Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #598993 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-30 15:42 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-05 13:25 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 192 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 15:42 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-30 19:50 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 21:16 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 21:22 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-30 22:47 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-10-01 13:48 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-10-01 15:27 +0100
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 09:53 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2016-10-01 21:53 +0100
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 16:06 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:31 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-02 00:18 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:31 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 09:57 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 08:11 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 18:03 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:47 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 16:10 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 21:15 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 16:21 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 22:12 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 17:28 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 22:51 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 21:26 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-08 05:32 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-08 13:59 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 10:20 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:11 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 10:27 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 18:26 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-03 22:12 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 18:16 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 22:28 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-02 02:18 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:47 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 23:17 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 19:44 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 23:50 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 10:29 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:15 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 10:47 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-06 14:40 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-03 22:24 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 20:43 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-02 23:17 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 23:48 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-03 11:57 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 10:37 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:17 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-03 22:30 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:17 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-02 20:48 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 21:10 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-03 05:14 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-03 14:45 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-04 00:12 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-04 12:32 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-04 18:41 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-10-04 14:59 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-04 19:44 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-04 16:04 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2016-10-04 21:45 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-04 22:12 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2016-10-04 16:13 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-05 00:06 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2016-10-04 19:39 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-05 05:06 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-04 23:07 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-05 05:24 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-05 21:28 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2016-10-05 19:55 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 04:29 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-06 08:01 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 18:29 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 04:19 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-10-06 18:02 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 18:30 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Gary R. Schmidt" <grschmidt@acm.org> - 2016-10-08 00:38 +1100
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 21:51 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2016-10-07 00:33 +0200
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 11:28 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-06 12:00 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 18:46 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 13:05 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 20:29 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 13:40 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 20:58 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 19:24 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 04:54 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 22:11 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-06 23:10 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 09:15 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-07 10:12 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 10:15 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 14:29 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2016-10-08 01:32 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 21:55 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 15:43 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 22:55 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 16:23 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-08 01:47 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 21:25 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-08 05:34 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-06 17:31 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 16:14 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-06 18:48 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 16:53 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 12:04 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 10:15 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 14:37 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 13:14 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 17:30 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 15:45 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 22:22 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 21:25 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-08 13:43 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-07 22:01 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-10-06 20:42 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-06 06:53 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-06 07:58 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-06 08:08 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 18:38 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2016-10-04 15:56 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-05 00:14 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> - 2016-10-04 19:39 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-05 05:25 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 11:00 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:20 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 22:07 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 13:45 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-06 21:13 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-06 21:22 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-07 04:59 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-07 12:17 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-04 00:26 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:35 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 21:12 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-02 22:32 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-03 05:15 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 17:23 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-08 12:20 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 05:30 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:35 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-01 18:17 +0300
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 18:12 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-02 01:17 +0300
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 19:08 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 00:11 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:50 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 23:26 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 20:47 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 00:09 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Juho Julkunen <giaotanj@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-02 22:06 +0300
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:54 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 23:40 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 08:29 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 20:46 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Cryptoengineer <treifamily@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 21:27 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:56 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-01 18:07 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 19:24 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-01 11:38 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-01 11:53 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-01 15:20 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-02 09:02 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 11:26 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-02 16:56 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says SteveGG <casagiannoni@optonline.net> - 2016-10-02 19:53 -0400
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 08:30 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 13:41 +0000
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says "Peter Bender" <pbender@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-04 07:00 +0200
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-04 10:25 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 10:34 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:29 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 17:37 +0200
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-05 11:20 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-05 14:11 -0500
lift-off noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:08 -0700
Re: lift-off Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 08:32 -0500
Re: lift-off edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 11:07 -0700
Re: lift-off rbrteline@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 12:45 -0700
Re: lift-off Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-03 17:31 -0500
Re: lift-off edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 13:41 -0700
Re: lift-off Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-06 21:40 -0500
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 17:36 +0200
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:41 -0700
Re: 1st Mars Colonists Should Be 'Prepared to Die,' Elon Musk Says Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-05 13:25 -0500
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 15:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69A9FE9D2690taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599926 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on Earth".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not "on the land portions of Earth". And we haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even gotten to my first choice yet, which would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> satisfy the latter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to live there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear. There's
>>>>>>>>>>>> no large native mammals, if that helps you any.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface and an air pump for air and a boat to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the nearest store for beer and other sundries?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you in this context? How about a "Torricellian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vacuum"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> how close to the surface one needs to be to use one,
>>>>>>>>>>>> please. Sheesh.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6
>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under water on Earth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "there's no AIR there, dude"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet", up
>>>>>>>>>>>> there, to him? It's basic physics... which he seems
>>>>>>>>>>>> to not have ever encountered.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking pump
>>>>>>>>>>> and a pushing pump?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive greater
>>>>>>>>>>> than 18,000 psi.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero
>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it is
>>>>>>>>>>> underwater.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation - by
>>>>>>>>>> eveyrone - I don't even know where to start. There are
>>>>>>>>>> so many issues stemming from the pressure at extreme
>>>>>>>>>> depths under water that we don't spend much time there.
>>>>>>>>>> Those who do go down deep spend years in specialized
>>>>>>>>>> training, and boatloads of money in specialized
>>>>>>>>>> equipment. For a reason.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond a
>>>>>>>>> couple of hundred feet, but that is not the subject of
>>>>>>>>> the original discussion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme
>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to extreme
>>>>>>>> depths for short periods.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a
>>>>>> reason it isn't done already.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many of
>>>>> the same reasons few people, except for refugees, move to
>>>>> North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming?
>>>>
>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like to
>>>> believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of - various
>>>> endeavours in the area.
>>>
>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most
>>> people.
>>
>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and
>> significant effort has to be put into not dying.
>>>
>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at things
>>> like the schools, shopping, recreation, local taxes, the crime
>>> rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually on the list.
>>>
>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers.
>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new, different,
>> exotic, *exciting* way of life.
>
> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't that
> popular.
That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living
underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever.
>
> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life would
> be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be like Star
> Trek?
>
I expect more of them understand the risks than you understand
living underwater. Or the difference between your ass and a hole in
the ground.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 22:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mollcd-7rh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #599938 |
In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in > news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > >> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on Earth". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not "on the land portions of Earth". And we haven't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even gotten to my first choice yet, which would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> satisfy the latter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to live there? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear. There's >>>>>>>>>>>>> no large native mammals, if that helps you any. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface and an air pump for air and a boat to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the nearest store for beer and other sundries? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you in this context? How about a "Torricellian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vacuum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> how close to the surface one needs to be to use one, >>>>>>>>>>>>> please. Sheesh. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6 >>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under water on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "there's no AIR there, dude"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet", up >>>>>>>>>>>>> there, to him? It's basic physics... which he seems >>>>>>>>>>>>> to not have ever encountered. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking pump >>>>>>>>>>>> and a pushing pump? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive greater >>>>>>>>>>>> than 18,000 psi. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero >>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it is >>>>>>>>>>>> underwater. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation - by >>>>>>>>>>> eveyrone - I don't even know where to start. There are >>>>>>>>>>> so many issues stemming from the pressure at extreme >>>>>>>>>>> depths under water that we don't spend much time there. >>>>>>>>>>> Those who do go down deep spend years in specialized >>>>>>>>>>> training, and boatloads of money in specialized >>>>>>>>>>> equipment. For a reason. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond a >>>>>>>>>> couple of hundred feet, but that is not the subject of >>>>>>>>>> the original discussion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme >>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to extreme >>>>>>>>> depths for short periods. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a >>>>>>> reason it isn't done already. >>>>>> >>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many of >>>>>> the same reasons few people, except for refugees, move to >>>>>> North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming? >>>>> >>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like to >>>>> believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of - various >>>>> endeavours in the area. >>>> >>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most >>>> people. >>> >>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and >>> significant effort has to be put into not dying. >>>> >>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at things >>>> like the schools, shopping, recreation, local taxes, the crime >>>> rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually on the list. >>>> >>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers. >>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new, different, >>> exotic, *exciting* way of life. >> >> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't that >> popular. > > That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living > underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever. As the idea is silly from the start, what else would you expect? >> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life would >> be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be like Star >> Trek? >> > I expect more of them understand the risks than you understand > living underwater. Or the difference between your ass and a hole in > the ground. I understand that everything needed to live underwater can be had off the shelf, that doing so would be very expensive, and that it would be a giant pain in the ass to get groceries. What else would one need to know? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 16:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69AA6AF25949taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599943 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
news:mollcd-7rh.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>> news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on Earth".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not "on the land portions of Earth". And we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't even gotten to my first choice yet, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would satisfy the latter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to live there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear. There's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no large native mammals, if that helps you any.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface and an air pump for air and a boat to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the nearest store for beer and other sundries?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything to you in this context? How about a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Torricellian vacuum"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how close to the surface one needs to be to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one, please. Sheesh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being under water on Earth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "there's no AIR there, dude"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet", up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, to him? It's basic physics... which he seems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not have ever encountered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking pump
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a pushing pump?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive greater
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than 18,000 psi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero
>>>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> underwater.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation -
>>>>>>>>>>>> by eveyrone - I don't even know where to start. There
>>>>>>>>>>>> are so many issues stemming from the pressure at
>>>>>>>>>>>> extreme depths under water that we don't spend much
>>>>>>>>>>>> time there. Those who do go down deep spend years in
>>>>>>>>>>>> specialized training, and boatloads of money in
>>>>>>>>>>>> specialized equipment. For a reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond a
>>>>>>>>>>> couple of hundred feet, but that is not the subject of
>>>>>>>>>>> the original discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme
>>>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to extreme
>>>>>>>>>> depths for short periods.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a
>>>>>>>> reason it isn't done already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many of
>>>>>>> the same reasons few people, except for refugees, move to
>>>>>>> North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like to
>>>>>> believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of -
>>>>>> various endeavours in the area.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most
>>>>> people.
>>>>
>>>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and
>>>> significant effort has to be put into not dying.
>>>>>
>>>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at things
>>>>> like the schools, shopping, recreation, local taxes, the
>>>>> crime rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually on the list.
>>>>>
>>>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers.
>>>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new, different,
>>>> exotic, *exciting* way of life.
>>>
>>> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't that
>>> popular.
>>
>> That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living
>> underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever.
>
> As the idea is silly from the start, what else would you expect?
You are, indeed, silly.
>
>>> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life would
>>> be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be like
>>> Star Trek?
>>>
>> I expect more of them understand the risks than you understand
>> living underwater. Or the difference between your ass and a
>> hole in the ground.
>
> I understand that everything needed to live underwater can be
> had off the shelf, that doing so would be very expensive, and
> that it would be a giant pain in the ass to get groceries.
>
> What else would one need to know?
>
That you're full of shit. But everybody other than you knows that
already.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 01:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <opvlcd-eri.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #599949 |
In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in > news:mollcd-7rh.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > >> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>> news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on Earth". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not "on the land portions of Earth". And we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> haven't even gotten to my first choice yet, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would satisfy the latter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to live there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear. There's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no large native mammals, if that helps you any. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface and an air pump for air and a boat to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the nearest store for beer and other sundries? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything to you in this context? How about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Torricellian vacuum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how close to the surface one needs to be to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one, please. Sheesh. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being under water on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "there's no AIR there, dude"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet", up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, to him? It's basic physics... which he seems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not have ever encountered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking pump >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a pushing pump? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive greater >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than 18,000 psi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> underwater. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation - >>>>>>>>>>>>> by eveyrone - I don't even know where to start. There >>>>>>>>>>>>> are so many issues stemming from the pressure at >>>>>>>>>>>>> extreme depths under water that we don't spend much >>>>>>>>>>>>> time there. Those who do go down deep spend years in >>>>>>>>>>>>> specialized training, and boatloads of money in >>>>>>>>>>>>> specialized equipment. For a reason. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond a >>>>>>>>>>>> couple of hundred feet, but that is not the subject of >>>>>>>>>>>> the original discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme >>>>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to extreme >>>>>>>>>>> depths for short periods. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a >>>>>>>>> reason it isn't done already. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many of >>>>>>>> the same reasons few people, except for refugees, move to >>>>>>>> North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like to >>>>>>> believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of - >>>>>>> various endeavours in the area. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most >>>>>> people. >>>>> >>>>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and >>>>> significant effort has to be put into not dying. >>>>>> >>>>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at things >>>>>> like the schools, shopping, recreation, local taxes, the >>>>>> crime rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually on the list. >>>>>> >>>>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers. >>>>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new, different, >>>>> exotic, *exciting* way of life. >>>> >>>> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't that >>>> popular. >>> >>> That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living >>> underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever. >> >> As the idea is silly from the start, what else would you expect? > > You are, indeed, silly. >> >>>> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life would >>>> be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be like >>>> Star Trek? >>>> >>> I expect more of them understand the risks than you understand >>> living underwater. Or the difference between your ass and a >>> hole in the ground. >> >> I understand that everything needed to live underwater can be >> had off the shelf, that doing so would be very expensive, and >> that it would be a giant pain in the ass to get groceries. >> >> What else would one need to know? >> > That you're full of shit. But everybody other than you knows that > already. Yet more arm waving and insults. What did I just say that is untrue? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 21:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69AD9E59AA60taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599957 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
news:opvlcd-eri.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>> news:mollcd-7rh.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>> news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Earth". Not "on the land portions of Earth".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And we haven't even gotten to my first choice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, which would satisfy the latter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to live there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no large native mammals, if that helps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you any.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surface and an air pump for air and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boat to the nearest store for beer and other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sundries?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything to you in this context? How about a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Torricellian vacuum"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how close to the surface one needs to be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use one, please. Sheesh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being under water on Earth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than "there's no AIR there, dude"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up there, to him? It's basic physics... which he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to not have ever encountered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pump and a pushing pump?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater than 18,000 psi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is underwater.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - by eveyrone - I don't even know where to start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are so many issues stemming from the pressure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at extreme depths under water that we don't spend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much time there. Those who do go down deep spend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years in specialized training, and boatloads of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money in specialized equipment. For a reason.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a couple of hundred feet, but that is not the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject of the original discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme
>>>>>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to
>>>>>>>>>>>> extreme depths for short periods.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a
>>>>>>>>>> reason it isn't done already.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many
>>>>>>>>> of the same reasons few people, except for refugees,
>>>>>>>>> move to North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like
>>>>>>>> to believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of -
>>>>>>>> various endeavours in the area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most
>>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and
>>>>>> significant effort has to be put into not dying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at
>>>>>>> things like the schools, shopping, recreation, local
>>>>>>> taxes, the crime rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually
>>>>>>> on the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers.
>>>>>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new,
>>>>>> different, exotic, *exciting* way of life.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't
>>>>> that popular.
>>>>
>>>> That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living
>>>> underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever.
>>>
>>> As the idea is silly from the start, what else would you
>>> expect?
>>
>> You are, indeed, silly.
>>>
>>>>> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life
>>>>> would be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be
>>>>> like Star Trek?
>>>>>
>>>> I expect more of them understand the risks than you
>>>> understand living underwater. Or the difference between your
>>>> ass and a hole in the ground.
>>>
>>> I understand that everything needed to live underwater can be
>>> had off the shelf, that doing so would be very expensive, and
>>> that it would be a giant pain in the ass to get groceries.
>>>
>>> What else would one need to know?
>>>
>> That you're full of shit. But everybody other than you knows
>> that already.
>
> Yet more arm waving and insults.
I know you are, but what am I?
>
> What did I just say that is untrue?
>
Who cares?
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 05:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a3dmcd-g3k.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #599965 |
In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in > news:opvlcd-eri.ln1@mail.specsol.com: > >> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>> news:mollcd-7rh.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>> news:u7ilcd-beh.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>> news:vdmjcd-gab.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>> news:ehqicd-5f8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> news:dqoicd-8b8.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:soiicd-0i7.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:a00hcd-432.ln1@mail.specsol.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics David DeLaney >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-10-05, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh sure, move the goalposts. You said "on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Earth". Not "on the land portions of Earth". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And we haven't even gotten to my first choice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, which would satisfy the latter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that would be where and how many people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to live there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd be just as ignorant about it, I fear. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no large native mammals, if that helps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you any. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Information free arm waving. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is difficult about running a pipe to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the surface and an air pump for air and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boat to the nearest store for beer and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sundries? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, does the distance "32 feet" mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything to you in this context? How about a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Torricellian vacuum"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not in the context of an underwater structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does the term "submarine snorkel" mean anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... Go look up how long submarine snorkels ARE, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how close to the surface one needs to be to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use one, please. Sheesh. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, because submarines MOVE and much over 5 or 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knots folds the tube. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A fixed habitat does not have that issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have yet to define any real challenge to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being under water on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to clue him in on the ones OTHER >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than "there's no AIR there, dude"? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain how an air pump on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface works? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain WHY I invoked "32 feet", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up there, to him? It's basic physics... which he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to not have ever encountered. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone want to explain the difference a sucking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pump and a pushing pump? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Off the shelf compressors can easily achive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greater than 18,000 psi. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is 18,000 psi in feet of water? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The pressure inside a closed container has zero >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correlation with the depth of the container if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is underwater. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bathyspheres go down to 3,000 feet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is so much cluelessness in this conversation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - by eveyrone - I don't even know where to start. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are so many issues stemming from the pressure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at extreme depths under water that we don't spend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much time there. Those who do go down deep spend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years in specialized training, and boatloads of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money in specialized equipment. For a reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, when one is doing research at depths far beyond >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a couple of hundred feet, but that is not the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject of the original discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The original discussion seems to be living at extreme >>>>>>>>>>>>> depths. This is more challenging than going to >>>>>>>>>>>>> extreme depths for short periods. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, just living underwater. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Fewer obstacles, if one is shallow, but there's still a >>>>>>>>>>> reason it isn't done already. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Like maybe very few people would want to do it for many >>>>>>>>>> of the same reasons few people, except for refugees, >>>>>>>>>> move to North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or maybe it's more difficult than some people would like >>>>>>>>> to believe. It's not like there hasn't been - a lot of - >>>>>>>>> various endeavours in the area. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or maybe it is expensive and not very attractive to most >>>>>>>> people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's very expensive because it's very dangerous, and >>>>>>> significant effort has to be put into not dying. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When most people look at places to live, they look at >>>>>>>> things like the schools, shopping, recreation, local >>>>>>>> taxes, the crime rate; heavy duty airlocks aren't usually >>>>>>>> on the list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> The one-way trip to Mars project drew 200,000 volunteers. >>>>>>> There's no lack of people willing to try any new, >>>>>>> different, exotic, *exciting* way of life. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is 0.0027% of the population, so it obviously isn't >>>>>> that popular. >>>>> >>>>> That's 200,000 people. There aren't 200,000 people living >>>>> underwater, nor is anyone proposing there will be, ever. >>>> >>>> As the idea is silly from the start, what else would you >>>> expect? >>> >>> You are, indeed, silly. >>>> >>>>>> Of those 200,000, how many actually understand what life >>>>>> would be like, what the dangers are and that it would NOT be >>>>>> like Star Trek? >>>>>> >>>>> I expect more of them understand the risks than you >>>>> understand living underwater. Or the difference between your >>>>> ass and a hole in the ground. >>>> >>>> I understand that everything needed to live underwater can be >>>> had off the shelf, that doing so would be very expensive, and >>>> that it would be a giant pain in the ass to get groceries. >>>> >>>> What else would one need to know? >>>> >>> That you're full of shit. But everybody other than you knows >>> that already. >> >> Yet more arm waving and insults. > > I know you are, but what am I? >> >> What did I just say that is untrue? >> > Who cares? Apparently you. So exactly what did I just say that is untrue? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 17:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #599723 |
On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: > If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality show with D > list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. SUB, SCIRBE!!1! Dave, yes, we have no Marianas - we have no Marianas to-day! -- \/David DeLaney posting thru EarthLink - "It's not the pot that grows the flower It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK> website on VIC is down, probably for good - oh well/ I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 16:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA699A54CAB92Ataustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599770 |
David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com:
> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality show
>> with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of the
>> Marianas Trench.
>
> SUB,
> SCIRBE!!1!
I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's being
made today. Reality television is always better with sea monsters.
>
> Dave, yes, we have no Marianas - we have no Marianas to-day!
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 18:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nt6nso$1hhj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599776 |
On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in > news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com: > >> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality show >>> with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of the >>> Marianas Trench. >> >> SUB, >> SCIRBE!!1! > > I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's being > made today. Reality television is always better with sea monsters. Trump, for sure
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-06 16:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA699ABCA18C27taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599783 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt6nso$1hhj$1
@gioia.aioe.org:
> On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in
>> news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>>
>>> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality show
>>>> with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of the
>>>> Marianas Trench.
>>>
>>> SUB,
>>> SCIRBE!!1!
>>
>> I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's being
>> made today. Reality television is always better with sea monsters.
>
> Trump, for sure
>
I think I'll need a little more context than that. Trump is more
interesting than 99% of the television being made today? Trump is a
sea monster? Reality television is better with Trump? Trump a laser
on his frickn' head? Sea monsters are trump cards in reality
television? Seriously, dude, context.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 12:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nt8kij$rj9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599784 |
On 10/6/2016 6:53 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt6nso$1hhj$1 > @gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in >>> news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality show >>>>> with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of the >>>>> Marianas Trench. >>>> >>>> SUB, >>>> SCIRBE!!1! >>> >>> I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's being >>> made today. Reality television is always better with sea monsters. >> >> Trump, for sure >> > I think I'll need a little more context than that. Trump is more > interesting than 99% of the television being made today? Trump is a > sea monster? Reality television is better with Trump? Trump a laser > on his frickn' head? Sea monsters are trump cards in reality > television? Seriously, dude, context. > I thought lack of context is OK with Trump, the guy is unhinged, lacks context himself. Reality TV, monster, sort of apply, (like Trump, sort of applies) but not interesting => insulting, the kind of boss you would like to kick in the nuts. Hillary too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69A6855796F5taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599872 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
news:nt8kij$rj9$1@gioia.aioe.org:
> On 10/6/2016 6:53 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt6nso$1hhj$1
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>> David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in
>>>> news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality
>>>>>> show with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of
>>>>>> the Marianas Trench.
>>>>>
>>>>> SUB,
>>>>> SCIRBE!!1!
>>>>
>>>> I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's
>>>> being made today. Reality television is always better with
>>>> sea monsters.
>>>
>>> Trump, for sure
>>>
>> I think I'll need a little more context than that. Trump is
>> more interesting than 99% of the television being made today?
>> Trump is a sea monster? Reality television is better with
>> Trump? Trump a laser on his frickn' head? Sea monsters are
>> trump cards in reality television? Seriously, dude, context.
>>
>
> I thought lack of context is OK with Trump, the guy is unhinged,
> lacks context himself. Reality TV, monster, sort of apply,
> (like Trump, sort of applies) but not interesting =>
> insulting, the kind of boss you would like to kick in the nuts.
> Hillary too.
>
Sill not enough context, but I would agree that the differences
between the two are on the same order of importance as the
difference between red and green cyanide laced Kool-Aid. Sure, the
food coloring gives it a little different taste, but it'll still
kill you.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 14:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nt8thd$1dh8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599876 |
On 10/7/2016 12:15 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in > news:nt8kij$rj9$1@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 10/6/2016 6:53 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt6nso$1hhj$1 >>> @gioia.aioe.org: >>> >>>> On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>>>> David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in >>>>> news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy >>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality >>>>>>> show with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom of >>>>>>> the Marianas Trench. >>>>>> >>>>>> SUB, >>>>>> SCIRBE!!1! >>>>> >>>>> I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's >>>>> being made today. Reality television is always better with >>>>> sea monsters. >>>> Trump, for sure >>>> >>> I think I'll need a little more context than that. Trump is >>> more interesting than 99% of the television being made today? >>> Trump is a sea monster? Reality television is better with >>> Trump? Trump a laser on his frickn' head? Sea monsters are >>> trump cards in reality television? Seriously, dude, context. >> >> I thought lack of context is OK with Trump, the guy is unhinged, >> lacks context himself. Reality TV, monster, sort of apply, >> (like Trump, sort of applies) but not interesting => >> insulting, the kind of boss you would like to kick in the nuts. >> Hillary too. > Sill not enough context, but I would agree that the differences > between the two are on the same order of importance as the > difference between red and green cyanide laced Kool-Aid. Sure, the > food coloring gives it a little different taste, but it'll still > kill you. > I gave you enough context, you just cant connect the words together, you think just like Hillary, "stop start stop start stuck pause", in jags, and jogs she has short noodles in her skull. try a coin, heads or tails, Clinton on one side Donald on the other, either way you lose. No context needed for either. Donald is scrambled mess, Hillary is scrambled mess with holes in brain, them two only good for Soylent Green, thats all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 13:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69A86BB517E0taustingmail@69.16.179.43> |
| In reply to | #599896 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
news:nt8thd$1dh8$1@gioia.aioe.org:
> On 10/7/2016 12:15 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
>> news:nt8kij$rj9$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> On 10/6/2016 6:53 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt6nso$1hhj$1
>>>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/6/2016 6:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>>>> David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:9f6dneVMnt44TWvKnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2016-10-06, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
>>>>>>> <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> If it were easy, Discovery Channel would have a reality
>>>>>>>> show with D list actors in a dance contest at the bottom
>>>>>>>> of the Marianas Trench.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SUB,
>>>>>>> SCIRBE!!1!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll admit it would be more intereseting than 99% of what's
>>>>>> being made today. Reality television is always better with
>>>>>> sea monsters.
>
>>>>> Trump, for sure
>>>>>
>>>> I think I'll need a little more context than that. Trump is
>>>> more interesting than 99% of the television being made today?
>>>> Trump is a sea monster? Reality television is better with
>>>> Trump? Trump a laser on his frickn' head? Sea monsters are
>>>> trump cards in reality television? Seriously, dude, context.
>
>>>
>>> I thought lack of context is OK with Trump, the guy is
>>> unhinged, lacks context himself. Reality TV, monster, sort of
>>> apply, (like Trump, sort of applies) but not interesting =>
>>> insulting, the kind of boss you would like to kick in the
>>> nuts. Hillary too.
>
>> Sill not enough context, but I would agree that the differences
>> between the two are on the same order of importance as the
>> difference between red and green cyanide laced Kool-Aid. Sure,
>> the food coloring gives it a little different taste, but it'll
>> still kill you.
>>
>
> I gave you enough context,
No, you really didn't.
> you just cant connect the words together,
> you think just like Hillary,
> "stop start stop start stuck pause", in jags, and jogs
> she has short noodles in her skull.
> try a coin, heads or tails,
> Clinton on one side Donald on the other,
> either way you lose.
>
> No context needed for either. Donald is scrambled mess, Hillary
> is scrambled mess with holes in brain, them two only good for
> Soylent Green, thats all.
>
You failed third grade English, didn't you? In addition to lack of
conext, your writing is nearly incomprehensible.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 17:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599907 |
On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in >> I gave you enough context, > > No, you really didn't. > >> you just cant connect the words together, >> you think just like Hillary, >> "stop start stop start stuck pause", in jags, and jogs >> she has short noodles in her skull. >> try a coin, heads or tails, >> Clinton on one side Donald on the other, >> either way you lose. >> >> No context needed for either. Donald is scrambled mess, Hillary >> is scrambled mess with holes in brain, them two only good for >> Soylent Green, thats all. >> > You failed third grade English, didn't you? In addition to lack of > conext, your writing is nearly incomprehensible. > you Engrlish Teacher, pupa ? one with sufficient intelligence can assemble meaning from few well chosen words. we tells you no gottum sufficient intelligence, you spoon-feeder, you have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you remain clueless sluggie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69AA0437EAFAtaustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599936 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
news:nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org:
> On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
>
>>> I gave you enough context,
>>
>> No, you really didn't.
>>
>>> you just cant connect the words together,
>>> you think just like Hillary,
>>> "stop start stop start stuck pause", in jags, and jogs
>>> she has short noodles in her skull.
>>> try a coin, heads or tails,
>>> Clinton on one side Donald on the other,
>>> either way you lose.
>>>
>>> No context needed for either. Donald is scrambled mess,
>>> Hillary is scrambled mess with holes in brain, them two only
>>> good for Soylent Green, thats all.
>>>
>> You failed third grade English, didn't you? In addition to lack
>> of conext, your writing is nearly incomprehensible.
>>
>
> you Engrlish Teacher, pupa ? one with sufficient intelligence
> can assemble meaning from few well chosen words. we tells you
> no gottum sufficient intelligence, you spoon-feeder, you
> have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you
> remain clueless sluggie.
QED. Incoherent. If you can't be bothered to use common English to
communicate effectively, I can't be bothered to give a flying fuck
at a rolling donut what you're babbling about.
Plus, it's pretty clear *you* have no idea what you're babbling
about, either.
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 22:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nt9oqt$l9o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599939 |
On 10/7/2016 5:45 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in > news:nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in >> have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you >> remain clueless sluggie. > > QED. Incoherent. If you can't be bothered to use common English to > communicate effectively, I can't be bothered to give a flying fuck > at a rolling donut what you're babbling about. > you way off topic, which is what you do when you have nothing to contribute, as usual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 21:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA69AD9FEBA084taustingmail@69.16.179.42> |
| In reply to | #599964 |
Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt9oqt$l9o$1
@gioia.aioe.org:
> On 10/7/2016 5:45 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
>> news:nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>>
>>> On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in
>
>>> have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you
>>> remain clueless sluggie.
>>
>> QED. Incoherent. If you can't be bothered to use common English to
>> communicate effectively, I can't be bothered to give a flying fuck
>> at a rolling donut what you're babbling about.
>>
>
> you way off topic, which is what you do when you have nothing to
> contribute, as usual.
>
I know you are, but what am I?
--
Terry Austin
Vacation photos from Iceland:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB
"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 13:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ntbeo5$15bj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #599966 |
On 10/7/2016 11:25 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in news:nt9oqt$l9o$1 > @gioia.aioe.org: > >> On 10/7/2016 5:45 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in >>> news:nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org: >>> >>>> On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>>>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in >> >>>> have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you >>>> remain clueless sluggie. >>> QED. Incoherent. If you can't be bothered to use common English to >>> communicate effectively, I can't be bothered to give a flying fuck >>> at a rolling donut what you're babbling about. >>> >> >> you way off topic, which is what you do when you have nothing to >> contribute, as usual. >> > I know you are, but what am I? > you'er "Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy", does that help things for you? try taking notes with pen and paper, when you read this newsgroup, that way you wont get so easily lost.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 22:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <57F87DB4.42D7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #599964 |
Serigo wrote: > > On 10/7/2016 5:45 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > > Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in > > news:nt97mg$9p$1@gioia.aioe.org: > > > >> On 10/7/2016 3:14 PM, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: > >>> Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in > > >> have-um must spell out the WHOLE enchilada and plate, or you > >> remain clueless sluggie. > > > > QED. Incoherent. If you can't be bothered to use common English to > > communicate effectively, I can't be bothered to give a flying fuck > > at a rolling donut what you're babbling about. > > > > you way off topic, which is what you do when you have nothing to > contribute, as usual. i gave his mother ten cents.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web