Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591444 > unrolled thread

What I wished to see in U.S. Schools

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What I wished to see in U.S. Schools ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-31 19:55 -0500
    Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 08:47 -0500
      Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-01 20:19 +0200
        Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:11 -0500
          Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 00:09 +0200
            Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 16:00 -0500
        gots the mungies noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 12:24 -0700
      Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-08-03 07:25 -0700
      Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-08-06 15:37 -0500
        Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 17:04 -0400
        Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 16:15 -0500
          Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 19:16 -0400
            Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 11:27 -0700
            Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 09:07 -0500
              Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 11:08 -0700
                Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools xxein1@att.net - 2016-08-08 13:15 -0700
                  Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 14:20 -0700
                    Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 15:16 -0700
                      Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 17:44 -0700
    Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-01 13:22 -0700
    Re: What I wished to see in U.S. Schools edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-03 06:56 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#591444 — What I wished to see in U.S. Schools

I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
school without exception. The following link gives a
glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#591498

On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
> school without exception. The following link gives a
> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek

What on earth does this have to do with physics?

>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591524

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> [mandatory courses on firearms in schools]
> 
> What on earth does this have to do with physics?

Nothing.  Do not feed the address-munging, pseudonymous troll.
Oh wait.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591537

On 8/1/2016 1:19 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> [mandatory courses on firearms in schools]
>>
>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
>
> Nothing.  Do not feed the address-munging, pseudonymous troll.
> Oh wait.
>

As opposed to a web developer who sees no value in address munging or 
maintaining a pseudonym.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_munging

And one who complains when people refer to information the web developer 
has published broadly and publicly, claiming that is "private" 
information. Maybe if you address-munged or used a pseudonym to protect 
against that..... Oh wait.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591548

Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 8/1/2016 1:19 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>>> [mandatory courses on firearms in schools]
>>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
>> Nothing.  Do not feed the address-munging, pseudonymous troll.
>> Oh wait.
> 
> As opposed to a web developer who sees no value in address munging or
> maintaining a pseudonym.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_munging

There is dubious value in it, at best.  You cannot have read the article 
that you are citing.
 
> And one who complains when people refer to information the web developer
> has published broadly and publicly, claiming that is "private"
> information.

I said “_personal_”, not “private”; and “_misusing_ against”, not “referring 
to”.  Big difference.

> Maybe if you address-munged or used a pseudonym to protect
> against that.....

Except that it doesn’t.  Let me, a studied *computer* scientist, tell you 
once again that you live in a fantasy land if you believe otherwise.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591769

On 8/1/2016 5:09 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>

>
>> Maybe if you address-munged or used a pseudonym to protect
>> against that.....
>
> Except that it doesn’t.  Let me, a studied *computer* scientist, tell you
> once again that you live in a fantasy land if you believe otherwise.
>


it provides a hinderence, the key is;

    Is cost of finding out greater than the value of knowing ?



or just use a remailer,  and your "pseudonym"


glad you studied computer scientist, but did you ever create anything ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591895 — gots the mungies

did aBu "munge my address, herein?

> Nothing.  Do not feed the address-munging, pseudonymous troll.
> Oh wait.
> 
> -- 
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591751

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:47:53 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> > I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
> > couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
> > school without exception. The following link gives a
> > glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
> 
> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
> 
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Some more clutter .... at least the originator of this thread has an honest name. I will try not to be fooled by his posts anymore. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592118

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:47:54 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
>> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
>> school without exception. The following link gives a
>> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
> 
> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
> 

When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
physics?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592122

On 8/6/2016 4:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:47:54 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
>>> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
>>> school without exception. The following link gives a
>>> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
>>
>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
>>
>
> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> physics?

Guns are great because they create lots of ghosts!

(now THIS is what we call "physics" and "Science" in this newsgroup!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592126

On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:47:54 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
>>> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
>>> school without exception. The following link gives a
>>> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
>>
>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
>>
>
> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> physics?

When the group was named sci.physics, not 
sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.

Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the 
fuck you want.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592141

On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:47:54 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>>> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
>>>> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
>>>> school without exception. The following link gives a
>>>> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
>>>
>>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
>>>
>>
>> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
>> physics?
>
> When the group was named sci.physics, not
> sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
>
> Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
> fuck you want.

Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage 
here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk 
about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you 
have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical 
drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592226

benj wrote:
> 
> On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:47:54 -0500, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/31/2016 7:55 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> >>>> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
> >>>> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
> >>>> school without exception. The following link gives a
> >>>> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia.
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
> >>>
> >>> What on earth does this have to do with physics?
> >>>
> >>
> >> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> >> physics?
> >
> > When the group was named sci.physics, not
> > sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
> >
> > Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
> > fuck you want.
> 
> Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage
> here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk
> about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you
> have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical
> drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?

PD is obssesed with...charters.

he tinks he invented usenet.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592320

On 8/6/2016 6:16 PM, benj wrote:
> On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:

>>> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
>>> physics?
>>
>> When the group was named sci.physics, not
>> sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
>>
>> Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
>> fuck you want.
>
> Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage
> here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk
> about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you
> have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical
> drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?
>

Don't be dramatic. I don't read all the posts on the newsgroup, and I 
don't respond to all the ones I read. Whether I responds depends on 
whether I feel like responding. I don't make any efforts to make things 
"fair".


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592345

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> On 8/6/2016 6:16 PM, benj wrote:
> > On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> 
> >>> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> >>> physics?
> >>
> >> When the group was named sci.physics, not
> >> sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
> >>
> >> Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
> >> fuck you want.
> >
> > Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage
> > here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk
> > about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you
> > have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical
> > drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?
> >
> 
> Don't be dramatic. I don't read all the posts on the newsgroup, and I
> don't respond to all the ones I read. Whether I responds depends on
> whether I feel like responding. 

You only respond when you feel you have the answer. It's against your policy to respond to post you have no answer for..
it will ruin the 'image' you created.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592365

On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 2:08:00 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > 
> > On 8/6/2016 6:16 PM, benj wrote:
> > > On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >> On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> > 
> > >>> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> > >>> physics?
> > >>
> > >> When the group was named sci.physics, not
> > >> sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
> > >>
> > >> Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
> > >> fuck you want.
> > >
> > > Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage
> > > here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk
> > > about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you
> > > have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical
> > > drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?
> > >
> > 
> > Don't be dramatic. I don't read all the posts on the newsgroup, and I
> > don't respond to all the ones I read. Whether I responds depends on
> > whether I feel like responding. 
> 
> You only respond when you feel you have the answer. It's against your policy to respond to post you have no answer for..
> it will ruin the 'image' you created.

xxein:  <yawn>  Did somebody say something?  What did I miss?  Please repeat it.  I have an obligation to respond with my own opinion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592379

xxein1@att.net wrote:
> 
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 2:08:00 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/6/2016 6:16 PM, benj wrote:
> > > > On 8/6/2016 5:15 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > >> On 8/6/2016 3:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> > >
> > > >>> When (on earth) did we begin to talk only about
> > > >>> physics?
> > > >>
> > > >> When the group was named sci.physics, not
> > > >> sci.discussion.anythingandeverything.
> > > >>
> > > >> Try reading the charter, rather than ignoring it and doing whatever the
> > > >> fuck you want.
> > > >
> > > > Funny that when someone (truthfully) mentions al the off-topic garbage
> > > > here, you jump all over them but when all your pal HVAC does is talk
> > > > about sex, bodily functions, ghosts and be an abusive stalker, all you
> > > > have is the highest praise for his not only off-topic, but nonsensical
> > > > drool. WHat gives Boinker? Something political going on I presume?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Don't be dramatic. I don't read all the posts on the newsgroup, and I
> > > don't respond to all the ones I read. Whether I responds depends on
> > > whether I feel like responding.
> >
> > You only respond when you feel you have the answer. It's against your policy to respond to post you have no answer for..
> > it will ruin the 'image' you created.
> 
> xxein:  <yawn>  Did somebody say something?  What did I miss?  Please repeat it.  I have an obligation to respond with my own opinion.


Does "xxein" stand for 'xxeinstein'? another ego trip..everybody tinks
they are another einstein.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592403

teh tOO-x-rated 'stein, I think, not

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592449

noTthaTguY wrote:
> 
> teh tOO-x-rated 'stein, I think, not


females have two XX chromosomes...


so it must be a ....nice jewish girl.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591544

On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 5:55:07 PM UTC-7, ClutterFreak wrote:
> I always wished that U.S. high schools should have a
> couple of mandatory courses on firearms. Every high
> school without exception. The following link gives a
> glimpse of such courses and competitions in Russia. 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek
> 


Would these courses be supervised by Eddie Eagle?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjl67PNhKHOAhVH02MKHTK_AX4QjRwIBw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.justplainpolitics.com%2Fshowthread.php%3F64562-Eddie-Eagle-in-the-news&psig=AFQjCNHtCzP5GQ8q7qB9a3m2l3aTJKH8iA&ust=1470168990367319

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web