Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #574693 > unrolled thread

past,present,future

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-05-01 15:54 -0700
Last post2016-05-07 19:07 +0200
Articles 5 on this page of 45 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 15:54 -0700
    Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 18:18 -0500
      Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 16:59 -0700
        Re: past,present,future "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-01 18:30 -0700
          Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 18:59 -0700
            Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:02 -0500
            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 22:46 -0700
              Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-02 10:01 -0700
                Re: past,present,future Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-02 21:39 -0500
                  Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-02 21:20 -0700
                    Re: past,present,future "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-02 22:26 -0700
                      Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-02 22:46 -0700
                        Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-03 00:15 -0700
                          Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-03 20:55 -0700
                            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-03 22:17 -0700
                            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 22:36 -0700
                              Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-09 21:21 -0700
                                Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-11 13:35 -0700
                Re: past,present,future "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-05-04 18:56 -0700
    Re: past,present,future David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-05-02 20:29 -0600
      Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-02 19:11 -0700
    Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 07:38 -0500
      Re: past,present,future Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-05 00:03 +0200
        Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 19:27 -0500
          Re: past,present,future Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-05 03:14 +0200
      Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-04 23:08 -0700
        Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 09:16 -0500
          Re: past,present,future Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-06 19:58 +0200
            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-06 11:11 -0700
        Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-05 09:40 -0700
          Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 15:29 -0500
            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-05 23:24 -0700
          Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-06 11:13 -0700
    Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 20:38 -0500
      Re: past,present,future benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-04 23:26 -0400
        Re: past,present,future Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-04 23:59 -0500
        Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-05 23:30 -0700
          Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 08:42 -0500
            Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-06 11:05 -0700
              Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 18:18 -0500
                Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-06 20:30 -0700
                  Re: past,present,future Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 22:33 -0500
                Re: past,present,future The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-06 20:58 -0700
                  Re: past,present,future Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-06 22:08 -0600
                    Re: past,present,future Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 19:07 +0200

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#576140

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-05-06 20:30 -0700
Message-ID<572D613B.73AB@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#576093
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/6/16 1:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > You're not learning anything, are you? ...there is no space or time
> 
>    In my universe, there are both space and time and evolution.
> 


by your universe you mean the cut-paste universe...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576141

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-06 22:33 -0500
Message-ID<04ydndbWm41j_LDKnZ2dnUU7-VMAAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#576140
On 5/6/16 10:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 5/6/16 1:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> You're not learning anything, are you? ...there is no space or time
>>
>>    In my universe, there are both space and time and evolution.
>>
>
>
> by your universe you mean the cut-paste universe...
>

   By my universe, i refer to the one I am apart of that is
   observable and measurable.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576147

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-05-06 20:58 -0700
Message-ID<572D67F5.454E@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#576093
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 5/6/16 1:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > You're not learning anything, are you? ...there is no space or time
> 
>    In my universe, there are both space and time and evolution.
> 
> --
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.



if you remove all the planets and things in the universe, ...will there
still be space?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576149

FromVirgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com>
Date2016-05-06 22:08 -0600
Message-ID<VIRGIL-6E1F27.22081006052016@news.giganews.com>
In reply to#576147
In article <572D67F5.454E@ix.netcom.com>,
 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Sam Wormley wrote:
> > 
> > On 5/6/16 1:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > You're not learning anything, are you? ...there is no space or time
> > 
> >    In my universe, there are both space and time and evolution.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> 
> 
> if you remove all the planets and things in the universe, ...will there
> still be space?

Will it matter if there is nothing to go in it ?
-- 
Virgil
"Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#576223

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2016-05-07 19:07 +0200
Message-ID<1589762.G73mafhTtu@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#576149
Virgil wrote:

>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > On 5/6/16 1:05 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > You're not learning anything, are you? ...there is no space or time
>> > 
>> >    In my universe, there are both space and time and evolution.
>> 
>> if you remove all the planets and things in the universe, ...will there
>> still be space?

If by “things” you mean luminous (ca. 0.4 % of the mass–energy of the 
universe), non-luminous (ca. 3.6 %), and dark matter (ca. 23 %), then 
probably yes, because there would still be dark energy (formerly, ca. 73 %).
 
> Will it matter if there is nothing to go in it ?
          ^^^^^^ :)

AIUI yes: without the positive gravitational pressure of matter as defined 
above, the negative pressure exerted on the universe by dark energy could 
quickly rip spacetime apart (Big Rip), especially if it is indeed 
quintessence in the form of phantom energy (w = p∕ρ < −1).

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web