Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #570752 > unrolled thread

The end of a black hole...

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2016-04-15 11:27 -0700
Last post2016-04-18 16:49 -0700
Articles 10 on this page of 30 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-15 11:27 -0700
    Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 13:38 -0500
      Re: The end of a black hole... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 11:52 -0700
      Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-15 13:33 -0700
        Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:51 -0500
          Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 13:58 -0700
          Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 14:08 -0700
            Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 16:43 -0500
              Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 23:01 -0700
          Re: The end of a black hole... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-16 19:12 -0400
        Re: The end of a black hole... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 17:30 -0700
          Re: The end of a black hole... benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-17 00:46 -0400
            Re: The end of a black hole... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 11:25 -0700
              Re: The end of a black hole... benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 00:02 -0400
    Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-16 17:17 -0500
      Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-16 18:01 -0700
        Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-16 23:55 -0500
    Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 00:02 -0700
      Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 13:19 -0500
        Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:51 -0700
          Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:55 -0500
            Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 14:17 -0700
              Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 16:24 -0500
                Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 15:21 -0700
                  Re: The end of a black hole... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-19 08:48 -0500
                Re: The end of a black hole... David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-04-20 21:31 -0500
                  Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-20 21:20 -0700
                    Re: The end of a black hole... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:00 -0500
      Re: The end of a black hole... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 15:26 -0700
        Re: The end of a black hole... xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-18 16:49 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#571377

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-18 14:55 -0500
Message-ID<geednTMmUNABpojKnZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#571375
   Whether something is rotation clockwise or counter clockwise is
   observer dependent.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571400

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-18 14:17 -0700
Message-ID<57154EFA.7AA9@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#571377
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>    Whether something is rotation clockwise or counter clockwise is
>    observer dependent.
> 


wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
THIS!!!



HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO PASTE IT???

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571402

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-18 16:24 -0500
Message-ID<geednScmUNDgzYjKnZ2dnUU7-T0AAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#571400
On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
>
> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
> THIS!!!
>

   Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
   clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
   the concept?

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571417

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-18 15:21 -0700
Message-ID<57155DF9.77C6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#571402
Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> >
> > wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
> > THIS!!!
> >
> 
>    Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
>    clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
>    the concept?
> 


all you did was change "rotation" to "rotating"...which is it, is it
rotation clockwise or rotating colockwise?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571542

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-04-19 08:48 -0500
Message-ID<nf5d0s$lbf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#571417
On 4/18/2016 5:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>> On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
>>> THIS!!!
>>>
>>
>>     Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
>>     clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
>>     the concept?
>>
>
>
> all you did was change "rotation" to "rotating"...which is it, is it
> rotation clockwise or rotating colockwise?
>

rotating kookwise, you know, that way =>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571985

FromDavid Staup <dstaup@charter.net>
Date2016-04-20 21:31 -0500
Message-ID<nf9dru$vo6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#571402
On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>
>> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
>> THIS!!!
>>
>
>    Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
>    clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
>    the concept?
>
Chuckle....

Sam you're arguing with an IDIOT

only another idiot would do so

hmmm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572005

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-20 21:20 -0700
Message-ID<571854F0.4636@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#571985
David Staup wrote:
> 
> On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 4/18/16 4:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> wat is this, are you having 'cut and paste' problems? YOU ALREADY PASTED
> >> THIS!!!
> >>
> >
> >    Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
> >    clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
> >    the concept?
> >
> Chuckle....
> 
> Sam you're arguing with an IDIOT
> 
> only another idiot would do so
> 
> hmmm


ain't you arguing with an idiot?? Which makes you..hmmm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572209

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-04-21 16:00 -0500
Message-ID<0MWdnfGOZNj8ooTKnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#572005
>> On 4/18/2016 4:24 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>>     Read my lips: whether something is rotating clockwise or counter
>>>     clockwise is observer dependent. Are you having trouble understanding
>>>     the concept?
>>>


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571419

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-04-18 15:26 -0700
Message-ID<57155F0E.46B2@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#571277
The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > i looked at the end
> > of a black hole..
> > there isn't anything there.
> >
> > if you go inside a
> > black hole in outer space..
> > there isn't anything there
> > on the other side..
> >
> > there is no other side.
> >
> > it's just a hole that leads nowhere.
> >
> > i don't know what
> > everybodys been telling you..
> >
> > a black hole is no different
> > from a tornado...defcon 5.
> >
> > whats on the other
> > edge of a tornado?
> >
> > nothing!
> >
> > i don't know what
> > everybodys been telling you..
> >
> > maybe you need
> > a complete explaination
> > of what is a black hole,
> > and how are they formed.
> >
> > and i'm the only one that can give it to you.
> >
> > but i'm not sure you're ready for it...
> >
> > to put it simply..
> >
> > black holes are formed by the curvature of space.
> >
> > it's the reason why the earth revolves around the sun..
> 
> In other words...
> 
> the force of a black hole
> turns a solar system either
> clockwise or counter clockwise.
> 
> That which you believe to be
> gravitional waves are actually..
> black hole waves.
> 
> The waves push and pull.
> 
> If the earth would
> fall into a black hole..
> it just comes out intact
> on the other side.
> 
> The only force
> a black hole has
> is the same force
> of a tornado or
> a
> 
> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=whirlpool&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=whirlpool&sc=8-9&sp=-1&sk=



In other words....when a star burns out it creates a whirlpool in
space...


in other words...space is a pool..

and the earth is simply floating on a pool.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571449

Fromxxein1@att.net
Date2016-04-18 16:49 -0700
Message-ID<afbbab06-c92b-4d4d-9391-9c788d42c092@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#571419
On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 6:25:58 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > i looked at the end
> > > of a black hole..
> > > there isn't anything there.
> > >
> > > if you go inside a
> > > black hole in outer space..
> > > there isn't anything there
> > > on the other side..
> > >
> > > there is no other side.
> > >
> > > it's just a hole that leads nowhere.
> > >
> > > i don't know what
> > > everybodys been telling you..
> > >
> > > a black hole is no different
> > > from a tornado...defcon 5.
> > >
> > > whats on the other
> > > edge of a tornado?
> > >
> > > nothing!
> > >
> > > i don't know what
> > > everybodys been telling you..
> > >
> > > maybe you need
> > > a complete explaination
> > > of what is a black hole,
> > > and how are they formed.
> > >
> > > and i'm the only one that can give it to you.
> > >
> > > but i'm not sure you're ready for it...
> > >
> > > to put it simply..
> > >
> > > black holes are formed by the curvature of space.
> > >
> > > it's the reason why the earth revolves around the sun..
> > 
> > In other words...
> > 
> > the force of a black hole
> > turns a solar system either
> > clockwise or counter clockwise.
> > 
> > That which you believe to be
> > gravitional waves are actually..
> > black hole waves.
> > 
> > The waves push and pull.
> > 
> > If the earth would
> > fall into a black hole..
> > it just comes out intact
> > on the other side.
> > 
> > The only force
> > a black hole has
> > is the same force
> > of a tornado or
> > a
> > 
> > http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=whirlpool&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=whirlpool&sc=8-9&sp=-1&sk=
> 
> 
> 
> In other words....when a star burns out it creates a whirlpool in
> space...
> 
> 
> in other words...space is a pool..
> 
> and the earth is simply floating on a pool.

xxein:  So you're the one who left those Baby Ruth bars in the pool.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web