Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #635005 > unrolled thread

Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 14:10 -0700
    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-01 19:14 -0500
      Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 21:54 -0700
        Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 22:16 -0700
          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 22:25 -0700
        Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-02 03:43 -0500
          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 05:43 -0700
            Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 09:49 -0700
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-02 12:08 -0700
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-03 17:59 -0400
          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-02 12:41 -0700
            Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-02 18:25 -0500
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 16:57 -0700
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-03 12:24 -0700
                Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-04 23:21 -0700
                  Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-05 10:30 -0700
                    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-07 11:00 -0700
      Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-02 13:39 -0500
        Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-02 18:31 -0500
          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-03 13:55 -0500
            Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-03 12:13 -0700
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-03 12:18 -0700
              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-04 14:16 -0500
                Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-04 15:29 -0500
                  Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-07 06:52 -0500
                    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-07 10:54 -0500
                      Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-07 12:29 -0500
                        Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-07 22:41 -0500
                          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-07 22:58 -0700
                            Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-08 05:47 -0500
                              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-08 10:18 -0700
                          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-09 13:29 -0500
                            Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-09 18:59 -0500
                              Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-10 12:31 -0500
                                Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-06-10 17:12 -0500
                Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-05 11:16 -0700
                  Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2017-06-07 06:56 -0500
        Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 20:19 -0700
          Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-05 21:00 -0700
    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-01 20:21 -0700
    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-03 12:33 -0700
    Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead? SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2017-06-04 14:55 -0400

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#635005 — Re: Do You Believe God Is Dead?

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Do You Believe God Is Dead?


I saw this movie "Rosemary's Baby", and I'm wondering..

'What kind of atheist are these?'

https://www.youtube.com/v/pdcqrbS1Xh8&autoplay=1


and they don't appear to be dumb people...doctors, lawyers, etc..


unless of course you believe in...witches.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#635033

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > Do You Believe God Is Dead?

Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635041

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> 
> Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.


i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it, didn't you?...all by yourself.



better watch out somebody doesn't drop an ink blotter on you...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635043

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> >
> > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> 
> i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it, didn't you?...all by yourself.
> 

...and what steps did you take to reach the conclusion that there is no
such thing as a god? 


scientific method or just a probability...

or, it's The Truth?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635044

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > >
> > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> >
> > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it, didn't you?...all by yourself.
> >
> 
> ...and what steps did you take to reach the conclusion that there is no
> such thing as a god?
> 
> scientific method or just a probability...
> 
> or, it's The Truth?


The truth of course is...there are no logical steps to your deductive
conclusion, it's 'just a feeling' you have.


You 'feel' there's no such thing as a god, ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635053

The Starmaker wrote in <5930EF79.757E@ix.netcom.com>:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > 
> > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
>
> i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> didn't you?...

Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.

>               all by yourself.

Yep. Wasn't hard.

> better watch out somebody doesn't drop an ink blotter on you...

Larf. Wassa madder, sooky? You afwaid of the dark?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635070

Idiot said
"Yep. Wasn't hard. 
"
Will be when you get between a
rock and something that is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635085

On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 5:43:08 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> Idiot said
> "Yep. Wasn't hard. 
> "
> Will be when you get between a
> rock and something that is

There can be no getting to the bottom line(GUT) We are clever enough to know this.Thus Gods will always come in handy.Same goes for life and death.The hear after,and the time to live fit well with Gods.Its a shame when we give God a name to be used in vain.  Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635106

<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>,
the Face-Shitter and the criminal Graveyard Vandal
aka "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>,
whose nym  anagrams to 
<reber.A.Hitler.z0g@gmail.com>, sings like
>
Hitler did, except that Glazier's G=EMC^2 says:
"Glazier  Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism",
while Bert, like Hitler, waits for his gruesome end
from/by <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635234

On 6/2/2017 12:49 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 5:43:08 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
>> Idiot said
>> "Yep. Wasn't hard.
>> "
>> Will be when you get between a
>> rock and something that is
> 
> There can be no getting to the bottom line(GUT) We are clever enough to know this.Thus Gods will always come in handy.Same goes for life and death.The hear after,and the time to live fit well with Gods.Its a shame when we give God a name to be used in vain.  Trebert
> 
Just repeat after HVAC: Hail Satan!
(It's OK to do it in vain!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635112

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote in <5930EF79.757E@ix.netcom.com>:
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > >
> > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> >
> > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > didn't you?...
> 
> Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
> 


You mean...no further testing is required? No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635141

The Starmaker wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > > >
> > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> > >
> > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > > didn't you?...
> >
> > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
>
> You mean...no further testing is required?
> No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???

Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635144

Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> wrote in 
news:slrnoj3svo.29b.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz:

> The Starmaker wrote:
>> Ned Latham wrote:
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > Ned Latham wrote:
>> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
>> > > >
>> > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
>> > >
>> > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
>> > > didn't you?...
>> >
>> > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
>>
>> You mean...no further testing is required?
>> No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???
> 
> Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.
> 
Why are you arguing with a retard? You do realize, don't you, that he 
masturbates furiously at every response? So far as anyone can tell, 
this is the *only* human interaction he gets, other than when the 
orderlies make him take his lithium.

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635216

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> > > >
> > > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > > > didn't you?...
> > >
> > > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
> >
> > You mean...no further testing is required?
> > No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???
> 
> Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.


I have  indisputable proof and incontrovertible evidence that there is a God...

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'

When God created the heavens...

He gave the heavens the primary colors Red, Blue and Green.

When God began to create the Earth...

He realized that He would have to create a whole

new set of primary colors...just for the earth.

So He created  a new set of Primary Colors for earth

Red, Blue....and Yellow.


He changed the Green to Yellow.


So now yous have two sets of Primary Colors...

Red, Blue and Green.
Red, Blue and Yellow.



and God said..."That was Good."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635356

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> > > > >
> > > > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > > > > didn't you?...
> > > >
> > > > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
> > >
> > > You mean...no further testing is required?
> > > No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???
> >
> > Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.
> 
> I have  indisputable proof and incontrovertible evidence that there is a God...
> 
> 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> 
> When God created the heavens...
> 
> He gave the heavens the primary colors Red, Blue and Green.
> 
> When God began to create the Earth...
> 
> He realized that He would have to create a whole
> 
> new set of primary colors...just for the earth.
> 
> So He created  a new set of Primary Colors for earth
> 
> Red, Blue....and Yellow.
> 
> He changed the Green to Yellow.
> 
> So now yous have two sets of Primary Colors...
> 
> Red, Blue and Green.
> Red, Blue and Yellow.


The Primary Colors Red, Blue and Yellow only exist on Earth....made
especially for earthlings.

not martians.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635406

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > > > > > didn't you?...
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
> > > >
> > > > You mean...no further testing is required?
> > > > No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???
> > >
> > > Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.
> >
> > I have  indisputable proof and incontrovertible evidence that there is a God...
> >
> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> >
> > When God created the heavens...
> >
> > He gave the heavens the primary colors Red, Blue and Green.
> >
> > When God began to create the Earth...
> >
> > He realized that He would have to create a whole
> >
> > new set of primary colors...just for the earth.
> >
> > So He created  a new set of Primary Colors for earth
> >
> > Red, Blue....and Yellow.
> >
> > He changed the Green to Yellow.
> >
> > So now yous have two sets of Primary Colors...
> >
> > Red, Blue and Green.
> > Red, Blue and Yellow.
> 
> The Primary Colors Red, Blue and Yellow only exist on Earth....made
> especially for earthlings.
> 
> not martians.


So, when God created the 'second' primary colors Red, Blue and Yellow for earth only, these primary colors do not
exist anywhere else in the universe. It's only on earth where you can go to the store and buy a jar of Yellow paint
because the yellow comes from clay, and clay only exist on earth. Clay is also used to make a man, ...in fact the first
paints on earth that was used to make a painting was the paint color...Yellow.

You see...Yellow is the signature of ...God. It's his fingerprint.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635687

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i guess that must be based on your evidence...you 'deduced it,
> > > > > > > didn't you?...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nope. I rejected the god hypothesis.
> > > > >
> > > > > You mean...no further testing is required?
> > > > > No need for...further investigation?? Just.. drop it???
> > > >
> > > > Uep. It's a crackpot notion. No point in wasating time on it.
> > >
> > > I have  indisputable proof and incontrovertible evidence that there is a God...
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> > >
> > > When God created the heavens...
> > >
> > > He gave the heavens the primary colors Red, Blue and Green.
> > >
> > > When God began to create the Earth...
> > >
> > > He realized that He would have to create a whole
> > >
> > > new set of primary colors...just for the earth.
> > >
> > > So He created  a new set of Primary Colors for earth
> > >
> > > Red, Blue....and Yellow.
> > >
> > > He changed the Green to Yellow.
> > >
> > > So now yous have two sets of Primary Colors...
> > >
> > > Red, Blue and Green.
> > > Red, Blue and Yellow.
> >
> > The Primary Colors Red, Blue and Yellow only exist on Earth....made
> > especially for earthlings.
> >
> > not martians.
> 
> So, when God created the 'second' primary colors Red, Blue and Yellow for earth only, these primary colors do not
> exist anywhere else in the universe. It's only on earth where you can go to the store and buy a jar of Yellow paint
> because the yellow comes from clay, and clay only exist on earth. Clay is also used to make a man, ...in fact the first
> paints on earth that was used to make a painting was the paint color...Yellow.
> 
> You see...Yellow is the signature of ...God. It's his fingerprint.


And, for those who don't believe in God...then

Why did Nature come up with a law of primary colors, then 5 billion years later comes up with a second law of primary colors for earth?


Changed Green to Yellow???


In the beginning, Nature created the heavens...and the earth.


Did Nature say, "Oh, I fuckin forgot people will be arriving pretty soon on earth, I need to change my law from green to yellow."


Nature said, "This business of creating an earth is turning into a fucking mess!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635098

On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 19:14:47 -0500, Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > 
>> > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
>
>Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.

Only if it's a bottle of your favorite rotgut whiskey.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635142

duke wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
> >
> > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
>
> Only if it's a bottle of your favorite rotgut whiskey.

Not even them, puje. There is no sucj thing as a god. EOD.

"[Ritual cannibalism] is the most perfect form of Prayer."
--Pope Paul VI, Demens Maximus et Primus Vesanus.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635210

On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 18:31:56 -0500, Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
wrote:

>duke wrote:
>> Ned Latham wrote:
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > 
>> > > > Do You Believe God Is Dead?
>> >
>> > Of course not: there's no such thing as a god.
>>
>> Only if it's a bottle of your favorite rotgut whiskey.
>
>Not even them, puje. There is no sucj thing as a god. EOD.

You have no evidence for that.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web