Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591079 > unrolled thread

What is the heaviest Particle Known?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What is the heaviest Particle Known? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:04 -0700
    Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:04 -0700
      Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 18:20 -0700
        Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-29 16:47 -0400
          Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:05 -0700
            Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-29 20:17 -0400
              Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 08:55 -0700
                Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 17:54 -0400
            Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 16:23 -0700
        Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 15:07 -0700
    Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-29 11:23 -0700
      Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-05 12:41 -0700
        Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-05 12:58 -0700
          Re: What is the heaviest Particle Known? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:13 -0700

#591079 — What is the heaviest Particle Known?

Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#591080

On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert

Ball lightning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591129

On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert
> 
> Ball lightning.

Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591203

On 07/28/2016 09:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
>> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2
>> wrote:
>>> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the
>>> Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go
>>> figure  TreBert
>>
>> Ball lightning.
>
> Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I
> was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create
> it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown
> TreBert
>

Treeb, Tesla took time out from bird sex to make ball lightning.

Russians got interested during the cold war and built a Tesla machine to 
make some. Then we had to build one too. HVAC will tell you all about it 
(and then kill you)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591214

On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 1:47:59 PM UTC-7, B Gates wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 09:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> >> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2
> >> wrote:
> >>> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the
> >>> Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go
> >>> figure  TreBert
> >>
> >> Ball lightning.
> >
> > Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I
> > was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create
> > it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown
> > TreBert
> >
> 
> Treeb, Tesla took time out from bird sex to make ball lightning.
> 
> Russians got interested during the cold war and built a Tesla machine to 
> make some. Then we had to build one too. HVAC will tell you all about it 
> (and then kill you)

That ball lightning I saw bounced,and made no noise It was bright but did not hurt my eyes. Is ball lightning a plasma that has a ball structure. Hmmm TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591228

On 07/29/2016 06:05 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 1:47:59 PM UTC-7, B Gates wrote:
>> On 07/28/2016 09:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the
>>>>> Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go
>>>>> figure  TreBert
>>>>
>>>> Ball lightning.
>>>
>>> Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I
>>> was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create
>>> it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown
>>> TreBert
>>>
>>
>> Treeb, Tesla took time out from bird sex to make ball lightning.
>>
>> Russians got interested during the cold war and built a Tesla machine to
>> make some. Then we had to build one too. HVAC will tell you all about it
>> (and then kill you)
>
> That ball lightning I saw bounced,and made no noise It was bright but did not hurt my eyes. Is ball lightning a plasma that has a ball structure. Hmmm TreBert
>
supposedly. Sometimes they "pop" when they disappear. Usually are silent 
when moving around. Ask HVAC he is a genius who knows all science about 
Tesla.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591271

BJ quacked
supposedly. Sometimes they "pop" when they disappear. Usually are silent 
when moving around. Ask HVAC he is a genius who knows all science about 
Tesla. 
-----------

Tesla fucked his pet bird. That's all I need to know about him.

As for swamp gas, it's the cause of many UFO reports that you dearly believe in. No offense but you're a simple minded cocksucker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591307

On 7/30/2016 11:55 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> supposedly. Sometimes they "pop" when they disappear. Usually are silent
> when moving around. Ask HVAC he is a genius who knows all science about
> Tesla.
> -----------
>
> Tesla fucked his pet bird. That's all I need to know about him.
>
> As for swamp gas, it's the cause of many UFO reports that you dearly believe in. No offense but you're a simple minded cocksucker
>
So folks, Hardblow once again demonstrates his advanced "co-author" 
knowledge of ball lighting and plasma physics. His total knowledge of 
said science is his fantasy of Tesla having sex with a pigeon! Anyone 
remember what the size of these birds are? Let us just say that with the 
sole exception of pencil-neck needle-dick Hardblow, it is scientifically 
impossible to have the sex that Hardblow so fervently believes in. That 
demonstrates the journalist understanding of science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591560

On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 3:05:25 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 1:47:59 PM UTC-7, B Gates wrote:
> > On 07/28/2016 09:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the
> > >>> Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go
> > >>> figure  TreBert
> > >>
> > >> Ball lightning.
> > >
> > > Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I
> > > was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create
> > > it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown
> > > TreBert
> > >
> > 
> > Treeb, Tesla took time out from bird sex to make ball lightning.
> > 
> > Russians got interested during the cold war and built a Tesla machine to 
> > make some. Then we had to build one too. HVAC will tell you all about it 
> > (and then kill you)
> 
> That ball lightning I saw bounced,and made no noise It was bright but did not hurt my eyes. Is ball lightning a plasma that has a ball structure. Hmmm TreBert

Ball of plasma does relate to a particle's weight.I want to know how it bounces.  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591215

On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 11:10:07 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:04:05 PM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert
> > 
> > Ball lightning.
> 
> Hmmmm Interesting reply.I think I saw it once about 82 years ago.I was 6.It scared me.Never saw it again.Don't think a lab can create it???   In reality not much is talk about it. Its a semi unknown  TreBert

Ball Lightning : The Biggest Particle

There is an abstract way of analyzing ball lightning using the “Charge=Area” theory. One conclusion from this dimensional analysis is the following proposal:

There is a maximum electric field E as a dual to c, the maximum speed of experiments.

Ball lightning is a relativistic voltage loop. The ball was created when lightning reached the voltage limit of about 3*10^8 volts per meter.

Advanced Units of Measure

Voltage = meter^2 / second^2

E = meter / second^2 = electric field abstraction

Ampere = meter^2 / second = Weber

Energy = meter^4 / second^2

Conclusion : Ball lightning is a relativistic effect in dimensions 5,6,7,8 = Ex Ey Ez Ht. The looping current is a looping magnetic bottle. Confinement of a plasma continues for ten seconds. Weber squared equals energy. Magnetic flux crossing and cutting were stable in nature, in ball lightning. Imagine if I had an app to control that with fields. Ball lightning confinement could be stable for hours.

Particles are sometimes joined by virtual particles to help a scientist describe a physic. A ball lightning is like a virtual particle that won’t go away too fast. Maybe it can be described using bra-ket SU[2] symmetry breaking with tensorial stress energy. The quantum chromodynamic version of ball lightning would use charmed conservation of parity and iso-spin. Using that tool set, ball lightning could be formalized into standard notation as the biggest particle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591172

On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:05 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert


The Top Quark.

"Four separate experiments found a joint value for the top quark of 173.34 (+/- 0.76) gigaelectronvolts divided by the speed of light squared, scientists announced Wednesday (March 19) at a physics conference in Italy."

http://www.livescience.com/44230-mass-of-top-quark-found-joint-effort.html

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591989

On Friday, July 29, 2016 at 11:23:03 AM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 3:04:05 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > Is it a neutron,or proton? is it the gluon? Don't bring in the Higgs particle its still not known its still an unknown  Go figure  TreBert
> 
> 
> The Top Quark.
> 
> "Four separate experiments found a joint value for the top quark of 173.34 (+/- 0.76) gigaelectronvolts divided by the speed of light squared, scientists announced Wednesday (March 19) at a physics conference in Italy."
> 
> http://www.livescience.com/44230-mass-of-top-quark-found-joint-effort.html
> 
> Double-A


What?  No one in this group cares about the Top Quark?  What about Top Cat?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591994

the heaviest Particle Known would have to be the heaviest planet known.


If you can put the earth on a scale...how much would it weigh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592082

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> the heaviest Particle Known would have to be the heaviest planet known.
> 
> If you can put the earth on a scale...how much would it weigh?



but if you're refering only to particles on earth then it would have to
be ... Mount Augustus.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web