Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #621638 > unrolled thread

Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?

Started byalal65536@gmail.com
First post2017-03-05 14:30 -0800
Last post2017-03-08 23:43 -0800
Articles 8 on this page of 48 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 14:30 -0800
    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 17:35 -0600
      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 17:09 -0800
        Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 18:18 -0800
          Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 03:21 -0800
            Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 12:06 -0600
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-06 18:37 -0500
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 03:47 -0800
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 05:11 -0800
                  Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 07:07 -0500
                    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 06:00 -0800
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 07:18 -0600
        Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 20:48 -0600
          Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 03:24 -0800
            Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 06:10 -0800
            Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 12:04 -0600
            Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 07:42 -0500
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 06:40 -0800
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:57 -0600
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-10 01:46 -0500
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-09 10:26 -0800
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-09 23:37 -0800
      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-06 18:05 -0500
        Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 04:00 -0800
          Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 07:17 -0600
          Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 05:19 -0800
            Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 08:48 -0800
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:41 -0600
              Re: Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:08 -0800
                Re: Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 12:31 -0800
              Re: Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-07 16:50 -0500
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 14:22 -0800
                Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 17:14 -0800
                  Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-08 06:06 -0800
                    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-03-08 23:07 -0800
                      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 05:54 -0800
                  Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 09:51 -0600
              Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 07:54 -0500
            Re: "String Theory" can "model" 10^500 "vacua". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-07 16:48 -0500
          Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 07:46 -0500
    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-05 16:08 -0800
    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 18:25 -0800
    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 09:11 -0800
      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-07 17:57 -0800
      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 09:19 -0800
        Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-08 12:33 -0800
    Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-03-09 00:20 -0500
      Re: Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-08 23:43 -0800

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#621669

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-03-05 16:08 -0800
Message-ID<58BCA890.25BE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#621638
alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?  Is a low state of entropy simpler?  Is a low state of entropy more beautiful?
> 
> Abhinav Lal
> Writer & Investor


a low state of entropy is just another way of saying...the universe began with a orderly design in purpose.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621686

Fromnumbernumber1964@gmail.com
Date2017-03-05 18:25 -0800
Message-ID<dddd34f9-86d8-4f54-afb9-dc535256990e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#621638
Dickhead entropy represents a closed system. Not like your mouth is right now. Oh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621976

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-07 09:11 -0800
Message-ID<e25d0a9a-891a-400c-a38e-dce31b51b630@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#621638
On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 2:31:01 PM UTC-8, alal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?  Is a low state of entropy simpler?  Is a low state of entropy more beautiful?  
> 
> Abhinav Lal 
> Writer & Investor

It was building up steam mainly hydrogen. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622078

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2017-03-07 17:57 -0800
Message-ID<o9no98$v3q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#621976
<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> who
is Face Shitter & Criminal Graveyard Vandal, named
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> who wrote:
> It was building up steam mainly hydrogen. TreBert
>
James McGinn" <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
 Bert, you are one dumb SOB.
>
>
>
& then <http://tinyurl.com/Jew-Swine-Glazier-cries> [1] for 
what is pointed out to hom in link [1] .. who then added:
>
But "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex
& an IQ of 122", & "I  know how everything works"
"Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
__**  "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert  **__.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622159

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-08 09:19 -0800
Message-ID<8e0eb323-6397-4e62-9f01-c3b9361c7129@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#621976
On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 9:12:01 AM UTC-8, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 2:31:01 PM UTC-8, alal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?  Is a low state of entropy simpler?  Is a low state of entropy more beautiful?  
> > 
> > Abhinav Lal 
> > Writer & Investor
> 
> It was building up steam mainly hydrogen. TreBert

Universe did not start with fusion energy.Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622169

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2017-03-08 12:33 -0800
Message-ID<o9ppms$1nl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#622159
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> Universe did not start with fusion energy... & Trebert did 
NOT do so neither, unless & until  Bert explains which one 
of his 17 theories turned Glazier into  becoming the Cretin
Face-Shitter and Criminal Graveyard Vandal that Bert is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622231

FromYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Date2017-03-09 00:20 -0500
Message-ID<JZydnXtwAdCKe13FnZ2dnUU7-T_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#621638
On 3/5/2017 5:30 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?  Is a low state of entropy simpler?  Is a low state of entropy more beautiful?
>
> Abhinav Lal
> Writer & Investor

When things are compressed they actually enter a state of reduced 
entropy. It's when they expand again that their entropy goes up. So the 
inside of a singularity, like a Blackhole or a Big Bang would be the 
state of lowest entropy possible, so it is the zero starting point of 
all entropy.

	Yousuf Khan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622245

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2017-03-08 23:43 -0800
Message-ID<58C1079B.4468@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#622231
Yousuf Khan wrote:
> 
> On 3/5/2017 5:30 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> > Why did the universe start in such a low state of entropy?  Is a low state of entropy simpler?  Is a low state of entropy more beautiful?
> >
> > Abhinav Lal
> > Writer & Investor
> 
> When things are compressed they actually enter a state of reduced
> entropy. It's when they expand again that their entropy goes up. So the
> inside of a singularity, like a Blackhole or a Big Bang would be the
> state of lowest entropy possible, so it is the zero starting point of
> all entropy.
> 
>         Yousuf Khan



I looked beyond the big bang, i did not see any edvidence of any
compression going on or a ...singularity


what I did see was a universe simply running out of sapce, and created
New space by expanding it's existing space..what

you people call  now the big bang.


It just got how because it was overcrowded.


Is Science just repeating what others tell you????


How do you come up with new ideas if you just repeat and copy old
ideas????


What a waste of space...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web