Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #591612 > unrolled thread

Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition

Started bymapou001@gmail.com
First post2016-08-02 00:03 -0700
Last post2016-08-05 18:25 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 90 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 00:03 -0700
    Misconceptions about LIGO (was: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 12:40 +0200
      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 12:58 +0200
      Misconceptions about LIGO (was: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition) jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-02 04:09 -0700
        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-02 14:32 +0200
          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-03 01:48 -0700
            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 07:51 -0500
              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-04 08:36 -0700
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 11:20 -0500
                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-05 01:08 -0700
                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 08:04 -0500
              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-04 20:48 +0200
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 12:30 -0700
                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 14:13 -0700
                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-04 22:04 +0000
                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:30 -0500
                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 06:00 -0700
                      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 08:11 -0500
                        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 06:15 -0700
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 11:27 -0500
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 16:22 -0400
                              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:42 -0500
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 19:31 -0400
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 17:30 -0700
                                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-05 22:21 -0700
                                      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 23:05 -0700
                                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 17:32 -0500
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:31 -0500
                                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:22 -0400
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 16:47 -0700
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 17:31 -0500
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-05 22:20 -0700
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:21 -0700
                                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:39 -0700
                        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 10:37 -0700
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:20 -0500
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:25 -0500
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 11:48 -0700
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-05 20:48 +0200
                              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 11:55 -0700
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:15 -0500
                              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:09 -0500
                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 16:26 -0400
                      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:45 -0500
                        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:32 -0700
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:32 -0500
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:57 -0700
                              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 14:17 -0700
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:37 -0400
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:24 -0400
                        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 19:35 -0400
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:32 -0500
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-05 01:42 -0700
              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 23:21 -0700
        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO (was: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition) poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 23:16 -0700
        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:04 -0500
      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO (was: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition) mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 10:35 -0700
        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-03 21:32 +0200
          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 13:16 -0700
            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 17:06 -0500
              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-08-03 15:39 -0700
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 21:25 -0500
                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 21:29 -0700
                    Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:58 -0500
                      Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 06:07 -0700
                        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 08:20 -0500
                          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 06:48 -0700
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 07:16 -0700
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-04 14:51 +0000
                              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 09:08 -0700
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-04 16:39 +0000
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:20 -0500
                                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 23:28 -0700
                                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-05 05:26 -0700
                            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 11:14 -0500
          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 23:23 -0700
            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-05 20:49 +0200
        Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:02 -0500
          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 05:12 -0700
          Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 12:50 -0700
            Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:28 -0500
              Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 19:35 -0700
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 20:55 -0700
                Re: Misconceptions about LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 10:45 -0500
                  Re: Misconceptions about LIGO LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 12:21 -0700
    Re: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 11:10 -0700
      Re: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 11:21 -0700
    Re: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 23:12 -0700
      Re: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 07:31 -0500
      Re: Fight the LIGO fraud. Sign this Petition "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 18:25 -0700

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →


#592002 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-08-05 16:22 -0400
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57a4f5a4$0$55850$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#591967
On 8/5/2016 12:27 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 8:15 AM, john wrote:
>> Off
>> Hide in your 'nym hole.
>> Cover your head.
>> FRAUD HAS HAPPENED.
>> Therefore, EVERYONE is suspect.
>
> OK, John. So because there has been lying, everyone lies about
> everything -- so says Ben Jacoby too. You trust no one. Especially not
> big orgs, like government and medicine and science, where everyone is a
> notorious liar.
> This is called paranoia.
>
>> Except, of course, the government
>> and LIGO


John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I 
said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what 
they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is 
clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his 
microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not 
trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions, 
versus people who "always" lie. He exaggerates and changes what people 
said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest 
like most Libs.

Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie 
and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth. How's that syphilis cure 
the government's been giving you working out?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592009 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 15:42 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no2tn3$1hpn$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#592002
On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> versus people who "always" lie.

And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been 
shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting 
people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."

> He exaggerates and changes what people
> said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest
> like most Libs.
>
> Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie
> and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth.

I've never said that government never lies. You know that.
But on the other hand, I know a firefighter and a 2nd grade teacher 
personally. They both work for the government. Neither of them have 
demonstrated to me that they are "people who have been shown to be liars 
on numerous occasions". So would it be a mistake to say that if you're 
in the government, you can't be trusted?

Here's an interesting case: Boyd Bushman. Worked for the government. 
Proven to have lied, on his deathbed no less. So there's at least ONE 
person in the government who has lied about aliens by claiming he has 
proof of them.

>  How's that syphilis cure
> the government's been giving you working out?


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592025 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-08-05 19:31 -0400
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57a521c6$0$40408$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#592009
On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
>> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
>> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
>> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
>> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
>> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
>> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
>> versus people who "always" lie.
>
> And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."

For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?) 
you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language. 
Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do 
not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting 
information. And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars 
the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you 
manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a 
lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just 
plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the 
Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and 
taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good 
at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)


>> He exaggerates and changes what people
>> said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest
>> like most Libs.
>>
>> Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie
>> and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth.
>
> I've never said that government never lies. You know that.
> But on the other hand, I know a firefighter and a 2nd grade teacher
> personally. They both work for the government. Neither of them have
> demonstrated to me that they are "people who have been shown to be liars
> on numerous occasions". So would it be a mistake to say that if you're
> in the government, you can't be trusted?
>
> Here's an interesting case: Boyd Bushman. Worked for the government.
> Proven to have lied, on his deathbed no less. So there's at least ONE
> person in the government who has lied about aliens by claiming he has
> proof of them.
>
>>  How's that syphilis cure
>> the government's been giving you working out?
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592039 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromLIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 17:30 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<1abeb4c5-0c5a-476a-beee-b2768fbaee9b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#592025
On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:31:21 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> >> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> >> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> >> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> >> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> >> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> >> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> >> versus people who "always" lie.
> >
> > And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> > shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> > people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> 
> For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?) 
> you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language. 
> Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do 
> not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting 
> information. And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars 
> the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you 
> manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a 
> lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just 
> plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the 
> Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and 
> taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good 
> at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)

Bodkin is a perfect example of a lying asshole who supports every stinking lie spewed from the kiss-ass physics community. Almost everything the gutless asshole says is a fucking lie or a caricature of the truth. I suggest that nobody engages in any discussion with the jackass from now on. Ignore the lying motherfucker or just insult and ridicule him at every opportunity.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592056 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-08-05 22:21 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57A573F6.6EC6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#592039
LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
> 
> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:31:21 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> > On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> > >> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> > >> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> > >> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> > >> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> > >> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> > >> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> > >> versus people who "always" lie.
> > >
> > > And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> > > shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> > > people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> >
> > For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?)
> > you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language.
> > Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do
> > not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting
> > information. And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars
> > the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you
> > manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a
> > lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just
> > plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the
> > Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and
> > taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good
> > at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)
> 
> Bodkin is a perfect example of a lying asshole who supports every stinking lie spewed from the kiss-ass physics community. 

He's not lying..he's just deluding himself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592057 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromLIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 23:05 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<d8464c56-4de6-431c-9318-71c353bf74f8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#592056
On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 10:21:38 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
> > 
> > On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:31:21 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> > > On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > > > On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> > > >> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> > > >> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> > > >> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> > > >> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> > > >> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> > > >> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> > > >> versus people who "always" lie.
> > > >
> > > > And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> > > > shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> > > > people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> > >
> > > For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?)
> > > you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language.
> > > Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do
> > > not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting
> > > information. And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars
> > > the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you
> > > manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a
> > > lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just
> > > plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the
> > > Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and
> > > taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good
> > > at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)
> > 
> > Bodkin is a perfect example of a lying asshole who supports every stinking lie spewed from the kiss-ass physics community. 
> 
> He's not lying..he's just deluding himself.

Same difference. It comes from a lack of balls.

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592132 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-06 17:32 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no5ogq$1h2k$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#592039
On 8/5/2016 7:30 PM, LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
>> For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?)
>> > you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language.
>> > Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do
>> > not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting
>> > information. And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars
>> > the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you
>> > manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a
>> > lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just
>> > plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the
>> > Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and
>> > taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good
>> > at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)
> Bodkin is a perfect example of a lying asshole who supports every stinking lie
> spewed from the kiss-ass physics community. Almost everything the gutless asshole
> says is a fucking lie or a caricature of the truth. I suggest that nobody engages
> in any discussion with the jackass from now on. Ignore the lying motherfucker or
> just insult and ridicule him at every opportunity.

You couldn't point to a lie if your life depended on it.
What's true is that when you open your own mouth, somehow your foot ends 
up in it after four or five words. You know it, and it pisses you off, 
and this is why you limit your responses to less than five words or so. 
(Can you say, "Fuck you"? That's two.)

I get it that you HATE finding yourself trapped by your own words. And 
your hate fuels your anger. And your anger is what generates your short 
fourth-grade outbursts that exhibit the imagination and vocabulary of a 
pull-string doll. Here's a tip, bubba. Don't want to find yourself in 
that trap of your own making? Then don't open your mouth. Because every 
single time you do, you end up making an ass of yourself inside of 15 
seconds.




-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592228 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-07 13:31 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no7uqi$1gm3$6@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#592025
On 8/5/2016 6:31 PM, benj wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
>>> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
>>> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
>>> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
>>> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
>>> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
>>> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
>>> versus people who "always" lie.
>>
>> And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
>> shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
>> people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
>
> For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?)
> you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language.
> Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do
> not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting
> information.

And you have said you trust no one.
Nor do you trust the evidence that they point to, claiming that if you 
haven't collected it yourself, then you don't trust it. Sucks to be you.

> And obviously the MORE they have been PROVEN to be liars
> the MORE one is inclined to fact-check everything that is said.  How you
> manage to twist that into a belief that EVERYTHING such people say is a
> lie is not only a gross misrepresentation and exaggeration, but just
> plane kooky. It's nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't you know the
> Obama administration is looking into banning all conspiracy theories and
> taxing conspiracy theory posts? And this is no lie! (You are pretty good
> at fact research, Boinker, don't trust me. Look it up!)
>
>



-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592408 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-08-08 18:22 -0400
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57a90642$0$55990$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#592228
On 8/7/2016 2:31 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 6:31 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 8/5/2016 4:42 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
>>>> said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
>>>> they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
>>>> clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
>>>> microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
>>>> trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
>>>> versus people who "always" lie.
>>>
>>> And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
>>> shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
>>> people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
>>
>> For someone who lives to argue like you do (You SURE you aren't Jewish?)
>> you sure don't have much of an understanding of the English language.
>> Are you a native speaker of English? Not "trusting" someone means you do
>> not blindly accept what they say as true without some sort of supporting
>> information.
>
> And you have said you trust no one.
> Nor do you trust the evidence that they point to, claiming that if you
> haven't collected it yourself, then you don't trust it. Sucks to be you.

Talk about sucks to be you. Does not trusting what people say without 
credible evidence the same as saying they are all lying all the time? 
This was your point. How ignorant do you think your readers and buyers 
of wooden toys are? A 6th grader or even Treebert could out-think you!

When people make assertions (LIKE SAY LIGO!) in science it is considered 
proper to be skeptical and demand corroboration. That can be your 
personal observations or reports of those you may trust more than those 
making the original assertions.

There is not perfect "truth" except in your fantasy religious world. 
That is why you will always be an amateur scientist. There is no 
absolute "truth" in science, and it's not about belief as hardblow 
thinks. You are both sad lost souls.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592033 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 16:47 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<7ff42cb1-a761-41ef-b13f-752adb599f1e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#592009
Odd said
"
Here's an interesting case: Boyd Bushman. Worked for the government. 
Proven to have lied, on his deathbed no less. So there's at least ONE "

Proven how?
Proven when?
You obviously didn't listen.
He specifically states that he never
personally SAW an alien.
He said he WAS GIVEN pictures, and told
what they were.
He said he WAS GIVEN artefacts, and told
what they were.

"Proven to have lied" is a lie, counsellor.
You twist things, boyo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592131 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-06 17:31 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no5ogf$1h2k$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#592033
On 8/5/2016 6:47 PM, john wrote:
> Odd said
> "
> Here's an interesting case: Boyd Bushman. Worked for the government.
> Proven to have lied, on his deathbed no less. So there's at least ONE "
>
> Proven how?
> Proven when?
> You obviously didn't listen.
> He specifically states that he never
> personally SAW an alien.
> He said he WAS GIVEN pictures, and told
> what they were.
> He said he WAS GIVEN artefacts, and told
> what they were.

Well, I think he said things a little more strongly than that.
But let's take your position for now. You've been touting Boyd Bushman's 
deathbed confession as compelling evidence of an expert in a key place 
and time, proclaiming the existence of aliens. Except now you're saying 
that he didn't see anything himself, or that he didn't describe anything 
that he saw himself, only that he's relating second-hand information 
that someone ELSE spooned into his mouth. So he's not a witness to 
anything now, according to you.

Again, you say, "Believe the testimony, even though the witness did not 
witness anything. Believe the testimony, even though the witness is 
acknowledged not to be credible."

So here we are with Bushman declaring, according to you, that he saw 
nothing but is happy to relate what someone ELSE told him, and yet what 
he describes you say should be believed. And here we are with movie 
producers who you say are liars when they declared their own movie a 
hoax, but you say that the subject of the movie should be believed.

I think you're a little nuts, John. Doesn't this sound a little nuts to you?

The point, John, is you're screwed no matter how you spin it. If you 
spin it that these guys have provided PROOF of aliens, then the evidence 
clearly is counter to that. If you spin it that these guys are fall-guys 
who either lied or were deceived by someone else, then they aren't 
credible for testifying about aliens either.

>
> "Proven to have lied" is a lie, counsellor.
> You twist things, boyo
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592055 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-08-05 22:20 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57A573B6.33C5@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#592009
Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> > John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> > said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> > they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> > clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> > microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> > trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> > versus people who "always" lie.
> 
> And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> 
> > He exaggerates and changes what people
> > said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest
> > like most Libs.
> >
> > Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie
> > and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth.
> 
> I've never said that government never lies. You know that.
> But on the other hand, I know a firefighter and a 2nd grade teacher
> personally. They both work for the government. Neither of them have
> demonstrated to me that they are "people who have been shown to be liars
> on numerous occasions". 

The fireman goes out and pulls the fire alarm so that he can get paid
for going out on a fire...
even if it is a false alarm, they still get paid extra for leaving the
fire house.

The 2nd grade teacher....she's always on vacation. So kids are confused
cause they get a different
subsitiute teacher every week...where is the 2nd grade teacher??

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592083 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-08-06 10:21 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57A61C96.1E8B@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#592055
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >
> > On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> > > John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> > > said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> > > they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> > > clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> > > microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> > > trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> > > versus people who "always" lie.
> >
> > And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> > shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> > people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> >
> > > He exaggerates and changes what people
> > > said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest
> > > like most Libs.
> > >
> > > Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie
> > > and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth.
> >
> > I've never said that government never lies. You know that.
> > But on the other hand, I know a firefighter and a 2nd grade teacher
> > personally. They both work for the government. Neither of them have
> > demonstrated to me that they are "people who have been shown to be liars
> > on numerous occasions".
> 
> The fireman goes out and pulls the fire alarm so that he can get paid
> for going out on a fire...
> even if it is a false alarm, they still get paid extra for leaving the
> fire house.
> 
> The 2nd grade teacher....she's always on vacation. So kids are confused
> cause they get a different
> subsitiute teacher every week...where is the 2nd grade teacher??


Making up the ol fireman and 2nd grade teacher analogy is stupid.
analogy is stupid. only pd uses analogy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#592086 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-08-06 10:39 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<57A620E6.379@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#592083
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/5/2016 3:22 PM, benj wrote:
> > > > John, Obviously Boinker is a liar because he just lied about what I
> > > > said. He loves to make up things he says people said (or change what
> > > > they actually said to something he can better argue against). He is
> > > > clearly someone who "always lies" just like HVAC. Somehow his
> > > > microcephalic brain cannot comprehend the difference between not
> > > > trusting people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions,
> > > > versus people who "always" lie.
> > >
> > > And you've said that you trust NO ONE. Therefore every person has been
> > > shown to be a liar on numerous occasions. Your words: "not trusting
> > > people who have been shown to be liars on numerous occasions."
> > >
> > > > He exaggerates and changes what people
> > > > said in a vain attempt to "win" his arguments. He's totally dishonest
> > > > like most Libs.
> > > >
> > > > Tell us again, Boinker how science, government and medicine NEVER lie
> > > > and ALWAYS can be trusted to tell the truth.
> > >
> > > I've never said that government never lies. You know that.
> > > But on the other hand, I know a firefighter and a 2nd grade teacher
> > > personally. They both work for the government. Neither of them have
> > > demonstrated to me that they are "people who have been shown to be liars
> > > on numerous occasions".
> >
> > The fireman goes out and pulls the fire alarm so that he can get paid
> > for going out on a fire...
> > even if it is a false alarm, they still get paid extra for leaving the
> > fire house.
> >
> > The 2nd grade teacher....she's always on vacation. So kids are confused
> > cause they get a different
> > subsitiute teacher every week...where is the 2nd grade teacher??
> 
> Making up the ol fireman and 2nd grade teacher analogy is stupid.
> analogy is stupid. only pd uses analogy.

a·nal·o·gy
?'nal?je/
noun
noun: analogy; plural noun: analogies

    a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification.



You must think PD everybody is really stupid. Anyone can see right through you and your obession with the use of...analogies.

It's the PD trademark.

But starting the sentence with "I know a.." didn't fool me. Thats  deceitful! How could you do something like that? It's beneath contempt.







That Was DDDDEEEESSSSPICABLE!!!!!
                                        ___
                                __  _/:::>__
                               /:/_/::/ _/::>
                             _/:(/:::\_/::/
                            _):::::::::::::\
                          _/::::::::::::::::\____
                         /      \:::::::::/      \
                        |  ::/\  ::::::::  / \::   |
                        / ::/  \  ::::::  /   |:::/
                       /:::|    \::::::::/    |:::\
                      /::::|     \::::::/     |::::\
                    ,------:      \::::/      :------,
                   /   ___  \0    /    \ 0   / ___  \
                  : ,-' ) `  `---'      `---'   ( `-,  :
                  \_    \         '     `        \_  _/
                    \____\                         \/
                          \                  _______\________
                           \              ,-'                )
                            \           ,-    ,----------- _/

                             \             ,-'      \\ ) _/
                              (___________/__________\\ /
                               :;;;\___________________)
                        ______,:;;;;;;;;:______
                      ,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;\_
                     /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;\_
                    /;;;;;;__;;;; ;;;;;; ;;;;;;;;;;\

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591971 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 10:37 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<9469175a-acb5-4c1d-9f70-2d32e6aff3f2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591958
Off his rocker said
"
Here are the three cases again: 
1. Telling the truth 
2. Lying and defrauding 
3. Fooled by a lie or a fraud 

Remember the hundreds of people who listened to "War of the Worlds" on 
the radio and swore they smelled smoke and poison gas and heard screams 
and death rays outside their homes. Even though it was a deliberate 
fiction and there was no poison gas, smoke, screams or death rays. 
Now, tell me again John that this kind of fringe hysteria just doesn't 
happen. "
You are the one saying that
nothing can be taken at face
because someone somewhere
perpetrated a hoax.
You are the one discounting
deathbed confessions,
eyewitness accounts,
any and all pictures and videos,
and all physical proof as hoaxes.
Not me.
Oh, yeah, you believe LIGO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591972 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 13:20 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no2lcg$14n6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#591971
On 8/5/2016 12:37 PM, john wrote:
> Off his rocker said
> "
> Here are the three cases again:
> 1. Telling the truth
> 2. Lying and defrauding
> 3. Fooled by a lie or a fraud
>
> Remember the hundreds of people who listened to "War of the Worlds" on
> the radio and swore they smelled smoke and poison gas and heard screams
> and death rays outside their homes. Even though it was a deliberate
> fiction and there was no poison gas, smoke, screams or death rays.
> Now, tell me again John that this kind of fringe hysteria just doesn't
> happen. "
> You are the one saying that
> nothing can be taken at face
> because someone somewhere
> perpetrated a hoax.

Not a hoax, John. A radio show for entertainment. And STILL people got 
carried away.
So when there's a hoaxster who sets out to deceive, yes, there will be 
people who get taken in.

> You are the one discounting
> deathbed confessions,
> eyewitness accounts,
> any and all pictures and videos,
> and all physical proof as hoaxes.

Nope, just the eyewitness accounts by people holding up pictures of what 
is proven to be a toy. And discounting the hoaxes perpetrated by 
hoaxsters who CONFESS to the hoax.

I'm going to guess that you think Bernie Madoff never deceived anyone, 
and that he's only in jail because the government thought he was a 
threat to their secrets. Let's wait for a deathbed confession from 
Bernie where he proclaims his innocence and says he was a CIA operative 
all along. THEN what'll you do?

> Not me.
> Oh, yeah, you believe LIGO
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591975 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 13:25 -0500
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<no2lma$154q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#591971
On 8/5/2016 12:37 PM, john wrote:
> Oh, yeah, you believe LIGO

Alright, let's just entertain that you don't believe LIGO.
So let's roll back and see what evidence you DO believe?

Yes or no answers, then reasons to these:
1. Do you believe in the existence of atoms? If so, what evidence proves 
that to you?
2. Do you believe in the existence of protons? If so, what evidence 
proves that to you?
3. Do you believe in the existence of electrons? If so, what evidence 
proves that to you?
4. Do you believe in the existence of neutrinos? If so, what evidence 
proves that to you?
5. Do you believe in the existence of muons? If so, what evidence proves 
that to you?
6. Do you believe in the existence of photons? If so, what evidence 
proves that to you?
7. Do you believe that energy is conserved? If so, what evidence proves 
that to you?
8. Do you believe that angular momentum is conserved? If so, what 
evidence proves that to you?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591978 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 11:48 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<1693ca0c-c70e-4607-8fd0-c5d5eda882ea@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591975
We have froth.
Come to think-
no HVAC?
No Sam?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591979 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2016-08-05 20:48 +0200
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<4080926.USX2SnZJh0@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#591975
Odd Bodkin wrote:

> On 8/5/2016 12:37 PM, john wrote:
>> Oh, yeah, you believe LIGO
> 
> Alright, let's just entertain that you don't believe LIGO.
> So let's roll back and see what evidence you DO believe?
> 
> Yes or no answers, then reasons to these:
> 1. Do you believe in the existence of atoms? If so, what evidence proves
> that to you?
> […]

You are playing into the crackpots’ cards if you reduce science to a matter 
of what can be believed.  Science is decisively _not_ a system of belief.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591982 — Re: Misconceptions about LIGO

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-05 11:55 -0700
SubjectRe: Misconceptions about LIGO
Message-ID<d9042e93-6388-4181-bfc4-b2675ea10554@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#591979
Point like particle said
"You are playing into the crackpots’ cards if you reduce science to a matter 
of what can be believed.  Science is decisively _not_ a system of belief. "
You have proof for:
DM?
BH caused by grav collapse?
Virtual particles?
Space time warp?

No, but you "believe" in them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web