, HVAC is too corrupt to realize the irony in all that depth. >> HVAC's never going to get that. The crazy deep good fractal question? >> Why The Fuck (WTF) does HVAC open his mouth on Usenet or anywhere in realLife > -------------- > > Kooks like you hate when I use your *own* words against you. I own no words. No Mahipal's Dictionary exists. Thanks for playing. > You suck Depends. What's your bra size? Go do covfefe yourself, HVAC. HVACyouIdiot, learn to attribute writings properly. Can you learn? -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ The |meForce> Paradox
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 04:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2645bb0b-ec76-4c7b-a2f4-7b750322eedb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635149 |
Loopy says learn to attribute writings properly. -------- Request denied
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 18:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59333c59$0$60294$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #635172 |
On 6/3/2017 7:23 AM, HVAC wrote: > Loopy says > learn to attribute writings properly. > -------- > > Request denied > Anyone here NOT see that one coming? :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 18:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59333996$0$51728$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #635147 |
On 6/2/2017 8:41 PM, HVAC wrote: > Loopy says >>> He is a fraud. >> >> A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. >> --------- >> >> So you agree that BJ is a fraud. >> >> > JohnJi, HVAC is too corrupt to realize the irony in all that depth. > HVAC's never going to get that. The crazy deep good fractal question? > Why The Fuck (WTF) does HVAC open his mouth on Usenet or anywhere in realLife > -------------- > > Kooks like you hate when I use your *own* words against you. > > You suck > Cripes! I TRIED to warn MyPalji that HVAC was a PRO. But he chose not to listen to me (as so many others) and now he pays the price!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 18:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <59333668$0$36020$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #635103 |
On 6/2/2017 2:59 PM, HVAC wrote: > Loopy says >> He is a fraud. > > A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. > --------- > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. > Rare degree of candor from an Indian. Ever heard the saying "You lie like an Indian rug"? > > Me either > Hey wait a minute guys. I was not the one posting the photoshopped business card! My business card still resides in the little leather ID tag on my briefcase. My business card that looks like the one Hardblow posted for me actually says: "Homeless Veteran: Anything will help! God Bless You!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 04:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <641b6c45-71de-4831-810f-beda6ece20c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635103 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 2:59:09 PM UTC-4, HVAC wrote: > Loopy says >> > He is a fraud. > >> A fraud calling another a fraud. So cliche. > --------- > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. May perhaps be that Sir BenjJi is a fraud, at least I respect BenjJi. > Rare degree of candor from an Indian. Ever heard the saying "You lie > like an Indian rug"? You HVAC suck like a idiotic gay lonely boy succubus! Now you've heard that. In Hindi? You want that in Hindi?! Well sure. Here hear ... Hear ye Ye YE: You HVAC suck like a idioticGayLonelyBoySuccubus@#! Now you've heard that. Yes, I've heard. I'm from the great Punjab=PUN+JAB. I put the I in PunJabI! Pay attention, if not your TrumpET owned taxes, HVAC. Address2WhiteHouse. If you are confused, just think of me as Luke Globally Warmed WalkerOfSkies. > Me either You HVAC misspelled the word neither. Your PUNnnn...NNNishment is IshQ 2 me c. You couldn't just write Me too, HVAC? Your English skills suck much like ...youKnow. Seriously, youDumbFuckHVAC, what in the hell do you want resolved regards your incompetency to understand science, math, or physics? Even religion? Lots of people here who would gladly resolve your serious honest questions, if you had any, they simply ignore knowing you. Lots lots LOTS of IshQism! I relish for the Days Of Future Passed when I too can evolve to ignore you HVAC. I know I==Mahipal write/post a lot, so I get read a lot. Well duh Duh DUH?! Silence is Golden, that's why TrumpET Types are forced to just read off of teleprompters. Dear Sir or MadMan... will you read m(y) teleprompter, it took me years to write... Teleprompter Writer... teleprompter writer... TELEPROMPTER WRITER -- BeatlesIshQ Mystery? Who in actual realLifeRealit(y) writes this teleprompterShit@# up in the first place?! This post will self destruct in 7.638 seconds... Mission Impossible Theme. I did recently watch the movie THEORY OF EVERYTHING, I wore briefs. The clean ones. Yes yes YES, they were clean at the beginning, by the end ...youKnow. Hol(y)... -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८! Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace. http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/ The |meForce> Paradox
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 05:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64b5ae37-2656-471a-84f1-6d2bf37098ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #635284 |
Loopy says > > So you agree that BJ is a fraud. May perhaps be that Sir BenjJi is a fraud ------------- Noted
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web