Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #598477 > unrolled thread

What's Your Sign?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 10:15 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-27 10:19 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-09-27 11:42 -0700
      Re: What's Your Sign? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-27 23:32 +0000
        Re: What's Your Sign? Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-27 20:16 -0500
          Re: What's Your Sign? djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2016-09-28 01:59 +0000
    Re: What's Your Sign? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 15:58 -0700
      Re: What's Your Sign? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-27 16:17 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-28 09:19 -0700
      spell ephemeris; thank you noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:37 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-30 15:43 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 13:30 -0700
      Re: What's Your Sign? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 13:38 -0700
        my sign is 3.1 rbrteline@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 13:04 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-05 23:36 +0000
      Re: What's Your Sign? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 19:58 -0700
    Re: What's Your Sign? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-10-07 14:36 -0700

#598477 — What's Your Sign?

What's your zodiac sign?


If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!


You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
your zodiac sign to them.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#598480

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> your zodiac sign to them.



Are you a Virgo? Wrong, you're a Leo.


You need to get a divorce, you're incompatible..


There are probably Virgo's that say they hate Leo's...



and if you insisit you're still a Virgo, you're a denier.


The N in NASA stands for NAZI.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598511

In article <57EAA934.5D1E@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> What's your zodiac sign?

I was born under the sign Emergency Entrance.

-- 
Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments
of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from
coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true
of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598572

In article <charlie-gordon1492-88C638.11425227092016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>,
je suis charly  <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>In article <57EAA934.5D1E@ix.netcom.com>,
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> What's your zodiac sign?
>
>I was born under the sign Emergency Entrance.

That was quick!  I was born under the sign of Maternity Ward.
(My mother was 34, or what the medical folk call an "elderly
primipara."  I took a while.)

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598593

On 9/27/2016 6:32 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
> In article <charlie-gordon1492-88C638.11425227092016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>,
> je suis charly  <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>> In article <57EAA934.5D1E@ix.netcom.com>,
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What's your zodiac sign?
>>
>> I was born under the sign Emergency Entrance.
>
> That was quick!  I was born under the sign of Maternity Ward.
> (My mother was 34, or what the medical folk call an "elderly
> primipara."  I took a while.)
>

Do you have a photo ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598601

In article <nsf5l2$1gqp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Serigo  <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 9/27/2016 6:32 PM, Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>> In article
><charlie-gordon1492-88C638.11425227092016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>,
>> je suis charly  <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote:
>>> In article <57EAA934.5D1E@ix.netcom.com>,
>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's your zodiac sign?
>>>
>>> I was born under the sign Emergency Entrance.
>>
>> That was quick!  I was born under the sign of Maternity Ward.
>> (My mother was 34, or what the medical folk call an "elderly
>> primipara."  I took a while.)
>>
>
>Do you have a photo ?

Not any more.  I used to have an album showing, among other
things, me as an admirably chubby and cheerful infant, and both
my parents with deep circles under their eyes because they'd just
gotten over the flu.

But they say that three moves equal one fire, and that album is
dead, Jim.

-- 
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598558

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 10:15:21 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> 
> You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> your zodiac sign to them.

All my sighs say  VOTE FOR GLAZIER.That is reality. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598566

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
 > All my sighs say  VOTE FOR GLAZIER.That is reality. Trebert
>
hanson wrote:
Pity, Glazier, but you have very, very good reason
 for your  "sighs" ... Everybody knows that you are  
<http://tinyurl.com/Glazier-the-Lying-Swine> which
became the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598659

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!


"Now Mimi's August 4 birthday would mean she was born "under the sign" of Cancer (one constellation "earlier"), not Leo. "

http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/starfinder2/en/



https://mic.com/articles/155350/why-is-astrology-fake-nasa-tumblr-post-explains#.UAcfUBhkq

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599068 — spell ephemeris; thank you

as I pointed out to an astrologist selling her b00k, y.a,
at the b00kstore, the j.p.l ephemeris does not bother
with the precession of the equinoxes, such that
the "solar astologers are off by over 2000 years,
which is about a whole house, but
I did not know, which way it went in the Vedic calendar;
so, thanks!...  so, now, I know that
my sister is a Cancer, and I'm not a Cancer

> > If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> 
> "Now Mimi's August 4 birthday would mean she was born "under the sign" of Cancer (one constellation "earlier"), not Leo. "
> 
> http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/starfinder2/en/
> 
> 
> 
> https://mic.com/articles/155350/why-is-astrology-fake-nasa-tumblr-post-explains#.UAcfUBhkq

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598994

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> your zodiac sign to them.


https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2016/09/29/signing-off-why-zodiac-has-changed/TdaGWqWEUhq3sSq4b6FrMM/story.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599148

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> your zodiac sign to them.



“Oh, my God,” the 34-year-old hairdresser said upon being informed that she was now a Taurus. “No way.”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2016/09/29/signing-off-why-zodiac-has-changed/TdaGWqWEUhq3sSq4b6FrMM/story.html




Give NASA another billion dollars and they'll give you your original zodiac sign back....ZodiacRandsomeWare.


You want Pluto back? PlutoRandsomeWare...


Hey, it's Hot weather lately, how much money does NASA want to make it cool again? ClimateWare..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599149

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > What's your zodiac sign?
> >
> > If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> >
> > You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> > your zodiac sign to them.
> 
> “Oh, my God,” the 34-year-old hairdresser said upon being informed that she was now a Taurus. “No way.”
> https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2016/09/29/signing-off-why-zodiac-has-changed/TdaGWqWEUhq3sSq4b6FrMM/story.html



"Keri Califano of Boston said that seeing her zodiac sign switched to Capricorn is motivation to have her Aquarius tattoo removed after two decades."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2016/09/29/signing-off-why-zodiac-has-changed/TdaGWqWEUhq3sSq4b6FrMM/story.html



I can understand the average person getting fooled by NASA, but I don't understand how their own members
of the 'scientific community' get fooled by NASA also??


What's that all about?


You're tryin to tell me that the 'scientific community' are just average people too? NO WAY!, Not those cold hearted motherfuckers!!!!

No way!!


They are just ...stupid.


There is a difference. One doesn't know better, the other 'should' know better, but don't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599290 — my sign is 3.1

you seem to be a typist, threeDOTone

> They are just ...stupid.
> 
> 
> There is a difference. One doesn't know better, the other 'should' know better, but don't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599627

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes:

>What's your zodiac sign?


>If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!

No, old news. Very old news.  NASA did not invent this.

I knew the zodiac signs were "off" by over one sign since I was a kid.
The Zodiac being "off" is probably in just about every "Why is astrology
a bunch of crap?" FAQ and website out there.

And even the astrologers knew about the precession that causes the
zodiac to be "off".  They call this the "astrological age" which is
equal to the 25,800 year precession period divided by 12 (zodiac signs)
or about 2,150 years.  Right now we are in the Age of Aquarius.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599644

as I recall, that is about when Captain kirK will thing his d00
(23rdcce?... twenty-three is the first nontwin prime, and
the volume of the truncated tetrahedron ... that was new,
just a few months ago

> equal to the 25,800 year precession period divided by 12 (zodiac signs)
> or about 2,150 years.  Right now we are in the Age of Aquarius.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599919

On 2016-09-27 17:15:32 +0000, The Starmaker said:

> What's your zodiac sign?
> 
> 
> If you leave it up to NASA, they will say you're wrong!
> 
> 
> You already lost a planet, the weather to them, now you may lose
> your zodiac sign to them.

*
They took away your Pluto.
Next, they are coming after Uranus.

earle
*

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web