Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #610586 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-28 00:31 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-12-31 13:20 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 85 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
moon landing hoax The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-28 00:31 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-28 21:59 +1100
Re: moon landing hoax The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-28 09:13 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-12-28 12:34 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 18:52 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 12:54 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 14:32 -0800
11\9 to kFj noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:38 -0800
Re: 11\9 to kFj noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 16:36 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-29 17:34 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 16:07 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-30 01:20 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:31 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 00:11 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 20:37 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 02:25 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-31 17:31 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 22:48 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:13 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-30 22:29 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 18:03 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 00:13 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 20:39 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 02:26 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-31 17:35 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-31 22:48 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 17:17 -0800
XoaH fo n00m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 12:15 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 17:44 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-06 00:41 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 21:18 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-06 03:22 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-06 16:44 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 17:12 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 21:20 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-06 03:23 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 14:20 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-30 01:17 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:29 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-12-28 22:25 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 09:43 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 09:47 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-12-29 14:30 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 14:08 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:38 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 15:26 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 22:11 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 20:22 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-12-30 14:21 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 11:41 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-30 17:38 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 12:06 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 12:23 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Sergio <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-30 14:33 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-12-30 15:38 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 13:06 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2017-01-01 09:38 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-01-02 01:15 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 10:19 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 15:19 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2017-01-05 00:09 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 23:29 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 21:54 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 17:53 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 17:49 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 15:00 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 17:18 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-05 19:12 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 16:40 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-01-06 00:10 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 09:17 -0700
Gutless whining (was Re: moon landing hoax Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2017-01-06 09:54 -0800
Re: Gutless whining (was Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 10:00 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-01-06 08:21 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 09:17 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-06 17:04 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> - 2016-12-28 22:08 +0000
Re: moon landing hoax wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-12-28 18:59 -0500
Re: moon landing hoax Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 16:23 -0700
Re: moon landing hoax The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-12-28 16:28 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Sergio <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-28 14:29 -0600
Re: moon landing hoax Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-31 08:20 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-31 09:09 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-31 09:55 -0800
Re: moon landing hoax Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-31 13:20 -0800
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 00:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o4kkf6$iro$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #611535 |
In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: > for that junk science known as global warming You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" engraved on your forehead. Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 23:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F451A06080melchizedek@216.166.97.131> |
| In reply to | #611720 |
wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com: > In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, > Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: > >> for that junk science known as global warming > > You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is the > equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" engraved on your > forehead. > > Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince you that you had been wrong? If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking rationally. pt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 21:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f9b36d0-60ea-454f-a06d-44c53f2a2872@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #611722 |
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 9:30:02 PM UTC-8, Cryptoengineer wrote: > wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in news:o4kkf6$iro$1 > @panix3.panix.com: > > > In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, > > Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: > > > >> for that junk science known as global warming > > > > You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is the > > equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" engraved on your > > forehead. > > > > Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? > > More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince > you that you had been wrong? > > If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking > rationally. > > pt http://grist.org/series/skeptics/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 17:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <586ece5b$0$34658$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #611724 |
On 1/5/2017 12:54 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 9:30:02 PM UTC-8, Cryptoengineer wrote: >> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in news:o4kkf6$iro$1 >> @panix3.panix.com: >> >>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >>> >>>> for that junk science known as global warming >>> >>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is the >>> equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" engraved on your >>> forehead. >>> >>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? >> >> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince >> you that you had been wrong? >> >> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking >> rationally. >> >> pt > > http://grist.org/series/skeptics/ > Here is the dogma so WHY WON'T YOU BELIEVE? Science is all about belief! Question: If it's all about man made global warming, then why did all you warmballers change your name to "climate change"? Oddly climate change is the ONE certainty that ALL SIDES agree is true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 17:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #611722 |
On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: > wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in news:o4kkf6$iro$1 > @panix3.panix.com: > >> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >> >>> for that junk science known as global warming >> >> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is the >> equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" engraved on your >> forehead. >> >> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? > > More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince > you that you had been wrong? > > If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking > rationally. > > pt > Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE! Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so. If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 15:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F498A0FA74Ctaustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #611825 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in
news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com:
> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in
>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com:
>>
>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said:
>>>
>>>> for that junk science known as global warming
>>>
>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is
>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT"
>>> engraved on your forehead.
>>>
>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity?
>>
>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince
>> you that you had been wrong?
>>
>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking
>> rationally.
>>
>> pt
>>
> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE!
> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so.
> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then
> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that
> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as
> that.
>
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge
I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to
what Adams actually says here.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 17:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o4mk67$aql$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #611833 |
On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in
> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com:
>
>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in
>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said:
>>>>
>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming
>>>>
>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is
>>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT"
>>>> engraved on your forehead.
>>>>
>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity?
>>>
>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince
>>> you that you had been wrong?
>>>
>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking
>>> rationally.
>>>
>>> pt
>>>
>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE!
>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so.
>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then
>> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that
>> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as
>> that.
>>
> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge
>
> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to
> what Adams actually says here.
Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics are more persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the engineer in
me screams that someone is jacking the numbers:
http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif
which is from:
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/
3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name.
Lynn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 19:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <586ee0d9$0$34702$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #611841 |
On 1/5/2017 6:18 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: > On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in >> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com: >> >>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: >>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in >>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com: >>>> >>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming >>>>> >>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is >>>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" >>>>> engraved on your forehead. >>>>> >>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? >>>> >>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince >>>> you that you had been wrong? >>>> >>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking >>>> rationally. >>>> >>>> pt >>>> >>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE! >>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so. >>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then >>> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that >>> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as >>> that. >>> >> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge >> >> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to >> what Adams actually says here. > > Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics are more > persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the engineer in me screams > that someone is jacking the numbers: > > http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif > > which is from: > > http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/ > > > 3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name. > > Lynn Name-calling is the only thing the "changers" have on their side. Number jacking in MANY ways is rife. Want lessons in number jacking? I can give them to you. These run the gamut from locating temperature stations in urban heat islands, to "adjusting" past temperature data, to locating the CO2 monitoring station on an active volcano. What could possibly go wrong? If you want more proof just look at the temperatures between 1940 and 1970. They went DOWN while CO2 went UP. So much for "anthropogenic". Gosh, Crichton wrote a book about this and suddenly and unexpectedly died of cancer. Coincidence? We are talking a proposed "energy tax" to "save the planet" of at least a Trillion dollars a year. So who is willing to do what dishonesty for THAT kind of bread. Think about it. http://bokbluster.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091125boklores.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 16:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F4A996DF020taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #611855 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in
news:586ee0d9$0$34702$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com:
> On 1/5/2017 6:18 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>> On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in
>>> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com:
>>>
>>>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>>>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in
>>>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so
>>>>>> is the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT"
>>>>>> engraved on your forehead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity?
>>>>>
>>>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince
>>>>> you that you had been wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking
>>>>> rationally.
>>>>>
>>>>> pt
>>>>>
>>>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE!
>>>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so.
>>>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true,
>>>> then you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with
>>>> them that is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as
>>>> simple as that.
>>>>
>>> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowl
>>> edge
>>>
>>> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way
>>> to what Adams actually says here.
>>
>> Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics
>> are more persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the
>> engineer in me screams that someone is jacking the numbers:
>>
>> http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-
>> Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif
>>
>> which is from:
>>
>> http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-t
>> o-noaa-data-tampering/
>>
>>
>> 3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name.
>>
>> Lynn
> Name-calling is the only thing the "changers" have on their
> side.
>
> Number jacking in MANY ways is rife. Want lessons in number
> jacking? I can give them to you. These run the gamut from
> locating temperature stations in urban heat islands, to
> "adjusting" past temperature data, to locating the CO2
> monitoring station on an active volcano. What could possibly go
> wrong? If you want more proof just look at the temperatures
> between 1940 and 1970. They went DOWN while CO2 went UP. So much
> for "anthropogenic". Gosh, Crichton wrote a book about this and
> suddenly and unexpectedly died of cancer. Coincidence?
>
> We are talking a proposed "energy tax" to "save the planet" of
> at least a Trillion dollars a year. So who is willing to do what
> dishonesty for THAT kind of bread. Think about it.
>
> http://bokbluster.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/091125boklores.j
> pg
>
Well, so far, I am correct. Neither of you has address Adams'
point, which is *not* which side is correct, but rather, _how the
average person can judge_ which side is correct.
I predict this will continue in 100% of all responses.
(And this why why both sides are reduced to foaming spittle and
namecalling, and wny nobody else *care*.)
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 00:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o4njdk$16r$7@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #611841 |
On 2017-01-05 3:18 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: > On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in >> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com: >> >>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: >>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in >>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com: >>>> >>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming >>>>> >>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is >>>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" >>>>> engraved on your forehead. >>>>> >>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? >>>> >>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince >>>> you that you had been wrong? >>>> >>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking >>>> rationally. >>>> >>>> pt >>>> >>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE! >>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so. >>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then >>> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that >>> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as >>> that. >>> >> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge >> >> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to >> what Adams actually says here. > > Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics are more > persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the engineer in me screams > that someone is jacking the numbers: > > http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif But the question to ask is whether or not the adjustment is based on valid science. > > which is from: > > http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/ > > > 3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name. > > Lynn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 09:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F55E739345Etaustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #611904 |
Alan Baker:
Do you agree that riots occured, leading to hundreds of arrests,
during the protests over Trump's election?
*One* answer, not
yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no
/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/n
o/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/
no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/
like you've been doing.
We both (and everyone else) know you *can't* answer once, and stick
with it, since the answer is "Yes, Clinton supporters are far more
prone to criminal violence than Trump supporters or Obama haters."
And you *can't* accept that, due to your illness.
Get help, Alan. Seriously. Before you hurt yourself. You're not
interacting with the world around you any more.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 09:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Gutless whining (was Re: moon landing hoax |
| Message-ID | <o4olkd$url$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #611941 |
On 2017-01-06 8:17 AM, Gutless whined.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 10:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Gutless whining (was Re: moon landing hoax |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F565E1AA227taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #611953 |
Alan Baker:
Do you agree that riots occured, leading to hundreds of arrests,
during the protests over Trump's election?
*One* answer, not
yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no
/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/n
o/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/
no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/yes/no/
like you've been doing.
We both (and everyone else) know you *can't* answer once, and stick
with it, since the answer is "Yes, Clinton supporters are far more
prone to criminal violence than Trump supporters or Obama haters."
And you *can't* accept that, due to your illness.
Get help, Alan. Seriously. Before you hurt yourself. You're not
interacting with the world around you any more.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 08:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <216v6clvvsc8h4bleaficnal97jv96skgc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #611841 |
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:18:56 -0600, Lynn McGuire wrote: >On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in >> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com: >> >>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: >>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in >>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com: >>>> >>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >>>>> >>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming >>>>> >>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is >>>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" >>>>> engraved on your forehead. >>>>> >>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? >>>> >>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince >>>> you that you had been wrong? >>>> >>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking >>>> rationally. >>>> >>>> pt >>>> >>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE! >>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so. >>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then >>> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that >>> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as >>> that. >>> >> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge >> >> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to >> what Adams actually says here. > >Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics are more persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the engineer in >me screams that someone is jacking the numbers: > http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif >which is from: > http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/ > >3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name. > >Lynn http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge "Non-scientists don’t have the tools to form a useful opinion on climate science." Non-scientists can look outside. Non-scientists can conclude that this prediction from 17 years ago was bullshit: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/04/top-5-failed-snow-free-and-ice-free-predictions/ “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 09:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6F55E97F2251taustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #611919 |
Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote in
news:216v6clvvsc8h4bleaficnal97jv96skgc@4ax.com:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:18:56 -0600, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>
>>On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in
>>> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com:
>>>
>>>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>>>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in
>>>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so
>>>>>> is the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT"
>>>>>> engraved on your forehead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity?
>>>>>
>>>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince
>>>>> you that you had been wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking
>>>>> rationally.
>>>>>
>>>>> pt
>>>>>
>>>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE!
>>>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so.
>>>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true,
>>>> then you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with
>>>> them that is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as
>>>> simple as that.
>>>>
>>> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowl
>>> edge
>>>
>>> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way
>>> to what Adams actually says here.
>>
>>Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics
>>are more persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the
>>engineer in me screams that someone is jacking the numbers:
>> http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Scre
>> en-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif
>>which is from:
>> http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-du
>> e-to-noaa-data-tampering/
>>
>>3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name.
>>
>>Lynn
>
> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowled
> ge "Non-scientists don’t have the tools to form a useful opinion
> on climate science."
>
> Non-scientists can look outside.
>
> Non-scientists can conclude that this prediction from 17 years
> ago was bullshit:
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/04/top-5-failed-snow-free-and-ice-
> free-predictions/ “Children just aren’t going to know what snow
> is,” Dr. David Viner, a scientist with the climatic research
> unit at the University of East Anglia, told the UK Independent
> in 2000.
>
Four for four, so far, refusing to address the actual point Adams
made. Still 100%. As predicted.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-06 17:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5870145c$0$4504$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #611919 |
On 1/6/2017 8:21 AM, Wally W. wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:18:56 -0600, Lynn McGuire wrote: > >> On 1/5/2017 4:00 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote in >>> news:586ecd6a$0$7319$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com: >>> >>>> On 1/5/2017 12:29 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: >>>>> wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in >>>>> news:o4kkf6$iro$1 @panix3.panix.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <o4h4f1$s97$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> for that junk science known as global warming >>>>>> >>>>>> You keep saying that. You keep not realizing that doing so is >>>>>> the equivalent of walking around with the word "IDIOT" >>>>>> engraved on your forehead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Seriously, why are you so *proud* of your wilful stupidity? >>>>> >>>>> More to the point, what sort of evidence would convince >>>>> you that you had been wrong? >>>>> >>>>> If you can't think of such evidence, you're not thinking >>>>> rationally. >>>>> >>>>> pt >>>>> >>>> Warmballers don't think rationally. They just BELIEVE! >>>> Yeah, that's it science is all about belief! HVAC told me so. >>>> If a democratic vote of scientists says something is true, then >>>> you must believe. If a bunch of politicians agree with them that >>>> is even more certain proof of truth. It's really as simple as >>>> that. >>>> >>> http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge >>> >>> I predict that no one in this thread will respond in any way to >>> what Adams actually says here. >> >> Adams is correct. Both sides are persuasive but the skeptics are more persuasive to me. I see graphs like this and the engineer in >> me screams that someone is jacking the numbers: >> http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif >> which is from: >> http://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/ >> >> 3-2-1 Cue William three names calling me some derisive name. >> >> Lynn > > http://blog.dilbert.com/post/155121836641/the-illusion-of-knowledge > "Non-scientists don’t have the tools to form a useful opinion on > climate science." > > Non-scientists can look outside. > > Non-scientists can conclude that this prediction from 17 years ago was > bullshit: > > http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/04/top-5-failed-snow-free-and-ice-free-predictions/ > “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” Dr. David Viner, a > scientist with the climatic research unit at the University of East > Anglia, told the UK Independent in 2000. > Just is an excellent example of what happens when politics infests science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Demetrice Barren <teercere@tmerunin.tme> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 22:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o41d4c$1u3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #610586 |
Sergio wrote: > On 12/28/2016 2:31 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> some people think the moon landing was a hoax... >> they just got it wrong..or mixed up.. >> the moon landing was just a publicity stunt. Incorrect. It was just another stinking capitalist lie. In order to dominate the marked and accumulate wealth. > Loonie I disagree. I am giving a 5% for a proper moon landing, but honestly, I don't even know what for, am I giving those 5% for. A couple of years from now on, it will reduce to 4, 3 and 2%, and I still will not know what for I will give those 2% for. Not my fault. Not our fault.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 18:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <o41jlo$21l$1@panix3.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #610586 |
In article <o417at$1okm$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Sergio <invlaid@invalid.com> said: On 12/28/2016 2:31 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> some people think the moon landing was a hoax... >> >> they just got it wrong..or mixed up.. >> >> the moon landing was just a publicity stunt. > > Loonie Technically, it's not loonie to say that some people believe that. Not that Starmaker isn't a loon, of course, or at least plays one on Usenet. (By the way, did you deliberately choose to use that _particular_ word?) -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 16:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA6ECA6C8E1CD6taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #610678 |
wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote in
news:o41jlo$21l$1@panix3.panix.com:
> In article <o417at$1okm$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> Sergio <invlaid@invalid.com> said:
>
> On 12/28/2016 2:31 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>>> some people think the moon landing was a hoax...
>>>
>>> they just got it wrong..or mixed up..
>>>
>>> the moon landing was just a publicity stunt.
>>
>> Loonie
>
> Technically, it's not loonie to say that some people believe
> that.
>
But it is entirely loonie *that* some people believe that.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5864589E.6FEF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #610678 |
William December Starr wrote: > > In article <o417at$1okm$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > Sergio <invlaid@invalid.com> said: > > On 12/28/2016 2:31 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >> some people think the moon landing was a hoax... > >> > >> they just got it wrong..or mixed up.. > >> > >> the moon landing was just a publicity stunt. > > > > Loonie > > Technically, it's not loonie to say that some people believe that. It's not a question of belief, it is a reality...the moon landing was just a publicity stunt. The first man in space was Russia... so they had to send a man to the moon to show the world...the moon landing was just a publicity stunt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web