Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #601305 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 43 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 11:02 -0700
two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:56 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 18:19 +0200
meters per period noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:52 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 11:55 -0700
Re: two trillion meters per wave noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 15:00 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-17 21:25 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-18 09:10 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 10:42 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-19 15:07 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 12:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-21 08:30 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:01 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:00 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-21 14:23 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:26 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:24 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 14:27 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 14:47 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-21 11:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 17:02 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 11:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-23 12:22 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 12:33 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 17:24 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-22 09:03 -0400
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 16:58 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 13:36 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 13:19 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 14:35 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-10-19 16:52 -0600
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 16:15 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-19 17:30 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Robert Bannister <robban@clubtelco.com> - 2016-10-20 10:02 +0800
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 19:18 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-19 19:58 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:32 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 10:47 -0700
Re: Two Trillion Galaxies, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e64ac54-c1ff-4230-a4dd-220c65283e25@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601305 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 11:01:47 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/science/two-trillion-galaxies-at-the-very-least.html?_r=0 > > > > > How long do you think it will take for 'these people' to change the age > of the universe to a trillion years???? > > > > first 'they' have to learn how to say the word...trillion. > > > they might have to look it up on the internet first... > > > of course the rest of yous are just going to ...wait. We Have finally seen Treb's universe TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b068bf38-ee60-4f07-a2b1-1fd937a41c47@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601491 |
The Universe is unlimited in size. Our galaxy has a policing force of advanced individuals that use things like TRUTH and LOVE and FORGIVENESS, which is the only way you can run things. You can't torture a plant to grow.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-22 06:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e7092pFnfrsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #601305 |
Am 17.10.2016 20:02, schrieb The Starmaker:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/science/two-trillion-galaxies-at-the-very-least.html?_r=0
>
>
>
>
> How long do you think it will take for 'these people' to change the age
> of the universe to a trillion years????
>
>
I personally think, that General Relativity is in fact true, but GR with
complex numbers instead of tensors.
Such a GR describes a cosmological concept, where time behaves like a
real axis, which has a spacelike, imaginary inverse.
What we call 'space' or 'universe' is then the image, we receive from
the past along our own past light cone. This cone is defined by equality
of real and imaginary units, or as 45° from our own axis of time.
If now the axis of time curves, the universe also changes. The former
one shrinks and a new picture ('universe') pops out of nowhere - in a
'big bang'.
We could eventually count galaxies in it. But this is similar to
counting clouds and afterwards saying, this number is the number of
clouds forever.
So galaxies belong to the past and the further away the more remote in
the past. This past could stretch pretty far, if our telescopes get
better. And so we can count galaxies like clouds in the sky and come to
no end.
TH
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web