Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #624786 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 109 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-23 20:56 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 18:57 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 19:35 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 19:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 20:14 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 22:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 02:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:18 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:07 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:46 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:53 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:24 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-24 18:03 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 07:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-25 11:26 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 10:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:06 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 12:52 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:15 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:20 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:12 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-26 01:15 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:51 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:50 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 07:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-26 23:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:38 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 19:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 20:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 19:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:07 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 04:56 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 01:10 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:16 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:00 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 05:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:26 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 13:19 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:02 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 17:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 21:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 13:26 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:21 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:08 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-28 11:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:23 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:43 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 16:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:28 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:55 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 12:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 17:41 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 14:38 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:29 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:25 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:04 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 16:18 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:06 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:48 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:59 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:13 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-24 14:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-24 11:05 -0800
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs gmbr3359@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 23:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 03:36 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 08:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd7d277d-938b-4f8c-a906-b4bb074e0e79@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624844 |
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 6:03:16 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/24/2017 9:59 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. > > > > So explain the charged glass rod and the charged ping pong ball. > > This is a demonstration anyone can do. > > Because such an event cannot be explained in any way that makes logical > sense, it is a miracle. > > That, or what is considered logical sense is not really > righ...nopenopenopenopenopenotdoingthat. > > > I was demonstrating this type of thing to my kid two days ago, with > > balloons and a cat. > > > > Did you even understand the Feynman quote? > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables ==================== hi **anonymous** criminal thief bodkin blockhead ========================== Y.P ==============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 08:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c2d0a15d-b668-4c2c-9fd1-5941981b32c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624836 |
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 5:03:31 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > Odd > " > You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you > please explain these observations? > " > > The only thing that can pull is physical > attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push > from the attached part. > So.... little ropes? > Maybe the strings from String Theory? > Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. ===================== Hi John !! we start talking business !!! above the heads of the f en parrots keep on going we are doing history == Y .Porat =============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 14:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ob3s2g$rej$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #624845 |
On 3/24/2017 10:13 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 5:03:31 PM UTC+3, john wrote: >> Odd >> " >> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you >> please explain these observations? >> " >> >> The only thing that can pull is physical >> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push >> from the attached part. >> So.... little ropes? >> Maybe the strings from String Theory? >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. > ===================== > Hi John !! > we start talking business !!! > above the heads of the f en parrots > keep on going > we are doing history > == > Y .Porat > ============================= > yea! like little interlocked doughnuts strung out...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 22:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1b360bc2-fc7b-4f41-bee3-128cbc711655@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624880 |
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 10:29:24 PM UTC+3, Serg io wrote: > On 3/24/2017 10:13 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 5:03:31 PM UTC+3, john wrote: > >> Odd > >> " > >> You're the one saying that pull interactions make no sense, so could you > >> please explain these observations? > >> " > >> > >> The only thing that can pull is physical > >> attachment- like a rope- and that's still a push > >> from the attached part. > >> So.... little ropes? > >> Maybe the strings from String Theory? > >> Otherwise, sorry, pull interactions are impossible. > > > ===================== > > Hi John !! > > we start talking business !!! > > above the heads of the f en parrots > > keep on going > > we are doing history > > == > > Y .Porat > > ============================= > > > > yea! like little interlocked doughnuts strung out... ======================== not exactly !! see Google the Y porat model - an abstract see 'the chain of orbitals there !! including its abstract and the Y Circlon mechanism ' TIA Y.Porat ==================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 11:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <58D56E08.552D@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #624786 |
john wrote: > > When PD challenged me to say what was > providing the push for push Gravity, > and I realized that electrons are > radiating a much smaller brand of emr- > call it Dark Radiation- > and that MATTER itself is the source. > > So is this Dark Radiation the same as > Dark Energy? Dark Radiation? Dark Energy?? are you talking about hacking Iphones???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 12:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cfef0ca2-e97a-4473-9d3e-f787202da2a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624872 |
Radiotronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gmbr3359@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 23:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66149e29-9759-437b-b54c-c3781e577cce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #624786 |
that is not a theory per se, but it is at least a flapd00dle
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-26 03:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5eeb421c-5a86-4b00-a312-daafdddc12a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625142 |
On Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 9:18:37 AM UTC+3, gmbr...@gmail.com wrote: > that is not a theory per se, but it is at least a flapd00dle ==================== at least what ?? speak clear and responsible and not a priory hostile === Y.P ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bcd9b1f4-1c34-4e75-a058-fb59daf8eb1f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625162 |
see, a priori, a theory must be proven, and that is what if & only if --iff-- really means; one should at least be able to prove one of them, but both is better > > that is not a theory per se, but it is at least a flapd00dle > ==================== > at least what ?? > speak clear and responsible > and not a priory hostile
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web