Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #561102 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 117 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:38 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-25 14:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 04:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-26 06:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-26 09:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 20:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-95B580.20413024032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #565312 |
In article <g469fb1a4v0if2de24lem9v9joegrv811r@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas > <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > >In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >> > > >> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There > >> >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > >> > > >> >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, > >> > > >> >>Nope. A born person. > >> > > >> > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the > >> > cord. > >> > >> And the legal status. > >> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. > > > > > >Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor > >dukie is being incredibly stupid again. > > Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that > late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency - > which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most > jurisdictions with that limited exception. > > And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that > they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing > discomfort jut to have a late abortion. > > They are incapable of honesty. It's just easier to "prove" abortion is evil if you produce pictures of late-term fetuses. Notice they never mention the serious medical problems that caused the woman to abort a fetus she wanted. They just want to dishonestly "show" that all abortions are of fully formed fetuses, instead of the peanut-sized blobs just beginning to form organs that are over 90% of abortions. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 20:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <98v26a.aui.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #565340 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > In article <g469fb1a4v0if2de24lem9v9joegrv811r@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas >> <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>>>> LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born >>>>>>>> person. There is NO law against abortion in your country or in >>>>>>>> mine. >>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>> being, >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. A born person. >>>>> >>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after >>>>> is the cord. >>>> >>>> And the legal status. >>>> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>> >>> >>> Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor >>> dukie is being incredibly stupid again. >> >> Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that >> late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency - >> which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most >> jurisdictions with that limited exception. >> >> And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that >> they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing >> discomfort jut to have a late abortion. >> >> They are incapable of honesty. > > > It's just easier to "prove" abortion is evil if you produce pictures > of late-term fetuses. Notice they never mention the serious medical > problems that caused the woman to abort a fetus she wanted. They just > want to dishonestly "show" that all abortions are of fully formed > fetuses, instead of the peanut-sized blobs just beginning to form > organs > that are over 90% of abortions. a DNC is not an abortion and there is a time , where abortion is too late an option and they won't do it )))))))))))))) *** KABOOM *** (((((((((((((((
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 04:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6Z6Jy.157653$qg.73779@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #565340 |
On 03/24/2016 11:41 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <g469fb1a4v0if2de24lem9v9joegrv811r@4ax.com>,
> Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>> <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There
>>>>>>>> is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. A born person.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the
>>>>> cord.
>>>>
>>>> And the legal status.
>>>> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered.
>>>
>>>
>>> Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor
>>> dukie is being incredibly stupid again.
>>
>> Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that
>> late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency -
>> which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most
>> jurisdictions with that limited exception.
>>
>> And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that
>> they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing
>> discomfort jut to have a late abortion.
>>
>> They are incapable of honesty.
>
>
> It's just easier to "prove" abortion is evil if you produce pictures of
> late-term fetuses. Notice they never mention the serious medical
> problems that caused the woman to abort a fetus she wanted. They just
> want to dishonestly "show" that all abortions are of fully formed
> fetuses, instead of the peanut-sized blobs just beginning to form organs
> that are over 90% of abortions.
HVAC and I are "for" late term abortions up to and including 36-37 years
old. They often represent a serious medical empergency.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mviafb1vp7m81s68j8p3tkjqqo0ut9l8fm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565340 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 20:41:30 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <g469fb1a4v0if2de24lem9v9joegrv811r@4ax.com>, > Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas >> <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> <snip> >> >> >> >> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There >> >> >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >> >> > >> >> >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, >> >> > >> >> >>Nope. A born person. >> >> > >> >> > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the >> >> > cord. >> >> >> >> And the legal status. >> >> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >> > >> > >> >Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor >> >dukie is being incredibly stupid again. >> >> Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that >> late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency - >> which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most >> jurisdictions with that limited exception. >> >> And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that >> they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing >> discomfort jut to have a late abortion. >> >> They are incapable of honesty. > the serious medical problems Now there's the joke of the century. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5miafbdojmtnqtct22amcpo8n655oq2qd7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565312 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 20:52:59 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas ><hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >>In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> > >>> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There >>> >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>> > >>> >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, >>> > >>> >>Nope. A born person. >>> > >>> > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the >>> > cord. >>> >>> And the legal status. >>> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >> >> >>Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor >>dukie is being incredibly stupid again. Sounds like jdyke is too stupid to understand what a partial birth abortion is. Crush the head in the birth canal. >Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that >late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency - Wow, have you been suckered in. >which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most >jurisdictions with that limited exception. Think partial birth abortion. That's not a C-section. That's out and out murder. Catholic hospitals refuse to perform abortions. >And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that >they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing >discomfort jut to have a late abortion. > >They are incapable of honesty. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd4260$1m2c$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565278 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote: > In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> > wrote: >> > >> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >>> wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >> >>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >> > >> >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >> >>> being, >> > >> >>Nope. A born person. >> > >> > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >> > the cord. >> >> And the legal status. >> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. > > Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor > dukie is being incredibly stupid again. When was he not incredibly stupid? -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 09:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dln2bsFie0aU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #565553 |
On 25/03/2016 19:05, Smiler wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote: > >> In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>>>> LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>> There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>> >>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>> being, >>>> >>>>> Nope. A born person. >>>> >>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>> the cord. >>> >>> And the legal status. >>> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >> >> Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor >> dukie is being incredibly stupid again. > > When was he not incredibly stupid? > Every time he does not post....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8hgreb1103u57k42p7f6pqvojobasvdb1c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563611 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>> >>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>> >>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>> >>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>> >>>You never did. >> >>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. > >You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. > >>> >>>>>It speaks for itself. >>> >>>>Wrong. >>> >>>Your funeral. >>It isn't my superstition. > >God will still judge you. > According to your superstition. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563720 |
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>> >>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>> >>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>> >>>>You never did. >>> >>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >> >>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. > >That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of the human unborn. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <speteb5hb6ma4esh77qpfchh2e8vp132pp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563853 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:51:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>>> >>>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>>> >>>>>You never did. >>>> >>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>> >>>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. >> >>That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >>you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. > >You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of >the human unborn. > You don't seem to understand I don't give a rat's ass about whatever you try to threaten me with that involves your peculiar superstition. After all, it has no supporting evidence and no verification in anything it says. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1d3ueb1p55blul4ova2sfdq6b1v0obkbb1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563854 |
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:03:36 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:51:16 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><26eteb5e2i9v6ktkqnp9i24ibmuhcmm9gk@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:20:03 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 08:13:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><g0kqeb97bn9p19pv99prb8ehva96qdhsj6@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:07:54 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:49:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><0dqoeblcvgqe72uqotn2l2vjn2tancp9pp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:34:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><cjqlebtuf5dp4c7v5ra61ii1m2c51c0cln@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:20:53 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:48:13 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><i2ejebh28j1p0et4vipje74l2h8i9e49b5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:06:20 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:35:28 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>><kibeebpbsh3k1p0366lqr6mk577t7der8o@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>God is creator of all things. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Done. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Where? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Many times in the past in this very ng. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Not where anyone else noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh, they noticed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Odd. Many have disagreed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that are afraid of the truth will do so. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Those that recognize bullshit will do so too. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Bullshit is trying to say there is NO God. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Why say this to me? Are you saying I have ever made such a statement? >>>>>>>>>>>If so, please provide an exact reference. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Because you constantly try to make the case that there is NO God. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Oh? Please provide a direct reference to where I have ever done that. >>>>>>>>>Your failure to do so will constitute evidence that once again you are >>>>>>>>>making unsupported accusations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >>>>>>>>there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Irrelevant. You directly stated I try to "make the case". Provide >>>>>>>supporting evidence. You seem to be weaseling out again. >>>>>> >>>>>>You never did. >>>>> >>>>>So you agree you were wrong and I never did make ay such statement. >>>> >>>>You never reflected any understanding that you WILL be judged by your life >>>>style. That most definitely includes your stance of murder of the human unborn. >>> >>>That is according to your superstition, which may mean something to >>>you but absolutely nothing to me. You can't seem to understand that. >> >>You don't seem to understand that God will judge you as a supporter of murder of >>the human unborn. >> > >You don't seem to understand I don't give a rat's ass about whatever >you try to threaten me with that involves your peculiar superstition. Interesting. We now know you were a rat before you were born. >After all, it has no supporting evidence and no verification in >anything it says. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <WKFGy.3661$JR.956@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #563142 |
Willing to bet someone's gonna cry foul that I didn't change the destinations, but something tells me duke doesn't ever visit r.a.sf.w... On 3/17/2016 11:34 AM, duke wrote: <snip> > No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that > there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. > > It speaks for itself. > > the dukester, American-American > Ah. So besides your ridiculous "there are no hyphenated Americans [and BTW, by being white, I'm more American than most]" way of thinking--which would amuse the people who were here when your ancestors came over, since they would have labeled you 'less American' for being Catholic :P-- am I to take it that you are in favor of making things as much of Hell-on-Earth for 'fags' especially, and all non-actively-Christian people in general, in order to encourage them to live outwardly-Christian lives and hopefully be spared the _actual_ Hell? Render unto Caesar, you insufferable git. And don't try to change Caesar's laws to match God's even if you're right that that's what they are. There'd be no reason whatsoever to do that unless there were modern countries subject to the Covenant with Jacob/Israel. Since there _aren't_ such things anymore, whether HE exists (especially as an unequivocal HE) or not, no one's going to be sending judgment on the secular countries of the world for not following HIS law as you interpret it :-D <arrogant sig snipped> -- Chrysi Cat 1/2 anthrocat, nearly 1/2 anthrofox, all magical Transgoddess, quick to anger Call me Chrysi or call me Kat, I'll respond to either!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <neqoeb9j9rhjo3ana7e3a83mi0ftlflol9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563224 |
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:57:04 -0600, Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> wrote: >Willing to bet someone's gonna cry foul that I didn't change the >destinations, but something tells me duke doesn't ever visit r.a.sf.w... From whence a comment comes, my comment goes. > >On 3/17/2016 11:34 AM, duke wrote: > ><snip> > >> No 'oh' to it. Your life style has consistently been revealed with ideas that >> there is no eternal punishment for you for your chose lifestyle. >> >> It speaks for itself. >> >> the dukester, American-American >> > >Ah. So besides your ridiculous "there are no hyphenated Americans [and >BTW, by being white, I'm more American than most]" way of >thinking--which would amuse the people who were here when your ancestors >came over, since they would have labeled you 'less American' for being >Catholic :P-- >am I to take it that you are in favor of making things as much of >Hell-on-Earth for 'fags' especially, and all non-actively-Christian >people in general, in order to encourage them to live >outwardly-Christian lives and hopefully be spared the _actual_ Hell? > >Render unto Caesar, you insufferable git. And don't try to change >Caesar's laws to match God's even if you're right that that's what they >are. > >There'd be no reason whatsoever to do that unless there were modern >countries subject to the Covenant with Jacob/Israel. Since there >_aren't_ such things anymore, whether HE exists (especially as an >unequivocal HE) or not, no one's going to be sending judgment on the >secular countries of the world for not following HIS law as you >interpret it :-D > ><arrogant sig snipped> the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <PbsEy.1982$fi2.185@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #561102 |
On 03/10/2016 06:00 AM, Attila < wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:38:11 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
> alt.atheism with message-id
> <vq2mdbtrfd57mjqilnekuonaddqvj1df7t@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension.
>>
>> God is creator of all things.
>>
>
> But you can't provide any supporting evidence.
And you can't provide any evidence there was any creation at all.
Why do you believe in the big bang?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jb25eb9bic3u40i99tqfhbpn2cklpp86hc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #561401 |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:54:07 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <PbsEy.1982$fi2.185@fx44.iad> wrote: >On 03/10/2016 06:00 AM, Attila < wrote: >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:38:11 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> alt.atheism with message-id >> <vq2mdbtrfd57mjqilnekuonaddqvj1df7t@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >>> >>> God is creator of all things. >>> >> >> But you can't provide any supporting evidence. > >And you can't provide any evidence there was any creation at all. > >Why do you believe in the big bang? Who said I did? I can't comment on that because I have not kept up with the latest findings. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <56E31DBA.2CF0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #561470 |
Attila < wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:54:07 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> in > alt.atheism with message-id <PbsEy.1982$fi2.185@fx44.iad> wrote: > > >On 03/10/2016 06:00 AM, Attila < wrote: > >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:38:11 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> <vq2mdbtrfd57mjqilnekuonaddqvj1df7t@4ax.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" > >>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. > >>> > >>> God is creator of all things. > >>> > >> > >> But you can't provide any supporting evidence. > > > >And you can't provide any evidence there was any creation at all. > > > >Why do you believe in the big bang? > > Who said I did? I can't comment on that because I have not kept up > with the latest findings. check the bedroom...somebody might be bangining her right now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t8k6ebhmdbn4tcabl6rgj9ptf1bjj9n7vh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #561651 |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:34:18 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> in alt.atheism with message-id <56E31DBA.2CF0@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Attila < wrote: >> >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:54:07 -0500, benj <none@gmail.com> in >> alt.atheism with message-id <PbsEy.1982$fi2.185@fx44.iad> wrote: >> >> >On 03/10/2016 06:00 AM, Attila < wrote: >> >> On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 10:38:11 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >> alt.atheism with message-id >> >> <vq2mdbtrfd57mjqilnekuonaddqvj1df7t@4ax.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:15:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" >> >>> <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 2/29/2016 12:08 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> God is not in the highest dimension....He is in the lowest dimension. >> >>> >> >>> God is creator of all things. >> >>> >> >> >> >> But you can't provide any supporting evidence. >> > >> >And you can't provide any evidence there was any creation at all. >> > >> >Why do you believe in the big bang? >> >> Who said I did? I can't comment on that because I have not kept up >> with the latest findings. > > > >check the bedroom...somebody might be bangining her right now. Do you bother to read the post you respond to? I suspect you simply string random words together. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web