Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #621483 > unrolled thread

Beyond The Big Bang

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-04 11:37 -0800
    Re: Beyond The Big Bang Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-04 12:45 -0800
      Re: The cosmos evaporates/sublimates/randomizes, _naturally. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-04 14:14 -0800
      Re: Jeff Relf wrong, once again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-04 23:11 +0000
      Re: Beyond The Big Bang benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-04 19:01 -0500
      Re: Beyond The Big Bang "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 16:15 -0800
        Re: Beyond The Big Bang benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-06 20:07 -0500
          Re: Beyond The Big Bang Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:12 -0800
        Re: Beyond The Big Bang "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-06 17:29 -0800
        Re: Beyond The Big Bang Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:11 -0800
          Re: Beyond The Big Bang "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:50 -0700
            Re: Beyond The Big Bang "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-15 10:36 -0700
            Re: Beyond The Big Bang Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-16 14:07 -0700
              Re: Beyond The Big Bang "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 14:58 -0700
                Re: Beyond The Big Bang benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 20:19 -0400
                  Re: Beyond The Big Bang "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-16 19:03 -0700
    Re: Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-04 19:11 -0800
      Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-10 10:34 -0800
        Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-10 19:03 +0000
          Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-10 12:41 -0800
            Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-11 15:18 -0800
        Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-11 15:24 -0800
          Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 16:56 -0800
            Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-11 18:19 -0800
              Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-11 19:00 -0800
                Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-11 22:08 -0800
                  Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:20 +1100
                    Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-12 00:29 -0800
                      asshole noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 00:32 -0800
                      Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 19:32 +1100
                      Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-12 01:16 -0800
                        Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:29 +0800
                          Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-12 12:01 -0800
                            Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 04:07 +0800
                        Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-12 12:11 -0800
          Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2017-03-11 19:27 -0800
            Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-11 22:16 -0800
              Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 00:12 -0800
                Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-12 11:26 -0800
                  l00king at photos noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 17:16 -0700
                  Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-13 11:03 -0800
                    Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-14 14:17 -0700
                Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:54 -0700
                  Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-15 10:24 -0700
                  Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 12:09 -0700
    Re: Beyond The Big Bang Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-05 11:37 +0000
      Re: Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-05 11:45 -0800
        Re: Beyond The Big Bang Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-05 21:00 +0100
          gnaBgiBdnoyeB, the noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 15:48 -0800
        Re: Beyond The Big Bang Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-05 21:47 +0000
          Re: Beyond The Big Bang The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-06 10:58 -0800
            Re: Beyond The Big Bang Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-07 17:15 +0000

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#621483 — Beyond The Big Bang

I notice yous people have trouble getting...

Beyond The Big Bang.


Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.


I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.


Why do yous???

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#621496

On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> 
> Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> 
> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> 
> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> 
> Why do yous???


There was no Big Bang.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621508 — Re: The cosmos evaporates/sublimates/randomizes, _naturally.

On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 1:46:18 PM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> The entropy of the cosmos ratchets up _naturally;
> i.e. the cosmos evaporates/sublimates/randomizes, _naturally.
> 
> Google "Heat Death of the Universe" and you get: ＜＜
> 
>   The heat death of the universe is a plausible 
>   ultimate fate of the universe in which the universe 
>   has diminished to a state of no thermodynamic free 
>   energy and therefore can no longer sustain processes 
>   that increase entropy ( including computation and life ).  ＞＞
> 
> Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington wrote: ＜＜
> 
>   If someone points out to you that
>   your pet theory of the universe is
>   in disagreement with Maxwell's equations --
>   then, so much the worse for Maxwell's equations.
>     
>   If it is found to be contradicted by observers --
>   well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes.
>     
>   But, if your theory is found to be
>   against the second law of thermodynamics,
>   I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but
>   to collapse in deepest humiliation.  ＞＞
> 
>   -- From "The Nature of the Physical World", 1915, chapter 4.


Eddington's observations were outside the error bars!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621523 — Re: Jeff Relf wrong, once again.

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes:

<snip>

Back at this crap again.  Since the last time you posted this crap, the
Universe has increased its gravitational potential energy as galaxy
clusters move apart.

Again, you should quit making up crap and pretending it's true.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621544

On 3/4/2017 3:45 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
>>
>> Beyond The Big Bang.
>>
>>
>> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
>>
>>
>> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
>>
>>
>> Why do yous???
>
>
> There was no Big Bang.
>
> Double-A
>
AA you da man! Ask about my BBB theory, Nobel level thinking for sure!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621868

On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> > 
> > Beyond The Big Bang.
> > 
> > 
> > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> > 
> > 
> > Why do yous???
> 
> 
> There was no Big Bang.
How> 
> Double-A
How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621889

On 3/6/2017 7:15 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
>>>
>>> Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why do yous???
>>
>>
>> There was no Big Bang.
> How>
>> Double-A
> How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
>
Reber my BBB theory explains it all. It's real Nobel level thinking. 
probably two of them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622003

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 5:07:34 PM UTC-8, benj wrote:
> On 3/6/2017 7:15 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> >> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> >>>
> >>> Beyond The Big Bang.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Why do yous???
> >>
> >>
> >> There was no Big Bang.
> > How>
> >> Double-A
> > How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
> >
> Reber my BBB theory explains it all. It's real Nobel level thinking. 
> probably two of them.


So what is your BBB theory anyway?  The Blue Balled Bang?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621898

<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> wrote
"about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that 
gave micro into the macro realm.Its different"... & then 
<http://tinyurl.com/Jew-Swine-Glazier-cries> [1]
for what is pointed out in link [1] to the Face Shitter &
Criminal Graveyard Vandal <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> 
>
who added:
But "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex
& an IQ of 122", & "I  know how everything works"
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
__**  "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert  **__.
>
which was answered by fellow Jews of Glazier whom
Bert embarrasses everywhere, day-in and day-out,
who said:
>
Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote:
GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! - Saul Levy
>
Yehiel Porat, the proud Zionist <poraty350@gmail.com> wrote:
Glazier, you idiot blockhead, your fucken mother gives all 
properties to anything !!... got it, Glazier, you  incurable 
block head & senile parrot !!... piss off, get out of my thread !!!
and do not disturb me, we have work to do !!!
next!!! to real intelligent people !! ... -- Y.Porat from Israel
>
benj" Benjamin Franklin Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> who wrote:
One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized.
>
Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
"Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage."
"Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can."
"Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup."
"Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__."
"Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!."
"reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" 
>
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622002

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:15:37 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> > > 
> > > Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Why do yous???
> > 
> > 
> > There was no Big Bang.
> How> 
> > Double-A
> How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert



So what would cause a space fabric rupture anyway?  To much heavy lifting?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623264

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:11:50 AM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:15:37 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> > > > 
> > > > Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Why do yous???
> > > 
> > > 
> > > There was no Big Bang.
> > How> 
> > > Double-A
> > How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
> 
> 
> 
> So what would cause a space fabric rupture anyway?  To much heavy lifting?
> 
> Double-A

A gravity flow change of direction.Anti-matter and matter hitting. All could upset the structure of space. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623280

"I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex
& an IQ of 122", & "I  know how everything works"
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true", since
"All could upset the structure of space" by TreBert
who cried:
__**  "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert  **__, & 
> 
Nobody but "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, 
the Face shitter & Criminal Graveyard Vandal complains like 
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> [1] does
who wrote:
>
"When I had that tube going up my Penis and a bag on my 
leg.It was not worth living... and now  my back and legs tell 
me I'm 89.Legs are first to go. Once I'm sitting on the ground 
getting up is hard to do. Sad but true my legs are giving  out. 
>
I am too old and too weak", since Glazier claimed  to be 
terminally ill, on his Deathbed with one foot already in his 
coffin, ...but he  keeps on urinating & defecating onto his 
shoes, diaper, his grave & into s.p... even after 13-Mar-2017...

when Glazier got the shock of his waning  & remaining days,
him saying:
"An old man just collapsed here at his computer!  He started 
breathing hard and sweating, then threw up, and then fell on 
the floor!  He hit his head, passed out briefly and started 
bleeding from nose!
>
The paramedic crew from the ambulance are tending to 
him now.  He is still breathing hard!  
Oh may gosh, he is the same age age I am!"
>
The closer you get to death the older makes its time 
much shorter.Once dead time stops.That is the scary 
part since  my partner, the GOPer _ Lady _Undertaker_
will sell my carcass to GOPer "Waste-Management. Inc."
 O ya TreBert
>
hanson wrote:
Pity. Read all the gruesome details she has in store for 
Bert in <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623495

On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:50:15 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:11:50 AM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:15:37 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why do yous???
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > There was no Big Bang.
> > > How> 
> > > > Double-A
> > > How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > So what would cause a space fabric rupture anyway?  To much heavy lifting?
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> A gravity flow change of direction.


Like these squally storm winds we have been having around here the last few days? 


Anti-matter and matter hitting. All could upset the structure of space. TreBert


Possible.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623508

On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 2:07:32 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:50:15 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:11:50 AM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:15:37 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Why do yous???
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > There was no Big Bang.
> > > > How> 
> > > > > Double-A
> > > > How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So what would cause a space fabric rupture anyway?  To much heavy lifting?
> > > 
> > > Double-A
> > 
> > A gravity flow change of direction.
> 
> 
> Like these squally storm winds we have been having around here the last few days? 
> 
> 
> Anti-matter and matter hitting. All could upset the structure of space. TreBert I 
> 
> 
> Possible.
> 
> Double-A

Also if photons could ever travel other than c my brain waves would collide .TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623538

On 3/16/2017 5:58 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 2:07:32 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:50:15 AM UTC-7, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:11:50 AM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
>>>> On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:15:37 PM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 12:45:06 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 11:37:30 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do yous???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was no Big Bang.
>>>>> How>
>>>>>> Double-A
>>>>> How about a rupture in the fabric of space creating a leak that gave micro into the macro realm.Its different.TreBert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So what would cause a space fabric rupture anyway?  To much heavy lifting?
>>>>
>>>> Double-A
>>>
>>> A gravity flow change of direction.
>>
>>
>> Like these squally storm winds we have been having around here the last few days?
>>
>>
>> Anti-matter and matter hitting. All could upset the structure of space. TreBert I
>>
>>
>> Possible.
>>
>> Double-A
>
> Also if photons could ever travel other than c my brain waves would collide .TreBert
>
Whoa! Now that is proof that Einstein's assumption that light always 
travels at c is false! Obviously Bert is the next Velikovsky and is 
writing "Brain waves in collision"! Hanson note: Velikovsky was Jewish 
too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#623552

"benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote to...
>
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> who
is Face Shitter & Criminal Graveyard Vandal, named
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, who
does  Anti-matter and matter shitting in his Van. All 
could upset the structure of Bert's brain waves that collide,
>
& then <http://tinyurl.com/Jew-Swine-Glazier-cries> [1] for 
what is pointed out to him in link [1] .. who then added:
>>
But... "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex
& an IQ of 122", & "I  know how everything works"
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
__**  "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert  **__.
>
"benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote
> Whoa! Now that is proof that Einstein's assumption that light always 
> travels at c is false! Obviously Bert is the next Velikovsky and is 
> writing "Brain waves in collision"! 
> Hanson note: Velikovsky was Jewish too.
>
hanson wrote:
Whoa!. Benj, Go figure! You are on the money. O ya,
much to the chagrin of Cretin Glazier, the Swine. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621560

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> 
> Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> 
> Why do yous???


If you hear junk science from others like, "there is no before" or
"comes from nothing", they are just people who are incompetent
and cannot see pass their noses. They reached their level of
incompetence. 

Beyond The Big Bang is ...certaintly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622441 — Looking Beyond The Big Bang

I'm 'proposing'
(i have to use the word "proposing" cause it's their lingo)

I'm proposing that you Look beyond the Big Bang.

(i know this is differcult for most of yous because you are told not to think Before)

So, you need to Look Beyond...

that is also differcult because Nature blocks certain things from your view...

for example?

You look at the ocean and it's hard to see thru the water.

If the water in the ocean was clear like a glass of water you can see Beyond and
see a whole universe of fish world.

But the color of the water blocks your view...(for reasons in physics i will not get into)

The same with the dark space...if it was clear like water..what would you see?

The ocean and the dark space both have blocking features that work the same way...it blocks most of the light. 

If you Look Beyond the Big Bang...you would say..

 "My God, it's full of stars! 



Here you can see The Big Bang in red shift stars exploding in every which way, and beyond it is filled with stars.

http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/before%20and%20after%20the%20big%20bang/untitled1.jpg




The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.







The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I notice yous people have trouble getting...
> >
> > Beyond The Big Bang.
> >
> > Yous have differculty seeing.. Beyond The Big Bang.
> >
> > I don't seem to have any trouble seeing...Beyond The Big Bang.
> >
> > Why do yous???
> 
> If you hear junk science from others like, "there is no before" or
> "comes from nothing", they are just people who are incompetent
> and cannot see pass their noses. They reached their level of
> incompetence.
> 
> Beyond The Big Bang is ...certaintly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622444 — Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> I'm 'proposing'
> (i have to use the word "proposing" cause it's their lingo)
>
> I'm proposing that you Look beyond the Big Bang.

It's impossible to look "beyond" a not-thing.

Ned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622453 — Re: Looking Beyond The Big Bang

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I'm 'proposing'
> > (i have to use the word "proposing" cause it's their lingo)
> >
> > I'm proposing that you Look beyond the Big Bang.
> 
> It's impossible to look "beyond" a not-thing.
> 
> Ned


you usually consider things and then reject, but you were given "a
not-thing" to consider, there's nothing to consider..your mind is blank
by someone
who told you, don't consider it, there nothing there. 

I'm sure they looked for you and found...nothing.


If you ask a little kid, "What are you doing?" and he responds
.."Nothing."

Or your girlfriend asks you "What are you thinking about?"...and you
tell her "Nothing." ...


we all know what "Nothing." means.


But you failed to look beyond...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web