Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #634524 > unrolled thread

E=M

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 11:12 -0700
    ! This topic has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 13:06 -0700
      Re: ! This topic has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-27 13:20 -0700
    Re: E=M Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-31 14:41 +1000
      Re: E=M Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-31 08:11 -0500
        Re: E=M Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-31 09:09 -0500
          Re: E=M "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-04 19:33 +1000
            Re: E=M Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 11:58 +0200
              Re: E=M Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> - 2017-06-04 11:53 +0000
              Re: E=M "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 08:58 +1000
            Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-04 06:14 -0700
            Re: E=M Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 13:25 +0000
              Re: E=M "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 09:00 +1000
                Re: E=M Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 23:13 +0000
                  Re: E=M "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 11:10 +1000
        Re: E=M Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-01 01:49 +0200
    Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 07:55 -0700
      Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 07:57 -0700
        Re: E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-31 10:16 -0700
          Re: E=M Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 15:47 -0700
            Re: E=M Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-31 18:11 -0500
            Re: E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-05-31 19:30 -0700
              Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-01 01:01 -0700
                Re: E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 10:33 -0700
                  Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 17:45 -0700
              Re: E=M Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 10:57 -0700
                Re: E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 11:35 -0700
                  Re: E=M Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 14:53 -0700
          Re: E=M poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-01 00:53 -0700
            Re: E=M The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-01 10:36 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#634913

On 5/31/2017 5:47 PM, Edward Prochak wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
>> i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> 
> That boat sailed long ago.
> ed
> 

Starfarter's head used to contain mass, however it has 'evaporated' over 
time, like the function e^(-e) and now approachs nothing at all

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634946

Edward Prochak wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> 
> That boat sailed long ago.
> ed


maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634966

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:30:17 AM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> Edward Prochak wrote:
> > 
> > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> > 
> > That boat sailed long ago.
> > ed
> 
> 
> maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?
==========================anything we can sense or even detect with our senses
of tools 
has mass 

IOW
=============================================
'NO MASS ' THE ONLY!!MASS  (NOT RELATIVISTIC AND NOT SCHMELATIVISTIC - NO REAL   PHYSICS !!
===========================================
2
MASS IS THE MOTHER OF ALL FORCES -INCLUDING GRAVITY !!
====================================================
simple  e hhh ??
too simple'' for a pompous blockhead like you ??
=============================
is it good enough for you ??
==================================
FULL   STOP !!
======================
Y.Porat
===================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634985

poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:30:17 AM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Edward Prochak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > > > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> > >
> > > That boat sailed long ago.
> > > ed
> >
> >
> > maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?
> ==========================anything we can sense or even detect with our senses
> of tools
> has mass


The question wasn't 'What Has Mass?', the question was..."What Is Mass?"



What ..be it, not What has it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635148

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 8:33:33 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 5:30:17 AM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Edward Prochak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > > > > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> > > >
> > > > That boat sailed long ago.
> > > > ed
> > >
> > >
> > > maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?
> > ==========================anything we can sense or even detect with our senses
> > of tools
> > has mass
> 
> 
> The question wasn't 'What Has Mass?', the question was..."What Is Mass?"
> 
> 
> 
> What ..be it, not What has it.
========================
if you like
it is as Newton defined it 
a property of matter to resist---

(and please don't go on and ask me 
what is matter?)--  

----change of movement or change in stationary situation .
yet it is not enough !!

my innovation AND PORIVE is that there is not ''relativistic mass
or for instance--

----the photon has mass - the only mass !!
 
IE
MASS IS NOT CHANGED MY MOVEMENT 

how do you like that ??
TIA
Y.Porat
=======================================

JUST ONE KIND OF MASS  C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634988

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:30:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Edward Prochak wrote:
> > 
> > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> > 
> > That boat sailed long ago.
> > ed
> 
> 
> maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?

Well I could tell you the grade school definition:
it is a property of matter that causes matter to have weight

I could give you the equivalence equation: E=mcc => m=E/cc

or I could ask you which mass do you mean:
inertial mass or gravitational mass?

But no matter which definition I give, and based on you posting
history here, you'd likely reply with some remark about stupid
scientists.

So I'll leave it with just: mass is a property of matter.
ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634992

Edward Prochak wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:30:17 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Edward Prochak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:16:36 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > > > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> > >
> > > That boat sailed long ago.
> > > ed
> >
> >
> > maybe you can expanin to me What Is Mass?
> 
> Well I could tell you the grade school definition:
> it is a property of matter that causes matter to have weight
> 
> I could give you the equivalence equation: E=mcc => m=E/cc
> 
> or I could ask you which mass do you mean:
> inertial mass or gravitational mass?
> 
> But no matter which definition I give, and based on you posting
> history here, you'd likely reply with some remark about stupid
> scientists.
> 
> So I'll leave it with just: mass is a property of matter.
> ed


But, but..I didn't ask Who Owns Mass? I aked...What Is Mass?...not what
has mass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635121

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 2:36:06 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Edward Prochak wrote:
[]
> > 
> > So I'll leave it with just: mass is a property of matter.
> > ed
> 
> 
> But, but..I didn't ask Who Owns Mass? I aked...What Is Mass?...not what
> has mass.

Let me speak a little louder:
MASS IS A PROPERTY OF MATTER!

Can you hear me now?
ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634965

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 8:16:36 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:55:23 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 9:12:09 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > something is wrong..here or somewhere
> > > >
> > > > You got
> > > >
> > > > space and time
> > > >
> > > > and some of yous
> > > >
> > > > say spacetime
> > > >
> > > > or space-time
> > > >
> > > > as if space and time are
> > > > one of the same.
> > > >
> > > > But yous then say
> > > >
> > > > mass is energy
> > > >
> > > > and engery is mass
> > > >
> > > > or
> > > >
> > > > engery equals mass
> > > >
> > > > but
> > > >
> > > > Why don't you simply call it: massenergy? or mass-energy? or energymass? or energy-mass?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > i mean if mass is energy and energy is mass...
> > > >
> > > > it should be
> > > >
> > > > energymass
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > just one word.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Did somebody here forget to do that????
> > > ==================
> > > mass is ,ass
> > (:-_)
> > sorry
> > mass is mass not ass ////
> > > and energy is energy
> > > mass is not energy
> > >
> > > energy iS
> > > MASS IN MOTION !!
> > >
> > > the dimension of energy is
> > > is
> > > kilogram  times meter ^2 /second ^2
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > FULL STOP !!
> > > ======
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ========================
> 
> 
> 
> maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
=======================
so better f yourself as usual 
and  be happy to the end of your happy life ...!!
Y.P
=================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634986

poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 8:16:36 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:55:23 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 9:12:09 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > something is wrong..here or somewhere
> > > > >
> > > > > You got
> > > > >
> > > > > space and time
> > > > >
> > > > > and some of yous
> > > > >
> > > > > say spacetime
> > > > >
> > > > > or space-time
> > > > >
> > > > > as if space and time are
> > > > > one of the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > But yous then say
> > > > >
> > > > > mass is energy
> > > > >
> > > > > and engery is mass
> > > > >
> > > > > or
> > > > >
> > > > > engery equals mass
> > > > >
> > > > > but
> > > > >
> > > > > Why don't you simply call it: massenergy? or mass-energy? or energymass? or energy-mass?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > i mean if mass is energy and energy is mass...
> > > > >
> > > > > it should be
> > > > >
> > > > > energymass
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just one word.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Did somebody here forget to do that????
> > > > ==================
> > > > mass is ,ass
> > > (:-_)
> > > sorry
> > > mass is mass not ass ////
> > > > and energy is energy
> > > > mass is not energy
> > > >
> > > > energy iS
> > > > MASS IN MOTION !!
> > > >
> > > > the dimension of energy is
> > > > is
> > > > kilogram  times meter ^2 /second ^2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > FULL STOP !!
> > > > ======
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > ========================
> >
> >
> >
> > maybe i don't know what 'mass' is...
> > i certaintly not going to look it up and get more confused.
> =======================
> so better f yourself as usual
> and  be happy to the end of your happy life ...!!
> Y.P
> =================================


I get it, I'm suppose to 'get knowledge' from the....Internet.


That explains why there is so much confusion amongs yous in the 'scientific community'.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web