Groups > sci.physics > #581013 > unrolled thread

Is Something Missing?

Started by	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post	2016-05-27 10:23 -0700
Last post	2016-05-28 01:49 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 26 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

  Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 10:23 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 18:29 +0100
      Re: Is Something Missing? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 11:39 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 18:08 +0000
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:06 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 14:44 -0500
          Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 13:49 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-27 21:27 +0000
          Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 15:50 -0700
            Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 00:26 +0000
              Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 17:39 -0700
                Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 18:08 -0700
                  Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 20:12 -0500
                    Re: Is Something Missing? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 03:40 -0700
                      Re: Is Something Missing? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-28 11:08 -0400
                Re: Is Something Missing? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-28 01:05 +0000
    Re: Is Something Missing? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 13:33 -0500
      Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 12:16 -0700
        Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-27 22:13 -0700
          Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-28 07:21 -0500
          Re: Is Something Missing? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 08:40 -0500
            Re: Is Something Missing? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-28 13:25 -0700
              Re: Is Something Missing? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 16:04 -0500
    Re: Is Something Missing? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-27 14:11 -0500
    Re: Is Something Missing? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-27 14:37 -0700
    Re: Is Something Missing? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-28 01:49 -0700

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#581013 — Is Something Missing?

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 10:23 -0700
Subject	Is Something Missing?
Message-ID	<57488289.2B79@ix.netcom.com>

I'm not good at math..

but when I see this:

E=Mc2


it always looks like something is missing.

What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?


What I mean is...

there's usually a bunch of numbers
on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.


Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
lead to E=Mc2? 

Where is it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#581016

From	Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com>
Date	2016-05-27 18:29 +0100
Message-ID	<nia057$6ib$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to	#581013

The Starmaker wrote:
> I'm not good at math..
>
> but when I see this:
>
> E=Mc2
>
>
> it always looks like something is missing.
>
> What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
>
>
> What I mean is...
>
> there's usually a bunch of numbers
> on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.
>
>
> Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
> lead to E=Mc2?

E=mc^2 is a consequence of the special theory of relativity.  See 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence#Background 
for example, or the numerous references and links therein.
>
> Where is it?
>


-- 
A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers
least fitted to bring children into the world.... Some are of low
intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely
to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the
consistent combination of love and firmness.... They are producing
problem children.... The balance of our human stock, is threatened...
		Sir Keith Joseph

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581027

From	Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date	2016-05-27 11:39 -0700
Message-ID	<a49d0e2d-7891-4164-a243-46a09f731caf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#581016

On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 1:29:15 PM UTC-4, Peter Percival wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > I'm not good at math..

StrawFarter, you are not good at anything. Never will be.

> > but when I see this:
> >
> > E=Mc2
> >
> > it always looks like something is missing.
> >
> > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?

So ShortStraw, math too is beyond your reach. No surprise that.

> > What I mean is...
> >
> > there's usually a bunch of numbers
> > on a blackboard...and it ends with the answer.

Often StrawFrock... the board is green, and there's no answer whatsoever.

> > Shouldn't there be a bunch of numbers that
> > lead to E=Mc2?
> 
> E=mc^2 is a consequence of the special theory of relativity.  See 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence#Background 
> for example, or the numerous references and links therein.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olinto_De_Pretto gave us E=mc^2.

Einstein had nothing to do with E=mc^2. By all measures.
Other than claiming E=mc^2 as his own by ...youKnow. Read the links,
before them links are all erased from existence Existence EXISTENCE.
Hillar(y)ious Servers do not last forever... unless FIB is still reading...
See 28 top secret pages, 22 confidential emails, what's their next ## to be?
Yes, I watch the News for its comedy factor... Talking Head Pawns...
Not to mention, the girls so darned cute/pretty/sexy/.../blonde/...

> > Where is it?
> -- 
> A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers
> least fitted to bring children into the world.... Some are of low
> intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely
> to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the
> consistent combination of love and firmness.... They are producing
> problem children.... The balance of our human stock, is threatened...
> 		Sir Keith Joseph

That signature speaks volumes about you Peter Percival. 
Do/did you have problem children? If so, how many?

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581021

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-05-27 18:08 +0000
Message-ID	<p2fm1d-i0q.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#581013

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I'm not good at math..

You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

> but when I see this:
> 
> E=Mc2
> 
> 
> it always looks like something is missing.

Such as an education.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581033

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 12:06 -0700
Message-ID	<57489AC6.5038@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581021

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > I'm not good at math..
> 
> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.

wats a signle?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581057

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-05-27 14:44 -0500
Message-ID	<nia83e$1ipe$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#581033

On 5/27/2016 2:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not good at math..
>>
>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>
> wats a signle?
>


signle = sig + nle

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581076

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 13:49 -0700
Message-ID	<5748B2DD.1A8A@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581057

Sergio wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/2016 2:06 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>> I'm not good at math..
> >>
> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >
> > wats a signle?
> >
> 
> signle = sig + nle


I already stated "I'm not good at math", ...

i don't understand these highly complex math terms like signle = sig +
nle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581083

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-05-27 21:27 +0000
Message-ID	<qmqm1d-l7r.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#581033

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > I'm not good at math..
>> 
>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> 
> wats a signle?

If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
doubt.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581107

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 15:50 -0700
Message-ID	<5748CF4C.4FAD@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581083

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >>
> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >
> > wats a signle?
> 
> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> doubt.
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581120

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-05-28 00:26 +0000
Message-ID	<365n1d-58s.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#581107

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >>
>> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >
>> > wats a signle?
>> 
>> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> doubt.
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> your spel checker couldn't figure it out...

Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581123

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 17:39 -0700
Message-ID	<5748E8C7.3189@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581120

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> >> >>
> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> >> >
> >> > wats a signle?
> >>
> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> >> doubt.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jim Pennino
> >
> >
> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> 
> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> 
> --
> Jim Pennino


Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581126

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 18:08 -0700
Message-ID	<5748EFA7.1158@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581123

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >
> > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > I'm not good at math..
> > >> >>
> > >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
> > >> >
> > >> > wats a signle?
> > >>
> > >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
> > >> doubt.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jim Pennino
> > >
> > >
> > > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
> >
> > Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
> >
> > --
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

I think I'm coming down with a cold...GO FIND A FUCKIN CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD! 

I think I'm going to have a headache...GO MAKE ME A FUKING ASPRIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!

I think I got cancer...GO FIND A FUCKING CURE!!

Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

I don't like this planet anymore...GO ON A FUCKIN ROCKET AND FIND ME ANOTHER FUCKIN PLANET!!!

I DON'T CARE YOU GUYS BLOW UP LOOKING FOR ONE. TAKE THOSE STUPID TEACHERS WITH YOU ON A ROCKET...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581127

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-05-27 20:12 -0500
Message-ID	<niarb8$ahe$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#581126

On 5/27/2016 8:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I'm not good at math..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wats a signle?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>>>>> doubt.

>>>>> --
>>>>> Jim Pennino
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
>>>
>>> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Pennino
>>
>> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?
>
>
> I think I'm coming down with a cold...GO FIND A FUCKIN CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD!
>

> I think I'm going to have a headache...GO MAKE ME A FUKING ASPRIN, MOTHERFUCKER!!!!
>
>
> I think I got cancer...GO FIND A FUCKING CURE!!
>
>
>
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?
>
>
> I don't like this planet anymore...GO ON A FUCKIN ROCKET AND FIND ME ANOTHER FUCKIN PLANET!!!
>
>
> I DON'T CARE YOU GUYS BLOW UP LOOKING FOR ONE. TAKE THOSE STUPID TEACHERS WITH YOU ON A ROCKET...
>

as Sylvester Stallone would say,

"You are the disease, and I am the cure. "

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581157

From	HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date	2016-05-28 03:40 -0700
Message-ID	<a0c1171f-9e62-4ea9-aa98-6eb92ccdb70f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#581127

Sergio
- show quoted text -
as Sylvester Stallone would say, 

"You are the disease, and I am the cure. " 
-----------

As Duke Nukem would say, "I'm here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... And I'm all outta gum"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581210

From	benj <nobodyxx@gmail>
Date	2016-05-28 11:08 -0400
Message-ID	<5749b480$0$15556$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to	#581157

On 05/28/2016 06:40 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Sergio
> - show quoted text -
> as Sylvester Stallone would say,
>
> "You are the disease, and I am the cure. "
> -----------
>
> As Duke Nukem would say, "I'm here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... And I'm all outta gum"
>
Duke Nukem is a famous scientist in your world, Right kook?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581128

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2016-05-28 01:05 +0000
Message-ID	<eg7n1d-afs.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#581123

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > I'm not good at math..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You could not add two signle digit numbers and get the correct answer.
>> >> >
>> >> > wats a signle?
>> >>
>> >> If you can not figure out such a simple typo, the point is proven beyond
>> >> doubt.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jim Pennino
>> >
>> >
>> > your spel checker couldn't figure it out...
>> 
>> Why would I bother to waste the time to spell check a post for an idiot?
>> 
>> --
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> Isn't your purpose on this world is to help...idiots like me?

Not hardly.

If you are looking for help, and you should be, search for someone with
the words "clinical psychology" in their title.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581024

From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date	2016-05-27 13:33 -0500
Message-ID	<vfednahaS66VDtXKnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#581013

On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?


   Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
   http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

   More: Why Does E=mc2?: (And Why Should We Care?)
   http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-Should-Care/dp/0306818760

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581037

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 12:16 -0700
Message-ID	<57489D03.9F6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581024

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> 
>    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
>    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
by L/c2.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

So, L
stands for
radiation and radium?

and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..

so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?

(if i read it correctly)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581141

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date	2016-05-27 22:13 -0700
Message-ID	<57492912.5393@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to	#581037

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> >
> > On 5/27/16 12:23 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?
> >
> >    Here is the derivation (from the horse's mouth so to speak).
> >    http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes
> by L/c2.
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
> 
> So, L
> stands for
> radiation and radium?
> 
> and he changed the L to E, to read E=Mc2..
> 
> so it is a formula to make atomic bombs, right?
> 
> (if i read it correctly)

Now, I don't want to go off subject on bombs..

My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"

Looking at the math in this file...it looks very familiar..
that math...I've seen it somewhere else...

Is that Isaics Newton's math????
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

Did the math originated from...Newton?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#581163

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2016-05-28 07:21 -0500
Message-ID	<nic2i6$1ltq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#581141

> Now, I don't want to go off subject on bombs..
>
> My question was "What exactly is E=Mc2? Is it math?"
>
> Looking at the math in this file...it looks very familiar..
> that math...I've seen it somewhere else...
>
> Is that Isaics Newton's math????
> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
>
>
> Did the math originated from...Newton?
>

1. E=Mc2  is incorrect, it should be E = m*c^2
2. if you do not recognize it as math, leave all math alone
3. Isaics Newton never existed, but Isaac Newton knew maths well.
4. Newton Gingrich may be channeling this maths to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

Is Something Missing?

Contents

#581013 — Is Something Missing?

#581016

#581027

#581021

#581033

#581057

#581076

#581083

#581107

#581120

#581123

#581126

#581127

#581157

#581210

#581128

#581024

#581037

#581141

#581163