Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #561102 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:38 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-25 14:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 04:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-26 06:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-26 09:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563599 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>> >>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>> >>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>> >>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>> >>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >> >>You never did. > >So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. >> >>>>It speaks for itself. >> >>>Wrong. >> >>Your funeral. >It isn't my superstition. God will still judge you. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #563611 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>wrote: <snip> >>>You never did. >> >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your > life style. Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the > human unborn. The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>It speaks for itself. >>> >>>>Wrong. >>> >>>Your funeral. >>It isn't my superstition. > > God will still judge you. That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-459DEE.15334519032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #563678 |
In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> > >>wrote: > > <snip> > > >>>You never did. > >> > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > > > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your > > life style. > > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the > > human unborn. > > The unborn cannot be murdered. > > >>>>>It speaks for itself. > >>> > >>>>Wrong. > >>> > >>>Your funeral. > >>It isn't my superstition. > > > > God will still judge you. > > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. Only an idiot would worry about it before then. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56EE2297.17B2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #563735 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > > >>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> > > >>wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > >>>You never did. > > >> > > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > > > > > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your > > > life style. > > > > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > > > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the > > > human unborn. > > > > The unborn cannot be murdered. > > > > >>>>>It speaks for itself. > > >>> > > >>>>Wrong. > > >>> > > >>>Your funeral. > > >>It isn't my superstition. > > > > > > God will still judge you. > > > > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > > And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. > Only an idiot would worry about it before then. no reason to buy car insurance...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncmvd1$8be$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #563796 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:09:59 -0800, The Starmaker wrote: > Jeanne Douglas wrote: >> >> In article <nck5qs$49f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >> > >> > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> > >>alt.atheism with message-id >> > >><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >> > >>wrote: >> > >> > <snip> >> > >> > >>>You never did. >> > >> >> > >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> > > >> > > You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by >> > > your life style. >> > >> > Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. >> > >> > > That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >> > > unborn. >> > >> > The unborn cannot be murdered. >> > >> > >>>>>It speaks for itself. >> > >>> >> > >>>>Wrong. >> > >>> >> > >>>Your funeral. >> > >>It isn't my superstition. >> > > >> > > God will still judge you. >> > >> > That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >> And if it turns out to be real, we'll deal with that when it happens. >> Only an idiot would worry about it before then. > > no reason to buy car insurance... Only if you don't want to have your car crushed and a fine when you're caught. But accidents are known to happen frequently, not so much your supposed god character. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k2eteble4c5bcl27km311m43i7tbingjrp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563678 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id <0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>You never did. >>> >>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> >> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >> life style. > >Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. Hint: it's your funeral. >> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the >> human unborn. > >The unborn cannot be murdered. Then you're saying they cannot be killed. My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 08:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5434981a-58c2-4431-aa81-91e5b06f6edc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #563852 |
Duke says >The unborn cannot be murdered. Then you're saying they cannot be killed. My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. ------------ If it's a male baby, I bet that picture gets passed around the priests as kiddie porn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncmvpe$9la$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #563852 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>>wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>You never did. >>>> >>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>> >>> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >>> life style. >> >>Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. > > Hint: it's your funeral. Your meaningless threats have no effect on me. >>> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >>> unborn. >> >>The unborn cannot be murdered. > > Then you're saying they cannot be killed. Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. A person has to have been born to be murdered. > My niece is about 5 months > pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > ***** > "Stupidity is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <893uebdqcppc1lepvn1vu7uv1qd8biferc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563915 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> >>>>>wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>You never did. >>>>> >>>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>>> >>>> You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your >>>> life style. >>> >>>Prove that it is more than just your stupid belief. >> >> Hint: it's your funeral. > >Your meaningless threats have no effect on me. > >>>> That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human >>>> unborn. >>> >>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >> >> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >A person has to have been born to be murdered. Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >> My niece is about 5 months >> pregnant and she has the pictures of her baby sucking it's thumb. >Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncp9gf$ab2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #563949 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: <snip> >>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>> >>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > >>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > > Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > That's why accidents > are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the > human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > >>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>> baby sucking it's thumb. > >>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > > Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-E8396B.17544021032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #564185 |
In article <ncp9gf$ab2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > > <snip> > > >>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. > >>> > >>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > > > >>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. > >>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > > > > Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > > To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. > A foetus is not a person. > > > That's why accidents > > are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the > > human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > > > >>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her > >>> baby sucking it's thumb. > > > >>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. > > > > Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > > waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > > I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. First trimester fetuses don't have thumbs to suck and certainly no legs big or strong enough to kick. They're only tiny blobs about the size of a peanut or a little bit larger. But I see that poor poor dukie is using the disgusting fallacy that abortions all take place in the 3rd trimester. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s5d2fbl88nnmku6os7e2jl7h6oj3hflta7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564185 |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>> >>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >> >>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >> >> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > >To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. >A foetus is not a person. Is it a rat? >> That's why accidents >> are not murder. So here you are openly supporting the murder of the >> human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >> >>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >> >>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's born. >> >> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > >I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. And that's a death sentence for you. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #564432 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>> >>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>> >>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>> >>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >> >>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > > Is it a rat? No, but you are. >>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>> >>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >>> >>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>born. >>> >>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >> >>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > > If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > And that's a death sentence for you. Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > ***** > "Empty threats are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-D1A3CA.15524822032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #564635 |
In article <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>>>> wrote: > >> > >><snip> > >> > >>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. > >>>>> > >>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. > >>> > >>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. > >>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. > >>> > >>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. > >> > >>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. > > > > Is it a rat? > > No, but you are. > > >>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly > >>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. > >>> > >>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her > >>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. > >>> > >>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's > >>>>born. > >>> > >>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain > >>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. > >> > >>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > > > > If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. > > LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is > NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > > > And that's a death sentence for you. > > Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. This one is especially stupid since every person has a death sentence. Eventually. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncsin1$1ibl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #564651 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:52:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote: > In article <ncsbpf$17sp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: < snip> >> > And that's a death sentence for you. >> >> Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > > This one is especially stupid since every person has a death sentence. > Eventually. Indeed. We are all born to die. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kd15fbhbcq7keom3tto7ru403s2mfd26jn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564635 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>>> >>>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>>> >>>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >>> >>>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a person. >> >> Is it a rat? > >No, but you are. Not me. I was a growing and developing human being form the moment of conception. How could you be a rat? >>>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>>> >>>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of her >>>>>> baby sucking it's thumb. >>>> >>>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>>born. >>>> >>>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >>> >>>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. >> If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. >LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is >NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, you are done. >> And that's a death sentence for you. >Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncul3b$plq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #564757 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >>>> >>>>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a >>>>person. >>> >>> Is it a rat? >> >>No, but you are. > > Not me. I was a growing and developing human being form the moment of > conception. But not a person. > How could you be a rat? > >>>>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>>>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>>>> >>>>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of >>>>>>> her baby sucking it's thumb. >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>>>born. >>>>> >>>>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>>>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >>>> >>>>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. > >>> If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. > >>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is >>NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > > Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, Nope. A born person. > you are done. Only in your imagination. >>> And that's a death sentence for you. >>Your empty meaningless threats have no effect on me. > ***** > "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 08:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <46q7fblok5t6t9bqcsavippep6g2s1rhu6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564871 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:04:57 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 15:52:41 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:05:02 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:50:28 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>The unborn cannot be murdered. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you're saying they cannot be killed. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. I'm saying that they cannot be murdered. >>>>>>>A person has to have been born to be murdered. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, bubba. To murder is to kill with purpose. >>>>> >>>>>To murder is to kill _a person_ with purpose. A foetus is not a >>>>>person. >>>> >>>> Is it a rat? >>> >>>No, but you are. >> >> Not me. I was a growing and developing human being form the moment of >> conception. > >But not a person. Meaningless nomenclature. >> How could you be a rat? >> >>>>>> That's why accidents are not murder. So here you are openly >>>>>> supporting the murder of the human unborn, and you will pay dearly. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> My niece is about 5 months pregnant and she has the pictures of >>>>>>>> her baby sucking it's thumb. >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. She has a picture of the foetus. It's not a baby until it's >>>>>>>born. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not little fellow sucking it's thumb. God a human heart beat, brain >>>>>> waves, sucks it's thumb and kicks about. You murdering pos. >>>>> >>>>>I've never murdered anyone, you lying POS. >> >>>> If you supported or participated in an abortion, you have. >> >>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There is >>>NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, >Nope. A born person. The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the cord. > >> you are done. > >Only in your imagination. Those that act to murder or support the murder of the human unborn are doomed to the fires. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 18:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565093 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> <snip> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, > >>Nope. A born person. > > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the > cord. And the legal status. An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>> you are done. >> >>Only in your imagination. > > Those that act to murder or support the murder of the human unborn are > doomed to the fires. Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. > ***** > "Empty threats are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 15:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q6l8fb9lrvef7ku3rq53n5m7hb3470ffai@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565200 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> > ><snip> > >>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There >>>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >> >>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, >> >>>Nope. A born person. >> >> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the >> cord. > >And the legal status. It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal fires. >An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>> you are done. >>> >>>Only in your imagination. >> >> Those that act to murder or support the murder of the human unborn are >> doomed to the fires. > >Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. > >> ***** >> "Empty threats are the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web