Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #602784 > unrolled thread

Infect the universe

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 10:29 -0700
    Re: Infect the universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 11:02 -0700
      Re: Infect the universe "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-28 11:26 -0700
    Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-28 13:06 -0700
      Re: Infect the universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-28 14:09 -0700
      Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-30 12:42 -0800
    Re: Infect the universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:13 -0700
      Re: Infect the universe "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-30 18:48 -0700
    Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-01 23:09 -0800
      Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-02 11:58 -0800
        Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-02 22:20 -0800
          Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-02 22:40 -0800
            Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 00:24 -0800
            Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-04 00:25 -0800
          Re: Infect the universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:16 -0800
            Re: Infect the universe "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-15 13:15 -0800
            Re: Infect the universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-11-15 13:21 -0800
              Re: Infect the universe "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-15 21:26 -0800
                Re: Infect the universe john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 05:41 -0800
                  Re: Infect the universe "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-16 07:43 -0800
            Re: Infect the universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-15 13:30 -0800
              Re: Infect the universe john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:10 -0800
              Re: Infect the universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 12:31 -0800
                Re: Infect the universe "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-16 13:07 -0800
                Re: Infect the universe Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-18 13:57 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#602784 — Infect the universe

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html


if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#602793

On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:41 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html
> 
> 
> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.

Universe like Earth its microbes all the way down.Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602796

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sternmacher The Starmaker wrote:
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html
>>
>
> Universe like Earth its microbes all the way down to
Trebert the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602804

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html
> 
> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.


of course, it's possible the universe has already has been...inoculated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602821

On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 1:06:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html
> > 
> > if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> 
> 
> of course, it's possible the universe has already has been...inoculated.


They have already found what looks like an alien grave on Mars!

https://deusnexus.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/bizarre-artifacts-on-mars/

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602971

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.ht
> >
> > if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> 
> of course, it's possible the universe has already has been...inoculated.



In order to infect mars, it has to have at least one host.


I got a good idea! Why not send people to mars, that's a good way to ...dump bodies, ..it might trigger new forms of life.



Send Elon Musk there and tell him...


"We want you to go to Mars and trigger new forms of lfe!"

He'll say, "But I'll die there!!"

and they tell him..."We want you to die.. there."



Put it on TV and make it a reality show...


monsters on mars...

headed to earth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603002

On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:41 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astronaut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-new-forms-life.html
> 
> 
> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.

I would go to Mars now,and on a one way ticket. I can live on can tuna,MSP and Lox Baggels and cream cheeze. At 89 it would be like a birthday gift.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603024

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Full Swine Glazier
moaned and groaned that "At 89 it would be like a birthday gift"
to be the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier> [1] who 
does this < http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
for Muslim "Anon Y Mouse" &  8 other Glazier-shit eaters shown 
in & by <http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine> shown in [1].

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603438

Peter Trei wrote:
> 
> On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > >
> > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > >>
> > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > >
> > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > >
> > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > >
> > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > Moon to contaminate.
> > >
> > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > >
> > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> >
> > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> >
> > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> 
> Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> 
> pt



Speaking of ashes...

ashes to ashes, dust to dust..


"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."


I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.


Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..

but just as it reads: 


"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."


When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..

it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..


 "dust of the ground,"


Just so you know.


So, from ashes...to dust.


ashes to ashes, dust to dust..


Or from, dust to ashes.


"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."


Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.


Trees...come from the minerals in the ground, 


and 'breath of life' is where the tree receives life...from the air.


In other words, the process God used to form man is the same process He used to form trees.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603503

hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Peter Trei wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > >
> > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > >
> > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > >
> > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > >
> > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > >
> > > pt
> >
> >
> >
> > Speaking of ashes...
> >
> > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> >
> >
> > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> >
> >
> > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> >
> >
> > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> >
> > but just as it reads:
> >
> >
> > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> 
> Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> Your mad lord is so stupid....


You have to try to 'come from understanding'...

God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.

And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..

I'm here to help.



> >
> >
> > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> >
> > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> >
> >
> >  "dust of the ground,"
> >
> >
> > Just so you know.
> >
> >
> > So, from ashes...to dust.
> >
> >
> > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> >
> >
> > Or from, dust to ashes.
> >
> >
> > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> >
> >
> > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> 
> But there is no mention of water....sucker.


You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.

Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.


'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.

air/breath

"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."


"breathed into" means added water to the dust.


air/breath

Where does water come from...the air. When it rains, go outside with a little cup and watch it fill with water.




> >
> >
> > Trees...come from the minerals in the ground,
> >
> >
> > and 'breath of life' is where the tree receives life...from the air.
> >
> >
> > In other words, the process God used to form man is the same process He used to form trees.
> 
> Only a stupid person can get taken in by ancient fools.


You mean like Issac Newton, Aristotle,Charles Darwin, Einstein, Carl Sagan?? How many years is...ancient? That which doesn't exist any longer??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603569

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Peter Trei wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > > >
> > > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > > >
> > > > pt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Speaking of ashes...
> > >
> > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > >
> > >
> > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> > >
> > >
> > > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> > >
> > > but just as it reads:
> > >
> > >
> > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> >
> > Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> > Your mad lord is so stupid....
> 
> You have to try to 'come from understanding'...
> 
> God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.
> 
> And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..
> 
> I'm here to help.
> 
> > >
> > >
> > > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> > >
> > > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> > >
> > >
> > >  "dust of the ground,"
> > >
> > >
> > > Just so you know.
> > >
> > >
> > > So, from ashes...to dust.
> > >
> > >
> > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > >
> > >
> > > Or from, dust to ashes.
> > >
> > >
> > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> >
> > But there is no mention of water....sucker.
> 
> You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.
> 
> Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.
> 
> 'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.
> 
> air/breath
> 
> "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> 
> "breathed into" means added water to the dust.
> 
> air/breathe
> 
> Where does water come from...the air. 

and Carbon...from the air.

air/breathe into...




"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."


 from, dust to ashes..


dust - minerals from the ground

ashes - minerals from the ground

And the Lord God formed man

of the dust of the ground,


and breathed into... water and carbon


and breathed into.. meaning exhale carbon into the minerals


Okay, lets start working on the chick now...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603571

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Peter Trei wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > > > >
> > > > > pt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of ashes...
> > > >
> > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> > > >
> > > > but just as it reads:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > >
> > > Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> > > Your mad lord is so stupid....
> >
> > You have to try to 'come from understanding'...
> >
> > God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.
> >
> > And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..
> >
> > I'm here to help.
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> > > >
> > > > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  "dust of the ground,"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just so you know.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So, from ashes...to dust.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Or from, dust to ashes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> > >
> > > But there is no mention of water....sucker.
> >
> > You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.
> >
> > Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.
> >
> > 'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.
> >
> > air/breath
> >
> > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> >
> > "breathed into" means added water to the dust.
> >
> > air/breathe
> >
> > Where does water come from...the air.
> 
> and Carbon...from the air.
> 
> air/breathe into...
> 
> "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> 
>  from, dust to ashes..
> 
> dust - minerals from the ground
> 
> ashes - minerals from the ground
> 
> And the Lord God formed man
> 
> of the dust of the ground,
> 
> and breathed into... water and carbon
> 
> and breathed into.. meaning exhale carbon into the minerals
> 
> Okay, lets start working on the chick now...


When God created a woman, did He used the Left side or the Right side of Adam?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603718

hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 1:39:20 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Peter Trei wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > > > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > > > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > > > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > > > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > > > > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > > > > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of ashes...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but just as it reads:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > >
> > > > > Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> > > > > Your mad lord is so stupid....
> > > >
> > > > You have to try to 'come from understanding'...
> > > >
> > > > God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.
> > > >
> > > > And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..
> > > >
> > > > I'm here to help.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  "dust of the ground,"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just so you know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, from ashes...to dust.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or from, dust to ashes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> > > > >
> > > > > But there is no mention of water....sucker.
> > > >
> > > > You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.
> > > >
> > > > Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.
> > > >
> > > > 'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.
> > > >
> > > > air/breath
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> > > >
> > > > "breathed into" means added water to the dust.
> > > >
> > > > air/breathe
> > > >
> > > > Where does water come from...the air.
> > >
> > > and Carbon...from the air.
> > >
> > > air/breathe into...
> > >
> > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> > >
> > >  from, dust to ashes..
> > >
> > > dust - minerals from the ground
> > >
> > > ashes - minerals from the ground
> > >
> > > And the Lord God formed man
> > >
> > > of the dust of the ground,
> > >
> > > and breathed into... water and carbon
> > >
> > > and breathed into.. meaning exhale carbon into the minerals
> > >
> > > Okay, lets start working on the chick now...
> >
> >
> > When God created a woman, did He used the Left side or the Right side of Adam?
> 
> What is the reason those goat herders used ribs to make woman when man was made from dust?????


Are you kidding?? Does a girl's breast feel like sandbags to you???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603719

hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 1:39:20 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Peter Trei wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > > > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > > > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > > > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > > > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > > > > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > > > > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of ashes...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but just as it reads:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > >
> > > > > Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> > > > > Your mad lord is so stupid....
> > > >
> > > > You have to try to 'come from understanding'...
> > > >
> > > > God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.
> > > >
> > > > And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..
> > > >
> > > > I'm here to help.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  "dust of the ground,"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just so you know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, from ashes...to dust.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or from, dust to ashes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> > > > >
> > > > > But there is no mention of water....sucker.
> > > >
> > > > You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.
> > > >
> > > > Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.
> > > >
> > > > 'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.
> > > >
> > > > air/breath
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> > > >
> > > > "breathed into" means added water to the dust.
> > > >
> > > > air/breathe
> > > >
> > > > Where does water come from...the air.
> > >
> > > and Carbon...from the air.
> > >
> > > air/breathe into...
> > >
> > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> > >
> > >  from, dust to ashes..
> > >
> > > dust - minerals from the ground
> > >
> > > ashes - minerals from the ground
> > >
> > > And the Lord God formed man
> > >
> > > of the dust of the ground,
> > >
> > > and breathed into... water and carbon
> > >
> > > and breathed into.. meaning exhale carbon into the minerals
> > >
> > > Okay, lets start working on the chick now...
> >
> >
> > When God created a woman, did He used the Left side or the Right side of Adam?
> 
> What is the reason those goat herders used ribs to make woman when man was made from dust?????



I didn't mention anything about ...ribs. Where did you get the ribs idea
from??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#604972

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 10:20:05 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > hhyapster@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08:59 PM UTC+8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Peter Trei wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 3:40:44 PM UTC-4, Robert Carnegie wrote:
> > > > > > On Monday, 31 October 2016 03:25:42 UTC, Cryptoengineer  wrote:
> > > > > > > djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote in
> > > > > > > news:oFvy7B.1oMv@kithrup.com:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article <691860fe-d44f-44de-9ba7-152c3a917ece@googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > >  <tsbrueni@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 10:28:40 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3880174/Could-DEAD-astro
> > > > > > > >>naut-seed-life-universe-Researchers-say-dumping-bodies-space-trigger-ne
> > > > > > > >>w-forms-life.html
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> if you view the earth like a rare virus...give mars a cold.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>Which means that burying people in space will have to be outlawed!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't think any *bodies* have been dumped in space yet.  Ashes,
> > > > > > > > yes, but I don't think anything living survives in them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Its well known that the Mars landers still carry some Earth
> > > > > > > microorganisms. There's a level of contamination below which
> > > > > > > NASA really, really tries to get the vehicles, but its not
> > > > > > > zero, and they acknowledge that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Apollo missions left urine bags, used "personal hygiene
> > > > > > > packs", and empty food packs on the moon, along with a
> > > > > > > falcon feather. But I doubt if there is an ecology on the
> > > > > > > Moon to contaminate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As soon as we land humans on Mars, the idea of maintaining
> > > > > > > the planet as pristine goes out the window.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ObSF: Arthur C Clarke: 'Before Eden'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah: I understand that the remaining Mars rover
> > > > > > is being steered /away/ from signs of water and
> > > > > > hypothetically possible life, in case of... that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Although I think human ashes sent into space -
> > > > > > and all the astronauts who didn't make it there
> > > > > > or make it back - weren't at orbital velocity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not in every case. The New Horizons probe carries
> > > > > some of Clyde Tombaugh's ashes as it leaves the
> > > > > Solar System. He's going to Heaven the hard way.
> > > > >
> > > > > pt
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of ashes...
> > > >
> > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'll explain the process...ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Man comes not from stupid fishes from the sea..
> > > >
> > > > but just as it reads:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > >
> > > Idiot...dust normally does not contain carbon; dust also does not contain water.
> > > Your mad lord is so stupid....
> > 
> > You have to try to 'come from understanding'...
> > 
> > God uses laymen language to communicate with earthlings at that time period.
> > 
> > And the 'scientific community' haven't firgure out How To translate the Bible Genesis into 'scientific terms'..
> > 
> > I'm here to help.
> > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When you cremate a person, the ashes that are left are actually..
> > > >
> > > > it's composition...is the minerals from the earth, or to put it simply..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  "dust of the ground,"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just so you know.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So, from ashes...to dust.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ashes to ashes, dust to dust..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Or from, dust to ashes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, ..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Meaning, God took the minerals from the ground and formed Man.
> > >
> > > But there is no mention of water....sucker.
> > 
> > You need to first translate Genesis into 'scientific terms' to see the water.
> > 
> > Water comes from the sky. It comes from the ...air.
> > 
> > 'breath of life'...translate to simply 'air'. The water comes from ...air.
> > 
> > air/breath
> > 
> > "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> > 
> > "breathed into" means added water to the dust.
> > 
> > air/breathe
> > 
> > Where does water come from...the air. 
> 
> and Carbon...from the air.
> 
> air/breathe into...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into..."
> 
> 
>  from, dust to ashes..
> 
> 
> dust - minerals from the ground
> 
> ashes - minerals from the ground
> 
> And the Lord God formed man
> 
> of the dust of the ground,
> 
> 
> and breathed into... water and carbon
> 
> 
> and breathed into.. meaning exhale carbon into the minerals
> 
> 
> Okay, lets start working on the chick now...

When we land on a planet(rock) LYs away with a probe if it has any form of life  are microbes will kill all. That is a given  Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#604988

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Infects the 
universe with his  Face shitting, Graveyard Vandalism & Glazierola

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#604989

reber g=emc^2 wrote:

> 
> When we land on a planet(rock) LYs away with a probe if it has any form of life  are microbes will kill all. That is a given  Trebert



What are your thoughts on Hanson, Mr. Trebert?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605037

On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 1:20:39 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> 
> > 
> > When we land on a planet(rock) LYs away with a probe if it has any form of life  are microbes will kill all. That is a given  Trebert
> 
> 
> 
> What are your thoughts on Hanson, Mr. Trebert?
>
It looks like he is simply
f.art.ingatu 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605050

Assbrain 
"It looks like he is simply 
f.art.ingatu "
Walk away- the farts stay with him!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605052

On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 5:42:04 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> Assbrain 
> "It looks like he is simply 
> f.art.ingatu "
> Walk away- the farts stay with him!!

It now looks like that he is also 
f.art.ingatu 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web