Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #570143 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 247 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-21 15:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 17:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2016-04-24 13:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 11:28 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? orobos287@gmail.com - 2016-05-05 07:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnt) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:29 -0700
(no, he doesnt) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <573D086F.5C0A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #578842 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:26:31 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >benj wrote: > >> > >> On 05/18/2016 02:21 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> > Mitchell Holman wrote: > >> >> > >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in > >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing > >> >>> would exist. > >> >> > >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. > >> >> > >> >> Who created your creator? > >> > > >> > > >> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >> > > >> > > >> > (all your questions are answered in that one sentence) > >> > > >> > > >> > So, 'In the beginning..' > >> > > >> > https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning > >> > > >> > 1. > >> > the point in time or space at which something starts. > >> > > >> > > >> > '...God created..' > >> > > >> > > >> > There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. > >> > it existed after God..God created the first...create. > >> > > >> > And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' > >> > > >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- > >> > >> Starfaker you are babbling and drooling! The whole biblical creation > >> myth like all of the creation myths is an attempt to explain highly > >> advanced technical physics to primitive ignorant humans (even MORE > >> primitive and ignorant than they are today if you can imagine that!) > >> > >> Hence it used terms that really make no logical sense like saying > >> creation took place in six "days"? Sure you can understand a "day" on > >> earth and what it means but what is a "day" for the universe? Obviously > >> a "day" is trying to explain operations that took place in stages or > >> phases. > >> > >> Native humans see things in causal form. Hence they want stories about > >> "beginnings" But if there was a beginning what was before that? Was > >> there a God? Defining God as the universe and all in it and the laws > >> that govern it allow you to say the laws might have been there but since > >> we are talking "creation" the universe wasn't and since "God" is the > >> universe then God must have not existed either unless it was there only > >> as laws. > >> > >> Story is that "God" is outside of time. Therefore "creation" does not > >> apply. Creation applies only to causal phenomena that we are and > >> observe. Hence out efforts to ascribe a "creation" to God is basically > >> nonsense. God is the theater and projectionist (this is something you > >> can understand starfaker) it always existed and exists because they are > >> outside of time. Then just for US the the movie starts and we watch it > >> all take place in linear fashion. But in truth it all already exists > >> wound up in the reels of film on the projector. We just can't see the > >> part that isn't yet in the projector or the things that have already > >> gone through and are wound up on the other reel. But in truth all of our > >> "creation" is just ONE time. WE just cannot comprehend something > >> existing outside of time. So we make up stories. > > > > > > > >It's very simple, you need to undertsand the order of events.... > > > > > >it is God created, not created God. > > Where is the evidence any god ever existed? > > > > > > > > Quote from unverified source removed. > > > > > > > > >Maybe you people need to go back to school and learn the Inglish languagge... > > > > > Quote from unverified source removed. > > > > > >Look up the Defintion for the word: "In" > > > >then, > > > >Look up the Defintion for the word: "the" > > > >then > > > >Look up the Defintion for the word: "beginning" > > > > > >then > > > > > >Look up the Defintion for the word: (,) > > > > > >Now, try to understand what the word "In" means... > > > >and "the" > > > > > >and "beginning". > > I see nothing about any god in there. 'In the beginning, ..." has nothing to do with any god. It is about understanding what 'In the beginning, ...' is...God comes in afterwards.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h16qjb5rv9pv2a9didmdrpalfagc63l5g7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578871 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 17:27:27 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <573D086F.5C0A@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Attila < wrote: >> >> On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:26:31 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >benj wrote: >> >> >> >> On 05/18/2016 02:21 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >> >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >> >> >>> would exist. >> >> >> >> >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. >> >> >> >> >> >> Who created your creator? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > (all your questions are answered in that one sentence) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > So, 'In the beginning..' >> >> > >> >> > https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning >> >> > >> >> > 1. >> >> > the point in time or space at which something starts. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > '...God created..' >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. >> >> > it existed after God..God created the first...create. >> >> > >> >> > And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' >> >> > >> >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- >> >> >> >> Starfaker you are babbling and drooling! The whole biblical creation >> >> myth like all of the creation myths is an attempt to explain highly >> >> advanced technical physics to primitive ignorant humans (even MORE >> >> primitive and ignorant than they are today if you can imagine that!) >> >> >> >> Hence it used terms that really make no logical sense like saying >> >> creation took place in six "days"? Sure you can understand a "day" on >> >> earth and what it means but what is a "day" for the universe? Obviously >> >> a "day" is trying to explain operations that took place in stages or >> >> phases. >> >> >> >> Native humans see things in causal form. Hence they want stories about >> >> "beginnings" But if there was a beginning what was before that? Was >> >> there a God? Defining God as the universe and all in it and the laws >> >> that govern it allow you to say the laws might have been there but since >> >> we are talking "creation" the universe wasn't and since "God" is the >> >> universe then God must have not existed either unless it was there only >> >> as laws. >> >> >> >> Story is that "God" is outside of time. Therefore "creation" does not >> >> apply. Creation applies only to causal phenomena that we are and >> >> observe. Hence out efforts to ascribe a "creation" to God is basically >> >> nonsense. God is the theater and projectionist (this is something you >> >> can understand starfaker) it always existed and exists because they are >> >> outside of time. Then just for US the the movie starts and we watch it >> >> all take place in linear fashion. But in truth it all already exists >> >> wound up in the reels of film on the projector. We just can't see the >> >> part that isn't yet in the projector or the things that have already >> >> gone through and are wound up on the other reel. But in truth all of our >> >> "creation" is just ONE time. WE just cannot comprehend something >> >> existing outside of time. So we make up stories. >> > >> > >> > >> >It's very simple, you need to undertsand the order of events.... >> > >> > >> >it is God created, not created God. >> >> Where is the evidence any god ever existed? >> >> > >> > >> > >> Quote from unverified source removed. >> >> > >> > >> > >> >Maybe you people need to go back to school and learn the Inglish languagge... >> > >> > >> Quote from unverified source removed. >> > >> > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "In" >> > >> >then, >> > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "the" >> > >> >then >> > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "beginning" >> > >> > >> >then >> > >> > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: (,) >> > >> > >> >Now, try to understand what the word "In" means... >> > >> >and "the" >> > >> > >> >and "beginning". >> >> I see nothing about any god in there. > > >'In the beginning, ..." has nothing to do with any god. > > >It is about understanding what 'In the beginning, ...' >is...God comes in afterwards. Please provide your evidence supporting the existence of any god. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <573F5EDD.500F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #578881 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 17:27:27 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > <573D086F.5C0A@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Attila < wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:26:31 -0700, The Starmaker > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >benj wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 05/18/2016 02:21 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > >> >> > Mitchell Holman wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in > >> >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing > >> >> >>> would exist. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Who created your creator? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > (all your questions are answered in that one sentence) > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > So, 'In the beginning..' > >> >> > > >> >> > https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning > >> >> > > >> >> > 1. > >> >> > the point in time or space at which something starts. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > '...God created..' > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. > >> >> > it existed after God..God created the first...create. > >> >> > > >> >> > And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' > >> >> > > >> >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- > >> >> > >> >> Starfaker you are babbling and drooling! The whole biblical creation > >> >> myth like all of the creation myths is an attempt to explain highly > >> >> advanced technical physics to primitive ignorant humans (even MORE > >> >> primitive and ignorant than they are today if you can imagine that!) > >> >> > >> >> Hence it used terms that really make no logical sense like saying > >> >> creation took place in six "days"? Sure you can understand a "day" on > >> >> earth and what it means but what is a "day" for the universe? Obviously > >> >> a "day" is trying to explain operations that took place in stages or > >> >> phases. > >> >> > >> >> Native humans see things in causal form. Hence they want stories about > >> >> "beginnings" But if there was a beginning what was before that? Was > >> >> there a God? Defining God as the universe and all in it and the laws > >> >> that govern it allow you to say the laws might have been there but since > >> >> we are talking "creation" the universe wasn't and since "God" is the > >> >> universe then God must have not existed either unless it was there only > >> >> as laws. > >> >> > >> >> Story is that "God" is outside of time. Therefore "creation" does not > >> >> apply. Creation applies only to causal phenomena that we are and > >> >> observe. Hence out efforts to ascribe a "creation" to God is basically > >> >> nonsense. God is the theater and projectionist (this is something you > >> >> can understand starfaker) it always existed and exists because they are > >> >> outside of time. Then just for US the the movie starts and we watch it > >> >> all take place in linear fashion. But in truth it all already exists > >> >> wound up in the reels of film on the projector. We just can't see the > >> >> part that isn't yet in the projector or the things that have already > >> >> gone through and are wound up on the other reel. But in truth all of our > >> >> "creation" is just ONE time. WE just cannot comprehend something > >> >> existing outside of time. So we make up stories. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >It's very simple, you need to undertsand the order of events.... > >> > > >> > > >> >it is God created, not created God. > >> > >> Where is the evidence any god ever existed? > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Quote from unverified source removed. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Maybe you people need to go back to school and learn the Inglish languagge... > >> > > >> > > >> Quote from unverified source removed. > >> > > >> > > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "In" > >> > > >> >then, > >> > > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "the" > >> > > >> >then > >> > > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "beginning" > >> > > >> > > >> >then > >> > > >> > > >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: (,) > >> > > >> > > >> >Now, try to understand what the word "In" means... > >> > > >> >and "the" > >> > > >> > > >> >and "beginning". > >> > >> I see nothing about any god in there. > > > > > >'In the beginning, ..." has nothing to do with any god. > > > > > >It is about understanding what 'In the beginning, ...' > >is...God comes in afterwards. > > Please provide your evidence supporting the existence of any god. He created the color Yellow on Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <072vjbl147n08l8hqhu26j5vdgif0ohhq2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #579293 |
On Fri, 20 May 2016 12:00:45 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <573F5EDD.500F@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Attila < wrote: >> >> On Wed, 18 May 2016 17:27:27 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <573D086F.5C0A@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >Attila < wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:26:31 -0700, The Starmaker >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >> >> <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >benj wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 05/18/2016 02:21 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >> >> >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >> >> >> >>> would exist. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Who created your creator? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > (all your questions are answered in that one sentence) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > So, 'In the beginning..' >> >> >> > >> >> >> > https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 1. >> >> >> > the point in time or space at which something starts. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > '...God created..' >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. >> >> >> > it existed after God..God created the first...create. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' >> >> >> > >> >> >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- >> >> >> >> >> >> Starfaker you are babbling and drooling! The whole biblical creation >> >> >> myth like all of the creation myths is an attempt to explain highly >> >> >> advanced technical physics to primitive ignorant humans (even MORE >> >> >> primitive and ignorant than they are today if you can imagine that!) >> >> >> >> >> >> Hence it used terms that really make no logical sense like saying >> >> >> creation took place in six "days"? Sure you can understand a "day" on >> >> >> earth and what it means but what is a "day" for the universe? Obviously >> >> >> a "day" is trying to explain operations that took place in stages or >> >> >> phases. >> >> >> >> >> >> Native humans see things in causal form. Hence they want stories about >> >> >> "beginnings" But if there was a beginning what was before that? Was >> >> >> there a God? Defining God as the universe and all in it and the laws >> >> >> that govern it allow you to say the laws might have been there but since >> >> >> we are talking "creation" the universe wasn't and since "God" is the >> >> >> universe then God must have not existed either unless it was there only >> >> >> as laws. >> >> >> >> >> >> Story is that "God" is outside of time. Therefore "creation" does not >> >> >> apply. Creation applies only to causal phenomena that we are and >> >> >> observe. Hence out efforts to ascribe a "creation" to God is basically >> >> >> nonsense. God is the theater and projectionist (this is something you >> >> >> can understand starfaker) it always existed and exists because they are >> >> >> outside of time. Then just for US the the movie starts and we watch it >> >> >> all take place in linear fashion. But in truth it all already exists >> >> >> wound up in the reels of film on the projector. We just can't see the >> >> >> part that isn't yet in the projector or the things that have already >> >> >> gone through and are wound up on the other reel. But in truth all of our >> >> >> "creation" is just ONE time. WE just cannot comprehend something >> >> >> existing outside of time. So we make up stories. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >It's very simple, you need to undertsand the order of events.... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >it is God created, not created God. >> >> >> >> Where is the evidence any god ever existed? >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Quote from unverified source removed. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Maybe you people need to go back to school and learn the Inglish languagge... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Quote from unverified source removed. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "In" >> >> > >> >> >then, >> >> > >> >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "the" >> >> > >> >> >then >> >> > >> >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: "beginning" >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >then >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Look up the Defintion for the word: (,) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Now, try to understand what the word "In" means... >> >> > >> >> >and "the" >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >and "beginning". >> >> >> >> I see nothing about any god in there. >> > >> > >> >'In the beginning, ..." has nothing to do with any god. >> > >> > >> >It is about understanding what 'In the beginning, ...' >> >is...God comes in afterwards. >> >> Please provide your evidence supporting the existence of any god. > > >He created the color Yellow on Earth. Your assertions are not evidence. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <aaa-FB9595.16015818052016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #578823 |
In article <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' If everything was created, what created that God?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <573D08F6.346C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #578859 |
Wisely Non-Theist wrote: > > In article <573CB3D7.2DA7@ix.netcom.com>, > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > > If everything was created, what created that God? 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' (all your questions are answered in that one sentence) So, 'In the beginning..' https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning 1. the point in time or space at which something starts. '...God created..' There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. it existed after God..God created the first...create. And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' (you failed my class) (you might be wisely but you cannot read)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578766 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 03:30:32 -0400, benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote: >Starfaker you are babbling and drooling! The whole biblical creation >myth like all of the creation myths is an attempt to explain highly >advanced technical physics to primitive ignorant humans (even MORE >primitive and ignorant than they are today if you can imagine that!) Well, it certainly is advanced compared to man's ability to reason it out. Yet he and I agree that "creation" as we use it addresses the beginning of all matter and energy in the universe. The what and the where before that is not ours to know. >Hence it used terms that really make no logical sense like saying >creation took place in six "days"? Sure you can understand a "day" on >earth and what it means but what is a "day" for the universe? Obviously >a "day" is trying to explain operations that took place in stages or >phases. Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here. >Native humans see things in causal form. Hence they want stories about >"beginnings" But if there was a beginning what was before that? Was >there a God? Defining God as the universe and all in it and the laws >that govern it allow you to say the laws might have been there but since >we are talking "creation" the universe wasn't and since "God" is the >universe then God must have not existed either unless it was there only >as laws. > >Story is that "God" is outside of time. Therefore "creation" does not >apply. Creation applies only to causal phenomena that we are and >observe. That's what he and I are already saying. >Hence out efforts to ascribe a "creation" to God is basically >nonsense. God is the theater and projectionist (this is something you >can understand starfaker) it always existed and exists because they are >outside of time. Then just for US the the movie starts and we watch it >all take place in linear fashion. But in truth it all already exists >wound up in the reels of film on the projector. We just can't see the >part that isn't yet in the projector or the things that have already >gone through and are wound up on the other reel. But in truth all of our >"creation" is just ONE time. WE just cannot comprehend something >existing outside of time. So we make up stories. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <VIRGIL-27237D.16084318052016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #578828 |
In article <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here Sane people prefer not to take it at all. The myths of wandering tribesmen are not binding in the atomic age! -- Virgil "Mit der Dummheit kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens." (Schiller)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8prpjbt78t3cgkq73ef6cfo4h71v5soorg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578860 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:08:43 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <VIRGIL-27237D.16084318052016@news.giganews.com> wrote: >In article <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here > >Sane people prefer not to take it at all. > >The myths of wandering tribesmen are not binding in the atomic age! Or in any other age. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s7csjb93pqchondv4mf18h5msep1130jbv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578863 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 18:40:39 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:08:43 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><VIRGIL-27237D.16084318052016@news.giganews.com> wrote: > >>In article <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com>, >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >> >>> Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here >> >>Sane people prefer not to take it at all. >> >>The myths of wandering tribesmen are not binding in the atomic age! >Or in any other age. Their shoes didn't have nuclear reactors to drive them. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oacsjbp6sl9mntbg1kp6h026449ubfa2v8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #579040 |
On Thu, 19 May 2016 16:33:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <s7csjb93pqchondv4mf18h5msep1130jbv@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2016 18:40:39 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:08:43 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><VIRGIL-27237D.16084318052016@news.giganews.com> wrote: >> >>>In article <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com>, >>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here >>> >>>Sane people prefer not to take it at all. >>> >>>The myths of wandering tribesmen are not binding in the atomic age! > >>Or in any other age. > >Their shoes didn't have nuclear reactors to drive them. > Nor do those of anyone else. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <88bsjbp3al89nhs2ta9eodrkc8qtutmmft@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578860 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:08:43 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote: >In article <aefpjbdljvu8rnk5i8uvl2v1fklt6dbi2a@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> Welcome to why the biblical explanation can't be taken literally here > >Sane people prefer not to take it at all. So does the ostrich when it hides it's head in the ground. >The myths of wandering tribesmen are not binding in the atomic age! Oh, did they take the 747 from Cairo to Rome with a stop over at the river? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ja7ojbpul24nm34bt9jjst2mo31pfpnse5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578761 |
On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Mitchell Holman wrote: >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >> >> > >> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >> > would exist. >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. >> >> Who created your creator? > > >'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' Where is the evidence this actually occurred? Use verified sources only. > > >(all your questions are answered in that one sentence) > > >So, 'In the beginning..' > >https://www.google.com/#q=define+beginning > >1. >the point in time or space at which something starts. > > >'...God created..' > > >There was no creation before God..so no one created God since creation did not exist before God.. >it existed after God..God created the first...create. Where is your evidence that any god ever existed? > >And then you have...'the heavens and the earth.' > >--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fkfpjbdnvmr6r7tr42phcqgpl1e45hp797@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578769 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 03:45:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id ><573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>> >>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >>> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >>> >>> > >>> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >>> > would exist. >>> >>> Without a creation your god would not exist. >>> >>> Who created your creator? >> >> >>'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >Where is the evidence this actually occurred? Use verified sources >only. Man is but a speck of dirt on the big picture when it comes to God. Go find your own evidence if you care. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <akipjb9erhc33grj8k266d4gdq7q6q1nm2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578829 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:13:10 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <fkfpjbdnvmr6r7tr42phcqgpl1e45hp797@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2016 03:45:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >><573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>> >>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >>>> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >>>> > would exist. >>>> >>>> Without a creation your god would not exist. >>>> >>>> Who created your creator? >>> >>> >>>'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >> >>Where is the evidence this actually occurred? Use verified sources >>only. > >Man is but a speck of dirt on the big picture when it comes to God. Since it is easy to verify the existence of man but there is no evidence to support the existence of any god the two cannot be compared. > Go find >your own evidence if you care. > I really don't. You are the one who keeps talking about it as if it is real and actually matters. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a9csjbdheuj81r62u2kskrdg8h72k5fjf2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578844 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:05:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:13:10 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><fkfpjbdnvmr6r7tr42phcqgpl1e45hp797@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 May 2016 03:45:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >>>>> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >>>>> > would exist. >>>>> >>>>> Without a creation your god would not exist. >>>>> >>>>> Who created your creator? >>>> >>>> >>>>'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >>> >>>Where is the evidence this actually occurred? Use verified sources >>>only. >> >>Man is but a speck of dirt on the big picture when it comes to God. >Since it is easy to verify the existence of man but there is no >evidence to support the existence of any god the two cannot be >compared. There is no possible way for man to actually exist without the hand of God. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kb6tjb5qibbvcetju6mujearndl0pc9pp8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #579041 |
On Thu, 19 May 2016 16:34:08 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <a9csjbdheuj81r62u2kskrdg8h72k5fjf2@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:05:46 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 18 May 2016 14:13:10 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><fkfpjbdnvmr6r7tr42phcqgpl1e45hp797@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 18 May 2016 03:45:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker >>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >>>>>> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >>>>>> > would exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Without a creation your god would not exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who created your creator? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >>>> >>>>Where is the evidence this actually occurred? Use verified sources >>>>only. >>> >>>Man is but a speck of dirt on the big picture when it comes to God. > >>Since it is easy to verify the existence of man but there is no >>evidence to support the existence of any god the two cannot be >>compared. > >There is no possible way for man to actually exist without the hand of God. > According to your superstition, but there is no evidence any god ever existed. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <573CC738.C2C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #578769 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > <573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Mitchell Holman wrote: > >> > >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in > >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: > >> > >> > > >> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing > >> > would exist. > >> > >> Without a creation your god would not exist. > >> > >> Who created your creator? > > > > > >'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > > Where is the evidence this actually occurred? You're the evidence... Don't you know Who you are?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0pipjb16erq8q1rlmbjof00t4kpuu41ecn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578838 |
On Wed, 18 May 2016 12:49:12 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <573CC738.C2C@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Attila < wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> >Mitchell Holman wrote: >> >> >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing >> >> > would exist. >> >> >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. >> >> >> >> Who created your creator? >> > >> > >> >'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' >> >> Where is the evidence this actually occurred? > > >You're the evidence... Nonsense. That is too vague to have any meaning. > > >Don't you know Who you are? Yes. But no one else does. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <573F5E31.6F8E@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #578845 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 12:49:12 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > <573CC738.C2C@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >Attila < wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 17 May 2016 23:21:46 -0700, The Starmaker > >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <573C09FA.5A01@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Mitchell Holman wrote: > >> >> > >> >> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in > >> >> news:1i0mjbl1llvtuvpoe7njfrtf3rv7tj9jgc@4ax.com: > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > If you can't see it, you don't want to. Without creation, nothing > >> >> > would exist. > >> >> > >> >> Without a creation your god would not exist. > >> >> > >> >> Who created your creator? > >> > > >> > > >> >'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.' > >> > >> Where is the evidence this actually occurred? > > > > > >You're the evidence... > > Nonsense. That is too vague to have any meaning. > > > > > > >Don't you know Who you are? > > Yes. But no one else does. If no one else knows who you are, what makes you think you know who you are?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web