Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #587189 > unrolled thread

censorship in this group

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  censorship in this group trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-28 18:49 -0700
    Re: censorship in this group James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 21:22 -0700
      Re: censorship in this group James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 16:12 -0700
    Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 05:27 +0000
      Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 00:38 -0700
        Re: censorship in this group trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-29 03:46 -0700
          Re: censorship in this group Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-29 08:07 -0500
            Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 12:51 -0500
              Re: censorship in this group Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-29 13:02 -0500
                Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 13:21 -0500
              Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 18:08 +0000
                Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 13:23 -0500
                  Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 00:54 +0000
                    Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 22:48 -0500
                      Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 22:44 -0700
                        Re: censorship in this group trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-30 01:18 -0700
                          Re: censorship in this group Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-30 08:53 -0500
                          Re: censorship in this group "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-30 08:39 -0700
                      Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 05:37 +0000
                        Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-30 11:16 -0500
                          Re: censorship in this group Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-05 14:19 -0500
                            Re: censorship in this group Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 12:55 -0700
                              Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-06 11:42 -0500
                                Re: censorship in this group Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 19:21 -0700
                                  Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-07 01:15 -0500
                                    Re: censorship in this group Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 16:25 -0700
                              Re: censorship in this group "Dan Smythe" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-07-06 18:18 -0700
                                Re: censorship in this group Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 19:11 -0700
                            Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-06 11:26 -0500
                          Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-05 19:43 +0000
            Re: censorship in this group Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:51 -0700
          Re: censorship in this group moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-29 13:36 +0000
        Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 14:51 +0000
          Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 12:55 -0500
            Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-29 18:10 +0000
              Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 13:45 -0500
                Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 00:56 +0000
                  Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-29 23:00 -0500
        Re: censorship in this group Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-30 13:11 -0700
      Re: censorship in this group benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-29 17:46 -0400
        Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 01:00 +0000
          Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 19:30 -0700
            Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 02:57 +0000
              Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 21:19 -0700
                Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 05:39 +0000
              Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 21:35 -0700
                Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-30 00:13 -0500
                  Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-29 22:35 -0700
                  Re: censorship in this group "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-06-29 22:42 -0700
                  Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 05:44 +0000
                    Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-30 10:58 -0500
                      Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 18:50 +0000
                  Re: censorship in this group moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-30 14:05 +0000
                    Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-30 17:41 -0500
                    Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-30 23:01 -0700
                Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-30 05:42 +0000
          Re: censorship in this group benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-01 17:41 -0400
            Re: censorship in this group jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-01 22:14 +0000
    Re: censorship in this group Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 09:22 -0500
      Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-30 23:17 -0700
        Re: censorship in this group The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-30 23:32 -0700
          Re: censorship in this group john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 06:40 -0700
          Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-01 11:19 -0500
        Re: censorship in this group ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-01 11:06 -0500
          Re: censorship in this group moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-02 23:17 +0000
            Re: censorship in this group "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 11:12 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#587303

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>>
>> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>> you must be seeing things.

<snip babble>
 
> Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,

Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
unmoderated newsgroup.

<snip kook froth>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587309

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
> >>
> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
> >> you must be seeing things.
> 
> <snip babble>
> 
> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
> 
> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
> unmoderated newsgroup.
> 
> <snip kook froth>
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino



20 years??? 

It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...

you can get the latest script at github

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587312

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>> >>
>> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>> >> you must be seeing things.
>> 
>> <snip babble>
>> 
>> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>> 
>> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
>> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
>> unmoderated newsgroup.
>> 
>> <snip kook froth>
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> 
> 20 years??? 
> 
> It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...

Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty

> you can get the latest script at github

As always, you are full of nonsense.

It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587320

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
> >> >>
> >> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
> >> >> you must be seeing things.
> >>
> >> <snip babble>
> >>
> >> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
> >>
> >> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
> >> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
> >> unmoderated newsgroup.
> >>
> >> <snip kook froth>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> >
> > 20 years???
> >
> > It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
> 
> Nope.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
> 
> > you can get the latest script at github
> 
> As always, you are full of nonsense.
> 
> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


didn't you see Clutter freak post, he said 

"Nope. I was using it in 1992 and I was a late comer. "


"using it" means, he was using either the script or program.


I mean...really...the only reason why you guys still post here is becaue...I Allow It!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587348

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> >> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>> >> >> you must be seeing things.
>> >>
>> >> <snip babble>
>> >>
>> >> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>> >>
>> >> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
>> >> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
>> >> unmoderated newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> <snip kook froth>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 20 years???
>> >
>> > It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
>> 
>> > you can get the latest script at github
>> 
>> As always, you are full of nonsense.
>> 
>> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> didn't you see Clutter freak post, he said 
> 
> "Nope. I was using it in 1992 and I was a late comer. "

Yep, and it was nonsense.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587321

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
> >> >>
> >> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
> >> >> you must be seeing things.
> >>
> >> <snip babble>
> >>
> >> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
> >>
> >> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
> >> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
> >> unmoderated newsgroup.
> >>
> >> <snip kook froth>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> >
> > 20 years???
> >
> > It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
> 
> Nope.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
> 
> > you can get the latest script at github
> 
> As always, you are full of nonsense.
> 
> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..

UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to  delete their usenet postings.

In other words, if I want to udp you, I run a udp program that automatically deletes all your postings and future posting on
auto...
your posting do not show up anywhere on *any* news server.


Ask anyone whos anyone.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587326

On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:35:17 -0700, The Starmaker
wrote:

> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>>>> >> you must be seeing things.
>>>>
>>>> <snip babble>
>>>>
>>>> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>>>>
>>>> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
>>>> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
>>>> unmoderated newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> <snip kook froth>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 20 years???
>>>
>>> It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
>> 
>>> you can get the latest script at github
>> 
>> As always, you are full of nonsense.
>> 
>> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..
> 
> UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to  delete their usenet postings.
> 
> In other words, if I want to udp you, I run a udp program that automatically deletes all your postings and future posting on
> auto...
> your posting do not show up anywhere on *any* news server.
> 
> 
> Ask anyone whos anyone.
> 

If such a script was available to public it would've
been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
alone. 

Come to think of it, do make it available for the kind
of regulars here like hvac, hanson, Pennino, and
Bodbod. I want to see how they'll dig their own graves
so to speak. They'll be the only ones left, having
_shit_ for discussion between themselves. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587329

ClutterFreak wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:35:17 -0700, The Starmaker
> wrote:
> 
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> >>>> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
> >>>> >> you must be seeing things.
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip babble>
> >>>>
> >>>> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
> >>>>
> >>>> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
> >>>> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
> >>>> unmoderated newsgroup.
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip kook froth>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jim Pennino
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 20 years???
> >>>
> >>> It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
> >>
> >>> you can get the latest script at github
> >>
> >> As always, you are full of nonsense.
> >>
> >> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> > okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..
> >
> > UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to  delete their usenet postings.
> >
> > In other words, if I want to udp you, I run a udp program that automatically deletes all your postings and future posting on
> > auto...
> > your posting do not show up anywhere on *any* news server.
> >
> >
> > Ask anyone whos anyone.
> >
> 
> If such a script was available to public it would've
> been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
> alone.
> 
> Come to think of it, do make it available for the kind
> of regulars here like hvac, hanson, Pennino, and
> Bodbod. I want to see how they'll dig their own graves
> so to speak. They'll be the only ones left, having
> _shit_ for discussion between themselves.


No, they would not be anyone left...


besides....there exist the udp police. the minute you activate the
program, it attracts the attention of the udp police.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587332

"ClutterFreak" Maldrecki <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> wrote:
 ...
>> Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj Jacoby <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>>>>> <snip babble>
>>>> <snip kook froth>
>>>> It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
>> Ask anyone whos anyone.
>> 
Maldrecki the he Iranian  Muslime & Glazier subsimmsive wrote:
> If such a script was available to public it would've
> been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
> alone which is seen in the daily clutter of Freack Maldrecki. 
> 
> Come to think of it, do make it available for the kind
> of regulars here like hvac, hanson, Pennino, and
> Bodbod. I want to see how they'll dig their own graves
> so to speak. They'll be the only ones left, having
> _shit_ for discussion between themselves. 
>
hanson wrote:
The parochial Iranian Babadook Muslime Transie Custard
aka "ClutterFreak"  <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com>
aka Mehram Maleki who is a virulent USA hater, proudly 
posted her Selfie as <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>
& is also a troll who said loud & clear, on 19-May-2016, 
in "Re: Thou shalt not covet", that 
 ____ "Maleki is talking bullshit"________, which s/he 
so did again as seen when s/he needed the criminality 
of a deranged Jew, Full Swine Glazier, to make her point, 
as seenb when Maldrecki wrote:
"Harlow compared to me, or my father, you're a dolt."
> 
USA Patriot "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka
Harlow Campbell wrote:
 Maybe (that is so) in your shithole country Iran
>
hanson wrote:
Malicious Maldrecki, the Muslime, is Iran's counterpart
to the USA's Jew Full-Swine Bert Glazier who like 
Cretin Glazier maintains to know how everything works, 
and like kikes Glazier behaves just like a dog that barks
into the night, a distant noise, Maldrecki knows nothing 
about.
LOL
>
Megalomaniacal Moron Mehram Custard Maldrecki wrote:
Iran is slowly rising ....
>
hanson wrote: 
You're such a Moron, Mehram. You are also rising
after you take a shit. Besides, you are slow on the 
uptake. Megalomaniacal & Overmedicated. 
Change your meds.
>
Now Mehram, why is it that Moslems flee, by the millions,
into the West that you so hate and rail against?
>
Looks like you are jealous, Maleki, because you can't
come here since you have been on a FBI watch list &
on a TSA no-fly list for your hateful and nefarious
behavior  when you visited here some decades back.
>
How many Westerners, even Moslems, do leave the West
and (im)migrate into to Iran?... NONE!... besides losers
and basket cases, like yourself, who then join ISIS
which is another thorn in your side. So much for Islame!
LOL
>
Iran is ancient. It had its apex millennia ago. It rose and
fell like Egypt, Greece & Rome.... never to ascend again,
and stagnate now as a "further running appendage"  Duh!
>
Malicious Maldrecki Custard wrote:
USA is slowly on the sharp way down.
>
hanson wrote:
You're such a Malfeasant, Malevolent Moron, Mehram.
If anyone is on a sharp way down its you Maleki
with all your geriatric Maladies that beset you. Pity.
>.
Let Harlow explain to you how & why the USA is, and 
will remain the predominant Player on the world stage. 
Hint: It renews itself with/by a constant stream of immigrants
from all over the world, unlike Iran that has always been
a closed Theocracy. Duh!
>
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587350

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:

<snip>

> If such a script was available to public it would've
> been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
> alone. 

Or anyone with an axe to grind, which is why it can only be done through
cooperation among news server administrators.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587363

On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:44:12 -0000,
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> If such a script was available to public it would've
>> been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
>> alone. 
> 
> Or anyone with an axe to grind, which is why it can only be done through
> cooperation among news server administrators.
> 

You cut my main point out (as usual). Cops wannabe
characters are not and will never be enough to make a
hangout going because it is exactly the inability to
offer anything else that drives them acting cops. Face
it. Characters like you are dependent upon
Clutterfreaks in the world. Without them you'd be a
sad cook Jim. This was my point!

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587375

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:44:12 -0000,
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
>> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> If such a script was available to public it would've
>>> been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
>>> alone. 
>> 
>> Or anyone with an axe to grind, which is why it can only be done through
>> cooperation among news server administrators.
>> 
> 
> You cut my main point out (as usual).

You have no point, just nonsense (as usual).


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587358

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> writes:

>On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:35:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>wrote:

>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
>>> 
>>>> you can get the latest script at github
>>> 
>>> As always, you are full of nonsense.
>>> 
>>> It is the collective action of a significant number news server 
>>> administrators.
>> 
>> okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..
>> 
>> UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to  
>> delete their usenet postings.
>> 
>> In other words, if I want to udp you, I run a udp program that 
>> automatically deletes all your postings and future posting on
>> auto...
>> your posting do not show up anywhere on *any* news server.
>> 
>> Ask anyone whos anyone.

>If such a script was available to public it would've
>been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
>alone. 

This shows the historical ignorance of Starfaker regarding Usenet.

Such a script would have worked 10-15+ years ago, not now.  Such scripts
did exist back then and _were_ widely abused.  Hipcrime, the Scientology
cancelbunny/cancelpoodle and so forth.

None of these scripts were called UDP. UDP, as mentioned, was an organized
effort to punish abusive/spammy providers, and implemented by the major
Usenet hubs of the time. I think the last UDP took place in 2001.

Hipcrime was the name of the most popular usenet abuse software.

There was also the concept of "cancellable spam" and the "Breitbart Index".

Because the serious abuse that ClutterFreak predicts really did happened
(Hipcrime, Scientology vs. the Net [fascinating reading], sporgery, cancel
wars/flood wars), most Usenet providers disabled the processing of cancel
commands/messages.  Because cancel messages are now ignored and no longer
work, and the fact Usenet is no longer popular, we don't see such abuse
much these days.

No "UDP script" would do enough to be noticed these days because so few
hosts honor cancel commands.

There are several terms worth googling in this post.

>Come to think of it, do make it available for the kind
>of regulars here like hvac, hanson, Pennino, and
>Bodbod. I want to see how they'll dig their own graves
>so to speak. They'll be the only ones left, having
>_shit_ for discussion between themselves. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587385

On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC), Michael
Moroney wrote:

> Hipcrime

http://www.hipcrime.com/html-hipcrime/new_page/index.html

Hmm.. Looks like it's specifically made for pussies.
Not even for hvac-hanson-BodBod-Jim quartet. 

Some authorities must've prevented its use by the
public to preserve usenet. I think it's been a mistake
to preserve it. It's again the same story as the
Prohibition. You guys flatter yourselves too much. You
think you're some kind of shit better than what you
actually are. They should've let you people fuck up
usenet if you chose so. 

I want this quartet here to fuck up this hangout. Why?
Because usenet is too good for these uncultured
bizarre characters. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587436

Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> writes:
> 
> >On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:35:17 -0700, The Starmaker
> >wrote:
> 
> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
> >>>
> >>>> you can get the latest script at github
> >>>
> >>> As always, you are full of nonsense.
> >>>
> >>> It is the collective action of a significant number news server
> >>> administrators.
> >>
> >> okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..
> >>
> >> UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to
> >> delete their usenet postings.
> >>
> >> In other words, if I want to udp you, I run a udp program that
> >> automatically deletes all your postings and future posting on
> >> auto...
> >> your posting do not show up anywhere on *any* news server.
> >>
> >> Ask anyone whos anyone.
> 
> >If such a script was available to public it would've
> >been used about 30 times a day in this newsgroup
> >alone.
> 
> This shows the historical ignorance of Starfaker regarding Usenet.
> 
> Such a script would have worked 10-15+ years ago, not now.  Such scripts
> did exist back then and _were_ widely abused.  Hipcrime, the Scientology
> cancelbunny/cancelpoodle and so forth.
> 
> None of these scripts were called UDP. UDP, as mentioned, was an organized
> effort to punish abusive/spammy providers, and implemented by the major
> Usenet hubs of the time. I think the last UDP took place in 2001.
> 
> Hipcrime was the name of the most popular usenet abuse software.


Hipcrime was not a "usenet abuse software"...it was a software to
implement a Usenet Death Penalty on anyone you wanted to UDP.

You know...take him out. Bang you're dead.

He who controls the UDP, controls Usenet.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587349

The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> >> > On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> >>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>> >> >> you must be seeing things.
>> >>
>> >> <snip babble>
>> >>
>> >> > Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>> >>
>> >> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
>> >> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
>> >> unmoderated newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> <snip kook froth>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 20 years???
>> >
>> > It is not an 'event, it's a script, or program...
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_Death_Penalty
>> 
>> > you can get the latest script at github
>> 
>> As always, you are full of nonsense.
>> 
>> It is the collective action of a significant number news server administrators.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> okay, i guess some here don't know what a UDP is...I'll explain..
> 
> UDP is a script or program that an individual uses to udp someone, to
> delete their usenet postings.

Nope, it can only be done by news server administrators who cooperatively
agree to accept cancel requests from each other.

As usual, you are clueless.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587546

On 6/29/2016 9:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>>>
>>> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>>> you must be seeing things.
>
> <snip babble>
>
>> Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>
> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
> unmoderated newsgroup.
>
> <snip kook froth>

More brainless chip babble. Subtle imperial thinkers know that if you 
can disrupt a conversation with school yard peurile taunts and other 
brainless blather, all the intelligent people will leave so one can
radicalize" the morons who stay. Just as good as censorship, eh, chimp?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587558

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 9:00 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 6/29/2016 1:27 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group.
>>>>
>>>> As censorship in an unmoderated newsgroup is essentially impossible,
>>>> you must be seeing things.
>>
>> <snip babble>
>>
>>> Of course with care an unmoderated newsgroup is hard to censor,
>>
>> Other than a UDP (which hasn't happened in about 20 years) or a poster
>> being so egregious no ISP will have him, there is no way to censor an
>> unmoderated newsgroup.
>>
>> <snip kook froth>
> 
> More brainless chip babble. Subtle imperial thinkers

"Subtle imperial thinkers" is just conspiracy theory kook babble.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587224

On 6/28/2016 8:49 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group. I thought that this
> group was supposed to be without a moderator. Who is playing "censor" in this group?
> I would like to decide for myself what I want to read, and what I do not want to read.
> That is why I chose to read "non-moderated" news groups. Whoever is trying to censor
> stuff for this group should start their own group and become moderator and then censor
> whatever they want to. Or better still move to a country where censorship is openly
> practiced and apply for a job as a "censor" and happily live and stay in that country.
> andrew vecsey
>

The group is not being censored. The messages are there. It's just that 
you're using Google Groups as a newsreader, which does hide some 
messages that are in fact there.

I'll point out two things:
1. You can override the Google Groups setting to show the hidden 
messages, if you'll only learn how to use the tool properly.
2. There are many other usenet readers besides Google Groups, and you 
always have the option of using one that doesn't hide messages.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#587438

Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
> On 6/28/2016 8:49 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> > I keep seeing forms of attempted censorship in this group. I thought that this
> > group was supposed to be without a moderator. Who is playing "censor" in this group?
> > I would like to decide for myself what I want to read, and what I do not want to read.
> > That is why I chose to read "non-moderated" news groups. Whoever is trying to censor
> > stuff for this group should start their own group and become moderator and then censor
> > whatever they want to. Or better still move to a country where censorship is openly
> > practiced and apply for a job as a "censor" and happily live and stay in that country.
> > andrew vecsey
> >
> 
> The group is not being censored. The messages are there. It's just that
> you're using Google Groups as a newsreader, which does hide some
> messages that are in fact there.


Hide and censored are the same thing, ...stupid.



conceal from the view or notice of others.
https://www.google.com/#q=define+hide


suppressing unacceptable parts.
https://www.google.com/#q=define+censorship


synonyms:	censor, keep secret, conceal, hide,
https://www.google.com/#q=define+suppressing



I was talking about UDP, not UPD.


either way, it's U.


U
PD
are
a
human
DP

and thats
a
P
in
my
book.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web