Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #570143 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 247 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 11:28 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? orobos287@gmail.com - 2016-05-05 07:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnt) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:29 -0700
(no, he doesnt) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13 Next page →
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-5E7918.00455429042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #574123 |
In article <0s36ib5mojavn85ms8a7mn7n2eddidilq7@4ax.com>, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:36:41 -0700, je suis charly > <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id > <charlie-gordon1492-769196.19364128042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> > wrote: > > >In article <ib65iblksb1ep6v184oa11lr858mmcspq0@4ax.com>, > > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> >I'll tell you 'where did life come from' because i seem to > >> >notice *nobody* on earth seems to know except me! > >> > >> Don't worry about it. That is just one more item yet to be > >> discovered. There are millions of them all waiting their turn. > > > >Do you have faith science will get the answer? > > No, but it has a better track record than anything else. Are you saying that the creation of life might not be natural? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfvtjm$1tms$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574124 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:45:54 -0700, je suis charly wrote: > In article <0s36ib5mojavn85ms8a7mn7n2eddidilq7@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:36:41 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-769196.19364128042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <ib65iblksb1ep6v184oa11lr858mmcspq0@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >I'll tell you 'where did life come from' because i seem to notice >> >> >*nobody* on earth seems to know except me! >> >> >> >> Don't worry about it. That is just one more item yet to be >> >> discovered. There are millions of them all waiting their turn. >> > >> >Do you have faith science will get the answer? >> >> No, but it has a better track record than anything else. > > Are you saying that the creation of life might not be natural? As everything we know is natural, how could it be unnatural? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6p57ibli2un8kqmfu1ln80ufkhv5lte3mb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #574124 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:45:54 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id <charlie-gordon1492-5E7918.00455429042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> wrote: >In article <0s36ib5mojavn85ms8a7mn7n2eddidilq7@4ax.com>, > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:36:41 -0700, je suis charly >> <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <charlie-gordon1492-769196.19364128042016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <ib65iblksb1ep6v184oa11lr858mmcspq0@4ax.com>, >> > Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> > >> >> >I'll tell you 'where did life come from' because i seem to >> >> >notice *nobody* on earth seems to know except me! >> >> >> >> Don't worry about it. That is just one more item yet to be >> >> discovered. There are millions of them all waiting their turn. >> > >> >Do you have faith science will get the answer? >> >> No, but it has a better track record than anything else. > >Are you saying that the creation of life might not be natural? I have no idea. Nor does anyone else. In the future anything is possible. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5723B698.1E2A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #574027 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers... > > > > > > BE REAL! > > > > > > Do you > > > see > > > anything > > > in outer space.. > > > or anywhere elsewhere > > > in the universe.. > > > like some kind of > > > mechanical machine > > > that can > > > manufacture a rose??? > > > > > > or a bee? > > > > > > Only God does stuff like that.. > > > > Look, every time science makes a new big discovery, > > the bible speaks of it first. > > > > Right now science is tryin to figure out.. > > 'where did life come from'? > > I'll tell you 'where did life come from' because i seem to > notice *nobody* on earth seems to know except me! > > I am your new fuckin science teacher... > > call me Mr. Nature! > > 'where did life come from'?...i'll give you a clue... > (that was nature does, gives clues) > > do you got rocks in your head? Mr. Nature is back.. (that was nature does, gives clues) I'll give you another clue.. How do you think people got started? The Stone Age. Do you need to be a rockit scientist to figure it out??? Okay, you got dust, rocks, stones...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VIRGIL-ED8AF1.14365929042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #574217 |
In article <5723B698.1E2A@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: A starmaker? Not bloody likely! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <572662DB.42CE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #574228 |
Virgil wrote: > > In article <5723B698.1E2A@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > A starmaker? Not bloody likely! > -- > Virgil > "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller) do you see any other starmakers here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <572663CB.108B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #574217 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers... > > > > > > > > BE REAL! > > > > > > > > Do you > > > > see > > > > anything > > > > in outer space.. > > > > or anywhere elsewhere > > > > in the universe.. > > > > like some kind of > > > > mechanical machine > > > > that can > > > > manufacture a rose??? > > > > > > > > or a bee? > > > > > > > > Only God does stuff like that.. > > > > > > Look, every time science makes a new big discovery, > > > the bible speaks of it first. > > > > > > Right now science is tryin to figure out.. > > > 'where did life come from'? > > > > I'll tell you 'where did life come from' because i seem to > > notice *nobody* on earth seems to know except me! > > > > I am your new fuckin science teacher... > > > > call me Mr. Nature! > > > > 'where did life come from'?...i'll give you a clue... > > (that was nature does, gives clues) > > > > do you got rocks in your head? > > Mr. Nature is back.. > (that was nature does, gives clues) > > I'll give you another clue.. > > How do you think people got started? The Stone Age. > > Do you need to be a rockit scientist to figure it out??? > > Okay, you got dust, rocks, stones... ...and one thing that there is clearly a lot of in the universe is...Rocks. you go to the moon you bring back rocks.. or is it the moon sending the rocks?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfvt5g$1tms$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574003 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:16:00 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> i mean come on already...yous atheist and half belivers... >> >> BE REAL! >> >> Do you see anything in outer space.. >> or anywhere elsewhere in the universe.. >> like some kind of mechanical machine >> that can >> manufacture a rose??? >> >> or a bee? >> >> Only God does stuff like that.. > > Look, every time science makes a new big discovery, > the bible speaks of it first. > > Right now science is tryin to figure out.. > 'where did life come from'? > > If those stupid guys would read the bible... Since when has reading been believing? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ccovhblsp7j88670d462okveekmnoq9hm7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #572907 |
On 24 Apr 2016 12:53:46 -0400, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote: >In article <nfc1hu$m9p$1@dont-email.me>, >"Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: > >> William December Starr wrote: >>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>> >>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >>> >>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>> that logically it's impossible >> >> If God is literally omnipotent, He knows how to convince me. > >Did you mean "omniscient" there? > >> There will be some set of events and words that can do so, even if >> they're ones that no mortal could think of or arrange. > >Will there be? I think it hinges on the question of "Can God do >*anything*, or can he only do anything that's possible?" God is all love. He can do anything as long as it's love. God's love cannot be replaced or challenged by evil. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bilgat@m.nu |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #572274 |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >> >>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >> >> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >> that logically it's impossible > > > If God is literally omnipotent, He knows how to convince me. There will >be some set of events and words that can do so, even if they're ones >that no mortal could think of or arrange. I hear a clock somewhere Coo Coo Coo Coo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tpa4ibd1hf69punir9o82h8tb6bpm770o2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #573936 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" ><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>> >>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >>> >>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>> that logically it's impossible >> >> >> If God is literally omnipotent, He knows how to convince me. There will >>be some set of events and words that can do so, even if they're ones >>that no mortal could think of or arrange. > > >I hear a clock somewhere > >Coo Coo Coo Coo Hardly a reasonable answer. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #573963 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >>>> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >>>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >>>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >>>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >>>> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >>>> that logically it's impossible >>> >>> >>> If God is literally omnipotent, He knows how to convince me. There will >>>be some set of events and words that can do so, even if they're ones >>>that no mortal could think of or arrange. >> >> >>I hear a clock somewhere >> >>Coo Coo Coo Coo > >Hardly a reasonable answer. I know him well. That's the best he can do. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VIRGIL-E15517.11390128042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #573973 |
In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with > >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" > >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >> > >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, > >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: > >>>> > >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll > >>>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a > >>>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old > >>>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. > >>>> > >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think > >>>> that logically it's impossible An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! . > > the duckster, Armenian-Armenian > > ***** > "The Mess is the most perfect form of Payout." > Pupy Paul VI > ***** -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #573998 |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, > duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with >> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: >> > >> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" >> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: >> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, >> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: >> >>>> >> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll >> >>>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a >> >>>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old >> >>>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. >> >>>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >> >>>> that logically it's impossible > >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which way we turn. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 11:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ea9e7bce-a1ca-4f0b-ad74-accd1bd6f73b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #574210 |
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 1:24:58 PM UTC-5, duke wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:39:01 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > > >In article <1fe4ib58hr6vs7p3fidqp9f9s1eekr13k0@4ax.com>, > > duck <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:25:08 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >> > >> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:18:09 -0500, bilgat@m.nu in alt.atheism with > >> >message-id <sb34iblldivgobt3rt505mtn4dvsn0nemf@4ax.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:19:54 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" > >> >><seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>On 4/21/16 3:47 PM, William December Starr wrote: > >> >>>> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, > >> >>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> said: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll > >> >>>>> have to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a > >> >>>>> way that made just believing in them without evidence (and old > >> >>>>> books without scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think > >> >>>> that logically it's impossible > > > >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! > Assuming that thing you describe cared that *you* believe it. > If he wanted to, he would. He wants us tempted so he can see which way we turn. > Dont be silly. > the dukester, American-American > > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI > *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VIRGIL-1F0B6F.14400729042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #574210 |
In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think > >> >>>> that logically it's impossible > > > >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! > > If he wanted to, he would. If "The" god were male there would be no humans. -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <78f9ibh8slk4416ibtdku7o3e4p1q356rp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #574231 |
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I think >> >> >>>> that logically it's impossible >> > >> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >> >> If he wanted to, he would. > >If "The" god were male there would be no humans. stupid comment. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng2on0$1vsk$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574376 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:11:28 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: > >>In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>> >> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>> > >>> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>> >>> If he wanted to, he would. >> >>If "The" god were male there would be no humans. > > stupid comment. That's all we ever get from you. > ***** > "Paedophilia is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r76cib5gcvcajquks26djig1osuot9iqqo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #574409 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:11:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >> >>>In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, >>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>> >> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>> > >>>> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>>> >>>> If he wanted to, he would. >>> >>>If "The" god were male there would be no humans. >> >> stupid comment. > >That's all we ever get from you. Well, it does take intelligence on your part to understand. So I can accept what problems you are having. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ng599c$1gcp$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574596 |
On Sun, 01 May 2016 09:56:43 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 09:11:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:40:07 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >>> >>>>In article <gm97ibhphdv41oupbgbvc153kgc1ljncbf@4ax.com>, >>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> But: what evidence would be sufficient to convince you? I >>>>> >> >>>> think that logically it's impossible >>>>> > >>>>> >An omniscient omnipotent god should be able to find way! >>>>> >>>>> If he wanted to, he would. >>>> >>>>If "The" god were male there would be no humans. >>> >>> stupid comment. >> >>That's all we ever get from you. > > Well, it does take intelligence on your part to understand. So I can > accept what problems you are having. I perfectly well understand that you're an idiot, no problem. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web